Panax quinquefolius

L.

American Ginseng

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 38 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
HighThreat Impact
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). Photo by tallpaultheforester, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
tallpaultheforester, CC BY-NC 4.0
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). Photo by Theo Witsell, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Theo Witsell, CC BY-NC 4.0
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). Photo by Theo Witsell, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Theo Witsell, CC BY-NC 4.0
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). Photo by Tomás Curtis, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Tomás Curtis, CC BY-NC 4.0
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). Photo by Grant Fessler, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Grant Fessler, CC BY-NC 4.0
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). Photo by Grant Fessler, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Grant Fessler, CC BY-NC 4.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.130734
Element CodePDARA09010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderApiales
FamilyAraliaceae
GenusPanax
Synonyms
Panax quinquefoliumL.
Other Common Names
American ginseng (EN) Ginseng à cinq folioles (FR)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
The name is spelled 'quinquefolium' in many botanical and other works, but the correct spelling under the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature is 'quinquefolius'.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-02-18
Change Date2000-03-20
Edition Date2025-02-18
Edition AuthorsK. Crowley, TNC-MRO (1995), rev. L. Morse (2000), rev. K. McConnell (2001), rev. T. Killeffer (2005), rev. C. Nordman (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) occurs in eastern North America, in the eastern and central United States, and southeastern Canada. It occurs from Maine west through southern Ontario to Minnesota and eastern South Dakota, south to Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and eastern Oklahoma. It is most characteristic of the Appalachian and Ozark regions. It is widely distributed, with at least 4,000 occurrences rangewide, primarily in the Appalachians and the Ozarks, but typically with very few plants per occurrence. It is considered uncommon in the Piedmont and Southern Appalachians, and rare in the southeastern Coastal Plain. It occurs at generally low densities over a very broad range, with a modern total population of many millions if not over 100 million individual plants. However, population sizes of this plant have decreased considerably since European settlement. More recently, an overall decline of 20-30 percent was found in monitored populations from 2004 to 2014, this represents a decline of 2-3 percent per year. Threats include over harvesting (by digging) the roots, deer browse, competition from invasive non-native plant species, loss of habitat, timber harvest (especially clearcutting), drought and other factors. American Ginseng occurs in many protected areas throughout its range but is often subject to poaching (illegal digging, theft) from land within protected conservation areas. Since 2000, American Ginseng has been included on the USDA Forest Service Regional Sensitive Species List for 10 of the 12 National Forests where it occurs, due to population viability concerns. Harvest is prohibited except under special conditions authorized by the USDA Forest Service.
Range Extent Comments
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) occurs in eastern North America, in the eastern and central United States, and southeastern Canada. It occurs from Maine west through southern Ontario to Minnesota and eastern South Dakota, south to Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and eastern Oklahoma.The Appalachian region is considered the central part or core of its range. Range extent was estimated to be about 3,000,000 square kilometers, using herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data collected between 1994 and 2025 (GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, SERNEC 2025, Weakley and Southeastern Flora Team 2024).
Occurrences Comments
American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) is widely distributed, with several thousand occurrences, primarily in the Appalachians and the Ozarks, but typically with very few plants per occurrence. It is considered common in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky, southern Ohio, southern Indiana and southern Illinois, uncommon in the Piedmont and Southern Appalachians from Maryland to Alabama and Tennessee, and rare in the southeastern Coastal Plain (Weakley and Southeastern Flora Team 2024). By applying a 1 km separation distance to herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1994 and 2025, it is estimated that there are at least 4,000 occurrences rangewide, however these data are likely incomplete (GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, McGraw 2023, NatureServe 2025, SERNEC 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
Panax quinquefolius (American Ginseng) is used for medicinal purposes globally but most commonly in Asia, where wild harvested plants command a substantial price premium over cultivated plants (USFWS 2022, White 2000). Threats include over harvesting (by digging) the roots, deer browse, competition from invasive non-native plant species, loss of habitat, timber harvest (especially clearcutting), drought and other factors (USFWS 2022, McGraw 2023). Logging of mesic hardwood forests (especially clearcutting) can be a threat since American Ginseng requires rich soil in a moist, generally shaded setting. American Ginseng is physiologically adapted to low light levels and can experience early leaf senescence or depressed growth with moderate high light levels (USFWS 2005) which can be an issue with increased forest fragmentation. But it is likely that American Ginseng can thrive in canopy gaps, which are more common in older or old growth forests (Chandler and McGraw 2017).

Prices for American Ginseng fluctuate but are higher than for any other commonly wild collected native North American medicinal plant. American Ginseng has two distinct markets, wild-harvested is the most expensive, while cultivated sells for lower prices (it is believed to be less effective in traditional Asian medicine), but some wild-simulated plants (lightly tended plants grown in natural settings) can appear similar to wild harvested, are hard to distinguish and to some extent are mixed in among those sold as the more expensive wild harvested plants. The United Plant Savers (2025) website notes that there may be a slow decline in the pressure from international markets, as farmers in China are cultivating American ginseng. It is unknown how much this has reduced wild harvest of the species.

There is substantial quantitative evidence that significant American Ginseng poaching has occurred in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, where harvest has been prohibited for a long time. It is the largest protected area within the geographic range of American Ginseng in the United States (Rock et al. 1999). For example, 10,151 roots were seized from illegal collectors between 1991 and 2000. According to law enforcement staff in the National Park, this figure accounts for 1-3% of total poaching. Field surveys showed that most American Ginseng plants were located in habitats which were somewhat less suitable for the plant, suggesting that poaching has caused a reduction of plants in the targeted, most suitable habitat areas for American Ginseng (Rock et al. 1999). The collecting pressure on wild American Ginseng may be much higher in the Appalachians than in the Ozarks, where collecting amounts vary greatly by county (independent of the abundance of the species) and American Ginseng on public trails in parks has been known to persist undisturbed for years.

A study by McGraw and Furedi (2005) reports that at least in a portion of West Virginia deer browse is impacting populations, this has been noted elsewhere but American Ginseng probably is not a preferred browse plant. Deer were found to be seed predators not dispersers, since no intact seeds were found in deer fecal pellets (McGraw 2023, USFWS 2005). Populations of American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) are locally adapted to mean maximum temperatures and do best with 28 inches of rainfall during the growing season and decline in drought conditions, when growing season rainfall is 16 inches or less. It is threatened by drought and increasing summer temperatures which may be associated with climate change (Souther and McGraw 2014, McGraw 2023).

In a study by Cruse-Sanders and Hamrick (2004), populations with a greater proportion of older plants and larger stage-class of individuals in protected populations had greater genetic diversity than within harvested populations. Removing the largest plants from a population may be subjecting the population to the Allee effect (Hackney and McGraw 2001). Also, "research suggests that local American Ginseng populations are highly adapted to local conditions and that artificial seeding with non-local seed may lead to local loss of fitness which could lead to the erosion of the gene pool" (Grubbs and Case 2004). Native populations are at risk of contamination from planted/cultivated seeds being brought in from elsewhere to augment existing natural populations (USFWS 2005).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Herbaceous perennial with a whorl of about 3, palmately compound leaves developing from a single, unbranched stem that arises from a fleshy, tuber-like root. Leaflets 5, oblong-obovate, 6-15 cm long, with a long petiolule (stem-like leaf stalk). The single umbellate inflorescences are composed of small greenish, perfect flowers. The fruit (1 cm) matures to red.

Diagnostic Characteristics

The leaves of Panax quinquefolius are composed of 5 stalked leaflets that are unlike those of P. trifolia, which have 3, nearly sessile leaflets. Panax quinquefolius may also be confused with species of Aralia when no fruiting or flowering structures are present. The leaves of Aralia spp. are pinnately compound versus palmately compound in Panax (Rhoads and Block 2000). It superficially resembles Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia).

Habitat

American Ginseng occurs primarily in rich, cool, moist but not extremely wet woods, under a closed canopy, or in older forests with some canopy gaps from tree falls. They occur especially on slopes or ravines (including wooded dunes in Michigan) and often over a limestone or marble parent material on soil with a good humus component. The forests where plants are found are typically hardwood-dominated or mixed, including cove forests, nutrient-rich mesic hardwood forests, but mostly not in the richest coves. Plants occasionally occur in rocky woods, among swampy hardwoods, or at the edges of dense woods. It is typically associated with Tulip-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), other associated species include Bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis), Black Cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa), Maidenhair Fern (Adiantum pedatum), Wood Nettle (Laportea canadensis) and Yellow Lady's Slipper (Cypripedium pubescens). It is known from elevations of 15 to 1,400 meters (McGraw 2023, SERNEC 2025, Voss 1985, Weakley and Southeastern Flora Team 2024).

Reproduction

Seeds typically fall near the parent plant or are dispersed by gravity (Cruse-Sanders and Hamrick 2004). Wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) were observed to disperse seed a mean distance of 15.2 - 21.7 meters and up to 96.6 meters. They are probably the most important disperser animals (Elza et al. 2016). Wood thrush numbers have declined 55 percent in less than 50 years. White-tailed deer are seed predators, they do disperse seeds they consume (McGraw 2023).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - HardwoodForest - MixedForest Edge
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLAND
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS2Yes
QuebecS2Yes
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
MinnesotaS3Yes
TennesseeS3Yes
IowaS3Yes
IllinoisS3Yes
OhioS4Yes
MichiganS2Yes
North CarolinaS3Yes
MaineS3Yes
LouisianaS1Yes
AlabamaS4Yes
ConnecticutS2Yes
District of ColumbiaSHYes
VermontS3Yes
IndianaS3Yes
ArkansasS4Yes
KansasS1Yes
VirginiaS3Yes
NebraskaS1Yes
OklahomaS1Yes
South DakotaS1Yes
West VirginiaS3Yes
New YorkS4Yes
MississippiS3Yes
PennsylvaniaS4Yes
South CarolinaS3Yes
MissouriS4Yes
New HampshireS2Yes
MarylandS2Yes
WisconsinS4Yes
DelawareS2Yes
New JerseyS2Yes
GeorgiaS3Yes
MassachusettsS3Yes
Rhode IslandS1Yes
KentuckyS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
3 - Energy production & miningSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.3 - Temperature extremesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (38)
Arkansas (2)
AreaForestAcres
Clifty CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,963
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
Georgia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Kelly RidgeChattahoochee National Forest8,325
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
Illinois (1)
AreaForestAcres
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Indiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
North Carolina (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainPisgah National Forest11,085
Chunky Gal (addition)Nantahala National Forest3,336
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Overflow CreekNantahala National Forest3,379
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Tennessee (6)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Little Frog Addition NWCherokee National Forest628
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Vermont (1)
AreaForestAcres
Wilder Mountain 09082Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests8,759
Virginia (15)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Crawford MountainGeorge Washington National Forest9,892
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Long SpurJefferson National Forest6,417
Mill MountainGeorge Washington National Forest10,840
Mottesheard (VA)Jefferson National Forest2,596
Mountain Lake Addition AJefferson National Forest1,469
North Fork PoundJefferson National Forest4,757
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
West Virginia (4)
AreaForestAcres
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
Middle MountainMonongahela National Forest19,020
Mottesheard (WV)Jefferson National Forest3,964
Seneca CreekMonongahela National Forest22,287
Wisconsin (1)
AreaForestAcres
09012 - Round Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest3,707
References (51)
  1. Castle, L.M., S. Leopold, R. Craft, and K. Kindscher. 2014. Ranking Tool Created for Medicinal plants at Risk of Being Overharvested in the Wild. Ethnobiology Letters 5:77–88.
  2. Catling, P. M., and K. W. Spicer. 1995. Pollen Vectors in an American Ginseng (<i>Panax quinquefolius</i>) Crop. Economic Botany 49(1):99-102.
  3. Chandler, Jennifer L. and James B. McGraw. 2017. Demographic stimulation of the obligate understorey herb, <i>Panax quinquefolius</i> L., in response to natural forest canopy disturbances. Journal of Ecology 105: 736–749. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12695
  4. COSEWIC. 2005. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Available online: http://www.cosewic.ca/index.php/en-ca/
  5. Cruse-Sander, J. M. 2003. Conservation of genetic diversity In wild American ginseng (<i>Panax quinquefolius</i> L.). Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Georgia, Athens. 180 pp.
  6. Cruse-Sanders, J. M., and J. L. Hamrick. 2004. Spatial and Genetic Structure within Populations of Wild American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L., Araliaceae). Journal of Heredity 95(4):309-321.
  7. Edward J. Fletcher Strategic Sourcing, Inc.
  8. Eilers, L.J., and D.M. Roosa. 1994. The vascular plants of Iowa: An annotated checklist and natural history. Univ. Iowa Press, Iowa City. 304 pp.
  9. Elza, M.C., C. Slover, and J.B. McGraw. 2016. Analysis of wood thrush (<i>Hylocichla mustelina</i>) movement patterns to explain the spatial structure of American ginseng (<i>Panax quinquefolius</i>) populations. Ecological Research 31: 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-015-1327-6
  10. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. 8th edition. Corrected printing (1970). D. Van Nostrand Company, New York. 1632 pp.
  11. Ford, P. 2005. American Ginseng (<i>Panax quinquefolius </i>L.): Species Review. USFWS, Division of Scientific Authority.
  12. Furedi, M. A. and J. B. McGraw. 2004. White-tailed Deer: Dispersers or Predators of American Ginseng Seeds? Am. Midl. Nat. 152:268-276.
  13. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. 910 pp.
  14. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  15. Great Plains Flora Association (R.L. McGregor, coordinator; T.M. Barkley, ed., R.E. Brooks and E.K. Schofield, associate eds.). 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. 1392 pp.
  16. Grubbs, H. J. and M. A. Case. 2004. Allozyme variation in American ginseng (<i>Panax quinquefolius</i> L.): Variation, breeding system and implications for current conservation practice. Conservation Genetics 5:13-23.
  17. Hackney, E.E. and J.B. McGraw. 2001. Experimental Demonstration of an Allee Effect in American Ginseng. Conservation Biology, 15(1):129-136.
  18. Haines, A. and T.F. Vining. 1998. Flora of Maine, A Manual for Identification of Native and Naturalized Vascular Plants of Maine. V.F.Thomas Co., Bar Harbor, Maine.
  19. iNaturalist. 2025. Online. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org (accessed 2025).
  20. Jones, R. 1987. Ginseng: The legendary herb. Kentucky Native Plant Society Newsletter 2(3), reprinted in The Lady-Slipper [Kentucky Native Plant Society] 15(2/3): 1-3, 2000.
  21. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  22. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  23. Lyke, Julie. 2000. The medicinal plant working group. Endangered Species Bull. 25(1/2): 20-21.
  24. MacBryde, Bruce. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, Va.
  25. McGraw, J. 2023. Wild American ginseng: lessons for conservation in the age of humans. The University of Georgia Press. Athens, Georgia.
  26. McGraw, J.B. and J.L. Chandler. 2018. Demographic hallmarks of an overbrowsed state in American ginseng. Global Ecology and Conservation 15: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00435
  27. McGraw, J. B. and M. A. Furedi. 2005. Deer Browsing and Population Viability of a Forest Understory Plant. Science. Vol. 307. www.sciencemag.org
  28. McWilliams, W. H., J. A. Westfall, P. H. Brose, D. C. Dey, A. W. D’Amato, Y. L. Dickinson, M. A. Fajvan, L. S. Kenefic, C. C. Kern, and K. M. Laustsen. 2018. Subcontinental-Scale Patterns of Large-Ungulate Herbivory and Synoptic Review of Restoration Management Implications for Midwestern and Northeastern Forests. General Technical Report NRS-182. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station. Online. Available https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs182.pdf
  29. Mohlenbrock, R.H. 1986. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, Illinois. 507 pp.
  30. Morse, Larry E. Personal Communication. North American Botanist, NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Formerly Chief Botanist, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  31. National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA). 2005. Raiders of the Last Parks. Washington, D.C. 20036. http://www.npca.org/magazine/2005/winter/poaching3.asp
  32. NatureServe. 2025. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  33. Rhoads, A.F. and T.A. Block. 2000. The Plants of Pennsylvania: An Illustrated Manual. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 1061 pp.
  34. Rock, J., H. Hornbeck, J. Tietjen, and E. Choberka. 1999. Habitat modeling and protection of American ginseng (<i>Panax quinquefolius</i> L.) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. U.S. National Park Service, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Gatlinburg, Tennessee.
  35. Schmidt, J.P., J. Cruse-Sanders, J.L. Chamberlain, and S. Ferreira. 2019. Explaining harvests of wild-harvested herbaceous plants: American ginseng as a case study. Biological Conservation 231: 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.006
  36. Scoggan, H.J. 1978-1979. The flora of Canada: Parts 1-4. National Museums Canada, Ottawa. 1711 pp.
  37. Seymour, F.C. 1969. The flora of Vermont: a manual for the identification of ferns and flowering plants growing without cultivation in Vermont. The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. 377 pp.
  38. Skelton, E.G., and E.W. Skelton. 1991. Haliburton flora. Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto. 142 pp.
  39. Smith, Tim. Personal communication. Botanist, Missouri Department of Conservation. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO
  40. Southeast Regional Network of Expertise and Collections (SERNEC) Data Portal. 2025. https//:sernecportal.org/index.php (accessed 2025).
  41. Souther, S. and J.B. McGraw. 2014. Synergistic effects of climate change and harvest on extinction risk of American ginseng. Ecological Applications 24(6): 1463-1477. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0653.1
  42. United Plant Savers (UPS). 2025. Species At Risk List. Online Available:https://unitedplantsavers.org/species-at-risk-list/ (accessed 2025).
  43. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006. Non-detriment finding on CITES export permit applications for wild and wild-simulated American ginseng harvested in 2006-2008. 6 June 2006. Online. Available: http://www.fws.gov/international/pdf/2006ginsengfinding.pdf (Accessed 2008).
  44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. General Advice for the export of wild and wild-simulated American ginseng (<i>Panax quinquefolius</i>) roots legally harvested during the 2022 harvest season in the 19 States and Tribe with an approved CITES Export Program for American ginseng. Branch of Monitoring and Consultation, Division of Scientific Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  45. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). August 3, 2005. Convention permit applications for wild American ginseng harvested in 2005. Washington, D.C. 20240.
  46. Van Bruggen, T. 1976. The vascular plants of South Dakota. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 538 pp.
  47. Voss, E.G. 1985. Michigan flora. Part II. Dicotyledons. Cranbrook Institute of Science and University of Michigan Herbarium. Ann Arbor, Michigan. 1212 pp.
  48. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2024. Flora of the southeastern United States. Edition of March 4, 2024. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2203 pp.
  49. White, D. 2000. Raiding Mother Earth's treasure chest. The Lady-Slipper [Kentucky Native Plant Society] 15(2/3): 4.
  50. White, Deborah. Personal communication. Botanist, Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY.
  51. White, D.J. 1988. Status Report on the American Ginseng, Panax quinquefolium L. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. 47 pp.