Anaxyrus microscaphus

(Cope, 1867)

Arizona Toad

G4Apparently Secure Found in 32 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105766
Element CodeAAABB01110
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderAnura
FamilyBufonidae
GenusAnaxyrus
Synonyms
Bufo microscaphus(Cope, 1867 "1866")Bufo microscaphus microscaphus(Cope, 1867 "1866")
Other Common Names
Arizona toad (EN)
Concept Reference
Gergus, E.W.A. 1998. Systematics of the Bufo microscaphus complex: allozyme evidence. Herpetologica 54:317-325.
Taxonomic Comments
The genus Anaxyrus was split from Bufo by Frost et al. (2006). However, taxonomy within the genus Bufo remains controversial and many references still use the long-established Bufo.

This species formerly was regarded as a subspecies of Bufo (now Anaxyrus) woodhousii by some authors. Gergus (1998) examined allozyme variation in the microscaphus complex and found discrete differences among the three subspecies (microscaphus ,californicus, and mexicanus), though the morphological differences are minor. Formerly included A. mexicanus and A. californicus as subspecies, but Gergus concluded that under the phylogenetic species concept they should be recognized as species.

See Sullivan and Lamb (1988), Malmos et al. (2001) and Schwaner and Sullivan (2009) for information on hybridization with Anaxyrus woodhousii in central Arizona.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-06-03
Change Date2025-06-03
Edition Date2025-06-03
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species is endemic to the southwestern U.S. in southwestern Utah, southern Nevada, Arizona, and western New Mexico. The population has declined in area of occupancy and abundance, although overall distribution has changed little. Damming riverine, alterations to isolated wetland habitats, and increasing frequency and severity of droughts continues to threaten this species.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs in the southwestern United States in scattered locations in southwestern Utah, southern Nevada, Arizona, and western New Mexico (Price and Sullivan 1988, Sullivan 1993, Gergus 1998, Stebbins 2003, Brennan and Holycross 2006, Ryan et al. 2014). It is found from the Colorado and Virgin river basins in southern Nevada and southwestern Utah southeast through the lower mountains of Arizona mostly below the Mogollon Rim into the Mogollon Plateau of west-central New Mexico (Nigro and Rorabaugh 2023). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records from 2005-2025, range extent is estimated to be 208,600 km² (RARECAT 2025).

It is presumed extirpated from the small historical distribution in California (Clark, Jr. 2011).
Occurrences Comments
Applying a 10 km separation distance to GBIF (2025) records from 2005-2025, 175 occurrences are estimated (RARECAT 2025).

Ryan et al. (2017) mapped 28 occupied sites in New Mexico. Price and Sullivan (1988) mapped about 45 collection sites in Arizona, Utah, and Nevada. In Arizona, at least 55 populations were documented from 1980-1995 (Nigro and Rorabaugh 2023).
Threat Impact Comments
Drought and lack of persistent wetlands is the primary threat to this species (Ryan et al. 2014, Oyler-McCance et al. 2024). As smaller isolated wetlands dry up and local extirpations occur, this species has shifted to primarily occupying riverine habitat (Driver et al. 2023). This species is suffering localized declines where riverine habitats have been dammed or otherwise converted to slow-moving or still water habitats (e.g. reservoirs, cattle ponds, golf course ponds) and symaptric A. woodhousii has out-competed A. microscaphus (Sullivan and Lamb 1988, Sullivan 1993, Schwaner and Sullivan 2005, Schwaner and Sullivan 2009, Wooten et al. 2019, Nigro and Rorabaugh 2023). In New Mexico, where A. woodhousii is not living sympatrically with this species, this species does occupy these human-modified wetlands (Ryan et al. 2014, Ryan et al. 2017a).

Hybridization between A. woodhousii and A. microcephalus has occurred in Arizona (Sullivan and Lamb 1988, Sullivan 1993), Nevada (Schwaner and Sullivan 2005), and Utah (Schwaner and Sullivan 2009), but apparently not in New Mexico (Ryan et al. 2014, Ryan et al. 2017a). Hybridization between these species occurs after riverine habitats are converted to reservoirs by damming in areas where both species occur, and A. woodhousii subsequently moves into these slower-moving or still water environments (Sullivan and Lamb 1988, Sullivan 1993, Ryan et al. 2014, Wooten et al. 2019). Despite earlier suggestions of hybridization eliminating A. microscaphus (Sullivan 1986), there is no evidence that this is occurring (Schwaner and Sullivan 2009, Ryan et al. 2017a, Wooten et al. 2019).

Chytrid has been detected in this species in New Mexico, but it has not been associated with mortality (Ryan et al. 2014). However, an unidentified skin fungal pathogen was associated with mortality events at two sites in New Mexico (Ryan et al. 2014).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This is a uniformly warty toad with the eyelids and the front of the oval parotoid glands usually pale; usually there is a light area on each sacral hump and in the middle of the back; cranial crests weak or absent; dorsal color varies with substrate color; both males and females have a pale throat; snout-vent length 5-8 cm; young have red-tipped tubercles on dorsum and the underside of the feet is yellow (Stebbins 1985).

Diagnostic Characteristics

This species differs from A. californicus in having red rather than yellow spots on the dorsum of juveniles (Gergus 1998). It differs from A. woodhousii in lacking a dorsal stripe, having weak or no cranial crests, more rounded parotoid glands, and by the males lacking a dark throat. It differs from A. speciosus in having the light colored areas on the eyelids, front of the parotoid glands, on the sacral humps, and in the middle of the back; also by lacking a sharp-edged tubercle on the hind feet (Stebbins 1985).

Habitat

Habitat includes rocky stream courses in the pine-oak zone (e.g., Arizona, New Mexico), stream courses bordered by willows and cottonwoods, irrigation ditches, flooded/irrigated fields, and reservoirs (Stebbins 1954, Price and Sullivan 1988, Schwaner and Sullivan 2005). Agricultural fields and irrigated ditches are also occasionally used (Dodd Jr. 2023).

Egg deposition occurs among gravel, leaves, or sticks, or on mud or clean sand, in flowing or shallow quiet waters of perennial or semipermanent streams (Dahl et al. 2000) or shallow ponds.

Reproduction

In west-central Arizona, breeding occurred February-April, independent of rainfall, and usually occurred for a total of a few weeks each year (Sullivan 1992). In southwestern Utah, breeding peaks in June. At higher elevations, breeding may extend to July or perhaps August (Stebbins 1985).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralDesertCropland/hedgerow
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
New MexicoS3Yes
NevadaS2Yes
ArizonaS3Yes
UtahS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (32)
Arizona (9)
AreaForestAcres
Black River CanyonApache-Sitgreaves National Forests11,817
Blind Indian CreekPrescott National Forest26,847
Campbell BlueApache-Sitgreaves National Forests7,003
CenterfireApache-Sitgreaves National Forests13,130
HellsgateTonto National Forest6,171
Hot AirApache-Sitgreaves National Forests31,712
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
NolanApache-Sitgreaves National Forests6,780
Sierra Ancha Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest7,787
New Mexico (17)
AreaForestAcres
Apache Kid ContiguousCibola National Forest67,542
Apache MountainGila National Forest17,506
Aspen MountainGila National Forest23,784
Canyon CreekGila National Forest9,824
Contiguous To Black & Aldo Leopold WildernessGila National Forest111,883
Contiguous To Blue Range WildernessGila National Forest1,980
Contiguous To Gila Wilderness & Primitive AreaGila National Forest79,049
Devils CreekGila National Forest89,916
Dry CreekGila National Forest26,719
Eagle PeakGila National Forest34,016
Elk MountainGila National Forest6,550
Frisco BoxGila National Forest38,979
Gila BoxGila National Forest23,759
Meadow CreekGila National Forest34,167
NolanGila National Forest13,051
Sawyers PeakGila National Forest59,743
Wahoo MountainGila National Forest23,122
Utah (6)
AreaForestAcres
Bull ValleyDixie National Forest10,911
CottonwoodDixie National Forest6,754
Lost PeakDixie National Forest4,141
Moody WashDixie National Forest31,835
Pine Valley MountainsDixie National Forest57,673
Stoddard MountainDixie National Forest13,165
References (45)
  1. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  2. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  3. Blair, A. P. 1955. Distribution, variation, and hybridization in a relict toad (<i>Bufo microscaphus</i>) in southwestern Utah. American Museum Novitates 1722: 1-38.
  4. Brennan, T. C., and A. T. Holycross. 2006. A field guide to amphibians and reptiles in Arizona. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix. v + 150 pp.
  5. Brown, A., Christensen, B., Schwaner, T.D., and Nickerson, M.F. 2000. Bufo microscaphus (Arizona Toad). Reproduction. Herpetological Review. 31:168.
  6. Clark, H. O., Jr. 2011. Herpetofauna of the 100-Mile Circle, Arizona toad, <i>Anaxyrus microscaphus</i> (Cope "1866" 1867). Sonoran Herpetologist 24(2): 14-15.
  7. Collins, J. T. 1991. Viewpoint: a new taxonomic arrangement for some North American amphibians and reptiles. SSAR Herpetol. Review 22:42-43.
  8. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  9. Dahl, A., M. P. Donovan, and T. D. Schwaner. 2000. Egg mass deposition by Arizona toads, BUFO MICROSCAPHUS, along a narrow canyon stream. Western North American Naturalist 60:456-458.
  10. Degenhardt, W. G., C. W. Painter, and A. H. Price. 1996. Amphibians and reptiles of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. xix + 431 pp.
  11. Dodd, C. K., Jr. 2023. Frogs of the United States and Canada, Second Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
  12. Driver, S. M., C. B. Eversole, D. R. Unger, D. L. Kulhavy, C. M. Schalk, and I.-K. Hung. 2023. Assessing the impacts of climate change on the at-risk species <i>Anaxyrus microscaphus</i> (The Arizona Toad): a local and range-wide habitat suitability analysis. Ecologies 4(4): 762-778. doi: 10.3390/ecologies4040050
  13. Frost, D. R. 2010. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.4 (8 April 2010). Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
  14. Frost, D. R. 2017. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
  15. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  16. Frost, D.R., T. Grant, J. Faivovich, R. Bain, A. Haas, C.F.B. Haddad, R.O. de Sa´, S.C. Donnellan, C.J. Raxworthy, M. Wilkinson, A. Channing, J.A. Campbell, B.L. Blotto, P. Moler, R.C. Drewes, R.A. Nussbaum, J.D. Lynch, D. Green, and W.C. Wheeler. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1-370.
  17. Gergus, E.W.A. 1998. Systematics of the <i>Bufo microscaphus</i> complex: allozyme evidence. Herpetologica 54:317-325.
  18. Gergus, E.W.A., B. K. Sullivan, and K. B. Malmos. 1997b. <i>Bufo microscaphus</i> complex call variation: species boundaries and mate recognition. Ethology 103:1-11.
  19. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  20. Krupa, J.J. 1988. Fertilization efficiency in the Great Plains toad (Bufo cognatus). Copeia. 1988:800-802.
  21. LaFrance, B. J., and A. M. Ray . 2024. A dataset of amphibian species in U.S. National Parks, Version 1.4. National Park Service. Fort Collins CO. doi: 10.57830/2306757
  22. Malmos, K. B., B. K. Sullivan, and T. Lamb. 2001. Calling behavior and directional hybridization between two toads (<i>Bufo microscaphus</i> X <i>B. woodhousei</i>) in Arizona. Evolution. 55:626-630.
  23. Nigro, E., and J. Rorabaugh. 2023. Arizona toad (<i>Anaxyrus microscaphus</i>). Online field guide to the reptiles and amphibians of Arizona. https://reptilesofaz.org/turtle-amphibs-subpages/h-a-microscaphus/ [accessed 21 September 2025].
  24. Oyler-McCance, S. J., M. J. Ryan, B. K. Sullivan, J. A. Fike, R. S. Cornman, J. T. Giermakowski, S. J. Zimmerman, R. L. Harrow, S. J. Hedwall, B. R. Hossack, I. M. Latella, R. E. Lovich, S. Siefken, B. H. Sigafus, and E. Muths. 2024. Genetic connectivity in the Arizona toad (Anaxyrus microscaphus): implications for conservation of a stream dwelling amphibian in the arid Southwestern United States. Conservation Genetics 25: 835–848.
  25. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  26. Price, A. H., and B. K. Sullivan. 1988. BUFO MICROSCAPHUS.Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 415.1-415.3.
  27. Ryan, M. J., Giermakowski, J. T., Latella, I. M., & Snell, H. L. (2017). Final Report: Status of the Arizona toad (<i>Anaxyrus microscaphus</i>) in New Mexico. University of New Mexico. doi: 10.25844/XN90-QD73
  28. Ryan, M. J., I. M. Latella, J. T. Giermakowski, and H. L. Snell. 2014. Current status of the Arizona Toad (<i>Anaxyrus microscaphus</i>) in New Mexico: identification and evaluation of potential threats to its persistence. Final Report 2014. Submitted to New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, NM. 26 pp. + appendices.
  29. Ryan, M. J., J. T. Giermakowski, I. M. Latella, and H. L. Snell. 2017. No evidence of hybridization between the Arizona toad (<i>Anaxyrus microscaphus</i>) and Woodhouse’s toad (<i>A. woodhousii</i>) in New Mexico, USA. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 12(2): 565-575.
  30. Schwaner, T.D 2003. Hybridization with Woodhouse's toad, Bufo woodhousii, and introgression in Arizona toads, Bufo microscaphus, along the Beaver Dam Wash in southwestern Utah. Georgia Journal of Science. 61:46.
  31. Schwaner, T. D., and B. K. Sullivan. 2005. <i>Bufo microscaphus</i> Cope, 1867 "1866" Arizona toad. Pages 422-424 in M. J. Lannoo, editor. Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press. Berkeley, California.
  32. Schwaner, T. D., and B. K. Sullivan. 2009. Fifty years of hybridization: introgression between the Arizona toad (<i>Bufo microscaphus</i>) and Woodhouse's toad (<i>B. woodhousii</i>) along Beaver Dam Wash in Utah. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 4(2):198-206.
  33. Schwaner, T.D., Hadley, D.R., Jenkins, K.R., Donovan, M.P. and Tait, B.A. 1998. Population dynamics and life-history studies of toads and frogs: short- and long-ranged needs for amphibian populations in southern Utah. Learning from the Land: Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Science Symposium Proceedings. Hill, L.M.,editor. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of land Management. BLM/UT/GI-98/006+1220.
  34. Stebbins, R. C. 1954a. Amphibians and reptiles of western North America. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  35. Stebbins, R. C. 1972. California Amphibians and Reptiles. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
  36. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  37. Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  38. Sullivan, B. K. 1992. Calling behavior of the southwestern toad (BUFO MICROSCAPHUS). Herpetologica 48:383-389.
  39. Sullivan, B. K. 1993. Distribution of the southwestern toad (BUFO MICROSCAPHUS) in Arizona. Great Basin Nat. 53:402-406.
  40. Sullivan, B. K. 1995. Temporal stability in hybridization between <i>Bufo microscaphus </i>and <i>Bufo woodhousii </i>(Anura: Bufonidae): Bahavior and morphology. J. Evol. Biol 8: 233-247.
  41. Sullivan, B. K. and T. Lamb. 1988. Hybridization between the toads <i>Bufo microscaphus</i> and <i>Bufo woodhousii</i> in Arizona: variation in release calls and allozymes. Herpetologica 44:325-333.
  42. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1994. Determination of endangered status for the arroyo southwestern toad. Federal Register 59(241):64859-64866. 16 December 1994.
  43. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on 31 Petitions. Federal Register 80(126):37568-37579.
  44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. National Listing Workplan. Online. Available: https://www.fws.gov/project/national-listing-workplan
  45. Wooten, J. A., B. K. Sullivan, M. R. Klooster, T. D. Schwaner, K. O. Sullivan, A. D. Brown, M. Takahashi, and P. R. Bradford. 2019. Thirty years of hybridization between toads along the Agua Fria River in Arizona. Journal of Herpetology 53(2): 104-114.