Florida Peninsula Inland Scrub
Summary
This system appears in many forms, but generally consists of xeromorphic shrub vegetation (mostly evergreen oak species) with or without an emergent overstory of Pinus clausa. The shrubs can be very thick in places, but usually there are open patches. Ground cover is always sparse, and bare soil patches are typically evident. It is found on a sequence of sand ridges and ancient dune fields which are oriented essentially north-south in the Florida Peninsula. The appearance, floristics, and boundary of Florida scrub may contrast dramatically with the "high pine" or sandhill vegetation which is often adjacent, although lack of fire can blur these boundaries.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
This system is dominated by xeromorphic, evergreen shrub species with or without an emergent layer of Pinus clausa. The shrub layer composition is relatively constant, as is the abundance of individual species. Quercus myrtifolia, Quercus inopina, Serenoa repens, Quercus geminata, Quercus chapmanii, Lyonia ferruginea, and Ceratiola ericoides are the most important species. Myers (1990) indicates that much of the variability in Florida scrub is due to variation in fire-return interval, ranging from once every 10 to 100 years. Ground cover is always sparse but typically includes Licania michauxii, Rhynchospora megalocarpa, Andropogon floridanus, and a variety of lichens (Cladonia species). There are a number of endemic plant species which may occur in inland Florida scrubs, including at least 13 federally listed species; many of the rarest scrub species are found only in the Lake Wales region.
This system has long been noted for its unique and interesting vegetation by authors such as Vignoles (1823), Harper (1914), Mulvania (1931), Kurz (1942), and Laessle (1958, 1968). More recent treatments by Myers (1990) and Menges (1999) have provided the most comprehensive summaries of scrub available. According to Harper (1927), "the nearly pure white sand of the ground surface, when viewed from a short distance, gives the impression of a thin rift of wind-driven snow. The vegetation is mostly dwarfed, gnarled and crooked, and presents a tangled, scraggly aspect." The appearance, floristics, and boundary of Florida scrub contrast dramatically with the "high pine" or sandhill vegetation which is often adjacent (Laessle 1968), although lack of fire can blur these boundaries. Scrub generally consists of xeromorphic shrub vegetation, such as evergreen Ceratiola ericoides, Lyonia spp., Quercus spp., Sabal etonia, Sabal palmetto, and Serenoa repens, with or without an emergent overstory of Pinus clausa.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system is restricted to a sequence of north/south-trending sand ridges, ancient dune fields, and former shorelines in the Florida peninsula. The largest inland scrub is found in two primary areas, essentially isolated from one another. The so called "Big Scrub" of the Ocala National Forest is the largest expanse of this system, with a somewhat smaller, more southerly area associated with the Lake Wales Ridge. According to Myers (1990), inland scrub occurs on Quartzipsamments which are excessively well-drained, nearly pure siliceous sands low in nutrients. Although all scrub soils are Entisols, there is considerable variation in soil color. This color variation appears to be related to the amount of leaching which has taken place, and appears to be related to the amount of time a site has been occupied by scrub vegetation. Excessive leaching, due to inferred long occupation by scrub vegetation, is believed to bleach upper soil horizons and develop pure white soils (such as the St. Lucie series), while moderate leaching, due to shorter occupation by scrub, contributes to less bleaching and consequently more yellow-colored soils (Paola and Orsino series).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Florida scrub is a pyrogenic system with floral and faunal components adapted to fire. Unlike most ecological systems of the Gulf and Atlantic coastal plains, this system is maintained by high-intensity, infrequent fires. Litter-fall rates are high, while turnover rates are low, contributing to fuel buildup (Lugo and Zucca 1983, Schmalzer and Hinkle 1996). However, scrub typically lacks fine-textured fuels necessary to ignite fires; most scrub fires ignite in other adjacent ecological systems. If fire spreads into scrub it is often under severe conditions of high wind, low humidity, and low fuel moisture. When fires occur in scrub they can be stand-replacing events. Pinus clausa, if present, is killed outright but may regenerate from seed released from serotinous cones. In parts of fires that burn completely, the shrub layer is typically killed back to ground layer but rapidly resprouts and returns to prefire levels of cover (Abrahamson 1984, Schmalzer and Hinkle 1992b). Other species such as Ceratiola ericoides may regenerate from seeds stored in soil (Johnson 1982). Eryngium cuneifolium and Dicerandra christmanii are narrowly endemic herb species which exhibit peaks in survival, recruitment, and density after fire (Menges 1999, Menges et al. 1999, Menges and Quintana-Ascencio 2004). Many scrub fires burn heterogeneously with resulting patches of unburned fuels. This gap dynamics can be significant (Weekley and Menges 2003), especially in the most xeric types like rosemary scrub (Menges 1994). In the sustained absence of fire, smaller shrubs and herbs may be lost as a consequence of increasing dominance of oak stems (Menges et al. 1993).
This system has likely persisted on fossil dunes since the Pleistocene (Laessle 1968), but remaining examples are merely remnants of an ecosystem once expansive in the late Pleistocene (Myers 1990). The stature and appearance of Florida scrub may be due primarily to nutrient-poor soils, to which many of the scrub species have adapted evergreen habits (Monk 1966). Drought stress is most likely during winter and early spring, but frequent fog during these periods may ameliorate such conditions (Menges 1994). Surprisingly, given the excessively well-drained soils, drought stress may not be an important ecological factor except to limit seedling establishment (Myers 1987, 1990).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Lack of fire is a big threat to Florida scrub ecosystems. Threats also include the loss of habitat to agriculture, commercial and residential development, and fragmentation of remaining Florida scrub habitat by roads and development (Weekley et al. 2008). These threats limit prescribed burning due to urban interface, safety and smoke management concerns. Since Florida scrub burns at high intensity, the use of prescribed fire on land which includes urban interface is especially difficult. Invasive exotic plant species are threats, but due to the very dry and low-nutrient coarse sand soils, invasive plant threats are less than in certain other habitats in Florida. Conversion to intensively managed pine plantations, citrus, and pasture has been a threat. By 1990, the scrubs of the Lake Wales Ridge were nearly gone (Myers 1990, Weekley et al. 2008). Scrub has been protected at numerous sites, but management with prescribed fire is difficult, so many are still threatened with lack of fire. The extensive scrub on Ocala National Forest is managed in blocks clearcut for pulpwood, in a manner which attempts to mimic the natural dynamics of a patch mosaic of disturbance (Myers 1990). Mechanical treatments (including logging, mowing and roller-chopping) and herbicides have been used to reduce woody vegetation in scrubs, but these should be used in conjunction with fire if possible. These methods may be useful to prepare sites for prescribed fire, which otherwise would not be possible due to very high fuel buildup (Menges and Gordon 2010).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is endemic to the Florida Peninsula. It is most common in two discrete islands or patches, the Big Scrub of Ocala and the Lake Wales Ridge, which is now highly fragmented and mostly lost to agriculture and development (Weekley et al. 2008).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species
Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.
Tree canopy
Pinus clausa, Quercus chapmanii, Quercus geminata, Quercus myrtifolia
Shrub/sapling (tall & short)
Lyonia ferruginea, Quercus inopina, Serenoa repens
Short shrub/sapling
Ceratiola ericoides, Licania michauxii
Herb (field)
Andropogon floridanus, Pteroglossaspis ecristata, Rhynchospora megalocarpa
Nonvascular
Donnellia commutata, Eccremidium floridanum
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (4)
Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (6)
Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (9)
Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.
| Name | G-Rank | |
|---|
| Carya floridana - Quercus myrtifolia - Quercus geminata Shrubland | | NatureServe |
| Ceratiola ericoides - Quercus geminata - (Quercus inopina) - Serenoa repens Scrub | | NatureServe |
| Pinus clausa / Ceratiola ericoides - Sabal etonia / Cladonia spp. Woodland | | NatureServe |
| Pinus clausa / Quercus geminata - Quercus myrtifolia - (Quercus laevis) / Garberia heterophylla Forest | | NatureServe |
| Pinus clausa / Quercus inopina Woodland | | NatureServe |
| Pinus clausa / Quercus myrtifolia - Quercus geminata Woodland | | NatureServe |
| Quercus inopina - Quercus geminata - Quercus chapmanii Shrubland | | NatureServe |
| Quercus myrtifolia - Quercus geminata - Lyonia lucida - Lyonia ferruginea Shrubland | | NatureServe |
| Quercus myrtifolia - Quercus geminata - Quercus chapmanii Shrubland | | NatureServe |
State Conservation Ranks (1)
Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.
Roadless Areas (1)
Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.
Florida (1)
| Area | Forest | Coverage | Hectares |
|---|
| Farles Prairie | Ocala National Forest | 1.9% | 14.94 |
Methodology and Data Sources
Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.
Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.
Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.
IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.
Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.
State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.