Southern Piedmont Moist Forest

EVT 7316Southern Piedmont Mesic Forest
CES202.342GNRTreeHardwood
Summary
This system encompasses mixed deciduous hardwood or occasionally hardwood-pine forests of mesic sites in the Piedmont of the southeastern United States. Most examples occur on lower or north-facing slopes where topography creates mesic moisture conditions. A mix of a small number of mesophytic trees is usually dominant, with Fagus grandifolia most prominent. Both acidic and basic substrates are currently included in this concept, as are certain heath bluffs, where dense shrub layers of mesophytic ericaceous shrubs may occur beneath an open tree canopy. Fire is naturally infrequent in this system, due to the slopes and moist conditions. If fire does penetrate, it is likely to be low in intensity and may not have significant ecological effects. Vegetation consists of forests dominated by combinations of trees that include a significant component of mesophytic species. Fagus grandifolia is almost always abundant and is often strongly dominant. Quercus rubra, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Acer rubrum may be abundant. In basic soil examples, Fraxinus americana and Acer floridanum are also abundant. A well-developed understory is usually present. Herbs range from fairly dense in basic examples to sparse in acidic examples, and may be nearly absent in a few. The composition of all lower strata varies substantially with soil acidity.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
These forests are dominated by mesophytic tree species. Fagus grandifolia is almost always abundant and is often strongly dominant. Quercus rubra, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Acer rubrum may be abundant. In examples on basic soils, Fraxinus americana and Acer floridanum (= Acer barbatum) are also abundant. A well-developed understory is usually present. Shrubs are generally sparse to moderate in density, except on heath bluffs. Herbs range from fairly dense in basic examples to sparse in acidic examples. The composition of all lower strata varies substantially with soil acidity. Basic examples have fairly diverse plants, especially herbs, which may include a number of species shared with Southern and Central Appalachian Cove Forest (CES202.373). The more common acidic examples have fewer plant species, though generally they have a higher species richness than other drier ecological systems.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
Examples occur on lower slopes or on north-facing slopes, where topography creates mesic moisture conditions. This system may occur on any kind of rock type, with rock chemistry being an important determinant of variation. Most soils are acidic, but those formed on mafic rocks often are circumneutral to basic. The moist conditions and slope limit natural fire intensity and frequency.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Fire is naturally infrequent in this system, due to the slopes and moist conditions. If fire does occur, it is likely to be low in intensity and may not have significant ecological effects. These forests generally exist naturally as old-growth forests, with canopy dynamics dominated by gap-phase regeneration. Small to occasional medium-sized canopy gaps created by wind are likely the primary form of natural disturbance, though infrequent fires might create gaps. Most of the prevailing species are shade-tolerant. Most are not very fire-tolerant. The mesophytic forest type is fire regime class III, surface fires with return intervals of 20 to 70 years (Landfire 2007a). Mixed-severity fires may occur approximately every 100 years depending on climatic conditions. Disturbance may also occur by recurrent, severe insect defoliations or droughts. Ice, straight-line winds or microbursts may cause blow-downs on a scale of 1 to 10 acres. Stand-replacement fires happen very infrequently. Low-intensity surface fires, whether natural or set by Native Americans, would have maintained the more fire-resistant Castanea dentata and oak species.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Conversion of this type has primarily resulted from repeated canopy removal through logging, which is also the most critical anthropogenic threat. These sites were historically less frequently logged than the adjacent pine-dominated uplands, with more desirable species being removed in preference to Fagus grandifolia, which is less desirable in the lumber trade. In addition, some mesic hardwood forests in more moderately dissected terrain have been converted to pine plantations or impacted (destroyed or fragmented) by agriculture. Bluff habitats are often prime sites for development, especially along major rivers. Complete devastation by natural agents was probably very rare in this forest type (Batista and Platt 1997). These forests also suffer the effects of ozone and acidic atmospheric deposition.

Aside from actual site conversion, feral hogs represent one of the greatest threats to biodiversity in these forests (Engeman et al. 2007). They can be especially difficult to control in sensitive slope forests (Edwards et al. 2013). In addition, invasive exotic species including Elaeagnus umbellata, Hedera helix, Ligustrum sinense, Lonicera japonica, and Wisteria sinensis can become dominant in the ground and shrub layers following canopy disturbance (Edwards et al. 2013). For mesic hardwood forests containing Fraxinus species, emerald ash borer (recently found in Georgia) may also be a significant stressor.

The most significant potential climate change effects over the next 50 years include periods of drought, which has affected parts of the coastal plain. Droughts will affect the health and survival of the moisture-requiring trees, as well as increase the probability of damaging wildfire.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This ecological system ranges throughout the southern Piedmont, from Virginia to Alabama.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Acer floridanum, Acer rubrum, Fagus grandifolia, Fraxinus americana, Liriodendron tulipifera, Pinus taeda, Quercus alba, Quercus rubra

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Aesculus sylvatica, Ilex opaca, Ribes echinellum

Tall shrub/sapling

Rhododendron eastmanii

Herb (field)

Carex gracillima, Clematis ochroleuca, Collinsonia tuberosa, Collinsonia verticillata, Cystopteris protrusa, Enemion biternatum, Geranium maculatum, Helianthus glaucophyllus, Hexalectris spicata, Hymenocallis coronaria, Lithospermum tuberosum, Osmorhiza claytonii, Panax quinquefolius, Primula meadia ssp. 2, Silene polypetala, Tradescantia virginiana, Trillium reliquum, Trillium rugelii, Waldsteinia lobata
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (10)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Birds (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Yellow-billed CuckooCoccyzus americanusG5
Great Crested FlycatcherMyiarchus crinitusG5

Reptiles (6)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Green AnoleAnolis carolinensisG5
Northern ScarletsnakeCemophora coccinea copeiG5T5
Common Five-lined SkinkPlestiodon fasciatusG5
Southeastern Five-lined SkinkPlestiodon inexpectatusG5
Broad-headed SkinkPlestiodon laticepsG5
Eastern Smooth EarthsnakeVirginia valeriae valeriaeG5T5

Amphibians (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Webster's SalamanderPlethodon websteriG3G4

Other (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Western RatsnakePantherophis obsoletusG5
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (11)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Deepwoods HorsebalmCollinsonia tuberosaG3G4--
Whorled HorsebalmCollinsonia verticillataG3G4--
Whiteleaf SunflowerHelianthus glaucophyllusG3--
Shoals Spider-lilyHymenocallis coronariaG3?--
American GinsengPanax quinquefoliusG3G4--
Webster's SalamanderPlethodon websteriG3G4--
Eastman's RhododendronRhododendron eastmaniiG3--
Miccosukee GooseberryRibes echinellumG1Threatened
Fringed CampionSilene polypetalaG2Endangered
Relict TrilliumTrillium reliquumG3Endangered
Lobed Barren-strawberryWaldsteinia lobataG3--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (13)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Fagus grandifolia - Liriodendron tulipifera - Carya cordiformis / Lindera benzoin / Podophyllum peltatum ForestG4 NatureServe
Fagus grandifolia - Liriodendron tulipifera / Euonymus americanus / Athyrium filix-femina ssp. asplenioides ForestG4 NatureServe
Fagus grandifolia - Quercus alba / Kalmia latifolia - (Rhododendron catawbiense) / Galax urceolata ForestG2 NatureServe
Fagus grandifolia - Quercus (alba, rubra) - Liriodendron tulipifera / (Ilex opaca) ForestG5 NatureServe
Fagus grandifolia - Quercus (alba, velutina, montana) / Kalmia latifolia ForestG4 NatureServe
Fagus grandifolia - Quercus rubra / Aesculus sylvatica / Actaea racemosa - Adiantum pedatum ForestG3 NatureServe
Fagus grandifolia - Quercus rubra / Cornus florida / Polystichum acrostichoides - Hexastylis virginica ForestG3 NatureServe
Liriodendron tulipifera - Tilia americana var. heterophylla - (Aesculus flava) / Actaea racemosa ForestG4 NatureServe
Quercus alba - Carya tomentosa / Euonymus americanus / Hexastylis arifolia ForestG4 NatureServe
Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Quercus montana / Collinsonia canadensis - Podophyllum peltatum ForestG3 NatureServe
Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Quercus montana - Tilia americana var. caroliniana / Ostrya virginiana ForestG2 NatureServe
Quercus rubra - Quercus alba - Carya glabra / Geranium maculatum ForestG4 NatureServe
Tilia americana var. heterophylla - Fraxinus americana / Sanguinaria canadensis - (Aquilegia canadensis, Asplenium rhizophyllum) ForestG2 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (5)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
ALSNR
GASNR
NCSNR
SCSNR
VASNR
Roadless Areas (3)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Alabama (3)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Cheaha BTalladega National Forest11.1%33.39
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest9.1%184.41
Oakey MountainTalladega National Forest1.5%36.36
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.