Great Lakes Alkaline Conifer-Hardwood Swamp

EVT 7481Laurentian-Acadian Alkaline Conifer-Hardwood Swamp
CES201.575GNRTreeRiparian
Summary
These forested wetlands are found across northern New England and the upper Midwest and eastern to south-central Canada in basins or floodplains where higher pH and/or nutrient levels are associated with a rich flora. The substrate is typically mineral soil, but there may be some peat; often, there is an organic epipedon over mineral soil. Thuja occidentalis is a diagnostic canopy species and may dominate the canopy or be mixed with other conifers or with deciduous trees, most commonly Acer rubrum or Fraxinus nigra but also Tsuga canadensis, Larix laricina, and Betula alleghaniensis. Some examples can be almost entirely deciduous and dominated by Fraxinus nigra. Cornus sericea is a common shrub. The herb layer tends to be more diverse than in acidic swamps. Small open fenny areas may occur within the wetland. Seepage may influence parts of the wetland, but the hydrology is dominated by the basin setting.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system is typically found in basins or in floodplains with higher pH and/or nutrient levels. Groundwater typically keeps these sites saturated or nearly so through most of the growing season. Surface water, either overland flow or from nearby lakes and streams, often contributes to the hydrologic regime, especially through flooding in the spring or after heavy rains. Some movement of groundwater is important in maintaining the dominant trees in this system (Schwintzer 1981, Johnson and Booker 1983). Soils are mineral or muck (well-decomposed peat) with sometimes a thin layer of peat over mineral soil. There is often pronounced microtopographic relief between hummock/mounds created by tree boles and roots and rotting fallen logs and small depressions. These provide different microhabitats and contribute to the diversity of the system.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Cold, nutrient-rich and alkaline groundwater is important in maintaining this system. While water chemistry is similar to alkaline fens (Laurentian-Acadian Alkaline Fen (CES201.585)), this is a treed conifer, conifer-hardwood, or hardwood swamp versus a shrub- or graminoid-dominated fen, implying other factors beyond just water chemistry are important in creating differing vegetation (Schwintzer and Tomberlin 1982). Other factors are likely hydrologic regime (length and degree of soil saturation), site history, and degree of water movement. Patchy windthrow creates small-scale canopy gaps. These swamps often occur on structurally weak organic soils where trees root shallowly due to anaerobic conditions and are thus particularly susceptible to windthrow (Slaughter et al. 2007). Fire was very infrequent in this system but could occur in very dry periods. If other factors remain the same, this system could regenerate after fire since Thuja occidentalis and many other dominants grow well on exposed mineral soil (Johnson and Booker 1983). Beaver (Castor canadensis) flooding can also shape conifer-hardwood swamp structure, species composition, and direct successional pathways.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Alterations in wetland hydrology, logging, excessive deer browse, and physical destruction of sites are the prime threats to this system. Hydrologic alterations can occur due to ditching, road construction, or quarrying/mining that affect groundwater or surface waterflows into sites. Both reductions and increases in groundwater or surface water input can negatively affect this system. Partial drainage of a site can allow upland species to colonize. Increased surface waterflow can flood these swamps, changing both the hydrologic regime and water chemistry. This would likely lead to tree death and the development of an herbaceous marsh or shrub swamp. The proximity of roads has been shown to be negatively correlated with black ash health in Minnesota (Ward et al. 2006). Increased flooding can also transport sediment and higher nutrient loads. Deer prefer Thuja occidentalis stands as wintering yards and can have significant impacts on Thuja occidentalis and other species through over-browsing (Rooney 2001, Rooney et al. 2002). Logging can negatively impact this system through removal of trees, compaction of the soil, and creation of ruts. This system is slow to recover from perturbation so disturbance can accumulate over time. A serious threat to stands of this system that contain Fraxinus spp. is emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). This exotic beetle has seriously affected Fraxinus spp. trees in southern Michigan and is projected to continue to spread throughout the range of Fraxinus spp. in the Midwest and Northeast by 2045 (DeSantis et al. 2012). After prolonged infestation, mortality of Fraxinus spp. is nearly 100% (Herms et al. 2010). Invasive plant species that can reduce diversity and alter structure of conifer- hardwood swamps include Elaeagnus umbellata, Frangula alnus (= Rhamnus frangula), Lythrum salicaria, Phalaris arundinacea, and Phragmites australis (Kost et al. 2007).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
Scattered locations from New England and adjacent Canada west to the Great Lakes and northern Minnesota.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Acer rubrum, Fraxinus nigra, Larix laricina, Thuja occidentalis

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Cornus sericea, Rhamnus alnifolia

Herb (field)

Cypripedium parviflorum, Erythranthe michiganensis, Isoetes lacustris, Poa paludigena, Polemonium lacustre, Sarracenia purpurea ssp. venosa, Tiarella cordifolia

Nonvascular

Caloplaca parvula, Frullania selwyniana
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (11)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Star-nosed MoleCondylura cristataG5
Cinereus ShrewSorex cinereusG5

Reptiles (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Kirtland's SnakeClonophis kirtlandiiG2

Amphibians (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Wood FrogLithobates sylvaticusG5

Butterflies & Moths (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Comstock's Sallow MothFeralia comstockiG5
Jocose Sallow MothFeralia jocosaG5

Insects (4)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Michigan Bog GrasshopperAppalachia arcanaG2G3
Hungerford's Crawling Water BeetleBrychius hungerfordiG2
Hine's EmeraldSomatochlora hineanaG2G3
Douglas Stenelmis Riffle BeetleStenelmis douglasensisG1G3

Other (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Northern White Cedar LithophaneLithophane thujaeG3G4
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (11)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Michigan Bog GrasshopperAppalachia arcanaG2G3--
Hungerford's Crawling Water BeetleBrychius hungerfordiG2Endangered
a lichenCaloplaca parvulaG2--
Kirtland's SnakeClonophis kirtlandiiG2--
Michigan MonkeyflowerErythranthe michiganensisG1Endangered
Selwyn's ScalewortFrullania selwynianaG3--
Northern White Cedar LithophaneLithophane thujaeG3G4--
Bog BluegrassPoa paludigenaG3G4--
Great Lakes Jacob's-ladderPolemonium lacustreG1G2--
Hine's EmeraldSomatochlora hineanaG2G3Endangered
Douglas Stenelmis Riffle BeetleStenelmis douglasensisG1G3--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (11)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Acer rubrum - Fraxinus spp. - Betula papyrifera / Cornus canadensis SwampG4 NatureServe
Fraxinus nigra - Mixed Hardwoods - Conifers / Cornus sericea / Carex spp. SwampG4 NatureServe
Larix laricina / Alnus incana SwampG4 NatureServe
Larix laricina - Thuja occidentalis SwampG3 NatureServe
Populus tremuloides - Populus balsamifera - Mixed Hardwoods Lowland Wet ForestG5 NatureServe
Thuja occidentalis - Acer rubrum / Cornus sericea SwampGNR NatureServe
Thuja occidentalis - Betula alleghaniensis ForestG2 NatureServe
Thuja occidentalis - Fraxinus nigra SwampGNR NatureServe
Thuja occidentalis - (Picea mariana, Abies balsamea) / Alnus incana SwampG4 NatureServe
Thuja occidentalis / Sphagnum (girgensohnii, warnstorfii) SwampGNR NatureServe
Tsuga canadensis - Betula alleghaniensis SwampG3 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (7)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
MESNR
MISNR
MNSNR
NHSNR
NYSNR
VTSNR
WISNR
Roadless Areas (31)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Michigan (5)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Bear SwampHuron-Manistee National Forest61.9%980.37
FibreHiawatha National Forest42.3%1,271.16
DeliriumHiawatha National Forest34.2%26.37
Government IslandHiawatha National Forest15.3%13.95
Norwich Plains Revised Roadless AreaOttawa National Forest9.1%161.19

Minnesota (11)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Phantom LakeSuperior National Forest12.9%339.12
Mississippi CreekSuperior National Forest12.8%295.56
Tait LakeSuperior National Forest10.1%259.29
Kawishiwi Lake To SawbillSuperior National Forest9.2%569.25
Wood LakeSuperior National Forest8.8%21.15
Cabin CreekSuperior National Forest7.1%175.23
Little Indian SiouxSuperior National Forest6.7%27.18
Baker - Homer - Brule LakesSuperior National Forest6.3%171.72
Baldpate LakeSuperior National Forest6.2%12.15
Brule Lake - Eagle MountainSuperior National Forest5.9%295.83
Hegman LakesSuperior National Forest3.2%8.73

Vermont (1)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Griffith Lake 09084Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests2.0%14.49

Wisconsin (14)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
09162 - MooseChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest38.9%969.48
09166 - East TorchChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest37.4%704.43
09161 - Gates LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest34.8%740.7
09159 - ThornappleChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest25.1%988.47
09164 - Tea LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest22.6%503.64
09157 - Chase CreekChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest17.0%422.19
09012 - Round Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest11.3%170.19
09177 - Le Roy CreekChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest11.3%371.97
09186 - Shelp LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest11.1%12.69
09181 - FoursectionChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest7.0%58.05
09180 - Perch LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest6.6%63.63
09182 - Pentoga RoadChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest5.3%106.56
09011 - Flynn Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4.7%112.41
09154 - St. Peters DomeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest1.4%21.87
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.