Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104930
Element CodeAAABF02030
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderAnura
FamilyScaphiopodidae
GenusSpea
SynonymsScaphiopus intermontanusCope, 1883
Other Common NamesCrapaud du Grand Bassin (FR) Crapaud pied-bêche du Grand Bassin (FR) Great Basin spadefoot (EN) Pied-bêche du Grand Bassin (FR)
Concept ReferenceWiens, J. J., and T. A. Titus. 1991. A phylogenetic analysis of Spea (Anura: Pelobatidae). Herpetologica 47:21-28.
Taxonomic CommentsTanner (1989) and Wiens and Titus (1991) recognized Spea as distinct from Scaphiopus, within which it was previously regarded as a subgenus (Crother 2017). Wiens and Titus (1991) found pronounced allozymic differences between small samples from populations of nominal S. intermontanus in Colorado and Oregon and suggested the possibility that two different species may be involved; further research is needed.
Garcia-Paris et al. (2003) used mtDNA to examine the phylogentic relationships of Pelobatoidea and found that the family Pelobatidae, as previously defined, is not monophyletic (Pelobates is sister to Megophryidae, not to Spea/Scaphiopus). They split the Pelobatidae into two families: Eurasian spadefoot toads (Pelobates), which retain the name Pelobatidae, and North American spadefoot toads (Scaphiopus, Spea), which make up the revived family Scaphiopodidae.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-08-02
Change Date2001-12-03
Edition Date2002-04-10
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Range Extent CommentsSouthern British Columbia (Cannings 1999) southward through central and eastern Washington and Oregon, southern Idaho, eastern California, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, and northwestern Colorado to northwestern Arizona (Hall 1998). From edge of Cascade-Sierra axis east to the Rockies. To elevations of about 9,200 ft (Stebbins 1985).
Occurrences CommentsHundreds of occurrences.
Threat Impact CommentsMost of habitat is not subject to incompatible uses or major threats, but intensive-extensive agriculture likely has extirpated/reduced some populations.