Pediocactus winkleri

Heil

Winkler's Pincushion Cactus

G2Imperiled Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.146686
Element CodePDCAC0E080
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNLeast concern
CITESAppendix II
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderCaryophyllales
FamilyCactaceae
GenusPediocactus
Other Common Names
Winkler Cactus (EN) Winkler's pincushion cactus (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Analysis of DNA sequences provide evidence of a close relationship among P. winkleri, P. despainii, and P. simpsonii (FNA 2003b). The morphological distinction between P. winkleri and P. despainii is much more tenuous than the key and descriptions indicate.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-05-22
Change Date2001-02-12
Edition Date2024-05-22
Edition AuthorsM. Russo and A. Frances, N. Ventrella (2024)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent1000-5000 square km (about 400-2000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
Pediocactus winkleri is a small cactus that is endemic to silty-loam and clay soils derived from Morrison and Dakota formations in salt brush communities of south-central Utah, USA. The species is known from just sixteen widely scattered occurrences located primarily in Capitol Reef National Park and on Bureau of Land Management lands. It is seriously threatened by heavy grazing by cattle and wildlife, and drought, as well as disturbances from recreational use, off-road vehicle use, and possible coal and oil exploration. Additional threats include illegal take by cactus collectors and predation by insects and mammals.
Range Extent Comments
Pediocactus winkleri occurs in western North America, where it is endemic to south-central Utah in Emery, Sevier, and Wayne counties in the United States (USFWS 2019). This cactus occurs in small populations widely scattered over a small area from the far northwest corner of Captiol Reef National Park in Sevier County to just south of Notom in central Wayne County. A disjunct population also exists near Hanksville in Wayne County. The range of P. winkleri overlaps in its northern extent with populations of the listed cactus P. despainii, and the northern boundary of Capitol Reef National Park is used by all land management agencies as an artificial boundary between these two species, even though some of the boundary populations may include hybrids or plants with P. despainii genetics (USFWS 2016). Range extent was calculated at 1285 sq km using data from the Utah Rare Plant Database (2021, UNHP 2021).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 2 km separation distance to population location data from the Utah Rare Plant Database (2021), there are sixteen estimated occurrences (UNHP 2021).
Threat Impact Comments
Livestock grazing was identified as a significant threat to this species in the 2016 recovery plan (USFWS 2016), and trampling and disturbance by livestock increased cactus mortality and reduced probability of flowering in long term monitoring plots (Clark et al. 2015). Since 2016, Capitol Reef National Park removed grazing from an allotment that contained 94 percent of the individuals within the park (USFWS 2019). Drought also increased mortality and decreased recruitment for Winkler cactus in long-term monitoring plots (Clark et al. 2015), and increased drought conditions resulting from climate change is a concern for this species. Predation by larvae of the cactus borer beetle and by native rodents has impacted individuals, but levels of recorded damage are low on a species scale (USFWS 2016). Off-highway vehicle use and other recreational use and road maintenance activities occurs in the range of this species and is a threat, as well as mineral exploration and oil and gas development. Illegal collection of Winkler cactus was a significant threat in the past, and it continues to be a threat to this species at levels unknown.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

The cactus is shaped like a small ribbed ball. There are no central spines, and 9-14 short radial spines, each 1.5-4 mm long. The flowers range from peach to pink in color. They are cold hardy and are native to high altitude sandy hilltops and slopes.

Habitat

Pediocactus winkleri grows in alkaline silty-loam or clay-loam, fine-textured soils primarily derived from the Dakota Formation and Morrison formation, on the tops and sides of rocky hills, benches and gentle slopes (USFWS 2016). This species is associated with salt desert shrub communities, characterized by drought-tolerant shrubs and grasses with ephemeral forbs, at 1,450-2,100 m elevation. It is also found among pinyon-juniper woodland stands.

Reproduction

Members of Pediocactus produce dry, dull-colored fruit which are presumed not to be dispersed by birds or rodents, but rather wind or water. Little variation exists within populations. These populations can be separated by distances of several miles even when there is suitable habitat. Further, dispersal within populations appears to be staggered throughout the growing season from shortly after seeds are produced in June to fall. This dispersal strategy may be disadventageous for the genus; however, populations in the genus when left undisturbed seem to be healthy with all age classes represented (Heil et al. 1981).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - ConiferDesert
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
UtahS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
3.1 - Oil & gas drillingUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (4)
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Utah (3)
AreaForestAcres
Lookout PeakFishlake National Forest9,195
Mcdonald BasinFishlake National Forest1,585
Solomon BasinFishlake National Forest19,963
References (12)
  1. Alston, D. G., and V. J. Tepedino. 2000. Direct and Indirect Effects of Insecticides on Native Bees. In Grasshopper Integrated Pest Management User Handbook (Technical Bulletin No. 1809), edited by G.L. Cuningham and M.W. Sampson. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services.
  2. Clark, D.J., Clark, T.O., Duniway, M.C. and Flagg, C., 2015. Effects of ungulate disturbance and weather variation on <i>Pediocactus winkleri</i>: Insights from long-term monitoring. <i>Western North American Naturalist</i>, <i>75</i>(1), pp.88-101
  3. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2003b. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 4, Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, part 1. Oxford University Press, New York. xxiv + 559 pp.
  4. Heil, K., B. Armstrong and D. Schleser. 1981. A review of the genus <i>Pediocactus. </i>Cactus and Succulent Journal 53:17-39.
  5. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  6. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1993. Proposal to determine the plant <i>Pediocactus winkleri</i> (Winkler cactus) to be and endangered species. Federal Register 58(192): 52059-52062.
  7. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Recovery outline for San Rafael Cactus (<i>Pediocactus despainii) </i>and Winkler Cactus <i>(Pediocactus winkleri). </i>Accessed online on May 9, 2011 at: http://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=Q2QA#status
  8. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016. Winkler cactus (<i>Pediocactus winkleri</i>) and San Rafael cactus (<i>Pediocactus despainii</i>) draft recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. 166 pp.
  9. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. 5-Year Review Short Form, Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) and San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii). Utah Ecological Services Field Office, West Valley City, Utah. 8 pp.
  10. Utah Natural Heritage Program. 2021. Utah Rare Plant Database. (Accessed 2021).
  11. Utah Natural Heritage Program (UNHP). 2021. Element Subnational Ranking Form: <i>Pediocactus winkleri</i> in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia (accessed 2024).
  12. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L.C. Higgins (eds.) 1993. A Utah flora. 2nd edition. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah. 986 pp.