Ozark-Ouachita Shortleaf Pine-Oak Forest

EVT 7367Ozark-Ouachita Shortleaf Pine Forest and Woodland
CES202.313GNRTreeConifer
Summary
This system represents forests and woodlands of the Ouachita and Ozark mountains region of Arkansas, adjacent Oklahoma, and southern Missouri in which Pinus echinata is an important or dominant component. Although examples of this system occur throughout this region, there is local variation in the extent to which they were present. For example, in the Ozark Highlands, this system was historically prominent only in the southeastern part where sandstone-derived soils were common, and in the southern part on soils derived from chert, being excluded from or diminished in other areas by non-conducive soils. In contrast, pine was virtually ubiquitous in the historical forests of the Ouachitas. In nearly all cases (at least in the Ouachitas), Pinus echinata occurs with a variable mixture of hardwood species. The exact composition of the hardwoods is much more closely related to aspect and topographic factors than is the pine component. In some examples of this system, the aggregate importance of hardwoods may be greater than pine, especially on subxeric and mesic sites.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Stands of this system typically contain Pinus echinata with various oak species, including Quercus alba, Quercus rubra, Quercus falcata, Quercus stellata, Quercus velutina, and Quercus marilandica. In some examples of this system, the aggregate importance of hardwoods may be greater than pine, especially on subxeric and mesic sites (Dale and Ware 1999). Typical shrubs include Vaccinium arboreum, Vaccinium pallidum, and Vaccinium stamineum. Characteristic herbs include Schizachyrium scoparium, Chasmanthium sessiliflorum, Solidago ulmifolia, Monarda russeliana, and Echinacea pallida.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
In the Ozark Highlands, this system was historically prominent only in the southeastern part, where sandstone derived soils were common (USFS 1999) and in the southern part on soils derived from chert; being limited in other areas by non-conducive soils. In contrast, pine was "virtually ubiquitous in the historical forests of the Ouachitas" (USFS 1999). In nearly all cases (at least in the Ouachitas), Pinus echinata occurs with a variable mixture of hardwood species. The exact composition of the hardwoods is much more closely related to aspect and topographic factors than is the pine component (Dale and Ware 1999).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Fire is an important dynamic process, which maintains open woodland conditions and can promote oak and pine regeneration. Fires have historically occurred more frequently than once every 10 years (Hedrick et al. 2007). Today the region consists largely of closed-canopy forests, though relatively frequent fires prior to Euro-American settlement created and maintained forests, woodlands, savannas and glades (Stambaugh and Guyette 2006). Prior to 1820, fires were most frequent in areas with relatively low topographic roughness, such as flat or gently sloping lands away from ravines and creeks (Stambaugh and Guyette 2008). For the next hundred years, fires increased as population increased (Stambaugh and Guyette 2006, 2008), until about 1930 when very effective fire-suppression practices began (Guldin et al. 2005). During the 1800s, these fires helped maintain Pinus echinata and hardwood forests with floristically rich understory vegetation of grasses and forbs (Hedrick et al. 2007). There is a very low rate of fire ignitions from lightning strikes in the Ozark Highlands area, nearly all ignitions are caused by people (Stambaugh and Guyette 2006). However, fires started by lightning could become very large, since ignitions may occur associated with drought, high winds, drying fuels, and decreasing humidity. The number of lightning strike-initiated wildfires is higher in the Ouachita Mountains and Boston Mountains. In these areas, presettlement wildland fires were ignited by Native Americans and by lightning (Foti and Glenn 1990). Other disturbances include wind, tornados, drought, and ice storms. These disturbances can open forest canopies and add significantly to downed woody debris, which can add fuel and lead to increased fire intensity when that downed material is dry and burns. Pinus echinata has shorter needles and is not as susceptible to ice as Pinus taeda, which is more common further south in Arkansas.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Lack of fire is a big threat. Without fire, the development of a closed forest canopy can lead to declines in the native herbaceous ground cover vegetation. Some forestry practices used with Pinus echinata, and forest succession by hardwood trees, or planting of Pinus taeda are threats to Pinus echinata-dominated or -codominated forests and woodlands. Pinus echinata woodlands have declined due to conversion to intensively managed Pinus spp. plantations. Usually sites have been replanted with Pinus taeda, and are then no longer burned for forest management. Some natural stands do not have adequate reproduction after restoration thinnings and prescribed fire, and will need to have Pinus echinata seedlings planted to regenerate stands (Guldin et al. 2005).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system occurs in the Ouachita and Ozark mountains region of Arkansas, adjacent Oklahoma, and southern Missouri.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Carya texana, Pinus echinata, Quercus alba, Quercus falcata, Quercus marilandica, Quercus rubra, Quercus stellata, Quercus velutina

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Vaccinium arboreum, Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium stamineum

Herb (field)

Chasmanthium sessiliflorum, Echinacea pallida, Galium arkansanum, Houstonia ouachitana, Monarda russeliana, Monarda stipitatoglandulosa, Schizachyrium scoparium, Solidago ouachitensis, Solidago ulmifolia, Streptanthus squamiformis
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (5)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Southern Flying SquirrelGlaucomys volansG5

Reptiles (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
North American RacerColuber constrictorG5
Coal SkinkPlestiodon anthracinusG5
Common Five-lined SkinkPlestiodon fasciatusG5

Other (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Confused Zale MothZale confusaG4G5
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (3)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Ouachita BluetHoustonia ouachitanaG3--
Ouachita Mountain GoldenrodSolidago ouachitensisG3--
Pine-oak JewelflowerStreptanthus squamiformisG2G3--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (8)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Pinus echinata - Quercus alba - Quercus falcata WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus alba - Quercus rubra / Vaccinium arboreum / Chasmanthium sessiliflorum ForestG3 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus alba / Schizachyrium scoparium WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus stellata - Quercus marilandica / Schizachyrium scoparium WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus echinata - Quercus velutina - Quercus stellata / Vaccinium spp. WoodlandG3 NatureServe
Pinus echinata / Rock Outcrop Interior Highland WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus echinata / Schizachyrium scoparium - Solidago ulmifolia - Monarda russeliana - Echinacea pallida WoodlandG1 NatureServe
Pinus echinata / Vaccinium (arboreum, pallidum, stamineum) WoodlandG3 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (3)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
ARSNR
MOSNR
OKSNR
Roadless Areas (19)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Arkansas (14)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest35.6%481.5
Bear MountainOuachita National Forest34.1%262.89
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest28.9%1,141.02
PenhookOzark-St. Francis National Forest28.8%765
East ForkOzark-St. Francis National Forest28.8%1,516.68
Devils CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest17.9%136.53
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest14.1%455.22
Pedestal RocksOzark-St. Francis National Forest7.2%638.37
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest5.7%211.23
Brush HeapOuachita National Forest5.1%85.95
Rich Mountain (AR)Ouachita National Forest3.9%40.41
Clifty CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest2.9%23.04
Indian CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest2.4%77.85
Hurricane CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest1.8%16.56

Missouri (3)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Spring Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest9.9%196.11
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest3.7%110.7
Anderson Mountain Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest2.0%21.87

Oklahoma (2)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Beech CreekOuachita National Forest26.7%896.94
Rich Mountain (OK)Ouachita National Forest13.5%274.5
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.