Eutrema penlandii

Rollins

Mosquito Range Mustard

G2Imperiled Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
HighThreat Impact
Penland alpine fen mustard (Eutrema penlandii). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.137410
Element CodePDBRA18020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusNonstandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderCapparales
FamilyBrassicaceae
GenusEutrema
Synonyms
Eutrema edwardsii ssp. penlandii(Rollins) W.A. Weber
Other Common Names
Penland Alpine Fen Mustard (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Treated as a species by Rollins (1993) and by Kartesz (1994 and 1999), but included in Eutrema edwardsii by Weber and Wittmann (2012) and FNA (2010). However, U.S. FWS (2019) concludes, "Mastin et al. (2018) published genetic evidence demonstrating that E. penlandii and E. edwardsii have a progenitor-derivative relationship. Chromosome counts, flow cytometry, and population genetic data have revealed that E. edwardsii is an allopolyploid species comprising tetraploid, hexaploid, and octoploid populations. Novel alleles found in the Mosquito Range mustard reveal that E. penlandii is one of two or three diploid progenitors of E. Edwardsii. The two may be discriminated based on novel alleles and patterns of genetic diversity (Hardwick 1997; Bruederle and Hardwick 1998; Hardwick et al in prep), differences in vegetative and reproductive morphology (Fayette and Bruederle 2001; Regier et al in prep; Bruederle, 2020 pers. comm.)), and chromosome counts, which was summarized by Bruederle (2016). Based on the aforementioned, we maintain that the Mosquito Range mustard is a unique and distinct species."
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2020-02-27
Change Date2020-02-27
Edition Date2020-02-27
Edition AuthorsDoyle, G. (2006), rev. J. Handwerk, and S. Panjabi (2006), rev. J. Handwerk (2010), rev. L. Oliver (2011), rev. J. Handwerk (2012),rev. J. Handwerk (2014); rev. Handwerk, J. (2020)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent100-250 square km (about 40-100 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Endemic to a 40 km stretch of the Continental Divide in Colorado where the Divide trends east-west, rather than north-south, and where a unique set of habitat conditions exist, including perennially wet, primarily calcareous soils at very high elevations. The occurrences are in close proximity to mines and are threatened by mineral extraction activities, especially ditching, which could alter the hydrology of the area, and drainage from mine tailings, which could acidify the sites. Recreational use is also a threat, especially from ORVs and hikers. This taxon represents one of only two species of Eutrema in North America, and the only Eutrema in the lower 48 states. This species is disjunct by 1000 miles to its nearest relative Eutrema edwardsii, an arctic circumpolar species.
Range Extent Comments
Eutrema penlandii is a Colorado (U.S.A.) endemic known from Lake, Park and Summit counties. It is limited to a 40 km stretch of the Continental Divide, above 12,000 feet. Range extent is estimated at 242 square kilometers, calculated in GeoCAT by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (2020).
Occurrences Comments
There are 24 documented occurrences as of 2020; two of the occurrences are considered historical.
Threat Impact Comments
The primary threats to Eutrema penlandii at this time appear to be hydrological alterations and mining. Activities that would impact surface water flow include anything from roads, trails, ruts from vehicles, footpaths, ruts, mining construction or any activity of this nature that draws water away from the peat fen habitat (USFWS no date, Plant Profile). Mineral extraction could have a significant impact on this taxon. The mining companies contested the Mosquito Range Research Natural Area; mining remains a big threat to plants in the Mosquito Range because of the thousands of mining claims - a change in the economic viability of mining could cause mining to increase there (Colorado Natural Heritage Program 2004). Also, as mentioned ditching associated with mining could affect the delicate hydrology and could cause water pollution, both of which would adversely affect the species. Recreational use is also a threat including trampling by ORV's and hikers. Any activity that directly or indirectly alters the surface or ground water supply and alters the wetland habitat required by this species could pose a significant threat. In one occurrence, Jeeps and ATVs were parked directly on top of Eutrema plants (Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Element Occurrence data). The impacts of this seemingly benign activity can destroy large areas of this sensitive bog habitat. Another threat to this species are random events that might wipe-out large parts of the already small populations, such as fungal blight, drought, or insect infestations (USFWS no date, Plant Profile). On a larger scale, global warming potentially threatens this and other alpine species.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Small herbaceous perennial from 1 to 15 cm tall. Plants are glabrous and have clusters of white, four petaled flowers at the top of each stem. Leaves are dimorphic: shiny and oval along the stem, and shovel-shaped at the base of the plant. Fruit are elliptical, with styles so small they are barely evident (Spackman et al. 1997).

Habitat

This species occurs in the alpine tundra above 3700 m elevation and downslope from snowfields, which provide melt water all summer. The plants are usually found on south- and east-facing flat to gently sloping benches with steep walls that provide some protection from snow-melting winds. On these wet benches, the plants are found in moss-covered peat fens, bogs, or marshes. Most of the populations are on limestone substrates, which have created unusually basic wetland soils, but it is not certain that the species is restricted to calcareous substrates.
Terrestrial Habitats
Alpine
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDBog/fen
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
ColoradoS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
3 - Energy production & miningLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
3.2 - Mining & quarryingLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - low
11.3 - Temperature extremesLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - low

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (2)
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
References (12)
  1. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. and S. I. Warwick. 2005a. A synopsis of <i>Eutrema</i>. Harvard Papers in Botany 10 (2): 129-135.
  2. Colorado Native Plant Society. 1989. Rare plants of Colorado. Rocky Mountain Nature Association, Colorado Native Plant Society, Estes Park, Colorado. 73 pp.
  3. Colorado Natural Heritage Program. 2004. The First Annual Colorado Rare Plant Symposium: Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plants of Colorado. Symposium Minutes.
  4. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2010. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 7. Magnoliophyta: Salicaceae to Brassicaceae. Oxford University Press, New York. xxii + 797 pp.
  5. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  6. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  7. Rollins, R.C. 1993a. The Cruciferae of continental North America: Systematics of the mustard family from the Arctic to Panama. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. 976 pp.
  8. Roy, G., S. Kelso, and A. Tonnesen. 1993. Habitat characteristics of <i>Eutrema penlandii </i>(Brassicaceae) in the Colorado Rockies: A study of alpine endemism. Madroño 40(4):236-245.
  9. Spackman, S., B. Jennings, J. Coles, C. Dawson, M. Minton, A. Kratz, and C. Spurrier. 1997. Colorado rare plant field guide. Prepared for Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by Colorado Natural Heritage Program.
  10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019. Species Biological Report for Mosquito Range mustard (<i>Eutrema penlandii</i>). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Colorado Ecological Services Field Grand Junction. Denver, Colorado. 46 pages
  11. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1993. The plant <i>Eutrema penlandii</i> (Penland alpine fen mustard) determined to be a threatened species. Federal Register 58(143): 40539-40547.
  12. Weber, W.A., and R.C. Wittmann. 2012a. Colorado Flora, Eastern Slope, a field guide to the vascular plants, fourth edition. University of Colorado Press. Boulder, Colorado. 555 pp.