Rhyacotriton kezeri

Good and Wake, 1992

Columbia Torrent Salamander

G2Imperiled (G2G3) Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Very high - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103633
Element CodeAAAAJ01040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyRhyacotritonidae
GenusRhyacotriton
Concept Reference
Good, D. A., and D. B. Wake. 1992. Geographic variation and speciation in the torrent salamanders of the genus Rhyacotriton (Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae). University of California Publications in Zoology 126:i-xii, 1-91.
Taxonomic Comments
The genus Rhyacotriton previously contained a single species R. olympicus. Based on genetic differentiation, Good and Wake (1992) split olympicus into 4 species: R. olympicus, R. variegatus, R. kezeri, and R. cascadae.

Good and Wake (1992) removed Rhyacotriton from the family Dicamptodontidae and established it as the sole member of the family Rhyacotritonidae.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2022-08-04
Change Date2004-05-10
Edition Date2022-08-04
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., K. J. Popper, and L. Hallock (2004), Gaines, E. (2022)
Threat ImpactVery high - medium
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 300
Rank Reasons
Small range in cold streams and seeps of the Coast Ranges of Washington and Oregon; compared to other torrent salamanders, this species' continued presence in managed forests suggests it may be less sensitive to timber harvest and other activities that result in increased water temperature and sedimentation. There are very few adequately protected populations.
Range Extent Comments
This species is found in the Coast Range of Oregon and Washington, from the vicinity of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County, Washington, south through Pacific, Lewis, Wahkiakum, and Cowlitz counties, Washington to the Little Nestucca River and the Grande Ronde Valley in Clastsop, Polk, Tillamook, and Yamhill counties, Oregon, USA (Good and Wake 1992, Russell et al. 2010, ORBIC 2022). iNaturalist shows additional research grade records from Washington and Columbia counties, Oregon (iNaturalist 2022). Including these records increases the range extent to 11,000 sq km. Distribution within the range is patchy (Hallock and McAllister 2005).
Occurrences Comments
There are approximately 20 unique documented locations in Oregon (325 observations; ORBIC 2022) and 20 unique documented locations in Washington (261 observations; ORBIC 2022). Additional records may exist. iNaturalist has approximately 120 unique research grade locations (170 observation records) across the two states (iNaturalist 2022), although it is possible that some of these may be misidentified, and many of them overlap with existing records.
Threat Impact Comments
Logging can negatively impact this species by increasing stream temperature and sedimentation (Welsh and Hodgson 2008), though the cool, moist climate and rapid vegetation growth in the Coast Range may mitigate these effects to some degree (Russell et al. 2010). The species occupies areas that area intensively managed for timber. The effect of timber harvest on Rhyacotriton kezeri is not clear, but activities that result in higher stream temperature, increased sedimentation, altered hydrology, or population fragmentation (including logging and road construction and maintenance) can have a negative effect on this species (Hallock and McAllister 2005, Russell et al. 2010, Emel et al. 2019). Habitat fragmentation from logging limits dispersal (Emel et al. 2019). Torrent salamanders in general are sensitive to increased temperature and sedimentation, such as may result from logging or logging road construction (Bury and Corn 1988, Corn and Bury 1989), but specific information on the effect on R. kezeri is not available. Optimal mature forest habitat has been greatly reduced by timber harvest activities within the range of this species (Hallock and McAllister 2005). Road construction and maintenance, including for logging, can have negative impacts to this species through increased sedimentation and altered flows. Roads and culverts may also pose a barrier to movement, particularly in a species with limited dispersal ability (Howell and Maggiulli 2011). However, this species' continued presence in managed forests suggests it may be less sensitive to timber harvest and other activities that result in increased water temperature and sedimentation.
Torrent salamanders are vulnerable to environmental toxins (Howell and Maggiulli 2011). Herbicides to suppress the shrub layer on forest lands after harvest, or to control invasive vegetation, have the potential to negatively impact Rhyacotriton kezeri. The severity of this threat is unknown.
This species has been identified as moderate to highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change, largely due to anticipated changes in stream hydrology, warmer temperatures, and drier microclimates (Case et al. 2014, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2022)
Ecology & Habitat

Description

For all species in the genus, mean SVL for the largest 10% of adults is between 5 and 6 cm.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from variegatus and cascadae by the absence of dorsal spotting or blotching; differs from olympicus also by the line of demarcation between the dorsal and ventral ground color being less distinct and being straight (wavy in olympicus); difficult to distinguish from immediately adjacent populations of R. variegatus,but differs by one or more of the following characteristics: dorsal spots absent (weak but usually present in northern populations of variegatus), a few small ventral speckles usually present in the gular and chest regions (not present away from contact zone), lighter limb insertions, and less extensive dark pigmentation of the soles of the feet (Good and Wake 1992).

Habitat

Rhyacotriton kezeri occupies coastal coniferous forests in small, cold mountain stream headwaters and spring seepages. Larvae often occur under stones in shaded streams. Adults also inhabit these streams or streamsides in saturated moss-covered talus, or under rocks in splash zone. Primarily in older forest sites; required microclimatic and microhabitat conditions generally exist in older forests (Welsh 1990). Two Rhyacotriton nests were found in deep, narrow rock crevices; eggs were lying in cold, slow-moving water (Nussbaum et al. 1983). Columbia torrent salamanders were more abundant in streams with high gradient, basalt geology, and in reaches that were closer to the stream origin (Russell et al. 2010).

Ecology

Adults are very sensitive to desiccation.

Reproduction

Breeds mostly in spring and early summer. Mean clutch size (based on yolked ovarian follicles) is 11.0 (Good and Wake 1992). Larval period lasts probably 3 to 3.5 years (Nussbaum and Tait 1977). Sexually mature 1.0-1.5 years after metamorphosis (Behler and King 1979; Nussbaum et al. 1983).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - ConiferBare rock/talus/scree
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
WashingtonS3Yes
OregonS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh - moderate
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh - moderate
9 - PollutionSmall (1-10%)UnknownModerate (short-term)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsSmall (1-10%)UnknownModerate (short-term)
9.3.3 - Herbicides and pesticidesSmall (1-10%)UnknownModerate (short-term)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Oregon (1)
AreaForestAcres
Hebo 1aSiuslaw National Forest13,930
References (29)
  1. Anderson, J.D. 1968. Rhyacotriton, R. olympicus. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 68:1-2.
  2. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  3. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  4. Bury, R. B., and P. S. Corn. 1988a. Responses of aquatic and streamside amphibians to timber harvest: a review. Pages 165-181 in Raedaeke, K., editor. Streamside management: riparian wildlife and forestry interactions. Univ. Washington.
  5. Cole, M. B., K.R. Russell, and T.J. Mabee. 2003. Relation of headwater macroinvertebrate communities to in-stream and adjacent stand characteristics in managed second-growth forests of the Oregon Coast Range mountains. Canadian journal of forest research 33(8):1433-1443.
  6. Corn, P. S., and R. B. Bury. 1989. Logging in western Oregon: responses of headwater habitats and stream amphibians. Forest Ecology and Management 29:39-57.
  7. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  8. Emel, S. L., D. H. Olson, L. L. Knowles, and A. Storfer. 2019. Comparative landscape genetics of two endemic torrent salamander species, <i>Rhyacotriton kezeri</i> and <i>R. variegatus</i>: implications for forest management and species conservation. Conservation Genetics 20(4):801-815.
  9. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  10. Gaines, E. Zoology Data Manager, Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Oregon Field Office, Portland, Oregon. Pers. comm.
  11. Good, D. A., and D. B. Wake. 1992. Geographic variation and speciation in the torrent salamanders of the genus <i>Rhyacotriton </i> (Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae). <span><span><span>University of California Publications in Zoology </span></span></span>126:i-xii, 1-91.
  12. Good, D.A. and Wake, D.B. 1992. Geographic variation and speciation in the torrent salamanders of the genus Rhyacotriton (Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae). University of California Publications in Zoology. 126:i-xii:1-91.
  13. Good, D. A., G. Z. Wurst, and D. B. Wake. 1987. Patterns of geographic variation in allozymes of the Olympic salamander, <i> Rhyacotriton olympicus </i>(Caudata: Dicamptodontidae). Fieldiana Zoolgy No. 32 (1374). 15 pp.
  14. Hallock, L. A. and K. R. McAllister. 2002. Columbia torrent salamander. Washington Herp Atlas. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/refdesk/herp/
  15. iNaturalist. 2022. Online. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org (accessed 2022).
  16. McAllister, K.R. 1995. Distribution of amphibians and reptiles in Washington State. Northwest Fauna 3:81-112.
  17. Nussbaum, R. A., and C. K. Tait. 1977. Aspects of the life history and ecology of the Olympic salamander, Rhyacoitriton olympicus (Gaige). American Midland Naturalist 98(1):176-199.
  18. Nussbaum, R.A., E.D. Brodie, Jr., and R.M. Storm. 1983. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Pacific Northwest. University Press of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho. 332 pp.
  19. O'Donnell, R. P., and C. H. Richart. 2012. Diet of the Columbia Torrent Salamander, <i>Rhyacotriton kezeri</i> (Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae): linkages between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems in forested headwaters. Northwestern Naturalist 93(1):17-22.
  20. Russell, K. R., A. A. Gonyaw, J. D. Strom, K. E. Diemer, and K. C. Murk. 2002. Three new nests of the Columbia torrent salamander, <i>Rhyacotriton kezeri</i>, in Oregon with observations of nesting behavior. Northwestern Naturalist 83(1):19-22.
  21. Russell, K. R., T. J. Mabee, and M. B. Cole. 2004. Distribution and habitat of Columbia torrent salamanders at multiple spatial scales in managed forests of northwestern Oregon. The Journal of Wildlife Management 68(2):405-417.
  22. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  23. Thomas, J. W., Ward, J., Raphael, M.G., Anthony, R.G., Forsman, E.D., Gunderson, A.G., Holthausen, R.S., Marcot, B.G., Reeves, G.H., Sedell, J.R. and Solis, D.M. 1993. Viability assessments and management considerations for species associated with late-successional and old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest. The report of the Scientific Analysis Team. USDA Forest Service, Spotted Owl EIS Team. 530 pp. Portland, Oregon.
  24. Thomas, J. W., Ward, J., Raphael, M.G., Anthony, R.G., Forsman, E.D., Gunderson, A.G., Holthausen, R.S., Marcot, B.G., Reeves, G.H., Sedell, J.R. and Solis, D.M. 1993. Viability assessments and management considerations for species associated with late-successional and old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest. The report of the Scientific Analysis Team. USDA Forest Service, Spotted Owl EIS Team, Portland Oregon. 530 pp.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 90-day findings on 25 petitions, notice of petition findings and initiation of status reviews. Federal Register 80(181):56423-56432.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. National Listing Workplan. Online. Available: https://www.fws.gov/project/national-listing-workplan
  27. Washington Herp Atlas. 2009 (map products updated March 2017). A cooperative effort of Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Forest Service. 250 pp.
  28. Welsh, H. H., Jr. 1990. Relictual amphibians and old-growth forests. Conservation Biology 4:309-19.
  29. Wilkins, R. N., and N. Phil Peterson. 2000. Factors related to amphibian occurrence and abundance in headwater streams draining second-growth Douglas-fir forests in southwestern Washington. Forest Ecology and Management 139(1-3):79-91.