Desmognathus wrighti

King, 1936

Pygmy Salamander

G3Vulnerable Found in 6 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.844117
Element CodeAAAAD03100
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyPlethodontidae
GenusDesmognathus
Other Common Names
Pygmy Salamander (EN) Southern Pygmy Salamander (EN)
Concept Reference
Crespi, E. J., R. A. Browne, and L. J. Rissler. 2010. Taxonomic revision of Desmognathus wrighti (Caudata: Plethodontidae). Herpetologica 66: 283-295.
Taxonomic Comments
Desmognathus organi (Crespi et al. 2010) formerly was included in this species. Crespi et al. (2010) referred to this species as "pygmy salamander." The English name "southern pygmy salamander" is provisionally adopted here in order to help distinguish this species from the one that was called "pygmy salamander" before D. organi (northern pygmy salamander) was recognized as a distinct species. Beamer and Lamb (2020), in their discussion of Desmognathus mtDNA phylogenetics, confirmed the placement of this species as the sister taxon of Desmognathus organi (Frost 2020).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-07-01
Change Date2010-09-08
Edition Date2025-07-01
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G. (2010); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
This species has a limited range in the southern Appalachian Mountains of southwestern North Carolina and southeastern Tennessee. The apparently stable with healthy populations, but loss of forest habitat due to logging, recreational development, acid rain, and insect pests is a concern.
Range Extent Comments
This species has a restricted range in southwestern North Carolina and southeastern Tennessee (Crespi et al. 2010). Range extent is estimated to be 7,804 km² (GBIF 2025, NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025).
Occurrences Comments
This species is known from at least a few dozen sites within its small range (see map in Crespi et al. 2010). Applying a 3 km separation distance to occurrence records, 42 occurrences are estimated (GBIF 2025, NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
The most immediate threats to this species involve habitat degradation in the form of reduced canopy. Clearcuts and logging cause the groundlayer to become drier, reducing moist microhabitat for this species (Pague 1991, J. Organ, pers. comm., 1997). The same occurs from canopy loss caused by hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae) and spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) (Pague 1991; J. Organ, pers. comm., 1997; Rossell Jr. et al. 2018). Red spruce-Fraser fir forests are declining in many high elevation sites of the southern Appalachians. Acid rain has also been implicated in the reduction of canopy cover (Rossell Jr. et al. 2018). Any loss of habitat would be a serious threat to populations in Virginia (Pague 1991). This species is projected to lose 94% of its climatic niche by 2050 due to climate change (Sutton et al. 2015). Overcollection is also a potential threat (Mitchell 1991, Rossell Jr. et al. 2018).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Chiefly spruce-fir forests, also (in lower abundance) hardwood forests at lower elevations (Harrison 2000, Rossell Jr. et al. 2018), though Petranka (1998) stated that these salamanders often occur at relatively high densities in mature mesophytic cove forests at lower elevations. Hides under moss, leaf litter, logs, bark on stumps, and rocks (Rossell Jr. et al. 2018). Ascends trees to about 2 meters in wet or foggy weather. Spends winter in underground seepages. Eggs are laid in underground cavities among rocks of spring seeps.

Ecology

Predators include carabid beetles and Gyrinophilus salamanders.

Reproduction

Egg laying occurs in winter and perhaps in spring or fall. Clutch size: 3-14. Hatching has been observed in fall. No aquatic larval stage; metamorphosis occurs within egg. Female remains with eggs until hatching.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - Mixed
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
North CarolinaS3Yes
TennesseeS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.3 - Tourism & recreation areasSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.1 - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animalsSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.5 - Air-borne pollutantsPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.5.1 - Acid rainPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (6)
North Carolina (4)
AreaForestAcres
Big Indian (addition)Nantahala National Forest1,155
Chunky Gal (addition)Nantahala National Forest3,336
Graveyard Ridge (addition)Pisgah National Forest1,958
Middle Prong AdditionPisgah National Forest1,852
Tennessee (2)
AreaForestAcres
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
Upper Bald RiverCherokee National Forest9,202
References (15)
  1. Beamer, D. A., and T. Lamb. 2020. Towards rectifying limitations on species delineation in dusky salamanders (<i>Desmognathus</i>: Plethodontidae): An ecoregion-drainage sampling grid reveals additional cryptic clades. Zootaxa 4734: 1-61.
  2. Crespi, E. J., R. A. Browne, and L. J. Rissler. 2010. Taxonomic revision of <i>Desmognathus wrighti </i>(Caudata: Plethodontidae). Herpetologica 66: 283-295.
  3. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  4. Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
  5. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  6. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  7. Harrison, J.R., III. 2000. Desmognathus wrighti. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 704:1-7.
  8. Mitchell, J. C. 1991. Amphibians and reptiles. Pages 411-76 in K. Terwilliger (coordinator). Virginia's Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia.
  9. NatureServe. 2025. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  10. Pague, C. A. 1991. Amphibians and reptiles. Pages 411-76 in K. Terwilliger (coordinator). Virginia's Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia.
  11. Petranka, J. W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  12. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  13. Rossell, C. R., Jr., I. C. Haas, L. A. Williams, and S. C. Patch. 2018. Comparison of relative abundance and microhabitat of <i>Desmognathus organi</i> (northern pygmy salamander) and <i>Desmognathus wrighti</i> (southern pygmy salamander) in North Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 17(1): 141-154.
  14. Sutton, W. B., K. Barrett, A. T. Moody, C. S. Loftin, P. G. deMaynadier, and P. Nanjappa. 2015. Predicted changes in climatic niche and climate refugia of conservation priority salamander species in the northeastern <br/>United States. Forests 6: 1-26. doi:10.3390/f6010001
  15. Tingstad, A. H., R. J. Lempert, M. Moskwik, D. L. Warren, C. Parmesan, L. O. Mearns, S. McGinnis, and Y. Ryu. 2017. Demonstrating the applicability of Robust Decision Making (RDM) to conservation decision-making under uncertain future climate: pilot study using the northern pygmy salamander (<i>Desmognathus organi</i>). Journal of Conservation Planning 13: 11-24.