Northern Rockies Ponderosa Pine Woodland

EVT 7053Northern Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland and Savanna
CES306.030GNRTreeConifer
Summary
This inland Pacific Northwest ecological system occurs in the foothills of the northern Rocky Mountains in the Columbia Plateau region and west along the foothills of the Modoc Plateau and eastern Cascades into southern interior British Columbia. These woodlands and savannas occur at the lower treeline/ecotone between grasslands or shrublands and more mesic coniferous forests typically in warm, dry, exposed sites. Elevations range from less than 500 m in British Columbia to 1600 m in the central Idaho mountains. Occurrences are found on all slopes and aspects; however, moderately steep to very steep slopes or ridgetops are most common. This ecological system generally occurs on glacial till, glacio-fluvial sand and gravel, dune, basaltic rubble, colluvium, to deep loess or volcanic ash-derived soils, with characteristic features of good aeration and drainage, coarse textures, circumneutral to slightly acidic pH, an abundance of mineral material, rockiness, and periods of drought during the growing season. In the Oregon "pumice zone" this system occurs as matrix-forming, extensive woodlands on rolling pumice plateaus and other volcanic deposits. These woodlands in the eastern Cascades, Okanagan and northern Rockies regions receive winter and spring rains, and thus have a greater spring "green-up" than the drier woodlands in the central Rockies. Pinus ponderosa (primarily var. ponderosa) is the predominant conifer; Pseudotsuga menziesii may be present in the tree canopy but is usually absent. In southern interior British Columbia, Pseudotsuga menziesii or Pinus flexilis may form woodlands or fire-maintained savannas with and without Pinus ponderosa var. ponderosa at the lower treeline transition into grassland or shrub-steppe. The understory can be shrubby, with Artemisia tridentata, Arctostaphylos patula, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Cercocarpus ledifolius, Physocarpus malvaceus, Purshia tridentata, Symphoricarpos oreophilus or Symphoricarpos albus, Prunus virginiana, Amelanchier alnifolia, and Rosa spp. common species. Understory vegetation in the true savanna occurrences is predominantly fire-resistant grasses and forbs that resprout following surface fires; shrubs, understory trees and downed logs are uncommon. These more open stands support grasses such as Pseudoroegneria spicata, Hesperostipa spp., Achnatherum spp., dry Carex species (Carex inops), Festuca idahoensis, or Festuca campestris. The more mesic portions of this system may include Calamagrostis rubescens or Carex geyeri, species more typical of Northern Rocky Mountain Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest (CES306.805). Mixed fire regimes and surface fires of variable return intervals maintain these woodlands typically with a shrub-dominated or patchy shrub layer, depending on climate, degree of soil development, and understory density. This includes the northern race of Interior Ponderosa Pine old-growth (USFS Region 6, USFS Region 1). Historically, many of these woodlands and savannas lacked the shrub component resulting from 3- to 7-year fire-return intervals.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Pinus ponderosa (primarily var. ponderosa) is the predominant conifer; Pseudotsuga menziesii may be present in the tree canopy but is usually absent. In southern interior British Columbia, Pseudotsuga menziesii or Pinus flexilis may form woodlands or fire-maintained savannas with and without Pinus ponderosa var. ponderosa at the lower treeline transition into grassland or shrub-steppe. The understory can be shrubby, with Artemisia tridentata, Arctostaphylos patula, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Cercocarpus ledifolius, Physocarpus malvaceus, Purshia tridentata, Symphoricarpos oreophilus or Symphoricarpos albus, Prunus virginiana, Amelanchier alnifolia, and Rosa spp. common species. Understory vegetation in the true savanna occurrences is predominantly fire-resistant grasses and forbs that resprout following surface fires; shrubs, understory trees and downed logs are uncommon. These more open stands support grasses such as Pseudoroegneria spicata, Hesperostipa spp., Achnatherum spp., dry Carex species (Carex inops), Festuca idahoensis, or Festuca campestris. The more mesic portions of this system may include Calamagrostis rubescens or Carex geyeri.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This ecological system within the region occurs at the lower treeline/ecotone between grasslands or shrublands and more mesic coniferous forests typically in warm, dry, exposed sites at elevations ranging from 500-1600 m (1600-5248 feet). These woodlands receive winter and spring rains, and thus have a greater spring "green-up" than the drier ponderosa woodlands in the Colorado and New Mexico Rockies. In eastern Washington, precipitation varies from 36-76 cm (~14-30 inches) with most occurring as snowfall (WNHP 2011). It can occur on all slopes and aspects; however, it commonly occurs on moderately steep to very steep slopes or ridgetops. This ecological system generally occurs on most geological substrates from weathered rock to glacial deposits to eolian deposits (e.g., glacial till, glacio-fluvial sand and gravel, dunes, basaltic rubble, colluvium, to deep loess or volcanic ash-derived soils) (WNHP 2011). Characteristic soil features include good aeration and drainage, coarse textures, circumneutral to slightly acidic pH, an abundance of mineral material, and periods of drought during the growing season. Some occurrences may occur as edaphic climax communities on very skeletal, infertile and/or excessively drained soils, such as pumice, cinder or lava fields, and scree slopes. In the Oregon "pumice zone" this system occurs as matrix-forming, extensive woodlands on rolling pumice plateaus and other volcanic deposits. Surface textures are highly variable in this ecological system ranging from sand to loam and silt loam. Exposed rock and bare soil consistently occur to some degree in all the associations.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Summer drought and frequent, low-severity fires create woodlands composed of widely spaced, large trees with small scattered clumps of dense, even-aged stands which regenerated in forest gaps or were protected from fire due to higher soil moisture or topographic protection. Closed-canopy or dense stands were also part of the historical range of stand variability but under natural disturbance regimes are a minor component of that landscape. Mixed fire regimes and surface fires of variable return intervals maintain these woodlands typically with a shrub-dominated or patchy shrub layer, depending on climate, degree of soil development, and understory density. Historically, many of these woodlands and savannas lacked the shrub component resulting from low-severity but high-frequency fires (2 - to 10-year fire-return intervals). Some sites, because of low productivity, naturally lacked a dense shrub understory. Mixed-severity fires had a return interval of 25-75 years while stand-replacing fire occurred at an interval of >100 years (Arno 1980, Fischer and Bradley 1987). The latter two intervals only occurred on 20-25% of stands within the landscape while surface fires were the dominant fire regime on over 75% of stands (Landfire 2007a). Presettlement fires were triggered by lightning strikes or deliberately set fires by Native Americans.

Pinus ponderosa is a drought-resistant, shade-intolerant conifer which usually occurs at lower treeline in the major ranges of the western United States. Establishment of ponderosa pine is erratic and believed to be linked to periods of adequate soil moisture and good seed crops as well as fire frequencies, which allow seedlings to reach sapling size.

Western pine beetle is another significant disturbance and especially affects larger trees. Bark beetle outbreaks are highly related to stand density. Denser stands in relation to site capacity will favor outbreaks, which will decrease as trees are thinned (Landfire 2007a). Mistletoe can cause tree mortality in young and small trees. Fires and insect outbreaks resulted in a landscape consisting of a mosaic of open forests of large trees (most abundant patch), small denser patches of trees, and openings (Franklin et al. 2008). White-headed woodpecker, pygmy nuthatch, and flammulated owl are indicators of healthy ponderosa pine woodlands. All these birds prefer mature trees in an open woodland setting (Jones 1998, Levad 1998 Winn 1998, as cited in Rondeau 2001).

LANDFIRE developed several state-and-transition vegetation dynamics VDDT models for this system across its range and dry or mesic conditions. This model is typical of much of the range and has five classes in total (LANDFIRE 2007a, BpS 1910530). These are summarized as:

A) Early Development 1 Open (5% of type in this stage): Fire-maintained grass/forb and/or seedlings and saplings. Seedling/sapling size class would be less than 5 inches in diameter. There would be no large patches (10-100 acres) of large or old-growth trees due to poor site conditions and abundance of rock outcroppings. However, dispersed large-diameter fire-remnant ponderosa pines and snag trees could be present. These large-diameter trees would have a density of less than one tree per acre. Grass species are the dominant lifeform in this class attaining maximum heights of 3 feet and patchy in distribution (25-75% cover).

B) Mid Development 1 Closed (tree-dominated - 10% of type in this stage): Tree cover is 41-60%. Closed ponderosa pine pole and medium-diameter stand; may have Douglas-fir as incidentals. Larger, old-growth trees may be present in this class, though the pole and medium-diameter class (5-21 inches) occurring between these large trees is most abundant and characteristic of this class. May see large-diameter snags, dead and downed trees present. High-density stunted pole stands are counted here; may see insect/disease here.

C) Mid Development 1 Open (tree-dominated - 20% of type in this stage): Tree cover is 0-40%. Open ponderosa pine pole and medium-diameter stand that may have Douglas-fir as incidentals. Larger, old-growth trees may be present in this class, the pole and medium-diameter (5-21 inches) trees are characteristic for this class. These patches have probably had recent fire or are drier so they retain a more open condition.

D) Late Development 1 Open (conifer-dominated - 55% of type in this stage): Tree cover is 0-40%. Fire-maintained open, park-like ponderosa pine; nearly any fire maintains; Douglas-fir may be seen as incidentals or in patches, but not a major component of the overstory. The overstory is characterized by large and very large ponderosa pine and isolated Douglas-fir. Understory is dominated by grasses and is relatively open. Seedlings are very infrequent, with <10% cover and usually occurring in patches.

E) Late Development 1 Close (conifer-dominated - 5% of type in this stage): Tree cover is 41-60%. High-density, multi-storied ponderosa pine stand; Douglas-fir regeneration on some sites. Thickets of various size classes distributed within the class and may be interspersed with large snags.

Frequent, non-lethal surface fires were the dominant disturbance factor, occurring every 3-30 years (Arno 1980, Arno and Petersen 1983, Fischer and Bradley 1987). Three-year fire-return intervals are likely very localized and associated with Native American burning. However, there is some disagreement as to the extent of Native burning. More median fire-return intervals were likely about 15 years. Mixed-severity fires likely occurred about every 50 years, again, depending on the vegetative state. Stand-replacement fires likely occurred in stands and small patches on the order of a few hundred acres every 300-700 years depending on the vegetative state. Some authors note that little information is available regarding the exact nature of stand-replacement fire severity in this BpS (LANDFIRE 2007a, BpS 1910530). Western pine beetle can attack large ponderosa pine in any canopy density (LANDFIRE 2007a, BpS 1910530).

Nutrient cycling, specifically carbon cycling, is an important ecological process within many ecological systems. However, biological decomposition in ponderosa pine forests is more limited than biological production, resulting in accumulation of organic materials, especially in the absence of fire (Harvey 1994, Graham and Jain 2005).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Conversion of this type has commonly come from rural and urban development. Since European settlement, fire suppression, timber harvest, livestock grazing, introduced diseases, road building, development, and plantation establishments have all impacted natural disturbance regimes, forest structure, composition, landscape patch diversity, and tree regeneration (Franklin et al. 2008). Timber harvesting has focused on the large, older trees in mid- and late-seral forests thereby eliminating many old forest attributes from stands (Franklin et al. 2008). Overgrazing may have contributed to the contemporary dense stands by eliminating grasses in some areas thereby creating suitable spots for tree regeneration as well as reducing the abundance and distribution of flashy fuels that are important for carrying surface fires (Hessburg et al. 2005, Franklin et al. 2008). Road development has fragmented many forests creating firebreaks. With settlement and subsequent fire suppression, occurrences have become denser. Presently, many occurrences contain understories of more shade-tolerant species, such as Pseudotsuga menziesii and/or Abies spp., as well as younger cohorts of Pinus ponderosa. These altered occurrence structures have affected fuel loads and alter fire regimes. With fire suppression and increased fuel loads, fire regimes are now less frequent and often become intense crown fires, which can kill mature Pinus ponderosa (Reid et al. 1999). Longer fire-return intervals have resulted in many occurrences having dense subcanopies of overstocked and unhealthy young Pinus ponderosa (Reid et al. 1999). With vigorous fire suppression, longer fire-return intervals are now the rule, and multi-layered stands of Pinus ponderosa and/or Pseudotsuga menziesii provide fuel "ladders," making these forests more susceptible to high-intensity, stand-replacing fires. The resultant stands at all seral stages tend to lack snags, have high tree density, and are composed of smaller and more shade-tolerant trees (WNHP 2011). Mid-seral forest structure is currently 70% more abundant than in historical, native systems, and late-seral forests of shade-intolerant species are now essentially absent (WNHP 2011). Early-seral forest abundance is similar to that found historically but lacks snags and other legacy features.

In the Pacific Northwest, regionally downscaled climate models project increases in annual temperature of, on average, 3.2°F by the 2040s. Projected changes in annual precipitation, averaged over all models, are small (+1 to +2%), and some models project wetter autumns and winters and drier summers. Warmer temperatures will result in more winter precipitation falling as rain rather than snow throughout much of the Pacific Northwest, particularly in mid-elevation basins where average winter temperatures are near freezing. This change will result in: less winter snow accumulation, higher winter streamflows, earlier spring snowmelt, earlier peak spring streamflow and lower summer streamflows in rivers that depend on snowmelt (as do most rivers in the Pacific Northwest) (Littell et al. 2009). Potential climate change effects could include: reduction in freshwater inflows through the further reduction in summer flows (Littell et al. 2009); drop in groundwater table; increased fire frequency due to warmer temperatures resulting in drier fuels, the area burned by fire regionally is projected to double by the 2040s and triple by the 2080s (Littell et al. 2009); and additionally, likely warming may stress host trees so mountain pine beetle outbreaks are projected to increase in frequency and cause increased tree mortality.

The ways in which the climate in the region where this system reaches its eastern limit is likely to change, and the effects of those changes on the structure and function of this system are all hard to predict, and only broad generalizations can be made (Rice et al. 2012). Average annual temperature likely will increase by 1.7°C by 2050 and by 1.1° to 5.5°C by the end of this century. Annual precipitation may increase by 10%, with wetter winters and drier summers, but less certainty can be assigned to possible precipitation changes than temperature changes. Climate changes will also affect the ecological system indirectly, through bark beetle populations and other ecological agents. Changes in the extremes of temperature and precipitation likely will have a stronger effect than will changes in annual averages, and the patterns of these extremes are especially hard to predict. Climate changes almost certainly will disrupt the composition, structure, and function of this ecological system, in ways that can only be very generally anticipated.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is found in the Fraser River drainage of southern British Columbia south along the Cascades and northern Rocky Mountains of Washington, Oregon and California. In the northeastern part of its range, it extends across the northern Rocky Mountains west of the Continental Divide into northwestern Montana, south to the Snake River Plain in Idaho, and east into the foothills of western Montana.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Crataegus phippsii, Pinus flexilis, Pinus ponderosa, Pinus ponderosa var. ponderosa, Pseudotsuga menziesii

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Amelanchier alnifolia, Arctostaphylos patula, Artemisia tridentata, Ceanothus velutinus, Cercocarpus ledifolius, Physocarpus malvaceus, Prunus virginiana, Purshia tridentata, Symphoricarpos albus, Symphoricarpos oreophilus

Short shrub/sapling

Arctostaphylos uva-ursi

Herb (field)

Astragalus pulsiferae var. suksdorfii, Calamagrostis rubescens, Carex geyeri, Carex inops, Carex rossii, Chaenactis thompsonii, Delphinium lineapetalum, Delphinium viridescens, Festuca campestris, Festuca idahoensis, Lomatium cuspidatum, Penstemon barrettiae, Penstemon eriantherus var. whitedii, Perideridia erythrorhiza, Pseudoroegneria spicata, Sidalcea oregana var. calva, Silene seelyi, Stenanthium occidentale, Trifolium thompsonii, Valeriana columbiana

Nonvascular

Cortinarius wiebeae, Hygrophorus caeruleus, Lactarius lactarioides, Rhizopogon atroviolaceus
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (9)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Yellow-pine ChipmunkNeotamias amoenusG5

Reptiles (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Western RattlesnakeCrotalus oreganusG5
GophersnakePituophis cateniferG5
Common Sagebrush LizardSceloporus graciosusG5

Amphibians (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Oregon Spotted FrogRana pretiosaG2

Molluscs (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Evening FieldslugDeroceras hesperiumG2Q

Other Invertebrates (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Giant Palouse EarthwormDriloleirus americanusG1

Other (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Chelan MountainsnailOreohelix sp. 1G2
Klamath taildropperProphysaon sp. 1G3
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (22)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Ames' MilkvetchAstragalus pulsiferae var. suksdorfiiG4T2--
Thompson's PincushionChaenactis thompsoniiG3--
a fungusCortinarius wiebeaeG2--
Phipps' HawthornCrataegus phippsiiG2G3--
Thin-petal LarkspurDelphinium lineapetalumG2G3Q--
Wenatchee LarkspurDelphinium viridescensG2--
Evening FieldslugDeroceras hesperiumG2Q--
Giant Palouse EarthwormDriloleirus americanusG1--
a fungusHygrophorus caeruleusG3--
a fungusLactarius lactarioidesG2G3--
Wenatchee Desert-parsleyLomatium cuspidatumG2--
Chelan MountainsnailOreohelix sp. 1G2--
Barrett's BeardtonguePenstemon barrettiaeG2--
Crested-tongue BeardtonguePenstemon eriantherus var. whitediiG4G5T2--
Red-root YampahPerideridia erythrorhizaG2--
Klamath taildropperProphysaon sp. 1G3--
Oregon Spotted FrogRana pretiosaG2Threatened
a fungusRhizopogon atroviolaceusG3--
Wanatchee Mountains Checker-mallowSidalcea oregana var. calvaG5T1Endangered
Seely's SileneSilene seelyiG3--
Thompson's CloverTrifolium thompsoniiG2--
Wenatchee ValerianValeriana columbianaG2G3--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (31)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana / Achnatherum occidentale ShrublandG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Arctostaphylos patula - Arctostaphylos viscida ForestG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Arctostaphylos patula - Ceanothus velutinus WoodlandG1 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Arctostaphylos patula - Purshia tridentata WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Artemisia arbuscula WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana / Poa nervosa WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Calamagrostis rubescens WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Ceanothus velutinus - Purshia tridentata WoodlandG4 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Cercocarpus ledifolius Central Rocky Mountain WoodlandGNR NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Elymus glaucus ForestG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Hesperostipa comata WoodlandG1 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Juniperus communis WoodlandG4 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Mahonia repens ForestG3 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Physocarpus malvaceus ForestG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Pseudoroegneria spicata WoodlandG4 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa - Pseudotsuga menziesii / Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. inermis WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Purshia tridentata / Achnatherum occidentale WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Purshia tridentata / Carex geyeri WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Purshia tridentata / Carex inops ssp. inops ForestG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Purshia tridentata / Carex rossii WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Purshia tridentata / Festuca idahoensis WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Purshia tridentata / Pseudoroegneria spicata WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Ribes montigenum WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Spiraea betulifolia ForestG1 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Symphoricarpos albus ForestG4 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Symphoricarpos oreophilus ForestG3 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Vaccinium cespitosum WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus ponderosa / Wyethia mollis WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pseudotsuga menziesii / Festuca campestris WoodlandG4 NatureServe
Pseudotsuga menziesii / Festuca idahoensis WoodlandG4 NatureServe
Pseudotsuga menziesii / Pseudoroegneria spicata WoodlandG4 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (5)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
IDSNR
MTSNR
ORSNR
WASNR
WYSNR
Roadless Areas (152)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Montana (56)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Devils TowerHelena National Forest43.7%1,262.79
HolterHelena National Forest39.9%317.52
Patricks Knob - North CutoffLolo National Forest17.8%1,222.83
Big LogHelena National Forest15.2%549.63
Swift Creek (01065)Bitterroot National Forest9.3%23.04
Needle Creek (01066)Bitterroot National Forest8.5%38.43
North SiegelLolo National Forest8.4%312.21
Tolan Creek (x1070)Bitterroot National Forest8.0%228.06
Alexander Creek #696Kootenai National Forest6.9%187.2
Flagstaff Mountain #690Kootenai National Forest6.5%290.43
Gold Hill #668Kootenai National Forest6.2%162.27
Rock CreekKootenai National Forest4.4%14.22
Welcome CreekLolo National Forest4.4%18.72
Selway - Bitterroot (01067)Bitterroot National Forest4.2%1,934.1
Silver KingLolo National Forest4.0%206.91
Teepee - Spring CreekLolo National Forest3.9%219.69
Big Creek #701Kootenai National Forest3.9%117.81
Mcgregor - ThompsonLolo National Forest3.8%415.08
Ellis CanyonHelena National Forest3.8%84.69
West Fork Elk #692Kootenai National Forest3.7%21.96
Middleman Mountain / Hedges MountainHelena National Forest3.3%436.41
South Siegel - South CutoffLolo National Forest2.6%144.45
Sleeping Child (x1074)Bitterroot National Forest2.6%222.3
Tenderfoot - Deep CreekLewis and Clark National Forest2.6%885.42
Sundance RidgeLolo National Forest2.4%73.89
BurdetteLolo National Forest2.3%149.67
Sheep Mountain - StatelineLolo National Forest2.3%350.19
Marble PointLolo National Forest2.2%113.85
Deep CreekLolo National Forest2.1%65.07
Berray Mountain #672Kootenai National Forest1.9%68.31
Allan Mountain (01946)Bitterroot National Forest1.6%690.39
Baldy MountainLolo National Forest1.6%41.76
Cabinet Face West #670Kootenai National Forest1.4%80.01
Cherry PeakLolo National Forest1.4%220.14
Clear CreekLolo National Forest1.4%31.05
CataractLolo National Forest1.4%51.84
Petty MountainLolo National Forest1.3%86.13
Blue Joint (mwsa) (01941)Bitterroot National Forest1.3%344.61
Mt. BushnellLolo National Forest1.3%212.58
Lone Cliff Smeads #674Kootenai National Forest1.2%25.74
CataractKootenai National Forest1.2%119.34
Beaver LakeBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest1.0%47.16
Pilgrim CreekLewis and Clark National Forest0.9%158.4
Ogden MountainHelena National Forest0.9%42.21
Galena #677Kootenai National Forest0.9%66.69
Mckay Creek #676Kootenai National Forest0.8%50.94
QuiggLolo National Forest0.8%215.82
Cube Iron - SilcoxLolo National Forest0.7%109.17
Trout CreekKootenai National Forest0.7%89.91
Lolo CreekLolo National Forest0.7%39.87
North Big HoleBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest0.6%128.61
Scotchman Peaks (MT)Kootenai National Forest0.6%130.5
Allen Peak #185Kootenai National Forest0.5%63.54
Silver KingBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest0.4%107.64
Cabinet Face East #671Kootenai National Forest0.4%79.56
HoodooLolo National Forest0.4%156.33

Oregon (66)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Pine CreekMalheur National Forest62.6%1,383.84
Myrtle SilviesMalheur National Forest42.9%2,027.79
Silver CreekOchoco National Forest41.0%1,320.75
Green MountainOchoco National Forest36.9%988.38
Malheur RiverMalheur National Forest35.6%1,050.12
Nipple ButteMalheur National Forest29.0%1,330.29
Flag CreekMalheur National Forest28.0%875.61
PotamusUmatilla National Forest23.7%516.51
Grande RondeUmatilla National Forest22.0%1,092.6
Metolius BreaksDeschutes National Forest21.8%982.71
Utley ButteMalheur National Forest21.2%833.13
North Fork MalheurMalheur National Forest21.0%1,537.29
SkookumUmatilla National Forest20.9%651.24
Cottonwood CreekOchoco National Forest18.2%731.97
Tope CreekWallowa-Whitman National Forest17.2%643.41
BadlandsWinema National Forest16.9%56.16
ShaketableMalheur National Forest16.4%447.75
North Mount EmilyWallowa-Whitman National Forest14.7%44.82
WaldoDeschutes National Forest13.6%272.7
Three SistersDeschutes National Forest13.2%410.13
Dry CabinMalheur National Forest12.6%625.23
Joseph CanyonWallowa-Whitman National Forest12.4%1,221.75
Mcclellan MountainMalheur National Forest11.0%942.12
Mt. EmilyWallowa-Whitman National Forest10.4%356.13
HellholeUmatilla National Forest10.0%2,668.14
Grande RondeWallowa-Whitman National Forest10.0%227.79
Cook RidgeWallowa-Whitman National Forest9.7%773.1
Walla Walla RiverUmatilla National Forest9.6%1,343.25
North Mt. EmilyUmatilla National Forest9.6%171
LookingglassUmatilla National Forest9.3%182.52
HomesteadWallowa-Whitman National Forest9.2%216.18
WildhorseWallowa-Whitman National Forest9.2%753.39
Cedar GroveMalheur National Forest8.7%3.96
Mill Creek Watershed (OR)Umatilla National Forest7.9%249.75
Horseshoe RidgeUmatilla National Forest7.7%186.75
Fox CreekMalheur National Forest7.6%178.92
Lake ForkWallowa-Whitman National Forest7.3%651.33
Aldrich MountainMalheur National Forest6.9%137.52
W - T ThreeUmatilla National Forest6.9%47.34
BuckhornWallowa-Whitman National Forest5.4%376.02
Lookout MountainOchoco National Forest4.7%269.73
West - South BachelorDeschutes National Forest4.7%489.33
Sheep DivideWallowa-Whitman National Forest4.5%296.82
Texas ButteUmatilla National Forest4.4%121.05
Bend WatershedDeschutes National Forest4.3%260.91
Dixie ButteMalheur National Forest4.3%214.65
HuckleberryWallowa-Whitman National Forest4.2%192.51
Rock CreekOchoco National Forest4.0%185.13
HellholeWallowa-Whitman National Forest4.0%7.83
DeadhorseWallowa-Whitman National Forest3.8%166.14
South Fork - TowerUmatilla National Forest3.2%216.45
Monument RockWallowa-Whitman National Forest3.2%74.07
Taytáy CreekWallowa-Whitman National Forest3.1%43.56
Badger CreekMt. Hood National Forest3.1%10.53
Lord Flat Somers PointWallowa-Whitman National Forest2.8%767.16
Mountain SheepWallowa-Whitman National Forest2.5%195.84
Snake RiverWallowa-Whitman National Forest2.3%296.55
Imnaha FaceWallowa-Whitman National Forest2.3%274.14
Upper Catherine CreekWallowa-Whitman National Forest2.2%58.68
Little Eagle MeadowsWallowa-Whitman National Forest2.1%60.48
Hurricane CreekWallowa-Whitman National Forest2.1%13.5
Lick CreekWallowa-Whitman National Forest2.0%15.48
Yamsay Mt.Winema National Forest1.6%42.39
Boulder ParkWallowa-Whitman National Forest1.5%71.64
Baldy MountainMalheur National Forest1.3%33.3
Castle RidgeWallowa-Whitman National Forest1.0%35.28

Washington (30)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Wenatchee CreekUmatilla National Forest19.0%1,177.38
BangsColville National Forest15.5%234.81
Cougar MountainColville National Forest13.3%243.99
Mill Creek Watershed (WA)Umatilla National Forest9.2%624.78
Slide RidgeWenatchee National Forest8.8%409.05
Meadow CreekUmatilla National Forest8.6%170.82
Devils GulchWenatchee National Forest8.1%799.11
Black CanyonWenatchee National Forest6.9%4.95
Black CanyonOkanogan National Forest6.8%268.11
Willow SpringsUmatilla National Forest5.7%239.58
South HuckleberryColville National Forest5.0%204.75
Upper TucannonUmatilla National Forest4.8%240.48
Hungry RidgeOkanogan National Forest4.4%154.89
SpanglerUmatilla National Forest4.0%96.21
Asotin CreekUmatilla National Forest3.6%241.29
Bodie MountainOkanogan National Forest3.0%48.24
Bodie MountainColville National Forest2.8%28.44
Clackamas MountainOkanogan National Forest2.6%131.22
Jackson CreekOkanogan National Forest2.6%81.72
Stormy Mtn.Wenatchee National Forest2.3%308.16
ThirteenmileColville National Forest2.2%108.27
Jackson CreekColville National Forest2.1%25.83
South RidgeOkanogan National Forest1.4%34.83
HoodooColville National Forest1.4%39.87
ChelanWenatchee National Forest1.1%342.54
Bald SnowColville National Forest0.7%69.39
Alpine Lakes Adj.Wenatchee National Forest0.7%160.74
ProfanityColville National Forest0.5%56.34
EntiatWenatchee National Forest0.4%129.51
SawtoothOkanogan National Forest0.3%152.19
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.