Pediocactus despainii

Welsh & Goodrich

San Rafael Cactus

G2Imperiled Found in 12 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.147621
Element CodePDCAC0E090
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNNear threatened
CITESAppendix II
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderCaryophyllales
FamilyCactaceae
GenusPediocactus
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2015-11-24
Change Date1987-10-07
Edition Date2015-11-24
Edition AuthorsRoth, E., rev. D. Atwood, rev. K. Maybury & B. Franklin (1996), rev. A. Tomaino (2013), rev. A. Treher (2015)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent1000-5000 square km (about 400-2000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Known from about 21 occurrences. Off-road vehicles and livestock trampling are serious threats. In addition, about half of this species' small range is covered by leases for oil and gas exploration and mining claims for gypsum and other minerals.
Range Extent Comments
Endemic to central Utah, occurring in Wayne and Emery Counties.
Occurrences Comments
Approximately 21 extant occurrences in Emery County (reported from Wayne County). Some sites are close to each other and connected by suitable habitat, so they might be part of one population (T. Switek, pers. comm., 2015).
Threat Impact Comments
Threatened by collecting, loss of individuals and habitat degradation associated with ORV and livestock trampling (USFWS 2007). About half of the population is in areas covered by oil and gas leases and/or mining claims for gypsum. However, at present, mineral exploration and subsequent mining is a minor threat (USFWS 2007). Other threats include climate change, and invasive exotic plant species (USFWS 2007).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Desert pavements of cobble or pebble in pinyon-juniper woodlands, 1500-1800 m (Flora of North America Editorial Committee 2003). Hills, benches and flats, of open, semi-arid grassland with scattered junipers and pinyon pines.

Reproduction

Members of Pediocactus produce dry, dull-colored fruit which are presumed not to be dispersed by birds or rodents, but rather wind or water. Little variation exists within populations. These populations can be separated by distances of several miles even when there is suitable habitat. Further, dispersal within populations appears to be staggered throughout the growing season from shortly after seeds are produced in June, to fall. This dispersal strategy may be disadvantageous for the genus, however, populations in the genus when left undisturbed seem to be healthy with all age classes represented (Heil et al. 1981).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandWoodland - ConiferSavannaGrassland/herbaceousDesert
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
UtahS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline
3 - Energy production & miningPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline
3.1 - Oil & gas drillingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline
3.2 - Mining & quarryingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slight
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slight
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline
6.1 - Recreational activitiesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - restrictedSlight or 1-10% pop. decline
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge - restrictedSlight or 1-10% pop. decline
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. decline

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (12)
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Utah (11)
AreaForestAcres
Boulder Mtn. / Boulder Top / Deer LakeDixie National Forest110,690
Capital ReefDixie National Forest763
Happy ValleyDixie National Forest14,458
Long Neck Mesa / Steep Creek / Oak Creek - Steep Creek / OakDixie National Forest55,489
Lookout PeakFishlake National Forest9,195
Mcdonald BasinFishlake National Forest1,585
Mt. Johns Peak - Mt AliceFishlake National Forest12,469
Muddy Creek - Nelson Mt.Manti-Lasal National Forest59,034
Solomon BasinFishlake National Forest19,963
Thousand Lake MountainFishlake National Forest27,267
Wayne WonderlandFishlake National Forest12,395
References (11)
  1. Butterworth, C.A., J.H. Cota-Sanchez, and R.S. Wallace. 2002. Molecular systematics of tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae: Cactoideae): A phylogeny based on rpl16 intron sequence variation. Systematic Botany 27:257-270.
  2. Butterworth, C., and J.M. Porter. 2013. <i>Pediocactus despainii</i>. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. Online. Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 11 July 2013).
  3. Dodge, R. 2011. March 3 last update. National Collection Plant Profile: <i>Pediocactus despainii</i>. Center for Plant Conservation. Online. Available: www.centerforplantconservation.org/ASP/CPC_ViewProfile.asp?CPCNum=3129 (Accessed 2013).
  4. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2003b. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 4, Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, part 1. Oxford University Press, New York. xxiv + 559 pp.
  5. Heil, K., B. Armstrong and D. Schleser. 1981. A review of the genus <i>Pediocactus. </i>Cactus and Succulent Journal 53:17-39.
  6. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  7. Porter, J. M., M. S. Kinney, and K. D. Heil. 2000. Relationships between <i>Sclerocactus </i>and <i>Toumeya </i>(Cactaceae) based on chloroplast trnL-trnF sequences. Haseltonia 7: 8-23.
  8. Switek, Tracy. Personal communication. 2015. Ecologist. U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  9. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Determination of endangered status for <i>Pediocactus despainii</i> (San Rafael cactus). Federal Register 52(179): 34914-34917.
  10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Recovery outline for San Rafael Cactus (<i>Pediocactus despainii) </i>and Winkler Cactus <i>(Pediocactus winkleri). </i>Accessed online on May 9, 2011 at: http://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=Q2QA#status
  11. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L.C. Higgins (eds.) 1993. A Utah flora. 2nd edition. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah. 986 pp.