Southern Appalachian Mountain Bald

EVT 7414Southern Appalachian Shrub Bald
CES202.294GNRShrubShrubland
Summary
This ecological system consists of dense herbaceous and shrubland communities in the highest elevational zone of the Southern Appalachians, generally above 1524 m (5000 feet) but occasionally to 1220 m (4000 feet), and at slightly lower elevations at its northern limit in Virginia and West Virginia, and in the Cumberland Mountains along the Virginia-Kentucky border. Vegetation consists either of dense shrub-dominated areas (heath balds) or dense herbaceous cover dominated by grasses or sedges (grassy balds). Heath balds are most often dominated by Rhododendron catawbiense, but substantial examples are also dominated by Rhododendron carolinianum, Kalmia latifolia, or a mixture of shrubs. One large example, dominated by Alnus viridis ssp. crispa, has been regarded as related to the heath balds, but is better treated separately due to much greater herbaceous diversity and coverage which is clearly different from typical heath balds. Grassy balds are characteristically dominated by Danthonia compressa, Deschampsia flexuosa, or Carex spp. Large areas have also become dominated by Rubus allegheniensis and/or Rubus canadensis, and by mixtures of native grasses with exotic pasture grasses. Most examples of grassy balds have some invading shrubs and trees, often dense enough to threaten the herbaceous vegetation. Heath balds may contain sparse stunted trees barely larger than the shrub canopy. The combination of high-elevation, non-wetland sites and dense herbaceous or shrub vegetation without appreciable rock outcrop conceptually distinguishes this system from all others in the Southern Appalachians. However, the widespread areas of degraded spruce-fir with grass and shrub cover and the invasion of grassy balds by trees blur the distinction somewhat.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Vegetation consists either of dense shrubs (heath balds or blackberry) or dense herbaceous cover dominated by grasses or sedges (grassy balds). Heath balds are most often dominated by Rhododendron catawbiense, but substantial examples are also dominated by Rhododendron carolinianum, Kalmia latifolia, or a mixture of other shrubs, including Prunus pensylvanica, Sorbus americana, Corylus cornuta, Gaylussacia baccata, Pieris floribunda, Vaccinium corymbosum, and Leiophyllum buxifolium. One large example, dominated by Alnus viridis ssp. crispa, is generally also regarded as being related to the heath balds. Grassy balds are characteristically dominated by Danthonia compressa, Carex pensylvanica, or other Carex spp. with forbs including Minuartia groenlandica, Paronychia argyrocoma, Saxifraga michauxii, Solidago glomerata, Solidago rugosa ssp. aspera, Sibbaldiopsis tridentata, and others. Large areas have also become dominated by Rubus allegheniensis, possibly with other brambles (Rubus canadensis, Rubus idaeus ssp. strigosus) and by mixtures of native grasses with exotic pasture grasses (e.g., Phleum pratense). Most examples of grassy balds have some invading shrubs and trees, often dense enough to threaten the herbaceous vegetation. Heath balds may contain sparse stunted trees barely larger than the shrub canopy.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system generally occurs at elevations above 1524 m (5000 feet) but may range as low as 1220 m (4000 feet) in the Southern Blue Ridge, with most examples from 1600-1780 m (5200-5800 feet) elevation (Mark 1958). It is also of limited extent above 1035 m (3400 feet) in the Cumberland Mountains along the Virginia-Kentucky border. It occurs on broad ridgetops and narrow spur ridges. Elevation and orographic effects (winds cooling as they rise to create increased condensation) make the climate cool and wet, with heavy moisture input from fog and cloud interception as well as high rainfall and snowfall. Convex slopes and exposure to wind offset the moisture input to some extent. The high peaks of the Southern Appalachians are not above the treeline; balds occur well below the elevation which would be a treeline today. Concentration of air pollutants has been implicated as an important anthropogenic stress in this elevational range in recent years. Soils range from shallow and rocky to fairly deep residual soils. Any kind of bedrock may be present, but most sites have erosion-resistant felsic igneous or metamorphic rocks, with slate and quartzite particularly frequent. Alder bald tends to occur on areas with thinner and rockier soils than nearby grassy bald (Brown 1941, J. Donaldson pers. comm. 2013), and is distinct from heath bald (Harshberger 1903b, Schafale 2012). The sites that support balds are not obviously different from similar sites that support spruce-fir forests, so the origin of the balds continues to be fodder for debate. Grazing and/or exposure to the elements may help maintain balds. Grass balds occur on less than one percent of the sites suitable for them (White and Sutter 1999b), and heath balds occur on 4-9% of the sites suitable for them (White et al. 2001). Forests occur on most of these sites, such as northern hardwood, high-elevation oak, or spruce-fir forests.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
The dynamics that maintain and that created the communities in this system have been a major topic of debate, so far without resolution. Most grassy bald occurrences show a strong tendency to succeed to shrub or forest vegetation under present conditions, suggesting that some important maintenance process has been lost. Northern hardwood, high-elevation oak, or spruce-fir forests may occur adjacent to balds. Grazing by native herbivores (elk and bison) and periodic fire have both been suggested as natural mechanisms to keep out woody vegetation. Others have suggested that all grassy balds are of anthropogenic origin and were never ecologically stable. The most definitive grassy balds have been documented as present at the time of the first European settlement, making documentation of their origin impossible. The presence of shade-intolerant endemic or disjunct herbaceous plant species in some suggests even greater age. These include Lilium grayi, Geum radiatum, Packera schweinitziana, and Houstonia purpurea var. montana. Some areas of the spruce-fir system degraded by a combination of logging, slash fires, and grazing resemble grassy balds, but most do not. The common practice of cattle grazing in grassy balds by early settlers has further obscured their presettlement character and evidence of presettlement disturbance processes.

Heath balds (not including alder balds) are more prone to disturbance by fire (Conkle 2004). However, heavy organic accumulations in the soil suggest great age for some. Most heath balds show limited tendency to succeed to forest, suggesting that the dense heath shrub layer is very competitive with tree seedlings. Spruce-fir forest stands which burned in historical times have not usually developed vegetation identical to heath balds.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
The lack of grazing, in combination with acid deposition, very high levels of nitrogen deposition, warmer winter temperatures, and higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide are factors which influence the loss of native graminoid species diversity, increases in weedy species and the transition of many grassy balds to tree- and shrub-dominated vegetation (Nodvin et al. 1995, Weiss 1999, Stevens et al. 2004, Boggs et al. 2005, Sturm et al. 2005, Post 2013). Over long periods of time in the past, native large grazing mammals (such as deer, elk, bison, and perhaps other now extinct large mammals) and domesticated livestock (cattle, sheep, and goats) influenced the vegetation by maintaining lower levels of vegetation biomass and ecosystem nutrient levels. Nutrient cycling in balds is faster when grazing animals are present.

Mechanical management (such as mowing or bush-hogging) presents different selection factors for plants compared to animal grazing or fire. There are differences regarding biomass accumulation (thatch buildup), sunlight, nutrient cycling, and plant selectivity. Mechanical management may, over time, create a markedly different community composition compared to historic species compositions.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system ranges from the Balsam Mountains and Great Smoky Mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee northward to Virginia and West Virginia. The system is also of limited extent in the Cumberland Mountains along the Virginia-Kentucky border. The current status in Georgia is open to question and the ecological system was apparently never extensive in any case. The distribution and classification of grassy balds and high-elevation pastures has been documented (Gersmehl 1970). Heath balds could be mapped separately from grassy balds as has been done for the Great Smoky Mountains (White et al. 2001). Alder bald can also be mapped separately, but it requires more field verification to map correctly.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Alnus viridis ssp. crispa, Diervilla lonicera, Kalmia latifolia, Pieris floribunda, Prunus pensylvanica, Rhododendron carolinianum, Rhododendron catawbiense, Rhododendron cumberlandense, Robinia hispida var. fertilis, Robinia hispida var. kelseyi, Robinia viscosa var. hartwigii, Rubus allegheniensis, Sorbus americana, Vaccinium erythrocarpum

Short shrub/sapling

Gaultheria procumbens

Herb (field)

Agrostis mertensii, Angelica triquinata, Botrychium lanceolatum var. angustisegmentum, Botrychium multifidum, Bromus ciliatus, Calamagrostis cainii, Carex appalachica, Carex cristatella, Carex misera, Carex oligosperma, Carex pallescens, Carex siccata, Castilleja coccinea, Chamaenerion angustifolium, Chelone lyonii, Crocanthemum bicknellii, Crocanthemum propinquum, Danthonia compressa, Epilobium ciliatum, Eutrochium maculatum, Gentiana austromontana, Geum geniculatum, Geum radiatum, Heracleum maximum, Houstonia purpurea var. montana, Hypericum graveolens, Hypericum mitchellianum, Krigia montana, Lilium grayi, Lilium philadelphicum var. philadelphicum, Milium effusum, Minuartia groenlandica, Packera schweinitziana, Prenanthes roanensis, Sibbaldiopsis tridentata, Spiranthes ochroleuca, Trichophorum cespitosum, Veratrum viride, Zigadenus leimanthoides

Nonvascular

Polytrichastrum appalachianum, Rhytidium rugosum, Scopelophila ligulata, Sphenolobus saxicola
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (13)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (4)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Red WolfCanis rufusG1
Snowshoe HareLepus americanusG5
Least WeaselMustela nivalisG5
Appalachian CottontailSylvilagus obscurusG4

Birds (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Vesper SparrowPooecetes gramineusG5

Reptiles (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Smooth GreensnakeOpheodrys vernalisG5

Butterflies & Moths (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Brown-lined Dart MothAnaplectoides brunneomediaG4
Tawny CrescentPhyciodes batesiiG3G4

Insects (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Divergent MelanoplusMelanoplus divergensG2G3
Serrulate MelanoplusMelanoplus serrulatusG1G3

Other (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
New England Sac SpiderClubiona spiralisG4
Eastern CougarPuma concolor couguarG5TXQ
Emerton's Ground Crab SpiderXysticus emertoniG5
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (21)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Cain's ReedgrassCalamagrostis cainiiG1--
Red WolfCanis rufusG1Endangered; Experimental population, non-essential
Wretched SedgeCarex miseraG3--
Appalachian GentianGentiana austromontanaG3--
Bent AvensGeum geniculatumG2--
Spreading AvensGeum radiatumG2Endangered
Mountain BluetHoustonia purpurea var. montanaG5T2Endangered
Mountain St. John's-wortHypericum graveolensG3--
Blue Ridge St. John's-wortHypericum mitchellianumG3--
False DandelionKrigia montanaG3--
Gray's LilyLilium grayiG1G2--
Divergent MelanoplusMelanoplus divergensG2G3--
Serrulate MelanoplusMelanoplus serrulatusG1G3--
Tawny CrescentPhyciodes batesiiG3G4--
Appalachian Haircap MossPolytrichastrum appalachianumG3--
Roan Mountain Rattlesnake-rootPrenanthes roanensisG3--
Eastern CougarPuma concolor couguarG5TXQDelisted
Fruitful LocustRobinia hispida var. fertilisG4T1T2--
Kelsey's LocustRobinia hispida var. kelseyiG4T1--
Hartweg's LocustRobinia viscosa var. hartwigiiG3T2--
Curled NotchwortSphenolobus saxicolaG3G4--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (15)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Alnus viridis ssp. crispa / Carex pensylvanica ShrublandG1 NatureServe
Aronia melanocarpa - Gaylussacia baccata / Carex pensylvanica ShrublandG1 NatureServe
Carex pensylvanica GrasslandG1 NatureServe
Danthonia compressa - (Sibbaldiopsis tridentata) GrasslandG1 NatureServe
Danthonia spicata - Solidago rugosa ssp. aspera Ruderal GrasslandGNA NatureServe
Kalmia latifolia - Gaylussacia (baccata, brachycera) Cumberland ShrublandG3 NatureServe
Kalmia latifolia - Rhododendron catawbiense - (Gaylussacia baccata, Pieris floribunda, Vaccinium corymbosum) ShrublandG2 NatureServe
Leiophyllum buxifolium Dwarf-shrublandG1 NatureServe
(Prunus pensylvanica, Sorbus americana) - Rubus spp. ShrublandGNR NatureServe
Rhododendron carolinianum - Rhododendron catawbiense - Leiophyllum buxifolium ShrublandG1 NatureServe
Rhododendron carolinianum ShrublandG2 NatureServe
Rhododendron catawbiense - Pieris floribunda ShrublandG1 NatureServe
Rhododendron catawbiense ShrublandG2 NatureServe
Rubus allegheniensis - Rubus canadensis / Carex pensylvanica ShrublandGNR NatureServe
Rubus canadensis - (Rubus idaeus ssp. strigosus) / Athyrium filix-femina - Solidago glomerata ShrublandGNR NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (6)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
GASNR
KYSNR
NCSNR
TNS1
VASNR
WVSNR
Roadless Areas (1)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

West Virginia (1)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest3.1%169.38
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.