Southern Appalachian Low-Elevation Pine Forest

EVT 7353
CES202.332GNRTreeConifer
Summary
This ecological system consists of Pinus echinata- and Pinus virginiana-dominated forests in the lower elevation Southern Appalachians and adjacent Piedmont and Cumberland Plateau, extending into the Interior Low Plateau of Indiana, Kentucky and Tennessee. Examples can occur on a variety of topographic and landscape positions, including ridgetops, upper and midslopes, as well as lower elevations (generally below 700 m [2300 feet]) in the Southern Appalachians such as mountain valleys. Examples occur on a variety of acidic bedrock types. Frequent, low-intensity fires coupled with severe fires may have been the sole factor favoring the occurrence of this system instead of hardwood forests in the absence of fire. Under current conditions, stands are dominated by Pinus echinata or Pinus virginiana. Pinus rigida may sometimes be present. Hardwoods are sometimes abundant, especially dry-site oaks such as Quercus falcata, Quercus montana, and Quercus coccinea, but also Carya glabra, Acer rubrum, and others. The shrub layer may be well-developed, with Gaylussacia baccata, Kalmia latifolia, Rhododendron minus, Vaccinium pallidum, or other acid-tolerant species most characteristic. Herbs are usually sparse but may include Pityopsis graminifolia and Tephrosia virginiana.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Vegetation consists of closed to open forests or woodlands dominated by Pinus echinata or Pinus virginiana. Pinus rigida may sometimes be present. Hardwoods are sometimes abundant, especially dry-site oaks such as Quercus falcata, Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus), and Quercus coccinea, but also Carya glabra, Acer rubrum, and others. An extensive hardwood component may partly be the result of fire suppression. The shrub layer may be well-developed, with Vaccinium pallidum, Gaylussacia baccata, or other acid-tolerant species most characteristic. Herbs are usually sparse but may include Pityopsis graminifolia and Tephrosia virginiana. Herbs probably were more abundant and shrubs less dense when fires occurred more frequently, and the communities of this system may have been grassy under more natural conditions, with Schizachyrium scoparium being a typical component, possibly with Danthonia sp.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system occurs on ridgetops, upper and midslopes, in mountain valleys and the lower ranges. It is found on south- and southwest-facing slopes (Whittaker 1956). Bedrock may be a variety of types, but the system may be limited to acidic substrates. Fire is undoubtedly a very important and necessary influence.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Fire is clearly an important influence on the dynamics of this ecological system, and frequent, low-intensity fires coupled with occasional severe fires (Harrod and White 1999, Fesenmyer and Christenson 2010) are thought to have been the primary factor leading to the occurrence of this system rather than hardwood forests on dry sites in the absence of fire. Fires probably were frequent and of low intensity, or a mix of low and higher intensity. Over many decades, accumulation of dead biomass can predispose these forests to catastrophic fire. However, even in the absence of fire, successional changes are normally restricted (possibly ending with oak domination) because most sites are infertile and dry (Murphy and Nowacki 1997). Fire probably is important for determining the dominance of pine species, the component of hardwoods, and the overall vegetation structure. Pinus echinata is fairly resilient to fire once mature, while Pinus virginiana individuals are fairly susceptible to fire but well-adapted to establishing in areas opened by intense fire.

Southern pine beetles (Dendroctonus frontalis) are an important disturbance and threat in this system, at least under present conditions and severe outbreaks can kill all the pines without creating the conditions for the pines to regenerate. Effects of logging and past clearing as well as lack of fire make understanding of this system's natural character and dynamics difficult. An extensive hardwood component may partly be the result of lack of fire. Some pine-dominated areas appear to be successional stands established in former hardwood forests after logging or cultivation, and would not be expected to have the same dynamics or ecosystem characteristics as natural pine forests maintained by fire. In natural pine forests, with adequate seed and seedlings, logging may allow pines to regenerate or, without adequate seedlings and with lack of fire may lead to a change in composition to hardwoods. This might also alter canopy composition as well as structure. In many cases, several prescribed fires or a combination of fire and thinning treatments will be necessary to restore these ecosystems (Elliott and Vose 2005).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Southern pine beetles (Dendroctonus frontalis) are an important disturbance and threat in this system, especially to the Pinus echinata trees, at least under present conditions. Lack of fire has contributed to the loss of this ecological system. Without fire, the development of a closed forest canopy can lead to declines in the native herbaceous ground cover vegetation. Clearcut logging of Pinus echinata and forest succession by hardwood trees, Pinus virginiana and/or Pinus taeda are threats to the very limited extent of Pinus echinata forests. Pinus echinata woodlands have declined due to conversion to intensively managed pine plantations, especially on the Cumberland Plateau. Often sites have been replanted with Pinus taeda, and are then no longer burned for forest management.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is found primarily in the Appalachian regions of Kentucky and the Southern Blue Ridge in northern Georgia, western North Carolina, southeastern Tennessee, the Cumberlands of Alabama, parts of the Interior Low Plateau (e.g., the Knobs Region of Kentucky and southern Indiana and the western Highland Rim of Tennessee), and southwestern Virginia. Any possible stands in the Piedmont would be found in the western foothills portions adjacent to the mountains.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Acer rubrum, Carya glabra, Carya tomentosa, Oxydendrum arboreum, Pinus echinata, Pinus rigida, Pinus virginiana, Prunus alleghaniensis, Prunus serotina var. alabamensis, Quercus coccinea, Quercus falcata, Quercus prinoides, Quercus prinus

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Castanea dentata, Gaylussacia baccata, Gaylussacia brachycera, Nestronia umbellula, Ribes curvatum, Stewartia ovata, Vaccinium hirsutum, Vaccinium pallidum

Short shrub/sapling

Amorpha schwerinii, Comptonia peregrina, Gaultheria procumbens

Herb (field)

Agalinis plukenetii, Borodinia serotina, Botrychium jenmanii, Bromus kalmii, Cleistes bifaria, Coreopsis verticillata, Crotalaria purshii, Cypripedium acaule, Desmodium ochroleucum, Hexastylis virginica, Hieracium scabrum, Isotria medeoloides, Liatris squarrulosa, Malaxis bayardii, Melanthium latifolium, Packera millefolium, Pityopsis graminifolia, Schizachyrium scoparium, Senega polygama, Spigelia marilandica, Taenidia montana, Tephrosia spicata, Tephrosia virginiana, Xerophyllum asphodeloides
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (26)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Red WolfCanis rufusG1
Least WeaselMustela nivalisG5

Birds (5)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Cooper's HawkAstur cooperiiG5
Prairie WarblerSetophaga discolorG5
Yellow-throated WarblerSetophaga dominicaG5
Red-breasted NuthatchSitta canadensisG5
Brown-headed NuthatchSitta pusillaG4

Reptiles (12)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Green AnoleAnolis carolinensisG5
Northern ScarletsnakeCemophora coccinea copeiG5T5
Timber RattlesnakeCrotalus horridusG4
Eastern Hog-nosed SnakeHeterodon platirhinosG5
Scarlet KingsnakeLampropeltis elapsoidesG5
Red CornsnakePantherophis guttatusG5
Northern PinesnakePituophis melanoleucus melanoleucusG4T4
Southeastern Five-lined SkinkPlestiodon inexpectatusG5
Little Brown SkinkScincella lateralisG5
Southeastern Crowned SnakeTantilla coronataG5
Mountain EarthsnakeVirginia valeriae pulchraG5T3T4
Eastern Smooth EarthsnakeVirginia valeriae valeriaeG5T5

Amphibians (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Peaks of Otter SalamanderPlethodon hubrichtiG2G3

Butterflies & Moths (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Hoary ElfinCallophrys poliosG5
Olympia MarbleEuchloe olympiaG5
Chestnut Clearwing MothSynanthedon castaneaeG3G5

Insects (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Northern Barrens Tiger BeetleCicindela patruelaG3

Other (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Eastern CougarPuma concolor couguarG5TXQ
Confused Zale MothZale confusaG4G5
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (15)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Schwerin IndigobushAmorpha schweriniiG3G4--
Shale Barren RockcressBorodinia serotinaG2Endangered
Alabama GrapefernBotrychium jenmaniiG3G4--
Red WolfCanis rufusG1Endangered; Experimental population, non-essential
American ChestnutCastanea dentataG3--
Northern Barrens Tiger BeetleCicindela patruelaG3--
Cream Tick-trefoilDesmodium ochroleucumG2G3--
Box HuckleberryGaylussacia brachyceraG3--
Small Whorled PogoniaIsotria medeoloidesG2G3Threatened
Bayard's MalaxisMalaxis bayardiiG1G2--
Blue Ridge RagwortPackera millefoliumG3--
Peaks of Otter SalamanderPlethodon hubrichtiG2G3--
Eastern CougarPuma concolor couguarG5TXQDelisted
Mountain ParsleyTaenidia montanaG3--
Mountain EarthsnakeVirginia valeriae pulchraG5T3T4--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (13)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Pinus echinata - Quercus alba / Vaccinium pallidum / Hexastylis arifolia - Chimaphila maculata ForestG3 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus (montana, falcata) / Oxydendrum arboreum / Vaccinium pallidum ForestG3 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus montana - Quercus stellata / Vaccinium pallidum / Pityopsis graminifolia var. latifolia WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus montana / Rhododendron minus / Vaccinium pallidum ForestG2 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus stellata - Quercus marilandica / Vaccinium pallidum WoodlandG4 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus stellata - Quercus montana / Danthonia spicata ForestG3 NatureServe
Pinus echinata Ruderal ForestGNA NatureServe
Pinus echinata / Schizachyrium scoparium Appalachian WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus echinata / Vaccinium (pallidum, stamineum) - Kalmia latifolia ForestG4 NatureServe
Pinus strobus / Kalmia latifolia - (Vaccinium stamineum, Gaylussacia ursina) ForestG2 NatureServe
Pinus virginiana - Pinus (rigida, echinata) - (Quercus montana) / Vaccinium pallidum ForestG3 NatureServe
Pinus virginiana - (Pinus rigida, Pinus pungens) / Schizachyrium scoparium ForestG3 NatureServe
Pinus virginiana Ruderal ForestGNA NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (8)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
ALSNR
GASNR
INSNR
KYSNR
NCSNR
SCSNR
TNSNR
VASNR
Roadless Areas (26)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Alabama (2)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Oakey MountainTalladega National Forest25.7%636.3
Cheaha ATalladega National Forest10.7%10.26

Georgia (9)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Ken MountainChattahoochee National Forest40.4%86.13
Miller CreekChattahoochee National Forest7.8%22.05
Big MountainChattahoochee National Forest7.3%58.5
Lance CreekChattahoochee National Forest5.0%183.24
Turner CreekChattahoochee National Forest4.6%27.54
Rocky MountainChattahoochee National Forest4.1%70.65
Boggs CreekChattahoochee National Forest3.4%28.62
Indian Grave GapChattahoochee National Forest2.9%11.88
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest2.8%136.17

Kentucky (1)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest13.6%155.7

North Carolina (5)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Yellowhammer Branch (add.)Nantahala National Forest10.7%54.45
Linville Gorge AdditionPisgah National Forest10.0%113.4
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest4.4%130.23
Dobson KnobPisgah National Forest4.1%102.06
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest1.4%76.32

South Carolina (2)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Big MountainSumter National Forest22.9%216.09
Bee CoveSumter National Forest11.5%141.3

Tennessee (5)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Little Frog Addition NWCherokee National Forest13.7%34.74
Devil's BackboneCherokee National Forest12.4%215.73
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest9.4%53.19
Bald River Gorge AdditionCherokee National Forest8.2%57.6
Big Frog AdditionCherokee National Forest6.7%10.08

Virginia (2)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest3.9%128.61
James River AdditionJefferson National Forest2.9%13.23
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.