Pacific Coast Tidal Marsh

EVT 7668Temperate Pacific Tidal Salt and Brackish Marsh
CES200.091GNRHerbRiparian
Summary
Intertidal salt and brackish marshes are found throughout the Pacific coast, from Kodiak Island and south-central Alaska to the central California coast. They are primarily associated with estuaries or coastal lagoons. Salt marshes are limited to bays and behind sand spits or other locations protected from wave action. Typically these areas form with a mixture of inputs from freshwater sources into coastal saltwater, so they commonly co-occur with brackish marshes. This is a small-patch system, confined to specific environments defined by ranges of salinity, tidal inundation regime, and soil texture. Patches usually occur as zonal mosaics of multiple communities. They vary in location and abundance with daily and seasonal dynamics of freshwater input from inland balanced against evaporation and tidal flooding of saltwater. Summer-dry periods result in decreased freshwater inputs from inland. Hypersaline environments within salt marshes occur in "salt pans" where tidal water collects and evaporates. Characteristic plant species include Distichlis spicata, Limonium californicum, Jaumea carnosa, Salicornia spp., Suaeda spp., and Triglochin spp. Low marshes are located in areas that flood every day and are dominated by a variety of low-growing forbs and low to medium-height graminoids, especially Salicornia depressa, Distichlis spicata, Bolboschoenus maritimus, Schoenoplectus americanus, Carex lyngbyei, and Triglochin maritima. In Alaska, tidal marshes are often dominated by near-monotypic stands of Carex lyngbyei, while the frequently inundated lower salt marshes are often dominated by Eleocharis palustris or Puccinellia spp. Other common species in Alaska include Hippuris tetraphylla, Plantago maritima, Cochlearia groenlandica, Spergularia canadensis, Honckenya peploides, or Glaux maritima. In the Cook Inlet and Alaska Peninsula, Carex ramenskii may be an associated species. High marshes are located in areas that flood infrequently and are dominated by medium-tall graminoids and low forbs, especially Deschampsia cespitosa, Argentina egedii, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis, and Symphyotrichum subspicatum, and in Alaska Poa eminens, Argentina egedii, Festuca rubra, and Deschampsia cespitosa. Transition zone (slightly brackish) marshes are often dominated by Typha spp. or Schoenoplectus acutus. Atriplex prostrata, Juncus mexicanus, Phragmites spp., Cordylanthus spp., and Lilaeopsis masonii are important species in California. The invasive weed Lepidium latifolium is a problem in many of these marshes. Rare plant species include Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Characteristic plant species include Distichlis spicata, Limonium californicum, Jaumea carnosa, Salicornia spp., Suaeda spp., and Triglochin spp. Low marshes are located in areas that flood every day and are dominated by a variety of low-growing forbs and low to medium-height graminoids, especially Salicornia depressa (= Salicornia virginica), Distichlis spicata, Bolboschoenus maritimus (= Scirpus maritimus), Schoenoplectus americanus (= Scirpus americanus), Carex lyngbyei, and Triglochin maritima. In Alaska, tidal marshes are often dominated by near-monotypic stands of Carex lyngbyei, while the frequently inundated lower salt marshes are often dominated by Eleocharis palustris or Puccinellia spp. Other common species in Alaska include Hippuris tetraphylla, Plantago maritima, Cochlearia groenlandica (= Cochlearia officinalis), Spergularia canadensis, Honckenya peploides, or Glaux maritima. In the Cook Inlet and Alaska Peninsula, Carex ramenskii may be an associated species. High marshes are located in areas that flood infrequently and are dominated by medium-tall graminoids and low forbs, especially Deschampsia cespitosa, Argentina egedii, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus), and Symphyotrichum subspicatum (= Aster subspicatus), and in Alaska Poa eminens, Argentina egedii, Festuca rubra, and Deschampsia cespitosa. Transition zone (slightly brackish) marshes are often dominated by Typha spp. or Schoenoplectus acutus. Atriplex prostrata (= Atriplex triangularis), Juncus mexicanus, Phragmites spp., Cordylanthus spp., and Lilaeopsis masonii are important species in California. The invasive weed Lepidium latifolium is a problem in many of these marshes. Rare plant species include Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
The frequency of tidal flooding and salinity vary widely. Soils are usually fine-textured and saturated. Tidal marshes have a limited distribution along the Gulf of Alaska and British Columbia coastline due to the topography and geomorphology of the coast, which features steep slopes and deep fjords and offers limited protection from wave action (National Wetlands Working Group 1988).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Tidal marsh zonal mosaics of multiple communities vary in location and abundance with daily and seasonal dynamics of freshwater input from inland balanced against evaporation and tidal flooding of saltwater. Summer-dry periods result in decreased freshwater inputs from inland. Hypersaline environments within salt marshes occur in "salt pans" where tidal water collects and evaporates. High marshes flood infrequently, mid marshes flood usually at higher tides and are usually brackish waters, while low marshes are inundated with saltwater daily.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Conversion of this type has commonly come from coastal development, road building, seawall construction, and cessation of freshwater inputs. Water diversions, ditches, roads, and human land uses in the contributing watershed can also have a substantial impact on the hydrological regime. Channel flow, tidal inundation, and fresh water discharges are disrupted by construction of seawalls, jetties, dikes, and dams. Direct alteration of hydrology (i.e., channeling, draining, damming) or indirect alteration (i.e., road building or removing vegetation on adjacent slopes) results in changes in amount and pattern of herbaceous wetland habitat. Human land uses both within the marshes as well as in adjacent upland areas have reduced connectivity between wetland patches and upland areas. Land uses in the contributing watershed have the potential to contribute excess nutrients into to the system which could lead to the establishment of non-native species and/or dominance of native increasing species. The invasive weeds, such as Spartina spp. are problems in many of these marshes. In general, excessive livestock or native ungulate use leads to a shift in plant species composition. Non-native plants or animals, which can have wide-ranging impacts, also tend to increase with these stressors. Although most wetlands receive regulatory protection at the national, state, and county level, many have been and continued to be filled, drained, grazed, and farmed extensively (Chappell and Christy 2004). Additionally, these regulations only pertain to the filling of these wetlands and do not regulate alterations in ecological conditions of these sites (WNHP 2011).

In the Pacific Northwest Regionally downscaled climate models project increases in annual temperature of, on average, 3.2°F by the 2040s. Projected changes in annual precipitation, averaged over all models, are small (+1 to +2 inches), but some models project wetter autumns and winters and drier summers. Increases in extreme high precipitation (falling as rain) in the western Cascades and reductions in snowpack are key projections from high-resolution regional climate models (Littell et al. 2009). Warmer temperatures will result in more winter precipitation falling as rain rather than snow throughout much of the Pacific Northwest, particularly in mid-elevation basins where average winter temperatures are near freezing. This change will result in: Less winter snow accumulation, Higher winter streamflows, Earlier spring snowmelt, Earlier peak spring streamflow and lower summer streamflows in rivers that depend on snowmelt (most rivers in the Pacific Northwest) (Littell et al. 2009).

Potential climate change effects could include: within San Francisco Bay, sea-level rise may completely obliterate these marshes as coastal development exists where the likely migration of this system would occur (SFBCDC 2011); reduction in freshwater inflows through the further reduction in summer flows (Littell et al. 2009); but models also predict increases in extreme high precipitation over the next half-century, particularly around Puget Sound (Littell et al. 2009), which may provide freshwater pulses that are intermittent, less predictable; drop in groundwater table; increased fire frequency due to warmer temperatures resulting in drier fuels the area burned by fire regionally is projected to double by the 2040s and triple by the 2080s (Littell et al. 2009); and some regional sea-level rise (IUCN 2013a). A recent analysis of sea-level rise for California indicates that by 2035-2064, projected ranges of global sea-level rise are ~6-32 cm above 1990 levels, with no discernable inter-scenario differences (Cayan et al. 2008a, as cited in PRBO Conservation Science 2011). "The combination of severe winter storms with sea-level rise and high tides would result in extreme sea levels that could expose the coast to severe flooding and erosion, damage to coastal structures and real estate, salinity intrusion into delta areas and coastal aquifers, and the degradation of the quality and reliability of freshwater supplies" (PRBO Conservation Science 2011).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is found throughout the Pacific coast, from Kodiak Island and south-central Alaska to the California coast.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Short shrub/sapling

Batis maritima

Herb (field)

Argentina egedii, Atriplex prostrata, Bolboschoenus maritimus, Carex lyngbyei, Carex ramenskii, Chloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimum, Chloropyron maritimum ssp. palustre, Cochlearia groenlandica, Deschampsia caespitosa, Distichlis spicata, Eleocharis palustris, Festuca rubra, Hesperevax sparsiflora var. brevifolia, Honckenya peploides, Jaumea carnosa, Juncus balticus var. littoralis, Juncus mexicanus, Lepidium latifolium, Lilaeopsis masonii, Limonium californicum, Lysimachia maritima, Monanthochloe littoralis, Plantago maritima, Poa eminens, Puccinellia nutkaensis, Salicornia depressa, Schoenoplectus acutus, Schoenoplectus americanus, Spergularia canadensis, Symphyotrichum subspicatum, Triglochin maritima

Submerged aquatic

Hippuris tetraphylla
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (6)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
California VoleMicrotus californicusG5
American MinkNeogale visonG5
Salt-marsh Harvest MouseReithrodontomys raviventrisG1G2

Birds (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Marsh WrenCistothorus palustrisG5
Savannah SparrowPasserculus sandwichensisG5
Ridgway's RailRallus obsoletusG3
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (6)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Saltmarsh Bird's-beakChloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimumG4?T1Endangered
Pt. Reyes Bird's-beakChloropyron maritimum ssp. palustreG4?T2--
Seaside EvaxHesperevax sparsiflora var. brevifoliaG4T3--
Mason's LilaeopsisLilaeopsis masoniiG2--
Ridgway's RailRallus obsoletusG3Endangered
Salt-marsh Harvest MouseReithrodontomys raviventrisG1G2Endangered
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (18)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Argentina egedii - Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Argentina egedii - Symphyotrichum subspicatum Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Bolboschoenus maritimus Tidal Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Calamagrostis nutkaensis - Argentina egedii - Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis Salt MarshG1 NatureServe
Carex lyngbyei - Argentina egedii Salt MarshG4 NatureServe
Carex lyngbyei - (Distichlis spicata, Triglochin maritima) Salt MarshG4 NatureServe
Carex lyngbyei Salt MarshG4 NatureServe
Deschampsia cespitosa - Argentina egedii Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Deschampsia cespitosa - (Carex lyngbyei, Distichlis spicata) Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Deschampsia cespitosa - Sidalcea hendersonii Salt MarshG2 NatureServe
Distichlis spicata - Frankenia salina - Jaumea carnosa Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Distichlis spicata - (Salicornia depressa) Salt MarshG4 NatureServe
Festuca rubra - (Argentina egedii) Salt MarshG1 NatureServe
Glaux maritima Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Salicornia (bigelovii, depressa) Tidal Salt MarshGNR NatureServe
Salicornia depressa - Distichlis spicata - Triglochin maritima - (Jaumea carnosa) Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Schoenoplectus (americanus, pungens) Tidal Salt MarshG3 NatureServe
Triglochin maritima - (Salicornia depressa) Salt MarshG4 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (4)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
AKSNR
CASNR
ORSNR
WASNR
Roadless Areas (1)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Oregon (1)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Umpqua SpitSiuslaw National Forest2.1%17.73
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.