Southern Appalachian Dark Rock Glade and Barrens

EVT 9233Southern and Central Appalachian Mafic Glade and Barrens
CES202.348GNRTreeConifer-hardwood
Summary
This Southern and Central Appalachian system consists of vegetation associated with shallow soils over predominantly mafic bedrock, usually with significant areas of rock outcrop. Bedrock includes a variety of igneous and metamorphic rock types such as greenstone and amphibolite. These areas support a patchy mosaic of open woodland and grassy herbaceous vegetation sometimes with a predominant woody short-shrub community present.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Vegetation
Vegetation is a fine mosaic of different physiognomies, with open woodland and grassy herbaceous vegetation or short shrubs predominating. Some instances may have closed canopies of small trees or large shrubs, but no examples have large canopy trees with a closed canopy. Bare rock outcrops are usually present in a minority of the area. The canopy species are species tolerant of dry, shallow soils, most commonly Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus), Pinus spp., and Juniperus virginiana var. virginiana. Basic examples may also have Carya glabra, Fraxinus americana, and other species abundant. Shrubs may be dense, with species determined by soil chemistry. The herb layer is usually fairly dense and dominated by grasses, both in treeless areas and beneath open canopy. An abundant forb component is also usually present, especially in the more basic examples. The forbs include species characteristic of other rock outcrops and grassland species, with a smaller number of forest species present. Other species that may be present include the woody plants Carya tomentosa (= Carya alba), Diervilla lonicera, Gaylussacia baccata, Kalmia latifolia, Aronia melanocarpa (= Photinia melanocarpa), Physocarpus opulifolius, and Quercus stellata; and herbaceous plants Aletris farinosa, Allium cernuum, Allium cuthbertii, Carex pensylvanica, Croton michauxii var. ellipticus (= Croton willdenowii), Cheilanthes tomentosa, Deschampsia flexuosa, Helianthus divaricatus, Hylotelephium telephioides, Muhlenbergia sobolifera, Packera paupercula, Phacelia dubia, Pycnanthemum tenuifolium, Saxifraga michauxii, Schizachyrium scoparium, Selaginella rupestris, Sibbaldiopsis tridentata, Solidago simplex var. randii, Solidago ulmifolia, Sorghastrum nutans, and Thalictrum revolutum.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system occurs on upper to mid slopes, usually on gentle to moderate slopes but occasionally steeper. The ground is mostly shallow soil over bedrock, usually with significant areas of rock outcrop. The rock usually has few fractures but may have a pitted or irregular surface. This rock structure supports more extensive and deeper soil development than in Southern Appalachian Granitic Dome (CES202.297), but has few of the crevices and deeper rooting sites available in Southern Appalachian Rocky Summit (CES202.327). Micro-scale soil depth and presence of seepage are important factors in determining the vegetation patterns. Shallow soil, unable to support a closed tree canopy, separates this system from forest systems. Bedrock includes a variety of igneous and metamorphic rock types. Some examples are on mafic substrates such as amphibolite, some are on felsic rock such as granitic gneiss but have flora that suggests a basic influence, and a few occur on felsic rocks and are clearly acidic. Rock or soil chemistry appears to be the most important factor affecting different associations on sites that have the physical structure to belong to this system. Elevation may also be an important factor causing variation.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
The dynamics of this system are complex and poorly understood. These sites, with their shallow soil, would likely be affected by fire, drought, and windstorms. Severe droughts kill tree saplings growing in cracks and potholes, helping to retain the open character of the glades (Quarterman et al. 1993). Fire may be an important influence on the vegetation structure, and may function to keep the vegetation more open in the long run. The patchy distribution of vegetation in examples of this system may limit fire intensity. These glades do not appear to be undergoing the kind of cyclic succession that has been described for granitic domes, but some balance of soil accumulation and destruction may be occurring on a longer term or coarser scale. There may be a zonation or patchiness to glade/barren vegetation, with different zones that may be identified by their characteristic plant species (Quarterman et al. 1993). These zones are apparently relatively stable, with woody plant encroachment evident only in relation to the invasion of shrubs and trees into potholes or crevices where soil accumulates more rapidly. It is possible that the slightly irregular curved surface of some examples represents a late stage in the weathering of old exfoliation surfaces that once supported granitic domes, but most known examples are not spatially associated with existing granitic domes.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
The most critical anthropogenic threat to native glade and rock outcrop vegetation is their conversion to human-created land uses, including residential development, quarries, industrial development, infrastructure development, and others (TNC 1996c). Rocky glades and outcrops may be the last areas to be converted to development and housing due to the unsuitability of the soil to septic tanks. Other common threats and stressors include both the removal of disturbance and the effects of inappropriate or too intensive or constant disturbance. These areas often attract off-road-vehicle use.

Fire plays a critical role in the maintenance of most native grasslands, which may surround or interfinger with rocky glades. In the absence of fire and appropriate disturbance in the landscape matrix, the areas with the most shallow soils (e.g., the glades) may be the only open areas persisting in a series of woody shrub thickets. Without fire or other disturbance, Juniperus species, Quercus species and other hardwoods quickly regenerate, shading out the herbaceous plants, and leading to a shift in species diversity from the ground layer to the upper woody strata, resulting in a net loss of species diversity (Taft et al. 1995). At sites with intermediate levels of woody encroachment, a signal of restoration potential is an inverse relationship between woody stem density and ground layer species richness (Taft 2009). More information is needed about the particular appropriate ranges of fire-return times and intensities in the various systems. The actual rocky or gravelly glades may not support sufficient fuel to consistently carry fire, but in the adjacent or interpenetrating perennial grasslands, occasional surface fire will retard woody plant encroachment and help maintain herbaceous diversity, as will, to an extent, grazing or mowing (Duffey et al. 1974). In addition to occasional fire, periodic drought may also be important in regulating woody plant encroachment into native grasslands. It is believed that these native glade-grassland systems have evolved under a combined system of grazing, drought, and periodic fire (Duffey et al. 1974, Estes et al. 1979, Noss 2013).

Fragmentation of glades and their accompanying native grasslands, barrens, and savannas occurs with the development of housing and industrial sites, as well as the construction of roads, which not only function as firebreaks, limiting the areas that can be burned with one ignition event, but which make it more difficult to mitigate the effects of smoke on human populations and their activities. In many cases, these glade-grassland systems were once extensive on the landscape, but have now been reduced to scattered and isolated remnant patches, presenting conservation and management challenges. These disturbances have had damaging effects on fragile soil profiles and plant and animal species. These combined impacts also foster a trend toward biotic homogenization, which results in the gradual replacement of ecologically distinct natural communities by those dominated by weedy generalists (McKinney and Lockwood 1999). In other cases, the grassland and/or glade system naturally occurs in small isolated patches occurring within an otherwise forested matrix.

Many glade sites, have been used as pastures, or as dumping grounds for trash (Quarterman et al. 1993). The spread of invasive exotic plants (particularly Ligustrum species and Lonicera species shrubs, as well as Lespedeza cuneata, Ailanthus altissima, and Albizia julibrissin) will fundamentally alter the character of glades and their accompanying native grasslands. Some of these exotics are allelopathic, thereby presenting a greater threat to native species (N. Murdock pers. comm.). Opportunistic native increaser plant species (e.g., Juniperus virginiana) can also shade out light-requiring herbaceous plants (TNC 1996c).

The most significant potential climate change effects over the next 50 years include shifts to dramatically drier or moister climate regimes. A cooler and wetter regime would most likely accelerate the trend toward woody plant encroachment, removing drought as a factor in its inhibition. A moderately drier regime during the growing season could favor the characteristic native grasses and forbs, which are adapted to these conditions better than the generalists. An extremely drier regime for an extended period of time could ultimately have negative effects.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system occurs in scattered clusters in the Southern Blue Ridge and adjacent portions of the upper Piedmont and Central Appalachians.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Carya glabra, Fraxinus americana, Juniperus virginiana, Quercus prinus

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Amelanchier sanguinea, Berberis canadensis, Diervilla lonicera, Quercus prinoides

Herb (field)

Anemone caroliniana, Arabis patens, Bromus ciliatus, Castilleja coccinea, Clematis ochroleuca, Coreopsis delphiniifolia, Corydalis micrantha ssp. micrantha, Cuscuta coryli, Deschampsia caespitosa, Echinacea laevigata, Euphorbia commutata, Gentianopsis crinita, Hylotelephium telephioides, Liatris aspera, Lilium philadelphicum var. philadelphicum, Melanthium woodii, Minuartia uniflora, Muhlenbergia glomerata, Packera millefolium, Packera plattensis, Parthenium auriculatum, Penstemon smallii, Phacelia dubia, Poa saltuensis, Potentilla arguta, Pycnanthemum verticillatum, Rudbeckia triloba var. pinnatiloba, Sabatia capitata, Salvia urticifolia, Sedum glaucophyllum, Sibbaldiopsis tridentata, Tragia urticifolia, Triantha glutinosa, Trichostema setaceum, Zigadenus leimanthoides

Nonvascular

Macrocoma tenuis ssp. sullivantii
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (17)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Red WolfCanis rufusG1
Least WeaselMustela nivalisG5
Southern Appalachian WoodratNeotoma floridana haematoreiaG5T4Q

Birds (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Chuck-will's-widowAntrostomus carolinensisG5
Eastern Whip-poor-willAntrostomus vociferusG5

Reptiles (8)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Green AnoleAnolis carolinensisG5
Eastern MilksnakeLampropeltis triangulumG5
Southeastern Five-lined SkinkPlestiodon inexpectatusG5
Dekay's BrownsnakeStoreria dekayiG5
Southeastern Crowned SnakeTantilla coronataG5
Common GartersnakeThamnophis sirtalisG5
Mountain EarthsnakeVirginia valeriae pulchraG5T3T4
Eastern Smooth EarthsnakeVirginia valeriae valeriaeG5T5

Butterflies & Moths (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Mottled DuskywingErynnis martialisG3
Tawny CrescentPhyciodes batesiiG3G4

Insects (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Divergent MelanoplusMelanoplus divergensG2G3

Other (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Eastern CougarPuma concolor couguarG5TXQ
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (15)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Spreading RockcressArabis patensG3--
American BarberryBerberis canadensisG3G4--
Red WolfCanis rufusG1Endangered; Experimental population, non-essential
Larkspur TickseedCoreopsis delphiniifoliaG3?--
Smooth Purple ConeflowerEchinacea laevigataG2G3Threatened
Mottled DuskywingErynnis martialisG3--
Divergent MelanoplusMelanoplus divergensG2G3--
Blue Ridge RagwortPackera millefoliumG3--
Glade Wild QuinineParthenium auriculatumG3G4--
Small's BeardtonguePenstemon smalliiG3--
Tawny CrescentPhyciodes batesiiG3G4--
Eastern CougarPuma concolor couguarG5TXQDelisted
Pinnate-lobe Black-eyed-SusanRudbeckia triloba var. pinnatilobaG5T3--
Appalachian Rose-gentianSabatia capitataG2--
Mountain EarthsnakeVirginia valeriae pulchraG5T3T4--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (12)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Aronia melanocarpa - Gaylussacia baccata / Carex pensylvanica ShrublandG1 NatureServe
Carya (glabra, tomentosa) - Fraxinus americana - (Juniperus virginiana) Open Woodland NatureServe
Diervilla lonicera - Solidago simplex var. randii - Deschampsia flexuosa - Hylotelephium telephioides - Saxifraga michauxii Grassland NatureServe
Fraxinus americana - Carya glabra / Muhlenbergia sobolifera - Helianthus divaricatus - Solidago ulmifolia Woodland NatureServe
Fraxinus americana / Physocarpus opulifolius / Carex pensylvanica - Allium cernuum - (Phacelia dubia) Wooded Grassland NatureServe
Juniperus virginiana - Fraxinus americana / Carex pensylvanica - Cheilanthes lanosa Open WoodlandG2 NatureServe
(Kalmia latifolia, Physocarpus opulifolius) / Schizachyrium scoparium - Thalictrum revolutum - Sibbaldiopsis tridentata Shrub Grassland NatureServe
(Pinus palustris) / Prunus umbellata - Rhus aromatica / Piptochaetium avenaceum - Schizachyrium scoparium Scrub Grassland NatureServe
Quercus stellata / Schizachyrium scoparium - Andropogon gerardii - Pycnanthemum tenuifolium - Packera paupercula Wooded Grassland NatureServe
Schizachyrium scoparium - Sorghastrum nutans - Aletris farinosa - Packera paupercula Grassland NatureServe
Selaginella rupestris - Croton michauxii var. ellipticus - Cheilanthes tomentosa - (Allium cuthbertii) Granitic Glade Vegetation NatureServe
Selaginella rupestris - Schizachyrium scoparium - Hylotelephium telephioides - Allium cernuum Mafic Glade NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (4)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
MDSNR
NCSNR
TNSNR
VASNR
Roadless Areas (3)

Inventoried Roadless Areas where this ecosystem is present, identified from LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type spatial analysis. Coverage indicates the proportion of each area occupied by this ecosystem type.

Georgia (1)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Ben GapChattahoochee National Forest5.4%28.17

North Carolina (1)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Linville Gorge AdditionPisgah National Forest1.9%21.33

Virginia (1)

AreaForestCoverageHectares
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest3.9%74.7
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.