Salix arizonica

Dorn

Arizona Willow

G2Imperiled (G2G3) Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.142880
Element CodePDSAL02080
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderSalicales
FamilySalicaceae
GenusSalix
Other Common Names
Arizona willow (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Recognized as a distinct species only since 1975; often confused with S. pseudocordata (=S. boothii) prior to its recognition as a new species (Dorn 1975). S. arizonica is apparently able to hybridize with a variety of co-occurring Salix species; putative hybrids between S. arizonica and S. brachycarpa, S. boothii, S. geyeriana, S. planifolia, S. wolfii, and S. monticola have been reported (Decker 2006).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-04-28
Change Date2000-06-15
Edition Date2025-04-28
Edition AuthorsGardner, P.A. (1989), rev. Franklin/Maybury (1996), rev. A. Olivero (2003), rev. K. Gravuer (2009), rev. S. Schuetze (2013), rev. N. Ventrella (2025)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Salix arizonica is a rare willow known in the western United States from the margins of the Colorado Plateau in the White Mountains of east-central Arizona, the High Plateaus of south-central Utah, and the southern Rocky Mountains of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. There are approximately 107 occurrences of this species, though there is evidence of hybridization with S. boothii, particularly for populations in Utah, and there may ultimately be fewer occurrences known. Most populations are located on U.S. Forest Service lands in subalpine wet meadows and riparian areas. The total population size is believed to be approximately 22,000-55,000 individuals, with the largest occurrences (consisting of thousands to tens of thousands of plants) located in Utah. These large Utah occurrences are believed to be stable. Other occurrences in Utah and elsewhere tend to be smaller (10-1,000 plants), and many are declining. Browsing by domestic and wild ungulates (primarily by elk and cattle) is the primary threat to Salix arizonica, although some conservation efforts such as browsing exclosures have been established in some populations. Hydrological alterations (e.g. from diversions and impoundments) and climate change are also a primary threats. Other threats include timber harvesting, road construction and maintenance, recreational use, development and maintenance of ski resort facilities, and disease. Despite its distribution in four states, populations are widely separated by unsuitable habitat and have high genetic differentiation. A monitoring protocol has been developed under the Conservation Assessment, but trends for this species remain unclear.
Range Extent Comments
Salix arizonica occurs in the western United States, in the White Mountains of Arizona, as well as southern Utah, New Mexico, and Colorado (FNA 2010). Populations are concentrated near the margins of the Colorado Plateau in southern Utah, eastern Arizona, northern New Mexico, and southern Colorado, with Utah and New Mexico being the principal areas of distribution (Welsh et al. 2008). Known occurrences are found in three primary clusters separated by 300-500 km (Decker 2006, Argus 2007): (1) the White Mountains of east-central Arizona (where restricted to 15-20 drainages around Mount Baldy); (2) the High Plateaus of south-central Utah (including the Markagunt Plateau near Brian Head Peak, the Paunsagunt Plateau along the East Fork of the Sevier River, the vicinity of Boulder Mountain, the Monroe Mountains, and Fishlake Mountain); and (3) the Southern Rocky Mountains of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado (where concentrated in the southern Sangre de Cristos, Nacamiento Mountains, and southern San Juan Mountains). However, In Utah, the Dixie National Forest botanist notes that the locations of Arizona willow reported near Boulder Mountain in the Escalante and Teasdale Ranger Districts are suspect and look to be more closely aligned to Booth's willow than Arizona willow (UNHP 2021). Range extent was estimated using data from the Utah Rare Plant Database, herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data collected between 1994 and 2025 (Utah Natural Heritage Program 2021, GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025, SEINet 2025).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance to data from the Utah Rare Plant Database, herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data collected between 1994 and 2025, it is estimated that there are 107 occurrences rangewide (Utah Natural Heritage Program 2021, GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025, SEINet 2025). Though there may be less than this, depending on the genetic status of questionable occurrences in Utah and New Mexico, which could be more closely aligned with S. boothii (UNHP 2021, Tonne 2002).

The Colorado Natural Heritage Program tracks three known occurrences of this species, all of which have been observed within the last 20 years (CNHP 2023). Occurrences have not been comprehensively mapped in Utah but are known to number more than 30; several dozen occurrences are known from the Fishlake National Forest alone, and 36 locations (some of which might be mapped as the same occurrence) have been reported in the Dixie National Forest (Decker 2006). However, an unknown number of these (particularly the Boulder Mountain populations), show evidence of hybridization with Salix boothii based on preliminary molecular analysis and morphology (UNHP 2021, Lencioni et al. 2024). In Arizona, potential habitat has been thoroughly surveyed and no additional populations are expected (Rutman 1992). However, in other parts of the range such as the San Juan mountains, additional occurrences may yet be found (Decker 2006). In New Mexico, there were 15 to 20 occurrences estimated in 2002 (Tonne 2002).
Threat Impact Comments
Browsing by domestic and wild ungulates (primarily elk and cattle) is the primary threat to Salix arizonica across its range (Arizona Willow Interagency Technical Team 1995, Decker 2006, Tonne 2002, Lencioni et al. 2024). Nearly all occurrences on public lands are part of active sheep or cattle grazing allotments. Although this species evolved with native herbivores, the effect of domestic livestock in combination with increasing pressure from wildlife (mainly due to increases in elk numbers), may be beyond its tolerance (Decker 2006). According to Strohmeyer and Maschinski (1995), nearly 62% of Arizona willow populations had reduced size and vigor attributed to grazing by ungulates, with cattle and elk being the primary herbivores observed in an experimental study. However, this threat has been somewhat reduced with recent conservation agreements (AGFD 2002). Since the mid-1990s, lands managers have attempted to mitigate this threat by installing ungulate enclosures around populations, which have been maintained for almost three decades, though caged individuals still show low-levels of browse (Lencioni et al. 2024). Overgrazing also has indirect impacts to S. arizonica by degrading wetland habitats and introducing non-native vegetation (Mygatt 1999). Excessive use of habitat by livestock also causes soil compaction, erosion, and stream channel downcutting (Tonne 2002). Because numbers of cattle and elk are relatively high in New Mexico and Arizona, the populations there may be threatened at a higher extent (Maschinski no date).

Hydrologic alteration (e.g. from diversions and impoundments or elimination of beaver populations) is also a primary threat. In Arizona, habitat has been altered by the construction of high elevation recreational fishing ponds, or tanks for livestock (Decker 2006). Additional threats to this species listed in the Arizona Willow Conservation Agreement and Strategy included alteration of hydrology, disease, timber harvest, and recreation (Arizona Willow Interagency Technical Team 1995). Other threats to this species include impacts from timber harvesting, road construction and maintenance, impacts from recreational use (off-road vehicles and snowmobiles), development and maintenance of ski resort facilities, and disease (particularly infection by fungal rust belonging to the species complex Melampsora epitea), and climate change (Mygatt 1999, AGFD 2002, Decker 2006, Fertig and Reynolds 2009, Maschinski no date). Many of these threats are synergistic; for example, stressed habitat conditions tend to promote rust outbreaks (Arizona Rare Plant Committee 2001). Climate change in particular is a significant threat to Salix arizonica (Decker 2006), and this species is considered to be extremely vulnerable to its effects (Handwerk et al. 2015).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Short shrubs, 0.1-1.5 (2.5) m tall; year-old twigs reddish or sometimes yellowish, glabrous or pubescent; stipules small, soon deciduous; petioles 3-8 mm long; leaf blades glandular-serrulate, acute to obtuse, with a cordate or subcordate (rounded) base, ovate to obovate, mostly 1.5-2.4 times as long as wide, 1-5 cm long and 0.5-2.8 (3.1) cm wide, sparsely pubescent to sometimes glabrous, non-glaucous; catkins precocious to coetaneous, sessile or on leafy peduncles to 1.2 cm long; floral bracts brown or black, persistent, with long, straight or wavy hairs; staminate catkins 1-3 cm long; stamens 2, filaments glabrous; pistillate catkins 1-4 cm long; capsule 3-5 mm long, glabrous, stipes 0.2-1.5 mm long; style 0.5-1.5 mm long, longer than the stigmas (Culver and Lemley 2013).

Diagnostic Characteristics

General identifying features are the short stature and the broad, non-glaucous leaves with a cordate or subcordate base (Holmgren et al. 2005). S. arizonica and S. boothii are distinguished by differences in leaf size, shape and base (specifically, S. arizonica has broader leaves with rounded to cordate bases), number of leaf margin teeth per centimeter (S. arizonica has more than S. boothii), stem internode length, and catkin length (Mygatt 1999, Decker 2006).

Habitat

Salix arizonica occurs in high elevation (subalpine) sedge meadows, low gradient streambanks, wet drainage ways, and cienegas from 2,600 to 3,400 m in elevation (FNA 2010). Its habitat often occurs as a narrow, linear strip associated with perennial water in seeps, springs, stream sides, and wet meadows (Decker 2006). Plants are also sometimes found in drier sites adjacent to forest edges or within the riparian zone where subsurface channels provide moisture. Sites tend to be unshaded to partly shaded. It is frequently associated with substrates of volcanic origin and appears to favor coarse-textured and well-watered soils, including those associated with alluvial deposits; soils tend to not be very rocky. In the White Mountains of Arizona, this species occurs on a mixture of felsic, basaltic, and epiclastic formations in glaciated reaches, large alluvial deposits, or in Sheep Crossing Formation (Long and Medina 2007). Slopes are generally flat to moderate (less than 5-9%). Rangewide, the most common associated species include Dasiphora floribunda, Caltha leptosepala, Carex spp., Deschampsia caespitosa, Pedicularis groenlandica, Picea engelmannii, Poa pratensis and other willows, especially S. monticola and S. planifolia (Decker 2006). In Colorado, this species is found in moist meadows or streamsides with Salix wolfii, Pentaphylloides floribunda, Salix monticola, Psychrophila leptosepala, Carex aquatilis, Phleum commutatum, Carex utriculata, Deschampsia cespitosa, Geum macrophyllum, Swertia perennis, Clementsia rhodantha, and Potentilla pulcherrima (Colorado Natural Heritage Program 2015).

Reproduction

Salix arizonica is a long-lived perennial which devotes several years to vegetative growth before reproducing (Decker 2006). Seeds of S. arizonica are reported to be very lightweight and are thought to disperse by both wind and water (Arizona Willow Interagency Technical Team 1995).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferForest EdgeGrassland/herbaceous
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
ArizonaS2Yes
ColoradoS1Yes
UtahS2Yes
New MexicoS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
1.3 - Tourism & recreation areasSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
2 - Agriculture & aquaculturePervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2.3.4 - Scale unknown/unrecordedPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource usePervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh - moderate
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh - moderate
5.3.4 - Unintentional effects: large scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest]Pervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh - moderate
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineInsignificant/negligible or past
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineInsignificant/negligible or past
7.2.11 - Dams (size unknown)Large (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineInsignificant/negligible or past
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive - largeSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, DECIDUOUS
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
Utah (1)
AreaForestAcres
HancockDixie National Forest9,809
References (31)
  1. Argus, G. W. 2007. <i>Salix </i>(Salicaceae) distribution maps and a synopsis of their classification in North America, north of Mexico. Harvard Papers in Botany 12(2): 335-368.
  2. Arizona Game and Fish Department. 2002. <i>Salix arizonica</i>. Unpublished abstract compiled and edited by the Heritage Data Management System, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ. 4 pp.
  3. Arizona Rare Plant Committee (ARPC). 2001. Arizona rare plant field guide: A collaboration of agencies and organizations. Arizona Rare Plant Committee, Phoenix.
  4. Arizona Willow Interagency Technical Team. 1995. Arizona willow conservation agreement and strategy. U.S. Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, Utah; U.S. Forest Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, New Mexico; National Park Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Denver, Colorado; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, Salt Lake City, Utah; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM.
  5. Center for Plant Conservation (CPC). 2025. Plant Profile: Arizona willow (<i>Salix arizonica</i>). Online. Available: <a href="https://saveplants.org/plant-profile/3794/Salix-arizonica/Arizona-Willow/">saveplants.org/plant-profile/3794/Salix-arizonica/Arizona-Willow/</a> (accessed 2025).
  6. Colorado Natural Heritage Program. 2015. June 18 last update. Colorado Rare Plant Guide. Fact sheet for <i>Salix arizonica</i>. Online. Available: https://cnhp.colostate.edu/rareplant/details/?plantID=19747 (Accessed 2025).
  7. Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). 2023. Element Subnational Ranking Form: <i>Salix arizonica</i> in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia (accessed 28 April 2025).
  8. Culver, D. R. and J. M. Lemly. 2013a. Field Guide to Colorado's Wetland Plants. Colorado Natural Heritage Program. Colorado State University. 694 pp.
  9. Decker, K. 2006. <i>Salix arizonica </i>Dorn (Arizona willow): A technical conservation assessment. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Online. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/salixarizonica.pdf (Accessed 2009).
  10. Fertig, W. and D. N. Reynolds. 2009. Survey of Rare Plants of Cedar Breaks National Monument: Final Report CPCESU Cooperative Agreement # H1200-004-0002 Survey Rare Plants and Establish Compliance with Conservation Agreement for Arizona Willow at Cedar Breaks National Monument. Prepared for Cedar Breaks National Monument, The Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, and Southern Utah University. 20 January 2009.
  11. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2010. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 7. Magnoliophyta: Salicaceae to Brassicaceae. Oxford University Press, New York. xxii + 797 pp.
  12. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  13. Handwerk, J., L. Grunau, and S. Spackman-Panjabi. 2015. Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: 2015 Rare Plant Addendum. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
  14. Holmgren, N.H., P.K. Holmgren, and A. Cronquist. 2005. Intermountain flora. Volume 2, part B. Subclass Dilleniidae. The New York Botanical Garden Press. 488 pages.
  15. iNaturalist. 2025. Online. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org (accessed 2025).
  16. Karrenberg, S., Edwards, P.J., and J. Kollmann. 2002. The life history of Salicaceae living in the active zone of floodplains. Freshwater Biology 47:73-748.
  17. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  18. Lencioni, S.J., Massatti, R., Keefover-Ring, K. and L.M. Holeski. 2024. The Cost of Self-Defense: Browsing Effects in the Rare Plant Species Salix arizonica. Ecology and Evolution14(11): e70582.
  19. Long, J.W. and A.L. Medina. 2007. Geologic associations of Arizona willow in the White Mountains, Arizona. In: Barlow-Irick, P., Anderson, J., C. McDonald, tech eds. Southwestern rare and endangered plants: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference; March 22-26, 2004, Las Cruces, New Mexico. Proceedings. RMRS-P-48CD. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Flagstaff, AZ. 48:49-58.
  20. Maschinski, J. No date. Center for Plant Conservation National Collection Plant Profile: <i>Salix arizonia</i>. Online. Available: http://ridgwaydb.mobot.org/cpcweb/CPC_ViewProfile.asp?CPCNum=3794. Accessed 2003, June 17.
  21. Mygatt, J. 1999. New Mexico Rare Plants: <i>Salix arizonica</i> (Arizona willow). New Mexico Rare Plant Technical Council, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Online. Available: http://nmrareplants.unm.edu (Version 15 March 2002). Accessed 2003, June 17.
  22. NatureServe. 2025. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  23. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  24. Rutman, S. 1992. Handbook of Arizona's endangered, threatened, and candidate plants. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Phoenix, Arizona.
  25. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2025. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2025).
  26. Strohmeyer, S. and J. Maschinski. 1996. Elk and Cattle Herbivory on Arizona Willow (<i>Salix arizonica</i>). In J. Maschinski, H.D. Hammond, and L. Holter, editors. Proceedings of the Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plant Conference, September 11-14, Flagstaff, AZ. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-GTR-283: 187-192.
  27. Thompson, J.T., R. Van Buren, and K.T. Harper. 2003. Genetic analysis of the rare species <i>Salix arizonica</i> (Salicaceae) and associated willows in Arizona and Utah. Western North American Naturalist 63:273-282.
  28. Tonne, P. 2002. Status report for Arizona willow (<i>Salix arizonica</i>; Salicaceae). New Mexico Natural Heritage Program Report 02-GTR-224, for New Mexico Forestry and Resources Conservation Division, prepared by the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, Albuquerque, NM. 46 pp.
  29. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1995. Withdrawal of proposed rule to list the plant <i>Salix arizonica</i> (Arizona willow) as endangered with critical habitat. Federal Register 60(82): 20951-20952.
  30. Utah Natural Heritage Program (UNHP). 2021. Element Subnational Ranking Form: <i>Salix arizonica</i> in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia (accessed 28 April 2025).
  31. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich and L.C. Higgins. (Eds.) 2008. A Utah Flora. 4th edition, revised. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, U.S.A. 1019 pp.