Ammospiza leconteii

(Audubon, 1844)

LeConte's Sparrow

G5Secure Found in 12 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammospiza leconteii). © Ryan Sanderson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Ryan Sanderson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammospiza leconteii). © Matt Zuro; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Matt Zuro; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammospiza leconteii). © Joseph Bratta; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Joseph Bratta; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammospiza leconteii). © David Kirsch; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© David Kirsch; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammospiza leconteii). © Jeff Timmons; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Jeff Timmons; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammospiza leconteii). © Quinn Diaz; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Quinn Diaz; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammospiza leconteii). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100333
Element CodeABPBXA0040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyPasserellidae
GenusAmmospiza
Synonyms
Ammodramus leconteii(Audubon, 1844)
Other Common Names
Bruant de Le Conte (FR) Gorrión de Le Conte (ES) Le Conte's Sparrow (EN) LeConte's sparrow (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Ammospiza was formerly (AOU 1983, 1998) considered congeneric with Ammodramus, but genetic data (Klicka and Spellman 2007, DaCosta et al. 2009, Klicka et al. 2014, Barker et al. 2015, Bryson et al. 2016) indicate that Ammodramus as previously constituted was polyphyletic and that these species are not true Ammodramus (AOU 2018).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-06
Change Date2016-04-06
Edition Date2014-09-17
Edition AuthorsKoenen, M.; Revisions by D.W. Mehlman (1999); Revisions by C. C. NeSmith, 2014.
Range Extent200,000 to >2,500,000 square km (about 80,000 to >1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Population appears stable or increasing.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: northeastern British Columbia and southern Mackenzie to central Quebec, south to southern Alberta, northern Montana, southern Saskatchewan, North Dakota, central Minnesota, northern Wisconsin, and northern Michigan, casually to South Dakota, and Ontario (Lowther 1996, AOU 1998). NON-BREEDING: central Oklahoma, southeastern Kansas, central and southern Missouri, southern Illinois, south to Gulf Coast, west to central Texas, and east to western Tennessee, central Alabama, southern Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida (Lowther 1996, AOU 1998). Breeding range extent estimated at 1,460,000 sq. km. (BirdLife International 2014) and 2,855,857 sq. km. (Canadian 2,426,685 sq. km. and USA 429,172 sq. km.) (PIF Science Committee 2013; http://rmbo.org/pifpopestimates ).
Occurrences Comments
Population fluctuates and habitat use varies from year to year. Number of occurrences undetermined but given the large estimated population size and large range, possible occurrences could be high but species exhibits large fluctuations in abundance and distribution so occurrences could be somewhat ephemeral and tied to local conditions (Igl and Johnson 1995, Lowther 2005).
Threat Impact Comments
HABITAT: Changes in land use have affected the extent and distribution of available habitats. Haying may destroy nests and can be detrimental to breeding birds. PARASITISM: Brood parasitism by Brown-headed Cowbirds (MOLOTHRUS ATER) has been reported, but the effect on productivity is unknown (Peabody 1901, Friedmann 1963, Murray 1969, Friedmann and Kiff 1985). Lowther (1996) indicates cowbird parasitism may seem relatively frequent: all five nests found by Murray (1969) in North Dakota were parasitized; but no parasitism found among 36 nests in Wisconsin (Richter 1969). INCLEMENT WEATHER: Flooding has been known to cause a large number of nest losses (Walkinshaw 1968, cited in Lowther 1996). Climate changes (e.g., an increase in extent of drought conditions) may have a significant impact on this species.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

BREEDING: Uses open, level uplands and lowlands, with tall, thick herbaceous vegetation and thick litter (Peabody 1901, Tester and Marshall 1961, Walkinshaw 1968, Murray 1969, Richter 1969). Wetlands, sedge meadows, prairie, grasslands within aspen parkland, planted cover (e.g., Conservation Reserve Program [CRP] fields, Permanent Cover Program [PCP] fields, and dense nesting cover [DNC]), hayfields, fallow fields, and idle pasture all support breeding populations (Peabody 1901; Walkinshaw 1937; Murray 1969; Richter 1969; Robbins 1969; Stewart 1975; Renken 1983; Cooper 1984; Niemi 1985; Renken and Dinsmore 1987; Dale 1993; Dhol et al. 1994; Hartley 1994; Jones 1994; Igl and Johnson 1995, 1999; Igl 1996; Prescott and Murphy 1995, 1996; Dale et al. 1997, McMaster and Davis 1998). Many species of tall, dense, native and tame grasses, sedges (CAREX), rushes (JUNCUS), and forbs can provide suitable habitat (Peabody 1901, Walkinshaw 1968, Murray 1969, Faanes 1981, Renken 1983, Cooper 1984, Niemi 1985; Renken and Dinsmore 1987, Dale 1993, Jones 1994, Madden 1996). Prefer areas with dense litter for nesting cover (Tester and Marshall 1961, Madden 1996).

In Minnesota and North Dakota, bred in hummocky alkali fens, tallgrass prairie, wet-meadow zones of wetlands, tame hayfields, and retired cropland (Johnsgard 1979). Nested on the ground in dense herbaceous vegetation, usually in the drier borders of wetlands. Although nested among scattered small willows (SALIX) in Minnesota and Michigan, they seemed to prefer areas free of shrubs and other woody vegetation (Peabody 1901, Walkinshaw 1968, Robbins 1969, Madden 1996). In North Dakota, were associated with a high amount of grass cover, especially broad-leaved, introduced grasses (Madden 1996).

Habitat use varies widely by region and yearly moisture conditions. In Montana, singing sparrows were observed in extensive wet meadows (Davis 1952). In North Dakota, Minnesota, and the Canadian prairie provinces, used freshwater wetlands and low wet prairie (Murray 1969). In Minnesota, three of 15 nests found were located in upland grasslands (Peabody 1901). More recent studies have found breeding evidence in drier upland areas. In Wisconsin and Minnesota, nested in dry upland grasslands, as well as in fallow fields near wetlands (Robbins 1969, Cooper 1984). In CRP fields in the northern Great Plains, occurred in both damp, low areas and dry, upland areas (Igl and Johnson 1995, 1999). In North Dakota, low, wet areas were optimal breeding habitat, but also nested in domestic hayfields and retired cropland (Stewart 1975).

In aspen parkland in Saskatchewan and Alberta, were not observed in cropland, including fallow cropland (Dale 1993, Hartley 1994, Prescott and Murphy 1995). In North Dakota, singing males were observed in small-grain fields that were CRP the previous year (L.D. Igl and D.H. Johnson, unpubl. data). Presence in these small-grain fields, however, may have been an expression of site fidelity to a previous breeding site. In Manitoba, were not detected in cropland (Jones 1994). In Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, occurred more frequently in PCP grasslands than in cropland (McMaster and Davis 1998).

NON-BREEDING: Variety of old field and prairie habitats with dense cover of grass or sedge. Examples include: moist fields of broomsedge, rice stubble, airfield grasslands, and damp weedy or grassy fields (Lowther 1996).

Ecology

Rough estimates of breeding territory sizes in North Dakota and Minnesota were 0.0009-0.004 hectares (Murray 1969, Cooper 1984).

Reproduction

Eggs are laid from late May to early July. Clutch size is 3-5 (usually 4). Incubation, by female, lasts 11-13 days. Young are tended by female alone at first, male helps later?
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceousCropland/hedgerow
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDBog/fenRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5B
ProvinceRankNative
NunavutSUBYes
Northwest TerritoriesS4Yes
QuebecS4BYes
ManitobaS5BYes
OntarioS5BYes
AlbertaS5BYes
SaskatchewanS5BYes
British ColumbiaS4BYes
Yukon TerritoryS1BYes
United StatesN3B,N4N
ProvinceRankNative
MississippiS3NYes
NebraskaSNRNYes
LouisianaS4NYes
Navajo NationSNRYes
South CarolinaS3NYes
New MexicoS2NYes
OklahomaSNRNYes
IndianaSNAYes
KansasSNAYes
AlabamaS3NYes
KentuckyS2NYes
MontanaS3BYes
MissouriSNRNYes
OhioSNAYes
FloridaS2NYes
GeorgiaS3Yes
North CarolinaSNAYes
TexasS3Yes
MinnesotaSNRBYes
IllinoisSXYes
North DakotaSUYes
ArkansasS3NYes
TennesseeS1NYes
WisconsinS2BYes
MichiganS3Yes
South DakotaS2BYes
IowaSNAYes
Roadless Areas (12)
Michigan (2)
AreaForestAcres
FibreHiawatha National Forest7,432
Norwich Plains Revised Roadless AreaOttawa National Forest4,360
Montana (3)
AreaForestAcres
QuiggLolo National Forest67,267
Selway - Bitterroot (01067)Bitterroot National Forest114,953
Silver KingBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest64,289
North Dakota (4)
AreaForestAcres
DelamereDakota Prairie Grasslands5,087
DurlerDakota Prairie Grasslands12,464
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
VenloDakota Prairie Grasslands5,317
Wisconsin (3)
AreaForestAcres
09154 - St. Peters DomeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4,002
09166 - East TorchChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4,647
09183 - Shoe Lake IslandsChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest7
References (68)
  1. American Ornithological Society (AOS). Chesser, R.T., K.J. Burns, C. Cicero, J.L. Dunn, A.W. Kratter, I.J. Lovette, P.C. Rasmussen, J.V. Remsen, Jr., D.F. Stotz, B.M. Winger, and K. Winker. 2018. Fifty-ninth Supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list of North American Birds. The Auk 135:798–813.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  4. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  5. Bent, A.C., et al. 1968. Life histories of North American cardinals, grosbeaks, buntings, towhees, finches, sparrows, and allies. Part Two. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 237. (reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY).
  6. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  7. BirdLife International. (2013-2014). IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on various dates in 2013 and 2014. http://www.birdlife.org/
  8. Bock, C.E., V.A. Saab, T.D. Rich, and D.S. Dobkin. 1993. Effects of livestock grazing on Neotropical migratory landbirds in western North America. Pages 296-309 in D.M. Finch and P.W. Stangel, editors. Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-229.
  9. Cadman, M.D., P.F.J. Eagles, and F.M Helleiner, compilers. 1987. Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario. Federation of Ontario Naturalists and the Long Point Bird Observatory. Universtiy of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Ontario.
  10. Cooper, S. 1984. Habitat and size of the Le Conte's Sparrow territory. Loon 56:162-165.
  11. Dale, B. 1993. 1992 Saskatchewan non-game bird evaluation of North American waterfowl management plan: DNC and short grass cover - 1992. Unpublished report. Saskatchewan Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta; Saskatchewan Wetland Conservation Corporation, Regina, Saskatchewan. 23 pp.
  12. Dale, B. C., P. A. Martin, and P. S. Taylor. 1997. Effects of hay management regimes on grassland songbirds in Saskatchewan. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:616-626.
  13. Davis, D.E. 1952. Le Conte's Sparrow in western Montana. Condor 54:115-116.
  14. Dechant, J.A., M.L. Sondreal, D.H. Johnson, L.D. Igl, C.M. Goldade, A.L. Zimmerman, and B.R. Euliss. 1999. Effects of management practices on grassland birds: Le Conte's Sparrow. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND. 14 pp.
  15. Dhol, S., J. Horton, and R.E. Jones. 1994. 1994 non-waterfowl evaluation on Manitoba's North American Waterfowl Management Program. Unpublished report. Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 12 pp.
  16. Faanes, C.A. 1981. Birds of the St. Croix River Valley: Minnesota and Wisconsin. North American Fauna 73. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 196 pp.
  17. Friedmann, H. 1963. Host relations of the parasitic Cowbird. Museum of Natural History. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C.
  18. Friedmann, H., and L.F. Kiff. 1985. The parasitic cowbirds and their hosts. Proc. Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology 2(4). 78 pp.
  19. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  20. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  21. Hartley, M.J. 1994. Passerine abundance and productivity indices in grasslands managed for waterfowl nesting cover in Saskatchewan, Canada. M.S. thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. 42 pp.
  22. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  23. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  24. Igl, L.D. 1996. Le Conte's, Sharp-tailed, and Henslow's sparrows in Grant County. Loon 68:127-128.
  25. Igl, L.D., and D.H. Johnson. 1995. Dramatic increase of Le Conte's Sparrow in Conservation Reserve Program fields in the northern Great Plains. Prairie Naturalist 27:89-94.
  26. Igl, L.D., and D.H. Johnson. 1999. Le Conte's Sparrows breeding in Conservation Reserve Program fields: precipitation and patterns of population change. Studies in Avian Biology 19:178-186.
  27. Johnsgard, P. A. 1979. Birds of the Great Plains: breeding species and their distribution. Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln. 539 pp.
  28. Johnson, D.H. 1996. Management of northern prairies and wetlands for the conservation of Neotropical migratory birds. Pages 53-67 in F.R. Thompson, III, editor. Management of midwestern landscapes for the conservation of Neotropical migratory birds. U.S. Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-187.
  29. Jones, R.E. 1994. Non-waterfowl evaluation of Manitoba's North American Waterfowl Management Program. Unpublished report. Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 15 pp.
  30. Kantrud, H. A. 1981. Grazing intensity effects on the breeding avifauna of North Dakota native grasslands. Canadian Field-Naturalist 95:404-417.
  31. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  32. Lowther, P.E. 1996. Le Conte's Sparrow (AMMODRAMUS LECONTEII). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 224. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 16 pp.
  33. Lowther, P.E. 2005. Le Conte's Sparrow (<i>Ammodramus</i> <i>leconteii</i>). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/224
  34. Madden, E.M. 1996. Passerine communities and bird-habitat relationships on prescribe-burned, mixed grass prairie in North Dakota. M.S. thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. 153 pp.
  35. McMaster, D.G., and S.K. Davis. 1998. Non-game evaluation of the Permanent Cover Program. Unpublished report. Saskatchewan Wetland Conservation Corporation, Regina, Saskatchewan. 75+ pp.
  36. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  37. Murray, B.G., Jr. 1969. A comparative study of Le Conte's and Sharp-tailed sparrows. Auk 86:199-231.
  38. National Audubon Society. 2010. The Christmas Bird Count Historical Results [Online]. Available at: http://birds.audubon.org/christmas-bird-count
  39. NatureServe. 2014. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed: various dates, 2014 ).
  40. Niemi, G. J. 1985. Patterns of morphological evolution in bird genera of New World and Old World peatlands. Ecology 66:1215-1228.
  41. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  42. Partners in Flight Science Committee. 2013. Population Estimates Database, version 2013. Available at http://rmbo.org/pifpopestimates. Accessed in 2014 and 2018.
  43. Peabody, P.B. 1901. Nesting habits of Leconte's Sparrow. Auk 18:129-134.
  44. Peterson, R.T. 1980b. A field guide to the birds of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  45. Peterson, R.T. 1990b. A field guide to western birds. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  46. Prescott, D.R.C., A.J. Murphy, and E. Ewaschuk. 1995. An avian community approach to determining biodiversity values of NAWMP habitats in the aspen parkland of Alberta. Alberta NAWMP Centre. NAWMP-012. Edmonton, Alberta. 58 pp.
  47. Prescott, D.R.C., and A.J. Murphy. 1995. Bird populations and vegetation structure of tame dense nesting cover (DNC) in Alberta's aspen parkland. Alberta NAWMP Centre. NAWMP-014. Edmonton, Alberta. 19 pp.
  48. Prescott, D.R.C., and A.J. Murphy. 1996. Habitat associations of grassland birds on native and tame pastures of the Aspen Parkland of Alberta. Alberta Centre. NAWMP-021. Edmonton, Alberta. 36 pp.
  49. Price, J., S. Droege, and A. Price. 1995. The summer atlas of North American birds. Academic Press, New York. x + 364 pp.
  50. Renken, R. B. 1983. Breeding bird communities and bird-habitat associations on North Dakota waterfowl production areas of three habitat types. M.S. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 90 pp.
  51. Renken, R. B., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1987. Nongame bird communities on managed grasslands in North Dakota. Canadian Field-Naturalist 101:551-557.
  52. Richter, C.H. 1969. The Le Conte's Sparrow in northeastern Wisconsin. Passenger Pigeon 31:275-277.
  53. Robbins, S. 1969. New light on the Le Conte's Sparrow. Passenger Pigeon 31:267-274.
  54. Root, T. 1988. Atlas of wintering North American birds: An analysis of Christmas Bird Count data. University of Chicago Press. 336 pp.
  55. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, J. E. Fallon, K. L. Pardieck, D. J. Ziolkowski, Jr., and W. A. Link. 2014. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2012. Version 02.19.2014. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/.
  56. Sauer, J.R., S. Schwartz, and B. Hoover. 1996. The Christmas Bird Count Home Page. Version 95.1 U.S.G.S. Biological Resource Division, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Online. Available: http://www.mbr.nbs.gov/bbs/cbc.html.
  57. Sauer, J. R., W. A. Link, J. E. Fallon, K. L. Pardieck, D. J. Ziolkowski Jr. 2013. The North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966-2011: Summary Analysis and Species Accounts. North American Fauna 79: 1–32. doi:10.3996/nafa.79.0001
  58. Sibley, D. A. 2000a. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  59. Stewart, R. E. 1975. Breeding Birds of North Dakota. Tri-College Center for Environmental Studies, Fargo ND.
  60. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  61. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  62. Tester, J.R., and W.M. Marshall. 1961. A study of certain plant and animal interrelations on a native prairie in northwestern Minnesota. Minnesota Museum of Natural History, Occasional Papers 8:1-51.
  63. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  64. Walkinshaw, L.H. 1937. LeConte's Sparrow breeding in Michigan and South Dakota. Auk 54:309-320.
  65. Walkinshaw, L.H. 1968. Le Conte's Sparrow (PASSERHERBULUS CAUDACUTUS). Pages 765-776 in O.L. Austin, Jr., editor. Life histories of North American cardinals, grosbeaks, buntings, towhees, finches, sparrows, and allies. Part 2. United States National Museum Bulletin 237. (reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY).
  66. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  67. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.
  68. Zink, R. M., and J. C. Avise. 1990. Patterns of mitochondrial DNA and allozyme evolution in the avian genus AMMODRAMUS. Syst. Zool. 39:148-161.