California Valley and Coastal Grassland

EVT 7129California Central Valley and Southern Coastal Grassland
CES206.942GNRHerbGrassland
Summary
This ecological system is found from 10-1200 m (30-3600 feet) elevation, in the Great Central Valley and along the southern coastal regions of California. It receives on average 50 cm (range 25-100 cm) of precipitation per year, mainly as winter rain. It is found with fine-textured soils, moist or even waterlogged in winter, but very dry in summer. Historically, these grasslands were common among oak savanna and woodland and probably experienced similar frequent fire regimes. Characteristic plant species include Nassella pulchra, Aristida spp., Achillea millefolium var. borealis, Achyrachaena mollis, Agoseris heterophylla, Bloomeria crocea, Triteleia ixioides, Chlorogalum pomeridianum, Clarkia purpurea, Dodecatheon jeffreyi, Elymus glaucus, Leymus triticoides, Festuca californica, Melica californica, Castilleja attenuata, and Poa secunda.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Characteristic plant species include Nassella pulchra, Aristida spp., Achillea millefolium var. borealis (= Achillea borealis), Achyrachaena mollis, Agoseris heterophylla, Bloomeria crocea, Triteleia ixioides (= Brodiaea lutea), Chlorogalum pomeridianum, Clarkia purpurea, Dodecatheon jeffreyi, Elymus glaucus, Leymus triticoides, Festuca californica, Melica californica, Castilleja attenuata (= Orthocarpus attenuatus), and Poa secunda (= Poa scabrella).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This ecosystem occurs from 10 to 1200 m (30-3600 feet) in elevation; receiving on average 50 cm (range 25-100 cm) of precipitation per year, mainly as winter rain. It is found with deep fine-textured soils, moist or even waterlogged in winter, but very dry in summer (Sawyer et al. 2009).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
These grasslands have evolved to survive fire and long seasonal droughts (Keeley 2006). Invasion of non-native annual grasses out-compete natives through prolific seed production and the ability to re-seed quickly after fires, which generally means they maintain themselves at the expense of the native grasses and forbs (Sawyer et al. 2009).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Conversion of this type has commonly come from agricultural and urban development, increased drought and increased fire frequency via Native American ignitions. Common stressors and threats include invasion of non-native annual species, heavy continuous grazing, and more frequent fire that favors the non-native annuals over the native bunch grasses. However, intact native grasslands also are stressed by fire suppression.

Conversion to agriculture and urban development are the greatest change agents to these grasslands rather than invasion by exotic species. Current thinking is that deep ripping and disruption of soil conditions makes way for exotics and if soil structure is in tact it is likely that native species will persist. Persistence of natives is more significant than dominance by natives. Many non-natives are here to stay and do not necessarily supplant or out compete the native species. These grasslands have experienced a long history of variable climate that supports a natural gradient from annual forblands in the southern portion of California to perennial grasslands in the northern portion. Loss of perennial grasses was thought to have been significant throughout the entire range but is now thought to have been over estimated. Many of the most spectacular wildflower fields in the South Coast Ranges and in southern California are the remaining pieces of this annual portion of the annual and perennial grasslands system (T. Keeler-Wolf pers. comm. 2013). There are, however, documented cases in particular where invasives such as Centaurea solstitialis, Brassica nigra, Taeniatherum, and others have swamped out the native species through thatch or shading (Stromberg et al. 2007, T. Keeler-Wolf pers. comm. 2013).

In the Central Valley, regional climate models project mean annual temperature increases of 1.4-2.0°C (1.8-3.6°F) by 2070. The projected impacts will be warmer winter temperatures; earlier warming in spring and increased summer temperatures. Regional models project a decrease in mean annual rainfall of 47-175 mm (1-7 inches) by 2070. While there is greater uncertainty about the precipitation projections than for temperature, some projections call for a slightly drier future climate relative to current conditions (PRBO Conservation Science 2011). In southwestern California, regional climate models project mean annual temperature increases of 1.7 to 2.2°C by 2070. In southwestern California, regional climate models project a decrease in mean annual rainfall of 51 to 184 mm by 2070. There is relatively little consensus about the projected effects of climate change on precipitation patterns in southwestern California: some projections suggest almost no change, others project decreases of up to 37% (PRBO Conservation Science 2011). Increase in drought length and magnitude will further favor the exotic annual species. Fires may increase with warmer temperatures and drier fuels, which may further favor non-native species, which survive fires through prolific seed production.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
Found from in California from 10-1200 m (30-3600 feet) elevation, in the Great Central Valley and along the southern coastal region.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Herb (field)

Achillea millefolium var. borealis, Achyrachaena mollis, Agoseris heterophylla, Bloomeria crocea, Castilleja attenuata, Chlorogalum pomeridianum, Clarkia purpurea, Elymus glaucus, Festuca californica, Leymus condensatus, Leymus triticoides, Melica californica, Nassella pulchra, Poa secunda, Primula jeffreyi, Triteleia ixioides
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (2)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
California VoleMicrotus californicusG5

Reptiles (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
GophersnakePituophis cateniferG5
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (1)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Giant WildryeLeymus condensatusG3G4--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
State Conservation Ranks (1)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
CASNR
Roadless Areas (15)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

California (15)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Cucamonga CSan Bernardino National Forest7.1%117.81
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest5.8%161.82
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest4.1%198.99
Mill PeakSan Bernardino National Forest3.8%121.32
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest2.5%304.02
Tepusquet PeakLos Padres National Forest2.2%50.94
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest2.1%83.79
Eagle PeakCleveland National Forest1.6%42.93
WestforkAngeles National Forest1.4%24.39
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest1.3%109.89
Mill CreekLassen National Forest0.9%28.8
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest0.8%139.5
Bear CanyonLos Padres National Forest0.8%48.15
Pleasant ViewAngeles National Forest0.7%72.99
GrindstoneMendocino National Forest0.6%62.28
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.