Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva

(A.W. Hill) Affolter

Cienega False Rush

T2T2 (G4T2) Found in 14 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
T2T2Global Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.151674
Element CodePDAPI19051
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationVariety
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderApiales
FamilyApiaceae
GenusLilaeopsis
Synonyms
Lilaeopsis recurvaA.W. HillLilaeopsis schaffneriana ssp. recurva(A.W. Hill) Affolter
Other Common Names
Huachuca Water-Umbel (EN) Schaffner's Grasswort (EN) Schaffner's grasswort (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
The USFWS listed this taxon as Lilaeopsis schaffneriana ssp. recurva (Federal Register, Jan. 6, 1997). As of 11/31/99, L. schaffneriana var. recurva is used in its List of Endangered and Threatened Plants. The latter rank is also used by Kartesz (1999). However, subspecies seems to be the rank used by Affolter (1985, p. 61), and is accepted in the Gray Index (online, 8/2000).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2022-08-04
Change Date1991-01-24
Edition Date2022-08-04
Edition AuthorsPartly by K. Johnson; rev. Maybury/Schwartz, 1996; MacBryde, 8/2000, rev. Treher (2022)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva is a semi- to fully aquatic perennial herb that occurs in Arizona (United States), and Sonora (Mexico). There 52 known occurrences, but at least eight are considered extirpated. Over the last 150 years, the wetland systems of the region have been seriously degraded and diminished in size. Most of the remaining populations are probably small remnants of larger populations that are thought to have existed when healthy cienega or cienega-like riparian habitats were far more common in the region. The taxon continues to be threatened by growing water demands and associated diversions and impoundments, livestock grazing, competition with herbaceous plant species, and other activities that impact habitat quality.
Range Extent Comments
Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva occurs in North America in aquatic habitats of the Sonoran Desert. It occurs in five watersheds of southeastern Arizona and northern Sonora. Historically, the species reached north to Tucson and south to Cananea, Sonora. The Tucson population along the Santa Cruz River (type locality) no longer exists, presumably due to the loss of perennial flow in this area.
Occurrences Comments
There are known 52 occurrences but some of these are extirpated (USFWS 2017). In Arizona, there are 17 extant occurrences, 8 that are considered extirpated, and 6 occurrences where plants haven't been seen during recent surveys (USFWS 2017, 2018). There are 21 occurrences in Mexico but their current status is unknown (USFWS 2018).
Threat Impact Comments
The primary threats to Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva are degradation of aquatic habitats including groundwater extraction, wildfires and associated sedimentation, competition from herbaceous plant species, livestock grazing, recreation, and the effects of drought and climate change. Pumping or diversion of water can destroy habitat by eliminating the water supply. Some populations of the taxon have been lost due to dredging of ponds. Cattle can impact plants and degrade habitat in multiple ways but the most significant impacts are during droughts when the animals congregate in the wetland habitats. Heavy foot traffic from recreation may impact local populations at areas like Bear Canyon, a popular recreation spot. Finally, one natural threat to the taxon is Javelina (Tayassu tajacu), which have been observed to eat the plants but their impact seems to be minimal. Other natural disturbances such as moderate flooding or unnatural disturbances (light grazing) may be beneficial by reducing surrounding competitive vegetation, both native and non-native. Droughts and climate change (USFWS 2017).
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva grows in perennial, shallow and slow-moving water. Such sites are rare in southeastern Arizona and northern Sonora, Mexico. Lilaeopsis is difficult to locate in the field, in part because it usually occurs with and resembles another small wetland species, Eleocharis charibea. Lilaeopsis has semisucculent leaves that are somewhat flexuous, whereas Eleocharis leaves are pithy, strictly straight and not at all succulent. The leaves of Lilaeopsis also appear to be a pale yellow-green compared to the darker green of most co-occurring herbaceous species.

Habitat

Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva occurs in rivers, streams, springs, and cinegas, which are marshy or meadow-like wetlands surrounded by semiarid vegetation (USFWS 2017, Warren 1991).

Hendrickson and Minckley (1984) describe three different types of cienegas based on elevation: low, mid, and high elevation cienegas. Low elevation cienegas or subtropical marshes occur mostly along major perennial rivers below 3,000 feet. The low elevation Lileaopsis sites have experienced the most disturbance, both human and natural. Low elevation cienega habitats were probably river backwaters and floodplain seeps. These locations are very unstable, experiencing cycles of flooding and drying due to varying climatic patterns. Human influence including groundwater pumping and diversion of water for irrigation have eliminated perennial flow in most southeastern Arizona rivers. Perennial flow is essential for wetland formation.

Mid-elevation cienegas occur between 3,000-6,000 feet. This elevation range fits Hendrickson and Minckley's (1984) definition of true cienega habitat. Permanent water is available and a unique wetland community has developed at these sites (Warren 1991). Flooding potential is lower at these cienega sites because they have smaller drainage areas. Also, the gradients are gentler at these mid-elevation sites as opposed to the higher elevation cienegas.

High elevation cienegas occur at elevations over 6,000 feet. They are described by Hendrickson and Minckley (1984) as "marshy to bog-like alpine and cold temperate meadowland." They may form in surface depressions that fill with water or at stream headwaters. There are few potential sites for Lilaeopsis at these elevations because usually these higher sites are in canyons with stream gradients too steep to support cienega wetlands. Three high elevation sites of Lilaeopsis are known in the Huachuca Mountains. One is in upper Scotia Canyon and another in upper Garden Canyon.

The surrounding vegetation of the cienega communities varies with elevation. Willow (Salix spp.) and cottonwood (Populus spp.) trees, cattails, large reeds, bulrush (Scirpus spp.), and halophytes in nearby saline areas are typical of desert-scrub communities of the low elevation cienega sites. Rushes, grasses, fewer cattails, semiaquatic sedges, watercress (Nasturtium officinale), water pennywort (Hydrocoytle americana), halophytes in adjacent saline areas, and trees (not as common with willows being the most common) are the dominant species of the grassland/oak woodland habitat of mid-elevation cienegas. Finally, the high elevation community is conifer forest including cold-resistant sedges and rushes, semiaquatic and terrestrial grasses, and low, woody alder (Alnus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) shrubs.

Ecology

This taxon does not tolerate much competition with other herbaceous aquatic plants, but will quickly colonize habitat disturbed by scouring floods and persist there until interspecific plant competition becomes too great. In order for populations to expand, some plants must remain in areas that escape the effects of periodic floods (Rutman and Rorabaugh 1995).

Reproduction

Affolter (1985) observed flowering specimens from collections made in June and August and fruiting specimens from May and July through early September. Flowering at low frequency has also been observed from March through October. Although seeds from Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva appear to germinate easily, vegetative reproduction via rhizomatous spreading and dispersal of dislodged clumps is clearly important.

Seeds are believed to remain in the seedbank for 5 to 10 years, providing a means of reestablishment after drought (USFWS 2017). The buoyant seeds are dispersed by water.
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
ArizonaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - restrictedUnknownHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingLarge - restrictedUnknownHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted (11-30%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted (11-30%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted - smallUnknownHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesRestricted - smallUnknownHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge (31-70%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
7.1.1 - Increase in fire frequency/intensityLarge (31-70%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive - largeSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
8.2.1 - Unspecified speciesPervasive - largeSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh - moderate
11.4 - Storms & floodingPervasive - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh - moderate

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (14)
Arizona (13)
AreaForestAcres
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
ChiricahuaCoronado National Forest76,876
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
Happy ValleyCoronado National Forest7,972
Lower Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest1,165
Lower RinconCoronado National Forest3,278
Middle Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest10,543
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
Santa RitaCoronado National Forest6,078
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
Upper Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest2,533
Upper Rincon RoadlessCoronado National Forest2,991
WhetstoneCoronado National Forest20,728
New Mexico (1)
AreaForestAcres
Peloncillo (NM)Coronado National Forest43,339
References (20)
  1. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus <i>Lilaeopsis </i>(Umbelliferae). Systematic Botany Monographs 6: 1-140.
  2. Affolter, J. M. 1985. A monograph of the genus LILAEOPSIS (Umbelliferae). Systematic Botany Monographs. Vol. 6. American Society of Plant Taxonimists. 140 pp.
  3. California Department of Fish and Game Endangered Plant Project and the Natural Diversity Data Base. 1988. California Native Plant Status Report: LILAEOPSIS MASONII. California Dept. of Fish and Game, Sacramento, Ca.
  4. Correll, D.S., and H.B. Correll. 1972. Aquatic and wetland plants of southwestern United States. 2 volumes. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. 1777 pp.
  5. Gori, D.F., P.L. Warren and L.S. Anderson. 1990. Population studies of sensitive plants of the Huachuca, Patagonia and Atacosa Mountains, Arizona. Submitted to Coronado National Forest in completion of P. O. 40-8197-9-0119. The Arizona Nature Conservancy, Tucson, AZ.
  6. Hendrickson, D. A. and W.L. Minckley. 1984. Cienegas: Vanishing climax communitites of the American Southwest. Desert Plants 6(3): 1-175.
  7. Hill, A. W. 1927. The genus LILAEOPSIS: a study in geographical distribution. Journal of the Linnaeus Society of Botany 47:525-551.
  8. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  9. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  10. Kearney, T.H., R.H. Peebles, and collaborators. 1951. Arizona flora. 2nd edition with Supplement (1960) by J.T. Howell, E. McClintock, and collaborators. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. 1085 pp.
  11. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1986. Climatological data annual summary: Arizona 90 (13). U.S. Department of Commerce, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
  12. Rutman, S. 1992. Handbook of Arizona's endangered, threatened, and candidate plants. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Phoenix, Arizona.
  13. Rutman, S., and J. Rorabaugh. 1995. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Proposal to determine endangered status for three wetland species found in southern Arizona and northern Sonora. Federal Register 60(63): 16836-16846.
  14. Shreve, F., and I.L. Wiggins. 1964. Vegetation and flora of the Sonoran Desert. 2 volumes. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford. 1740 pp.
  15. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2014. Huachuca water umbel (<i>Lilaeopsis schaffneriana</i> ssp. <i>recurva</i>) 5-Year Review. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona Ecological Services Tucson Sub-Office, Tucson, Arizona. 59 pp.
  16. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2017. Recovery plan for <i>Lilaeopsis schaffneriana</i> ssp. <i>recurva</i> (Huachuca water umbel). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office, Tucson, Arizona. 108 pp.
  17. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018. Huachuca water umbel (<i>Lilaeopsis schaffneriana</i> ssp. <i>recurva</i>) 5-Year Review. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona Ecological Services Tucson Sub-Office, Tucson, Arizona. 2 pp.
  18. Warren, P.L. 1991. Reconvery of LILAEOPSIS SCHAFFNERIANA var. RECURVA at San Bernadino National Wildlife Refuge. Submitted to : U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Arizona Nature Conservancy, Tucson, AZ.
  19. Warren, P. L., D.F. Gori, L.S. Anderson and B.S. Gebow. 1991. Status report: LILAEPOSIS SCHAFFNERIANA var. RECURVA. Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Arizona Nature Conservancy, Tucson, Az.
  20. Warren, P.L., L.S. Anderson and P.B. Shafroth. 1989. Population studies of sensitive plants of the Huachuca and Patagonia Mountains, Arizona. Submitted to Coronado National Forest in completion of P.O. No. 40-8197-9-431. The Arizona Nature Conservancy, Tucson, AZ.