Rhyacotriton variegatus

Stebbins and Lowe, 1951

Southern Torrent Salamander

G3Vulnerable (G3?) Found in 18 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104649
Element CodeAAAAJ01020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyRhyacotritonidae
GenusRhyacotriton
Concept Reference
Good, D. A., and D. B. Wake. 1992. Geographic variation and speciation in the torrent salamanders of the genus Rhyacotriton (Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae). University of California Publications in Zoology 126:i-xii, 1-91.
Taxonomic Comments
The genus Rhyacotriton previously contained a single species R. olympicus. Based on genetic differentiation, Good and Wake (1992) split olympicus into 4 species.: R. olympicus, R. variegatus, R. kezeri, and R. cascadae. Highton (2000) interpreted their data as showing that R. cascadae likely encompasses two species.

Good and Wake (1992) removed Rhyacotriton from the family Dicamptodontidae and established it as the sole member of the family Rhyacotritonidae.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2022-09-21
Change Date2022-09-21
Edition Date2022-09-21
Edition AuthorsGaines, E. (2022)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species has a small range in western Oregon and northern California. It still occurs throughout its historical range and is common in places, but logging and associated sedimentation and increased water temperatures have led to some localized extirpations and reductions in abundance. Threats from logging are likely decreasing, but the species faces new threats from climate change and marijuana cultivation. Furthermore, it has narrow habitat requirements and with low reproductive rates and dispersal abilities it is slow to colonize new areas. Information on population size and trends is limited.
Range Extent Comments
The southern torrent salamander occurs from southern Mendocino County, California, USA, near Port Arena, through the Coast Ranges to the Little Nestucca River and the Grande Ronde Valley in Polk, Tillamook, and Yamhill counties, Oregon, where the range abuts that of R. kezeri (Emel et al. 2019, Halstead et al. 2020, iNaturalist 2022, ORBIC 2022). It also occurs along the West Slope of the Cascades as far north as the Middle Fork of the Willamette River east of Eugene (Wagner 2001, ORBIC 2022). It is known from Mendocino, Siskiyou, Humboldt and Del Norte Counties in California, and Benton, Coos, Curry, Douglas, Josephine, Lane, Lincoln, Polk, Tillamook, and Yamhill Counties in Oregon. It is patchily distributed in headwaters and low order tributaries (Welsh and Lind 1996).
Occurrences Comments
The species was present at 80.3% of randomly selected headwater streams in one study in coastal northern California (Diller and Wallace 1996). Although Oregon does not currently track element occurrences for this species, there are over 200 known observation records in the state that would distill to approximately 80 element occurrences. Approximately 25% of these observations are post-2000 (ORBIC 2022).
Threat Impact Comments
The southern torrent salamander is extremely sensitive to temperature increases and increased siltation that can be caused by timber harvest, road construction and maintenance (Welsh and Oliver 1998, Ashton et al. 2006, Bury 2008, Welsh and Hodgson 2008, Bury 2015, Welsh et al. 2019). Timber harvest is associated with increased sedimentation, habitat fragmentation, and water temperature, and leads to reduced relative abundance of this species (Ashton et al. 2006, Bury 2008, Emel et al. 2019, Welsh et al. 2019). Clear cutting can lead to water temperatures that are above the lethal limits for this species (Bury 2008). Forest fertilizers can be lethal to this species (Marco et al. 2001). Roads, including those associated with timber harvest, increase siltation and present an impassable barrier, limiting dispersal, fragmenting populations and increasing genetic isolation (Wagner 2001, Emel et al. 2019). They can also negatively impact the species by increasing sedimentation. However, the species can persist in some areas after timber harvest, and management for the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) and Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) likely benefits this species (Diller and Wallace 1996, USFWS 2000).

Because of limited dispersal abilities and long generation times, populations are vulnerable to fragmentation and genetic isolation; roads and non-forest habitat are impassable (Diller and Wallace 1996, Emel et al. 2019). Drought, flow modification, and water diversion associated with climate change or marijuana cultivation can render sites unsuitable (Bauer et al. 2015, Bury 2015). Water diversion for marijuana cultivation reduces habitat, alters headwater stream flow, and exacerbates effects of climate change (Bauer et al. 2015). Increased temperatures associated with climate change are likely to result in a decrease in the amount of suitable habitat and a reduced range for this species (Bury 2015).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

For all species in the genus, mean SVL for the largest 10% of adults is between 5 and 6 cm.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from KEZERI and OLYMPICUS by the presence of dorsal dark spotting, but the spotting is weak in northern populations in geographic proximity to KEZERI; differs from OLYMPICUS also by lacking the wavy line of demarcation between the dorsal and ventral ground colors and the large, well-defined ventral spots; southern populations of VARIEGATUS are more heavily spotted than are northern populations; heavily spotted populations resemble many populations of CASCADAE, but in the latter the concentrations of dorsal and ventral spotting usually are not as equally balanced as in VARIEGATUS; also, ventral spotting in CASCADAE often is lacking or consists only of a few very fine speckles, and heavy spotting along the sides of most CASCADAE produces a much more sharply defined line of demarcation between the dorsal and ventral surfaces than is true in VARIEGATUS; heavily spotted VARIEGATUS usually have a strong preorbital stripe anterior to the eye (weak or absent in most CASCADAE); difficult to distinguish from immediately adjacent populations of R. KEZERI, but the latter usually differs by one or more of the following characteristics: dorsal spots absent (weak but usually present in northern populations of VARIEGATUS), a few small ventral speckles usually present in the gular and chest regions (not present away from contact zone), lighter limb insertions, and less extensive dark pigmentation of the soles of the feet (Good and Wake 1992).

Habitat

The southern torrent salamander is a headwater specialist, found in coniferous forests in small, cold (< 16°C), clear, high-gradient mountain streams and spring seepages, especially in gravel-dominated riffles with low sedimentation (Welsh and Hodgson 2008). Larvae often occur under stones in shaded streams. Adults also inhabit these streams or streamsides in saturated moss-covered talus, or under rocks in splash zone. They typically occur in older forest sites with large conifers, abundant moss, and > 80% canopy closure; required microclimatic and microhabitat conditions generally exist only in older forests (Welsh 1990, Welsh and Lind 1996). Young, managed forests may be occupied as long as the required microhabitats are present (Diller and Wallace 1996). Two Rhyacotriton nests were found in deep, narrow rock crevices; eggs were lying in cold, slow-moving water (Nussbaum et al. 1983).

Ecology

Adults are very sensitive to desiccation (Ray 1958).
Density generally is not more than about 5-6 per sq m, but sometimes up to about 30-40 per sq m (see Diller and Wallace 1996).

Reproduction

Breeds mostly in spring and early summer in Oregon, also in fall and winter (Stebbins 1985). Mean clutch size (based on yolked ovarian follicles) = 8-10 (Good and Wake 1992). Larval period lasts 3 to 3.5 years in coastal populations in southwestern Oregon (Nussbaum and Tait 1977); also reported as 4-5 years (see 1995 Herpetol. Rev. 26:172). Sexually mature 1.0-1.5 years after metamorphosis (Behler and King 1979; Nussbaum et al. 1983). Probably a communal nester (Nussbaum).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - ConiferBare rock/talus/scree
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS3Yes
CaliforniaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2.4 - Abstraction of surface water (unknown use)Restricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateModerate (short-term)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateModerate (short-term)
9.3.2 - Soil erosion, sedimentationLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateModerate (short-term)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (18)
California (11)
AreaForestAcres
Blue Creek Rare ISix Rivers National Forest12,134
North Fork SmithSix Rivers National Forest37,898
Orleans Mtn.Klamath National Forest49,090
Orleans Mtn. BSix Rivers National Forest17,183
Orleans Mtn. CSix Rivers National Forest15,589
PacksaddleSix Rivers National Forest3,862
PortugueseKlamath National Forest18,915
Ship MountainSix Rivers National Forest11,936
SiskiyouKlamath National Forest54,039
Siskiyou ASix Rivers National Forest1,017
Siskiyou BSix Rivers National Forest18,871
Oregon (7)
AreaForestAcres
Drift CreekSiuslaw National Forest6,333
North KalmiopsisSiskiyou National Forests91,560
South KalmiopsisSiskiyou National Forests104,477
TahkenitchSiuslaw National Forest5,799
TenmileSiuslaw National Forest10,818
Umpqua SpitSiuslaw National Forest2,090
WoahinkSiuslaw National Forest5,309
References (27)
  1. Anderson, J.D. 1968. Rhyacotriton, R. olympicus. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 68:1-2.
  2. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  3. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  4. Brodie, J. B. 1995. Status review of the Southern Torrent Salamander in California. Report to the Fish and Game Commission. California Dept. of Fish and Game. 23 pp. plus appendices.
  5. Bury, R. B., and P. S. Corn. 1988a. Responses of aquatic and streamside amphibians to timber harvest: a review. Pages 165-181 in Raedaeke, K., editor. Streamside management: riparian wildlife and forestry interactions. Univ. Washington.
  6. Corn, P. S., and R. B. Bury. 1989. Logging in western Oregon: responses of headwater habitats and stream amphibians. Forest Ecology and Management 29:39-57.
  7. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  8. Diller, L. V., and R. L. Wallace. 1996. Distribution and habitat of <i>Rhyacotriton variegatus</i> in managed, young growth forests in north coastal California. Journal of Herpetology 30:184-191.
  9. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  10. Gaines, E. Zoology Data Manager, Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Oregon Field Office, Portland, Oregon. Pers. comm.
  11. Good, D. A., and D. B. Wake. 1992. Geographic variation and speciation in the torrent salamanders of the genus <i>Rhyacotriton </i> (Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae). <span><span><span>University of California Publications in Zoology </span></span></span>126:i-xii, 1-91.
  12. Good, D.A. and Wake, D.B. 1992. Geographic variation and speciation in the torrent salamanders of the genus Rhyacotriton (Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae). University of California Publications in Zoology. 126:i-xii:1-91.
  13. Good, D. A., G. Z. Wurst, and D. B. Wake. 1987. Patterns of geographic variation in allozymes of the Olympic salamander, <i> Rhyacotriton olympicus </i>(Caudata: Dicamptodontidae). Fieldiana Zoolgy No. 32 (1374). 15 pp.
  14. Highton, R. 2000. Detecting cryptic species using allozyme data. Pages 215-241 in R. C. Bruce, R. G. Jaeger, and L. D. Houck, editors. The biology of plethodontid salamanders. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. xiii + 485 pp.
  15. Jennings, M. R., and M. P. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and reptile species of special concern in California. Final Report submitted to the California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division. Contract No. 8023. 255 pp.
  16. Nijhuis, M. J., and R. H. Kaplan. 1998. Movement patterns and life history characteristics in a population of the cascade torrent salamander (<i>Rhyacotriton cascadae</i>) in the Columbia River gorge, Oregon. Journal of Herpetology 32:301-304.
  17. Nussbaum, R. A. 1969. A nest site of the Olympic salamander, RHYACOTRITON OLYMPICUS (Gaige). Herpetologica 25:277-278.
  18. Nussbaum, R. A., and C. K. Tait. 1977. Aspects of the life history and ecology of the Olympic salamander, Rhyacoitriton olympicus (Gaige). American Midland Naturalist 98(1):176-199.
  19. Nussbaum, R.A., E.D. Brodie, Jr., and R.M. Storm. 1983. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Pacific Northwest. University Press of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho. 332 pp.
  20. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  21. Thomas, J. W., Ward, J., Raphael, M.G., Anthony, R.G., Forsman, E.D., Gunderson, A.G., Holthausen, R.S., Marcot, B.G., Reeves, G.H., Sedell, J.R. and Solis, D.M. 1993. Viability assessments and management considerations for species associated with late-successional and old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest. The report of the Scientific Analysis Team. USDA Forest Service, Spotted Owl EIS Team. 530 pp. Portland, Oregon.
  22. Thomas, J. W., Ward, J., Raphael, M.G., Anthony, R.G., Forsman, E.D., Gunderson, A.G., Holthausen, R.S., Marcot, B.G., Reeves, G.H., Sedell, J.R. and Solis, D.M. 1993. Viability assessments and management considerations for species associated with late-successional and old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest. The report of the Scientific Analysis Team. USDA Forest Service, Spotted Owl EIS Team, Portland Oregon. 530 pp.
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 6 June 2000. 12-month finding for a petition to list the southern torrent salamander in California as endangered or threatened. Federal Register 65(109):35951-35956.
  24. Welsh, H. H., and A. J. Lind. 1992. Population ecology of two relictual salamanders from the Klamath Mountains of Northwestern California. Pp. 419-437 in McCullough D. R. and Barrett, R. H. 1992, Wildlife 2001: Populations. Elsevier Applied Science, London.
  25. Welsh, H. H., Jr. 1990. Relictual amphibians and old-growth forests. Conservation Biology 4:309-19.
  26. Welsh, H. H., Jr., and A. J. Lind. 1996. Habitat correlates of the southern torrent salamander, <i>Rhyacotriton variegatus </i>(Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae), in northwestern California. Journal of Herpetology 30:385-398.
  27. Welsh, H. H., Jr., and L. M. Ollivier. 1998. Stream amphibians as indicators of ecosystem stress: a case study from California's redwoods. Ecological Applications 8:1118-1132.