This system is found throughout the glaciated regions of the Midwest, typically in gently rolling to flat landscapes. It can occur on uplands within the prairie matrix or within the context of dry-mesic oak-hickory forests and oak savannas. These are common on rolling glacial moraines and outwash plains. Soils are typically well-drained to excessively drained Mollisols or Alfisols that range from sand to sandy loam in texture. Historically, this type was quite extensive in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. It is distinguished from other forested systems within the region by a dry edaphic condition that is transitional between dry prairies, oak barrens, or savannas and dry-mesic oak-hickory forests and woodlands. Forest cover can range from dense to moderately open canopy. Fire-resistant oak species, in particular Quercus velutina, Quercus macrocarpa, Quercus coccinea, and Quercus ellipsoidalis, dominate the overstory. Carya glabra, Prunus serotina, and Sassafras albidum are also common in portions of the range of this system. Depending on range of distribution and overstory canopy density, the understory may include species such as Gaylussacia baccata (in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota), Vaccinium angustifolium, and Rhus aromatica, and/or a mixture of woodland and grassland species, including Schizachyrium scoparium, Deschampsia flexuosa, and Carex pensylvanica. Extreme drought, along with periodic ground and crown fire events, constitute the main natural processes for this type and likely maintained a more open canopy structure that supported oak regeneration. In fact, many current examples of this type have resulted from long-term fire suppression and conversion of oak barrens to these forests and woodlands. Fire suppression may also account for examples of this system with the more dry-mesic understory. It likely has allowed for other associates such as Quercus rubra and Fraxinus americana to become more prevalent. Extensive conversion for agriculture in the surrounding landscape with more productive soils has fragmented and isolated examples of this system. It is found primarily within the "corn belt" of the United States, and remaining large areas of this system are likely under considerable pressure due to conversion to pastureland and urban development.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Forest cover can range from a dense to moderately open canopy. Fire-resistant oak species, in particular Quercus velutina, Quercus macrocarpa, Quercus coccinea, and Quercus ellipsoidalis, dominate the overstory. Carya glabra, Prunus serotina, and Sassafras albidum are also common in portions of the range of this system. Depending on range of distribution and overstory canopy density, the understory may include species such as Gaylussacia baccata (in MI, WI, and MN), Vaccinium angustifolium, and Rhus aromatica, and/or a mixture of woodland and grassland species, including Schizachyrium scoparium, Deschampsia flexuosa, and Carex pensylvanica.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system can occur on uplands within the prairie matrix or within the context of dry-mesic oak-hickory forests and oak savannas. These are common on rolling glacial moraines and outwash plains and, less frequently, old dunes. Soils are typically well-drained to excessively drained Mollisols or Alfisols that range from sand to sandy loam in texture. Dry soils or landscape position (steep slopes, upper slopes, south- or west-facing aspect) favor the formation of this system. Historically, this type was quite extensive in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. It is distinguished from other forested systems within the region by a dry edaphic condition that is transitional between dry prairies, oak barrens, or savannas and dry-mesic oak-hickory forests and woodlands.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Extreme drought, along with periodic ground and crown fire events, constitute the main natural processes for this type and likely maintained a more open canopy structure that supported oak regeneration. In fact, many current examples of this type have resulted from long-term fire suppression and conversion of oak barrens to these forests and woodlands. Frequency of fires necessary to maintain this system varied, largely depending on soil fertility and drainage, with more fertile and mesic sites requiring more frequent fires. Fire-return intervals of 5-20 years would typically maintain a woodland or oak grub shrubland, while fire-return intervals of 20-50 years would typically maintain a closed canopy oak forest (Landfire 2007a). Fire suppression may also account for examples of this system with the more dry-mesic understory. It likely has allowed for other associates such as Quercus rubra and Fraxinus americana to become more prevalent.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Fire suppression and conversion to agricultural or urban uses are the major threats to this system. Fire suppression has resulted in more closed-canopy forests with little or no oak regeneration and invasion by fire-intolerant trees, such as Acer spp., Celtis occidentalis, Fagus grandifolia, Liriodendron tulipifera, Prunus serotina, and Sassafras albidum, and understory species (Nowacki and Abrams 2008). Extensive conversion for agriculture in the surrounding landscape with more productive soils has fragmented and isolated examples of this system. It is found primarily within the "corn belt" of the United States, and many remaining large areas of this system are under considerable pressure due to conversion to pastureland and urban development. Stands can be significantly affected by insect defoliators Spongy Moth (Lymantria dispar) and forest tent caterpillar (Malacosoma disstria). Long-term effects from these have been limited in this system, but significant mortality in Quercus-dominated stands in the northeastern U.S. has been noted due to Spongy Moth defoliation (Davidson et al. 2001). Heavy deer browsing is not as common as in more mesic systems but can affect the understory and tree seedlings, reducing many native forbs and tree seedlings (Healy 1997, Rooney 2001). White-tailed deer have been shown to browse oak seedling over maple seedlings (Stroke and Anderson 1992). Invasive plant species that threaten the diversity and structure include Alliaria petiolata, Celastrus orbiculata, Cynanchum louiseae (= Vincetoxicum nigrum), Cynanchum rossicum (= Vincetoxicum rossicum), Elaeagnus umbellata, Lonicera japonica, Lonicera maackii, Lonicera morrowii, Lonicera sempervirens, Lonicera tatarica, Lonicera x bella, Lonicera xylosteum, Rhamnus cathartica, and Rosa multiflora (Kost el al. 2007).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
Found throughout the glaciated regions of the Midwest.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species
Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.
Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (6)
Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.
Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.
Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.
State
S-Rank
IL
SNR
IN
SNR
MI
SNR
MN
SNR
MO
SNR
ND
SNR
OH
SNR
WI
SNR
Roadless Areas (1)
Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.
Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.
Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.
Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.
IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.
Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.
State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.