Fraxinus quadrangulata

Michx.

Blue Ash

G4Apparently Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Critically endangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.134797
Element CodePDOLE040F0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNCritically endangered
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderScrophulariales
FamilyOleaceae
GenusFraxinus
Other Common Names
blue ash (EN) Frêne anguleux (FR) Frêne bleu (FR)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
In a recent phylogenetic analysis Wallander (2008) determined that Fraxinus quadrangulata and Fraxinus anomala are united with Fraxinus dipetala in the section Dipetalae.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-06-29
Change Date2021-06-29
Edition Date2021-06-29
Edition AuthorsTreher (2021)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Fraxinus quadrangulata occurs in the east-central U.S.A. from western Ohio to Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois; south to northern Alabama, Missouri and northern Arkansas, and western Kansas. The primary threat to this species is mortality and reduced regeneration associated with the Emerald Ash Borer, a phloem-feeding beetle native to Asia. The Conservation Status of this species should be reviewed frequently to detect changes in the impact of the borer.
Range Extent Comments
Fraxinus quadrangulata occurs in the east-central U.S.A. from western Ohio to Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois; south to northern Alabama, Missouri and northern Arkansas, and western Kansas. There are scattered occurrences at the perimeter of the species range (Ontario, Georgia, Virginia, West Virginia, and Oklahoma).
Threat Impact Comments
The primary threat to this species is mortality and reduced regeneration associated with the Emerald Ash Borer, a phloem-feeding beetle native to Asia. The invasive Emerald Ash Borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, 1888, was introduced in Detroit, Michigan from Asia in the 1990s (Haack et al. 2002) and has since caused rangewide declines in ash populations. The beetles feed on the leaves and lay their eggs in crevices of the bark. Larvae feed in the vascular structures during the summer, creating serpentine shaped galleries. They typically prepupae overwinter in the trees with pupation lasting from April-May, when adults emerge. Emerald Ash borers cause significant damage to the foliage of the tree and the vascular tissues. The tree will typically die within two years of the infestation (Poland and McCullough 2006). Within six years of an infestation, up to 99% mortality was observed in ash species (Knight et al. 2013, Klooster et al. 2014, McCullough et al. 2008). Tree saplings with 2 or more cm dbh can be infested (McCullough et al. 2008, Aubin et al. 2015). While an infested tree may push out root sprouts for one to two years, the tree usually dies (Klooster et al. 2014). The mass mortality of reproductively mature plants that would replenish the seed bank and the relatively short persistence in the seed bank (2-3(7) years) (Klooster et al. 2014), causes concern about the species ability to regenerate post-infestation. However, studies in southeastern Michigan report a lesser impact on Blue Ash than other species, with declines of 7.1% and 31.6% in the overstory. In addition, the species at sites in southeastern Michigan show abundant regeneration. (Spei 2016). Other studies in the region noted similar rates of decline, between 20% and 40% for Blue Ash (Tanis and McCullough 2012). Blue ash appears to be less susceptible to EAB; the bark thickness of this species is close to the maximum thickness that EAB can penetrate with its ovipositor (Peterson 2014).
Ecology & Habitat
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS2Yes
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
TennesseeSNRYes
GeorgiaS2Yes
ArkansasSNRYes
IndianaS3Yes
MississippiS1Yes
MissouriSNRYes
WisconsinS1Yes
KentuckyS5Yes
MinnesotaSNRYes
IowaS1Yes
OklahomaS1Yes
MichiganSNRYes
AlabamaSNRYes
West VirginiaS1Yes
VirginiaS3Yes
KansasS2Yes
IllinoisS2Yes
OhioSNRYes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.2 - Named speciesPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
Arkansas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Clifty CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,963
References (15)
  1. Emerald Ash Borer Information Network. 2020. Available. Online: www.emeraldashborer.info/index.php (accessed 9 Apr 2020).
  2. Haack, R., E. Jendek, H. Liu, K. Marchant, T. Petrice, T. Poland, and H. Ye. 2002. The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsletter of the Michigan Etymological Society 47(3-4):1-5.
  3. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  4. Klooster, W., D. Herms, K. Knight, C. Herms, D. McCullough, A. Smith, K. Gandhi, and J. Cardina. 2014. Ash (<i>Fraxinus</i> spp.) mortality, regeneration, and seed bank dynamics in mixed hardwood forests following invasion by emerald ash borer (<i>Agrilus planipennis</i>). Biological Invasions 16: 859-873.
  5. Knight, K., J. Brown, and R. Long. 2013. Factors affecting the survival of ash (<i>Fraxinus</i> spp.) trees infested by emerald ash borer (<i>Agrilus planipennis</i>). <i>Biological Invasions</i> 15: 371-383.
  6. Little, E.L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agriculture Handbook No. 541. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C. 375 pp.
  7. McCullough, D.G., N.F. Schneeberger, and S.A. Katovich. 2008. Emerald ash borer pest alert. NA-PR-02-04. USDA Forest Service.
  8. <p>Aubin, I., F. Cardou, K. Ryall, D. Kreutzweiser, and T. Scarr. 2015. Ash regeneration capacity after emerald ash borer (EAB) outbreaks: Some early results. <i>The Forestry Chronicle</i> 91(3): 291-298.</p>
  9. Peterson, D. 2014. Suitability of blue ash (<i>Fraxinus quadrangulata</i>) and green ash (<i>F. pennsylvanica</i>) to emerald ash borer (<i>Agrilus planipennis</i>) and its larval parasitoid <i>Tetrastichus </i><i>planipennisi</i>. <em>Open Access Theses</em>. 459.
  10. Poland, T. M., and D. G. McCullough. 2006. Emerald Ash Borer: Invasion of the urban forest and and the threat to North America's ash resource. Journal of Forestry 104(3):118-124.
  11. Robinett, M.A., and D.G. McCullough. 2019. White ash (<i>Fraxinus americana</i>) survival in the core of the emerald ash borer (<i>Agrilus planipennis</i>) invasion. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 49:510-520.
  12. Spei, B. A. 2016. An Analysis Of Blue Ash (<i>Fraxinus quadrangulata</i>) Regeneration In Southeastern Michigan In The Presence Of Emerald Ash Borer (<i>Agrilus planipennis</i>). Wayne State University Theses. 477. Online. Available: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_theses/477.
  13. Steiner, K.C., L.E. Graboski, K.S. Knight, J.L. Koch, M.E. Mason. 2019. Genetic, spatial, and temporal aspects of decline and mortality in a Fraxinus provenance test following invasion by the emerald ash borer. Biological Invasions 21:3439–3450.
  14. Tanis, S.R., and D.G. McCullough. 2012. Differential persistence of blue ash and white ash following emerald ash borer invasion. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42(8):1542-1550.
  15. Wallander, E. 2008. Systematics of <i>Fraxinus </i>(Oleaceae) and evolutionary dioecy. Plant Systematics and Evolution 273:25-49.