Florida Highlands Freshwater Marsh

EVT 7489Floridian Highlands Freshwater Marsh
CES203.077GNRHerbRiparian
Summary
This system represents non-tidal marsh vegetation in the peninsula of Florida and in the Tallahassee area. These highland marshes occupy different types of depressions such as former lake basins, shallow peat-filled valleys, and zones around existing natural lakes. The marshes and the basins they occur within are unstable over time due to subsurface subsidence and drainage pattern changes. In some examples, surface waterflow is generally lacking due to the presence of limestone near the surface, but water levels have fluctuated greatly over time. Soils range from mucky surfaces to sandy loams or sands, but slowly permeable subsoils contribute to the presence of standing water for much of the year. The vegetation mosaic includes a range of mostly herbaceous plant communities that may be referred to as marshes, meadows, and prairies, collectively comprising a relatively diverse number of associations. Permanent water bodies support a range of submerged and floating aquatic species. Areas with approximately a meter of standing water tend to support dense stands of emergent herbaceous perennials, often in monospecific stands; species include Typha latifolia, Pontederia cordata, Nelumbo lutea, and others. Where there is less water (usually present only during wet season), more graminoid vegetation is present, with species such as Panicum hemitomon, Leersia hexandra, and others. With historic water level fluctuations, the vegetation mosaic has also changed, sometimes quite rapidly.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
A relatively diverse assemblage of vegetation is present, ranging from open water communities to emergent and graminoid marshes, and scattered shrublands. Placing all component associations is difficult due to a number of factors; the current list (12-02) is incomplete. In the absence of fire, portions of stands will become dominated by Salix caroliniana. If fire continues to be absent, these areas may succeed to Acer rubrum until a replacement fire or mechanical activity restores the marsh.

The concentric zones or bands of vegetation are related to length of the hydroperiod and depth of flooding. The outer, or driest, zone is often occupied by sparse herbaceous vegetation consisting of Aristida palustris, Rhynchospora microcarpa, Rhynchospora cephalantha, Rhynchospora tracyi, Rhynchospora filifolia, etc., Xyris elliottii, the subshrub Hypericum myrtifolium, and patches of Amphicarpum muehlenbergianum or Spartina bakeri. This sparse zone may be followed downslope by a sparse to dense zone of Hypericum fasciculatum, Stillingia aquatica, and scattered herbs, such as Xyris fimbriata, Eriocaulon compressum, Eriocaulon decangulare, Rhynchospora inundata, and Eleocharis baldwinii. The innermost, deepest zone is occupied by Panicum hemitomon, Pontederia cordata, Sagittaria lancifolia, or Cladium mariscus ssp. jamaicense (= Cladium jamaicense). Floating-leaved plants, such as Nymphaea odorata, may be found in open water portions of the marsh. Depending on depth and configuration, depression marshes can have varying combinations of these zones and species within each zone.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
These highland marshes occupy different types of depressions such as former lake basins, shallow peat-filled valleys, and zones around existing natural lakes (Kushlan 1990). The marshes and the basins they occur within are unstable over time due to subsurface subsidence and drainage pattern changes. Soils range from mucky surfaces to sandy loams or sands, but slowly permeable subsoils contribute to the presence of standing water for much of the year.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
In some examples, surface waterflow is generally lacking due to the presence of limestone near the surface, but water levels have fluctuated greatly over time (Patton and Judd 1986). In the absence of fire, portions of stands will become dominated by Salix caroliniana. If fire continues to be absent, these areas may succeed to Acer rubrum until a replacement fire or mechanical activity restores the marsh. Paynes Prairie is a large permanently protected example of highland marsh. Water-control structures allow the manipulation of water levels in Paynes Prairie to achieve ecosystem management goals (Kushlan 1990).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Drainage is the biggest threat to highland marshes, but many have been grazed by cattle and some have been mined for peat (Kushlan 1990). Nutrient-laden runoff from adjacent developed or agricultural land is a threat to many highland marshes (Kushlan 1990). Invasive exotic plants are also a threat.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is found in the Florida Peninsula and in the Tallahassee Hills/Valdosta Limesink area, possibly ranging into adjacent Georgia. See map in Kushlan (1990, p. 327).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Acer rubrum

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Cephalanthus occidentalis, Salix caroliniana

Short shrub/sapling

Hypericum fasciculatum

Herb (field)

Leersia hexandra, Panicum hemitomon, Pontederia cordata, Sagittaria lancifolia, Typha latifolia

Floating aquatic

Nelumbo lutea
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (6)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Round-tailed MuskratNeofiber alleniG2

Amphibians (4)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Southern Cricket FrogAcris gryllusG5
Pig FrogLithobates grylioG5
Southern Leopard FrogLithobates sphenocephalusG5
Eastern NewtNotophthalmus viridescensG5

Other Invertebrates (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Chicken TurtleDeirochelys reticulariaG5
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (1)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Round-tailed MuskratNeofiber alleniG2--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (11)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Andropogon (capillipes, glaucopsis) - Rhynchospora fascicularis var. fascicularis - Rhexia mariana Wet MeadowG2 NatureServe
Cephalanthus occidentalis / Limnobium spongia - Salvinia minima Shrub SwampG3 NatureServe
Cladium mariscus MarshGNR NatureServe
Nelumbo lutea - Pontederia cordata - Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani MarshG2 NatureServe
Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis - Peltandra virginica - Sagittaria lancifolia MarshG2 NatureServe
Panicum hemitomon - Pontederia cordata MarshG3 NatureServe
Pontederia cordata MarshG3 NatureServe
Salix caroliniana Coastal Plain Wet ShrublandG4 NatureServe
Salix caroliniana / Decodon verticillatus / Typha latifolia SwampG2 NatureServe
Spartina bakeri - Muhlenbergia filipes - Andropogon glomeratus - Rhynchospora colorata MarshG3 NatureServe
Typha latifolia - Pontederia cordata MarshG3 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (1)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
FLSNR
Roadless Areas (1)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Florida (1)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Farles PrairieOcala National Forest13.5%104.13
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.