Great Lakes Moist Sub-boreal Balsam Fir-Spruce Forest

EVT 9089Laurentian-Acadian Sub-boreal Mesic Balsam Fir-Spruce Forest
CES103.426GNRTreeConifer
Summary
This ecological system represents the mesic southern or subboreal eastern boreal forest, ranging from northwestern Ontario to eastern Canada's Atlantic provinces and extending into the U.S. in northeastern Minnesota, Isle Royale, and near-coastal areas of Lake Superior shores in northern Wisconsin and Michigan. The low-elevation forests are dominated by Picea glauca and Abies balsamea. Picea mariana is often present, along with occasional Pinus banksiana. Codominant boreal hardwoods include Populus tremuloides and Betula papyrifera. Northern hardwoods, such as Acer saccharum and Tilia americana are relatively minor. The shrub and herb layers are variable, decreasing as the percent conifer cover increases. Common shrub species include Acer spicatum, Alnus viridis, Corylus cornuta, Diervilla lonicera, and Lonicera canadensis. The moss layer ranges from discontinuous to continuous. These upland forests typically occur on loamy soils over bedrock in scoured bedrock uplands and loamy, rocky, or sandy soils on glacial moraines, till plains and outwash plains, and moisture conditions range from well-drained to somewhat poorly drained. Wetter sites may contain Alnus incana ssp. rugosa, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Equisetum spp. This is the matrix forest type in many parts of its range. This group may include earlier-successional patches, in which Populus spp. and Betula spp. are dominant or mixed with Picea and Abies, that will develop into spruce-fir forests. Blowdown with subsequent gap regeneration is the most frequent form of natural disturbance, with large-scale fires important at longer return intervals. Insect infestations, in particular by Choristoneura fumiferana (spruce budworm), also can impact this group.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Picea glauca typically dominates on drier sites or is codominant with Abies balsamea on more mesic sites. In some mesic to wet-mesic examples, Abies balsamea dominates. This group includes several successional stages, including earlier-successional patches in which Populus spp. and Betula spp. are dominant. Mid-successional stands often contain stands mixed with Picea and Abies, that will develop into spruce-fir forests. The shrub and herb layers are variable, decreasing as the percent conifer cover increases. Common shrub species include Acer spicatum, Corylus cornuta, Diervilla lonicera, and Lonicera canadensis. The composition and density of the herbaceous layer can vary among associations and location. Typically, Aralia nudicaulis, Eurybia macrophylla, Clintonia borealis, and Maianthemum canadense are common understory species. The moss layer ranges from discontinuous to continuous. Wetter sites may contain Alnus incana ssp. rugosa, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Equisetum spp. Additional diagnostic shrub and herb species of this subboreal type will be added through further analyses.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
These upland forests typically occur on loamy soils over bedrock in scoured bedrock uplands and loamy, rocky, or sandy soils on glacial moraines, till plains and outwash plains (Minnesota DNR 2003). Moisture conditions range from well-drained to somewhat poorly drained. Climate typically is characterized by cool, even temperatures, shorter growing season, and deep and sometimes severe winter snowfall. In the southern part of their range in the Great Lakes states, they occur along northern Great Lakes shorelines and on islands in Lake Superior. Cold temperate to boreal. Soils are typically neutral to acidic, shallow sandy, sandy-loam, or loamy-sand. Some examples occur on heavier, mesic silty or clay loams that are more alkaline in nature. Along Great Lakes shorelines, these soils overlay limestone or volcanic bedrock.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
These forests are affected by windthrow, insect defoliation, and infrequent fires. Forests closer to the Great Lakes shorelines occur on shallower soils and are more likely to experience more serious windthrow and snap-off of larger trees. Mammalian herbivory also can impact forest stands. Selective herbivory by white-tailed deer and moose (Alces americanus) can alter the composition and structure and favor browse-tolerant species such as Picea glauca. These forests typically regenerate from gap-phase dynamics.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system ranges in Canada from northwestern Ontario (possibly eastern Manitoba) to eastern Canada's Atlantic provinces and extending into the U.S. in northeastern Minnesota, Isle Royale, and near-coastal areas of Lake Superior shores in northern Wisconsin and Michigan. Its range westward is marked by a shift towards greater Picea glauca dominance and lower Abies balsamea dominance.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
State Conservation Ranks (3)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
MISNR
MNSNR
WISNR
Roadless Areas (31)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Michigan (3)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Government IslandHiawatha National Forest70.6%64.35
Norwich Plains Revised Roadless AreaOttawa National Forest20.2%356.76
FibreHiawatha National Forest3.1%94.5

Minnesota (15)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
South Kawishiwi RiverSuperior National Forest65.7%36.45
Cabin CreekSuperior National Forest59.6%1,463.67
Brule Lake - Eagle MountainSuperior National Forest49.9%2,500.56
Tait LakeSuperior National Forest49.4%1,266.93
Baker - Homer - Brule LakesSuperior National Forest48.7%1,323.45
Mississippi CreekSuperior National Forest46.8%1,082.16
Wood LakeSuperior National Forest45.3%109.08
Kawishiwi Lake To SawbillSuperior National Forest44.9%2,780.55
Big IslandChippewa National Forest35.7%3.6
Hegman LakesSuperior National Forest33.0%89.73
Phantom LakeSuperior National Forest30.7%810.81
Little Indian SiouxSuperior National Forest29.7%119.52
Elmwood IslandChippewa National Forest23.0%3.78
Baldpate LakeSuperior National Forest15.9%31.32
Moose Portage IIISuperior National Forest12.7%4.23

Wisconsin (13)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
09181 - FoursectionChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest6.7%55.17
09012 - Round Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest6.3%94.77
09177 - Le Roy CreekChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest5.3%175.59
09157 - Chase CreekChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4.5%111.6
09182 - Pentoga RoadChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4.3%87.21
09180 - Perch LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4.3%41.22
09011 - Flynn Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4.2%101.7
09164 - Tea LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest3.4%76.77
09166 - East TorchChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest2.6%48.24
09161 - Gates LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest2.0%42.12
09162 - MooseChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest1.5%38.34
09154 - St. Peters DomeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest1.5%24.75
09159 - ThornappleChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest1.3%52.83
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.