Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.
Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.
| Common Name | Scientific Name | G-Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Ring-necked Snake | Diadophis punctatus | G5 |
| Southern Alligator Lizard | Elgaria multicarinata | G5 |
Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.
| Common Name | Scientific Name | G-Rank | ESA Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oakwoods Gooseberry | Ribes quercetorum | G3G4 | -- |
Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.
| Name | G-Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| Pinus sabiniana - Quercus wislizeni / Arctostaphylos viscida Woodland | G3 | NatureServe |
| Pinus sabiniana - Quercus wislizeni / Ceanothus cuneatus Woodland | G3 | NatureServe |
| Quercus douglasii - Pinus sabiniana / Grass Woodland | G4 | NatureServe |
| Quercus wislizeni - Quercus douglasii - Pinus sabiniana Woodland | G4 | NatureServe |
Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.
| State | S-Rank |
|---|---|
| CA | SNR |
Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.
| Area | Forest | Coverage | Hectares |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oat Mtn. | Sequoia National Forest | 18.1% | 894.96 |
| Stanley Mountain | Los Padres National Forest | 17.4% | 1,031.13 |
| Los Machos Hills | Los Padres National Forest | 16.1% | 726.03 |
| Machesna Mountain | Los Padres National Forest | 16.1% | 799.47 |
| Ishi | Lassen National Forest | 14.7% | 1,294.92 |
| Mill Creek | Sequoia National Forest | 14.6% | 1,637.73 |
| Tuolumne River | Stanislaus National Forest | 14.4% | 1,006.47 |
| Sycamore Springs | Sierra National Forest | 14.3% | 578.16 |
| Black Mountain | Los Padres National Forest | 13.1% | 889.83 |
| Big Rocks | Los Padres National Forest | 11.6% | 555.84 |
| Lpoor Canyon | Los Padres National Forest | 9.4% | 522.45 |
| Greenhorn Creek | Sequoia National Forest | 8.9% | 1,011.69 |
| Mirada Pime | Los Padres National Forest | 8.8% | 474.93 |
| La Panza | Los Padres National Forest | 8.1% | 161.91 |
| Tepusquet Peak | Los Padres National Forest | 7.2% | 169.47 |
| Garcia Mountain | Los Padres National Forest | 7.1% | 225.81 |
| Ferguson Ridge | Sierra National Forest | 6.0% | 147.33 |
| Polk Springs | Lassen National Forest | 5.5% | 210.87 |
| La Brea | Los Padres National Forest | 5.2% | 294.66 |
| Horseshoe Springs | Los Padres National Forest | 5.0% | 282.42 |
| Manzana | Los Padres National Forest | 4.9% | 41.58 |
| Black Butte | Los Padres National Forest | 4.6% | 96.3 |
| De La Guerra | Los Padres National Forest | 4.3% | 95.31 |
| Mill Creek | Lassen National Forest | 4.3% | 132.48 |
| Chico | Sequoia National Forest | 4.1% | 665.1 |
| Black Mtn. | Sequoia National Forest | 3.9% | 235.53 |
| Channell | Sequoia National Forest | 3.4% | 629.1 |
| Kings River | Sierra National Forest | 3.3% | 700.74 |
| Fox Mountain | Los Padres National Forest | 2.6% | 556.47 |
| Tule | Angeles National Forest | 2.5% | 98.46 |
| Woolstaff | Sequoia National Forest | 1.7% | 292.59 |
| Antimony | Los Padres National Forest | 1.5% | 248.67 |
| North Mountain | Stanislaus National Forest | 1.5% | 47.16 |
| Deer Mountain | Mendocino National Forest | 1.5% | 69.3 |
| Devil Gulch | Sierra National Forest | 1.4% | 175.95 |
| Bear Canyon | Los Padres National Forest | 1.3% | 77.94 |
| Camuesa | Los Padres National Forest | 1.3% | 44.64 |
| Thomes Creek | Mendocino National Forest | 1.2% | 83.97 |
| Cuyama | Los Padres National Forest | 1.1% | 90.54 |
| Moses | Sequoia National Forest | 0.6% | 50.4 |
| Santa Cruz | Los Padres National Forest | 0.5% | 46.98 |
| Sawmill - Badlands | Los Padres National Forest | 0.3% | 72.63 |
Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.
Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.
Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.
IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.
Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.
State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.