Midwestern Sandy Tallgrass Prairie

EVT 7412North-Central Interior Sand and Gravel Tallgrass Prairie
CES202.695GNRHerbGrassland
Summary
This system is found in the northern Midwest, particularly in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and possibly ranging into Ontario. It is often found on glacial features such as kames, eskers, moraines, lakeplains (though excluding the Great Lakes lakeplain) and sandplains, and along eolian dunes. In contrast to the deeper, richer soils supporting other tallgrass systems in the region, the underlying soils in this system tend to be more shallow, sandy, rocky, and/or gravelly outwash soils. Organic content is significantly lower. Grassland species such as Schizachyrium scoparium, Andropogon gerardii, and Bouteloua spp., varying in cover from sparse to moderately dense, dominate this system. Hesperostipa spartea and Sporobolus heterolepis are also common components of this system. Woody species more tolerant of droughty conditions may be found in some examples. The most common trees are Pinus banksiana, Quercus ellipsoidalis, Quercus macrocarpa, and Populus tremuloides. Fire and drought are the major dynamics influencing this system. If fire and periodic drought are not present, woody species begin to invade this system, especially in the eastern parts of its distribution. Wind can also play a role, especially on examples found on sandplains and/or eolian dunes.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Grassland species such as Schizachyrium scoparium, Andropogon gerardii, and Bouteloua spp., varying in cover from sparse to moderately dense, dominate this system. Hesperostipa spartea and Sporobolus heterolepis are also common components of this system. Woody species more tolerant of droughty conditions may be found in some examples. The most common trees are Pinus banksiana, Quercus ellipsoidalis, Quercus macrocarpa, and Populus tremuloides.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system is often found on glacial features such as kames, eskers, moraines, lakeplains (though excluding the Great Lakes lakeplain), and sandplains, and along eolian dunes and river deltas. In contrast to the deeper, richer soils supporting other tallgrass systems in the region, the underlying soils in this system tend to be more shallow, sandy, rocky, and/or gravelly soils. Soil texture is sand or sandy loam. Organic content and soil moisture retention are significantly lower than the more mesic grasslands.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Fire and drought are the major dynamics influencing this system. If fire and periodic drought are not present, woody species begin to invade this system, especially in the eastern parts of its distribution. Fire-return intervals were likely 1-8 years (Landfire 2007a). Drier examples of this system likely could not be maintained in the presence of long-term short fire-return intervals due to the lower fertility of the soils. The typical dominant perennial grasses would not have time to recover from repeated burning and shorter-lived opportunistic species could dominate (Loucks et al. 1985). These sites were maintained as grasslands by the dry soil conditions possibly supplemented by low-frequency fires, while other areas required fire to eliminate invasion by woody species. Wind can also play a role, especially on examples found on sandplains and/or eolian dunes or during droughts when vegetation cover is low. Blowouts can form, exposing bare sand (Burgess 1965). Productivity is lower on this system than on other tallgrass prairies, so vegetation responds more slowly to disturbance. This system can not persist with the same frequency of reductions in vegetation cover by fire, grazing, drought, or mowing as richer prairies can.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Tallgrass prairie has been largely eliminated from the landscape due to conversion to agricultural uses, elimination of the landscape-level processes that maintained the system, and introduction of exotic species. Estimates across the range of all tallgrass prairie systems are that 82-99.9% of tallgrass prairie has been eliminated (reported in Samson and Knopf 1994). This system occurs in a region that is generally very fertile and suitable for crops. The soils on which this system occurs are less fertile than the general region and so more of this system has escaped outright conversion to cropland than richer prairie systems. In addition to loss through direct conversion to crop fields, farmland development has fragmented the natural landscape and has eliminated the large-scale processes of fire and grazing by native ungulates that were necessary to maintain some examples of this system. Those examples have been invaded by woody species and non-native forbs and cool-season grasses. Many examples of this system can tolerate moderate grazing over time or heavy grazing for short periods, but when used as long-term pasture and with high stocking rates, the dominant native grasses are reduced or eliminated. Heavy haying or grazing, or if those are done consistently during the mid-summer months, negatively affects the dominant warm-season grasses by removing their biomass before they have flowered. Cool-season grasses and forbs which set seed earlier are favored by these activities. Native and non-native forbs, woody species, and C3 grasses increase in the absence of fire, especially when combined with grazing by livestock. Drier sites on hilltops or rocky soils persist longer but more mesic sites on lower slopes can be invaded by trees and shrubs after just several years without fire. Non-native grasses have been planted for forage on some sites, as well.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is found in the northern Midwest possibly ranging into Ontario.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Pinus banksiana, Populus tremuloides, Quercus ellipsoidalis, Quercus macrocarpa

Herb (field)

Andropogon gerardi, Bouteloua gracilis, Calamovilfa longifolia, Carex inops ssp. heliophila, Dalea purpurea var. purpurea, Hesperostipa spartea, Schizachyrium scoparium, Sisyrinchium montanum, Sporobolus heterolepis
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (12)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Thirteen-lined Ground SquirrelIctidomys tridecemlineatusG5

Reptiles (4)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
North American RacerColuber constrictorG5
Smooth GreensnakeOpheodrys vernalisG5
Dekay's BrownsnakeStoreria dekayiG5
Common GartersnakeThamnophis sirtalisG5

Butterflies & Moths (5)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Manitoba Oakworm MothAnisota manitobensisG2Q
Relict Dart MothDichagyris reliquaG2
Persius DuskywingErynnis persius persiusG5T1T3
Dakota SkipperHesperia dacotaeG2
Blazing Star Stem BorerPapaipema beerianaG3?

Insects (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
American Burying BeetleNicrophorus americanusG3
Antenna-waving WaspTachysphex pechumaniG2G3
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (7)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Manitoba Oakworm MothAnisota manitobensisG2Q--
Relict Dart MothDichagyris reliquaG2--
Persius DuskywingErynnis persius persiusG5T1T3--
Dakota SkipperHesperia dacotaeG2Threatened
American Burying BeetleNicrophorus americanusG3Threatened; Experimental population, non-essential
Blazing Star Stem BorerPapaipema beerianaG3?--
Antenna-waving WaspTachysphex pechumaniG2G3--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (7)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Andropogon gerardii - Calamagrostis canadensis Sand Wet MeadowG2 NatureServe
Andropogon gerardii - Sorghastrum nutans - Schizachyrium scoparium - Aletris farinosa GrasslandG2 NatureServe
Schizachyrium scoparium - Bouteloua curtipendula Gravel GrasslandG3 NatureServe
Schizachyrium scoparium - Bouteloua spp. - Hesperostipa spartea Gravel GrasslandG2 NatureServe
Schizachyrium scoparium - Danthonia spicata - Carex pensylvanica - (Viola pedata) Sand GrasslandG2 NatureServe
Schizachyrium scoparium - Hesperostipa spartea - Bouteloua (curtipendula, gracilis) Sand GrasslandG2 NatureServe
Schizachyrium scoparium - Sorghastrum nutans - Andropogon gerardii - Lespedeza capitata Sand GrasslandG3 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (9)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
IASNR
ILSNR
INSNR
MISNR
MNSNR
MOSNR
NDSNR
SDSNR
WISNR
Roadless Areas (4)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

North Dakota (4)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands21.2%1,250.19
VenloDakota Prairie Grasslands4.1%88.29
DurlerDakota Prairie Grasslands3.9%194.94
DelamereDakota Prairie Grasslands1.1%23.13
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.