Asio flammeus

(Pontoppidan, 1763)

Short-eared Owl

G5Secure Found in 27 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100351
Element CodeABNSB13040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderStrigiformes
FamilyStrigidae
GenusAsio
Other Common Names
Buho Cuerno Corto, Lechuzón Campestre (ES) Coruja-do-Banhado, Mocho-do-Campo (PT) Hibou des marais (FR) short-eared owl (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
The genetic distance (based on allozyme data) between A. otus and A. flammeus is unusually large for congeneric bird species; further study of their phylogenetic relationships is warranted. Eight or nine subspecies are recognized, of which five or six are island endemics. Asio f. flammeus, the nominate form, is the only subspecies recognized in North America (Holt and Leasure 1993).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-10-21
Change Date1996-11-27
Edition Date2025-10-21
Edition AuthorsGotthardt, T. A., J. G. McClory, and G. Hammerson (1996); rev. D. Jue and S. Jue (2014); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species has a large range across most of the planet. The population declined by more than 50% during the 20th century and continues to decline. It is primarily threatened by loss of open habitats.
Range Extent Comments
The breeding range in North America extends from northern Alaska to northern Labrador, south to California, Utah, Colorado, Missouri, Illinois, Ohio, and Virginia. The species breeds in small numbers in every province and territory in Canada (Cadman and Page 1994). It is more numerous in western and central North America than in eastern North America. In the northeastern United States, it currently nests in Vermont, New York, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania (Tate 1992). In Eurasia, this species ranges from Iceland, British Isles, Scandinavia, northern Russia, and northern Siberia south to southern Europe, Afghanistan, northern Mongolia, the northern Kurile Islands, and Kamchatka. The species also occurs in the Hawaiian Islands, Caroline Islands (Ponape), and Greater Antilles (Cuba, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico) (AOU 1983). During the nonbreeding season, this owl occurs mostly in the southern parts of most Canadian provinces and southward to southern Baja California, southern Mexico, the Gulf Coast, and Florida; also Hawaii (resident on all main islands) and the Greater Antilles (uncommon in Puerto Rico, including Isla Culebra). In the Old World, nonbreeding occurrences extend from the breeding range south to northwestern Africa, Mediterranean region, Ceylon, southern China, and Japan (AOU 1983).
Occurrences Comments
There are many occurrences throughout the range.
Threat Impact Comments
Habitat loss is the biggest threat. The species is declining in many parts of the range due to destruction and degradation of marshes, grasslands, and low-use pastures (Ehrlich et al. 1992, Wiggins et al. 2020). This may be a result of development, changing land-use patterns (e.g., farmlands to woodlands, or to development), changing farming practices (e.g., hay fields to row crops), reforestation, wetland loss, or a combination of these factors. Populations have declined due to reforestation of farmlands and fragmentation and development of coastal grasslands (see Holt 1992). Loss of open grasslands to later successional stages of community development reduces available hunting and breeding habitat. On Nantucket Island, succession of maritime heathland to scrub oak may be reducing available habitat (Tate 1991). Prey abundance may be a limiting factor in the owl's distribution and breeding success (Melvin et al. 1989). The owl's reported reliance on microtine rodents emphasizes the importance of open habitats favored by these mammals (Lockie 1955, Hagen 1969, Clark 1975).

Clark (1975) reported mortality caused by collisions or entanglement with trains, cars, aircraft, farm machinery, and wire fencing, and collisions with radio antennas and guy wires are likely, but these probably do not pose a major threat compared to habitat loss. Short-eared owls have often been subjected to shooting by humans (Bent 1938, Clark 1975, Remsen 1978). Remsen (1978) mentioned the owl's vulnerability to shooting as a factor in its decline in California.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A small to medium-sized owl. Published lengths range from 37-39 cm (Cramp 1985) to 34-42 cm (Mikkola 1983), with females slightly larger than males and considerably heavier, averaging 411 g compared to 350 g for males (Mikkola 1983). They are excellent flyers with long wings (95-110 cm) (Cramp 1985), and light wing-loading (0.333 g/cm squared) (Clark 1975). There is little difference in wing length between the sexes (Clark and Ward 1974).

The back and upper wing surfaces are tawny brown to buff-colored with heavy but indistinct streaking. The ventral surfaces are much lighter, with bold, vertical brown streaking on the breast, and a pair of barely visible "ear" tufts close together at the top of the facial disk; belly is pale, lightly streaked; wings are long and have a buffy patch beyond the wrist above and a dark patch at the base of the primaries below; dark facial disk contrasts with yellow eyes; legs and feet are feathered (NGS 1983). Mature males are bright white on the underwing, while mature females show somewhat more buff coloration (Bent 1938, Village 1987). It is, nonetheless, difficult to sex or age these birds in the field. Females are generally darker than males but young birds are also darker than older ones (Mikkola 1983), thus a young male may be darker than an old female. Both sexes have a distinct, black carpal bar and dark wingtips. Juveniles possess full adult plumage by October of the first year (Bent 1938, Cramp 1985).

The facial disc is circular and whitish with dark areas around the bright yellow eyes. Recently fledged and juvenile owls show much darker coloration overall and a much darker facial disc which whitens with age. The owl gets its common name from the small ear-tufts over the eyes. These tufts are part of the facial disc and are erected when the bird is annoyed or alert. They may possibly aid in making birds more cryptic when in vegetation by breaking the line of the circular facial disc.

VOCALIZATIONS: The bird is generally silent but does vocalize in courtship (a low, repeated, hooting: "voo, hoo, hoo, hoo," or in conjunction with defensive behavior or annoyance: "yaps" or "barks"). Young owls give a food-begging call ("pssssip") that apparently aids adults in locating them from the time they leave the nest until after fledging. Adult owls may squeal while feigning injury during broken-wing acts to distract intruders from nests or young. Both young and adults will clack their bills when annoyed or in defense. Apparently, no data exist on the use of broadcasting tape-recorded vocalizations for detection or monitoring purposes.

Diagnostic Characteristics

These are probably the most diurnal of owls (Lockie 1955, Clark 1975) and may often be observed from late afternoon until nightfall, or at dawn. A crow-sized owl abroad during daylight in open country will most likely be a short-eared owl. However, they also hunt at night. Easily recognized by its blunt-headed profile and the fact that it glides with its wings held horizontally. This contrasts with the shallow V-shape of the northern harrier (Circus cyaneus) with which the owl often shares habitat and may be confused. Harriers may also be distinguished by their white rump patch. Habitat is useful in separating short-eared owls from long-eared owls (Asio otis), the latter being predominantly a woodland dweller. The long-eared owl is also more slender with much longer ear tufts. Burrowing owl also inhabits open country but is smaller (24 cm vs. 38 cm), has relatively longer legs, and (in adults) has at least some horizontal barring on the breast. The short-eared owl's style of flight is unique and has at times been called mechanical, moth-like, or even "slovenly" (Peterson 1934).

Habitat

BREEDING: Broad expanses of open land with low vegetation for nesting and foraging are required. Habitat types frequently mentioned as suitable include fresh and saltwater marshes, bogs, dunes, prairies, grassy plains, old fields, tundra, moorlands, river valleys, meadows, savanna, open woodland, and heathland (Dement'ev et al. 1951, Clark 1975, Mikkola 1983, Holt and Melvin 1986). In general, any area that is large enough, has low vegetation with some dry upland for nesting, and that supports suitable prey may be considered potential breeding habitat, although many will not have breeding short-eared owls. Dement'ev and Gladkov (1951) assert that "nearby water" is a requirement for nesting habitat. Roosts by day on ground, on low open perch, under low shrub, or in conifer. Reported from "forest" habitats in Hawaii.

Nests on ground, generally in slight depression (Terres 1980), often beside or beneath a bush or clump of grass. Many nests are near water but generally are on dry sites. In coastal Massachusetts, nested in secondary herbaceous grass/sand dune vegetation dominated by Ammophila (Holt 1992). Same nest site may be used in successive years. Moves into and breeds in areas with high rodent densities.

Generally nest on high ground or upland sites (Pitelka et al. 1955; Clark 1975; Holt and Melvin 1986; Tate and Melvin 1987, 1988; Combs and Melvin 1989). Urner (1925) reported nests in a saltmarsh, one of which was subsequently flooded by a high tide, but in general, drier sites are preferred. During five years of study on Nantucket and Tuckernuck islands, all 41 nests found were in dry upland areas, though wetter sites were available (Holt and Melvin 1986; Tate and Melvin 1987, 1988; Combs and Melvin 1989; Combs and Griffin 1990). Eight nest sites at Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge, east of Nantucket, found between 1982 and 1985, were also all on dry upland sites (Holt and Melvin 1986).

Using a line-intercept technique (Brower and Zar 1977, Holt and Melvin 1986), vegetation characteristics of 15 nest sites on Nantucket were evaluated in 1986 and 1987. This analysis showed that low dense shrubs, mainly black huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata) and bayberry (Myrica pennsylvanica), that were less than 0.5 m comprised 40.4%, and high dense shrubs (same species, >= 0.5 m) comprised 37.14% of the cover within five meters of the nest (Tate and Melvin 1987, 1988). Other vegetation included low sparse shrubs (11.1%), low dense grass (8.1%), and high dense grass (3.0%, mostly Andropogon scoparius and Ammophila breviligulata). These data demonstrate that in choosing nest sites on Nantucket, dense shrub cover is usually sought.

NON-BREEDING: Suitable breeding habitat may also be occupied by wintering birds. Conversely, Clark (1975) noted two occasions when winter territories became breeding territories. Short-eared owls tend to congregate and roost communally in the winter (Banfield 1947, Craighead and Craighead 1956, Clark 1975), often in sheltered sites near hunting areas. Winter roosts have been reported in abandoned dumps, quarries, gravel pits, storage yards, stump piles, old fields, small evergreen groves, bayberry thickets, dunes, and open, abandoned cellars (Clark 1975, Bosakowski 1986). May also roost directly on the ground in tall grasses, possibly choosing vegetation of a coloration that blends with their plumage (Craighead and Craighead 1956).

In winter the ground roosting habit may be abandoned for trees, possibly in response to deep snow (Banfield 1947, Bosakowski 1986). Smith (1989) noted drastic decreases in numbers of short- eared owls at known winter roosts on Point Peninsula in Jefferson County, New York, after a heavy snowfall created deep cover.

Ecology

Somewhat gregarious in winter; groups may gather where prey is abundant (NGS 1983, Tate 1992). Breeding density in different areas 0.6-6 pairs per sq km. May defend feeding territory in winter (where prey is sufficient). Reported average home range size: 15-200 ha. In coastal Massachusetts, 10 territories averaged 64 ha (48-126 ha) (Holt 1992). In Manitoba, mean size of five territories was 73.9 hectares (Clark 1975).

Local abundance varies with vole abundance. In the winter, short-eared owls congregate at sites that provide good foraging (Craighead and Craighead 1956). Congregations of up to 200 birds have been reported (Bent 1938). Assemblage sites usually provide shelter and are within, or adjacent to, hunting areas (Clark 1975). In wintering areas in New York where vole densities were high, Clark (1975) saw owls establish and defend hunting territories. Territories were less distinct when vole numbers were low.

DISEASES, PARASITES, AND PREDATION: Disease is presently not known to limit populations. Harrison (1943) reported an owl infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis avium In 1987, four young owls from two widely separated nests on Nantucket Island were discovered to be suffering from a feather disorder of unknown cause (Tate 1991), in which the juvenal plumage was not developing properly and the emerging feathers were twisted or malformed. All of these young had developed open sores, apparently from picking at the skin around these feather shafts with their beaks. This problem is not known to have been reported previously in the literature and no cause was determined. Avian predation is known from: great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), snowy owl (Nyctea scandiaca), peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), and marsh harrier (Circus aeruginosus) (Clark 1975). Northern harrier, American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), and European kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) have been known to steal prey from short-eared owls (Village 1987, Tate 1991). As a ground-nesting species, eggs and young are vulnerable to various mammalian ground predators such as foxes, raccoons, and mustelids, populations of which have been augmented because of human-caused increases in food resources. Predation by the striped skunk may be one of the reasons for the extirpation of the short-eared owl as a breeding bird on Martha's Vineyard (Melvin et al. 1989). Domestic cats and dogs have been known to disturb owl nests on Nantucket Island (Tate 1991). The potential for an increase in the threat of predation or disturbance by domestic or feral cats and dogs may be high.

Reproduction

See Johnsgard (1988) for egg dates (timing of nesting varies with latitude and prey abundance). Often only the oldest chicks survive.

COURTSHIP AND TERRITORIAL DEFENSE: Wing-clapping, exaggerated or deep wing-beats, and skirmishing are three displays seen predominantly during the breeding season (Lockie 1955, Clark 1975). Short-eared owls wing-clap along territorial boundaries or during flights within a territory, in aggressive displays to other birds or to human observers, and in courtship flight. When wing-clapping, the owl's wings are brought below the body and clapped together in short, rapid bursts. Both males and females may wing-clap. The courtship flight is unique and involves song, a spiraling flight, and wing-clapping by the male (DuBois 1924, Mikkola 1983, Holt 1985). Exaggerated wing-beats also occur in the same contexts as wing-claps. In this behavior the owl brings its wings high over its body, prominently displaying the underwing. Owls often patrol territorial boundaries using exaggerated wing-beats. Skirmishing involves other neighboring owls, usually along territorial boundaries, and is aggressive and territorial in nature. Exposure of talons, hovering, and sometimes actual striking of the other bird is involved. Any of these displays observed during the breeding season may signify a territorial bird. Observation and mapping of these behaviors over a nesting season is the best way to delineate an owl's breeding territory (Lockie 1955, Village 1987, Tate 1991).

Generally begin courtship in mid- to late March on Nantucket Island along the coast of Massachusetts (Holt and Melvin 1986; Tate and Melvin 1987, 1988). Courtship has been reported as occurring in mid-March in Montana (Dubois 1924) and as early as late February in Jefferson County, New York (G. Smith, pers. comm.). Pitelka et al. (1955) reported initial courtship activity in the first week of June at Barrow, Alaska. Unpaired males may engage in courtship flights well into the breeding season (Clark 1975; G. Tate, pers. obs.). The breeding season is often reported to commence in direct relation to vole abundance with a larger prey population yielding an earlier start to breeding activities (Randall 1925, Snyder and Hope 1938, Lockie 1955, Mikkola 1983).

NESTING: Depending on latitude, nesting activities generally begin in late winter to early spring across the owl's distribution. Timing of nesting may be correlated with latitude and prey abundance (Mikkola 1983, Cramp 1985). The nesting cycle from nest initiation to fledging of young takes approximately seven to nine weeks in temperate zones lasting from mid-March to mid-September in the Northeast Region. During a four-year study of breeding ecology on Nantucket Island, egg-laying began in April each year (as early as the first week) and all young were fledged by the first week of September (Holt and Melvin 1986; Tate and Melvin 1987, 1988; Combs and Melvin 1989). Late nests or renests accounted for young fledging in late August and September (Tate and Melvin 1987, 1988). Polygyny may result in two nests within one short-eared owl territory. On Nantucket, two broods from different females that overlapped temporally were raised within a territory defended by a single male (Tate 1991).

Unlike most owls that nest in holes or take over the abandoned nests of crows or other birds, the short-eared owl is unique within its family (Strigidae) in building a nest, albeit a crude one, on the ground. The female makes a small scrape in the ground with her body and lines it with nearby material. Nests may be lined with grass, leaves, twigs or feathers (Bent 1938, Clark 1975). These small nest depressions do not last long after the young have dispersed from the site (G. Tate, pers. obs.).

Generally between four and nine eggs are laid, and sometimes more (Bent 1938), although Mikkola (1983) reported a range of two to 13 from 121 European records. Murray (1976) reported a mean clutch size of 5.61 from 186 nests in North America. A trend for mean clutch size to increase from south to north was also noted in this sample. The largest clutch ever reported in the literature is 16 from Finland (Mikkola 1983). Large clutches of 14 in Scotland (Adair 1982) and 13 from Finland (Mikkola and Sulkara 1969) have also been reported. All exceptionally large clutches were laid in years of peak vole abundance in these areas.

Clark (1975) reported a mean clutch of 8.6 from five clutches in 1969 in Manitoba, Canada. Pitelka et al. (1955) reported a range in clutch size of four to eight with a mean of 6.3 from 22 nests in Alaska. A four-year study of nesting owls on Nantucket reported clutch sizes of 5.8 (n = 6), 7.7 (n = 9), 6.8 (n = 8), and 5.2 (n = 8) in 1985-88 respectively, with an inclusive range of four to nine (Holt and Melvin 1986; Tate and Melvin 1987, 1988; Combs and Melvin 1989).

Two broods are sometimes raised and, if the nest is destroyed or depredated, the female may renest (Lockie 1955, Mikkola 1983). Pitelka et al. (1955) saw no evidence of renesting by short-eared owls in Alaska; this was apparently tied to the shorter season. In 1986 and 1987, single late nests with eggs were found on Nantucket in mid-July (G. Tate, unpubl. data). These were suspected to be either second broods or renests.

Witherby et al. (1938) reported an incubation period of 24-28 days in temperate zones. With data from six eggs in four nests, Pitelka et al. (1955) reported an incubation period for Barrow, Alaska, that ranges from 26-37 days (mean = 30). He saw no evidence that incubation takes longer there than at lower latitudes. From a Finnish study of four nests, Gronlund and Mikkola (1969) reported an incubation period of 24-29 days (mean = 25.7). In 1986, three eggs, each from separate nests on Nantucket, were documented as having 29-, 30-, and 31-day incubation periods (mean = 30) (Tate 1991).

Normally the female does all of the incubation (Witherby et al. 1938, Dement'ev et al. 1951, Pitelka et al. 1955, Clark 1975) and lays at approximately 24-hour intervals (Mikkola 1983). She begins incubation with the first egg laid and hatching is therefore asynchronous. According to Mikkola (1983), the first and last eggs laid take the same length of time to incubate. Young owls leave the nest before fledging and wander into the surrounding area at about two weeks of age (Lockie 1955, Clark 1975). The young owlets stay concealed but continue to wander and are found and fed by both parents by means of the food-begging call given by the young. Fledging has been reported variously at 24-27 days (Witherby et al. 1938) and 31-36 days (Urner 1923). On Nantucket, young owls dispersed from the nest at 14-17 days and fledged when about 30 days old (Holt and Melvin 1986).

Age of first breeding is reported as one year or less (Mebs 1966, cited by Mikkola 1983; Glutz von Blotzheim and Bauer 1980). Field evidence of breeding at one year has been obtained on Nantucket in 1990, when a sitting female that had been banded as a nestling in 1989 was trapped. This female was brooding on a nest only 98 m from her natal nest site (K.P. Combs unpubl. data). These owls have been known to live as long as 12.5 years (Mebs 1966, cited by Mikkola 1983).

Short-eared owls usually offer little defense of the nest from human intruders. Wing-clapping, circling overhead with deep wing beats, "barks" or "yaps," and broken-wing acts are employed when any defense is attempted. Adults perform a distraction display that is a dramatic broken-wing act accompanied by vocalization. It is most often used by the male when an observer is at, or near, a nest or dispersed young (Clark 1975; G. Tate, pers. obs.). However, often both owls vacate the vicinity of the nest site while an intruder is present. At times the female may desert the area, retreating to another part of the breeding territory, while the male remains nearby. Females may return to the nest by flying low and remaining inconspicuous (G. Tate, pers. obs.).

While short-eared owls have been observed diving at house cats (G. Tate, pers. obs.), the best defense is their cryptic coloration and the fact that the female sits tightly on the nest. On Nantucket, some females remained on the nest while observers passed within two meters, and on Tuckernuck Island, a female on a nest would not budge in spite of repeated attempts from as close as one meter to flush her (G. Tate, pers. obs.). These behaviors make it extremely difficult to find nests.
Terrestrial Habitats
SavannaGrassland/herbaceousOld fieldTundraCropland/hedgerow
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDBog/fen
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN4B,N3N,N4M
ProvinceRankNative
QuebecS3BYes
British ColumbiaS3B,S1NYes
OntarioS4B,S2NYes
NunavutS3BYes
Yukon TerritoryS3BYes
AlbertaS3B,SUNYes
LabradorS2BYes
New BrunswickS1BYes
Prince Edward IslandS1BYes
ManitobaS2BYes
SaskatchewanS3B,S2NYes
Nova ScotiaS1BYes
Island of NewfoundlandS2BYes
Northwest TerritoriesS3Yes
United StatesN5B,N5N
ProvinceRankNative
KansasS2B,S3NYes
ColoradoS2BYes
District of ColumbiaS1N,SHBYes
TexasS4NYes
MaineS1B,S1NYes
New HampshireSNAYes
TennesseeS3NYes
ArizonaSNRYes
WashingtonS2B,S3NYes
AlaskaS4BYes
WyomingS1Yes
IdahoS3Yes
West VirginiaS2NYes
MarylandS1BYes
South CarolinaS2Yes
MontanaS4Yes
DelawareSHB,S1NYes
FloridaSNAYes
Rhode IslandS1NYes
VermontS1B,S1NYes
CaliforniaS2Yes
ArkansasS3NYes
North DakotaSNRB,SNRNYes
North CarolinaSUB,S3NYes
MassachusettsS1B,S3NYes
WisconsinS1B,S3NYes
OregonS3Yes
OhioS1Yes
New YorkS2Yes
UtahS2Yes
MinnesotaS3BYes
MissouriS2Yes
GeorgiaS4Yes
New MexicoS1B,S2NYes
MississippiS2NYes
IndianaS2Yes
IllinoisS1Yes
AlabamaS2NYes
New JerseyS1B,S3NYes
NevadaS2Yes
South DakotaS3B,S3NYes
HawaiiS2Yes
VirginiaS1B,S3NYes
PennsylvaniaS1B,S3N,S2MYes
MichiganS1Yes
OklahomaS3NYes
IowaS1B,S2NYes
NebraskaS2Yes
LouisianaS2NYes
KentuckyS1B,S2NYes
ConnecticutSHB,S1NYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.1 - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animalsLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.1.3 - Persecution/controlLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (27)
Alaska (7)
AreaForestAcres
Bering LakeChugach National Forest965,076
Chugach-12Chugach National Forest8,116
Chugach-13Chugach National Forest13,337
College FiordChugach National Forest1,130,818
Copper River WetlandsChugach National Forest85,972
Mansfield PeninsulaTongass National Forest54,991
Sheridan GlacierChugach National Forest224,683
California (5)
AreaForestAcres
CamuesaLos Padres National Forest8,209
Devil's Gate (CA)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest9,946
Little PineLos Padres National Forest1,315
Lpoor CanyonLos Padres National Forest13,762
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Idaho (3)
AreaForestAcres
Borah PeakSalmon-Challis National Forest130,463
Italian PeakCaribou-Targhee National Forest141,158
SeceshPayette National Forest248,088
Montana (4)
AreaForestAcres
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
BridgerGallatin National Forest45,059
Freezeout MountainBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest97,305
Snowcrest MountainBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest97,649
Nevada (4)
AreaForestAcres
Pine Grove SouthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest88,945
South SchellHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest125,614
Toiyabe RangeHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest99,225
West Walker (NV)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,683
Oregon (1)
AreaForestAcres
HellholeUmatilla National Forest65,679
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Jim Wilson CanyonBuffalo Gap National Grassland6,024
Utah (2)
AreaForestAcres
Stansbury MountainsWasatch-Cache National Forest39,696
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
References (106)
  1. Adair, P. 1982. The short-eared owl (<i>Asio accipitrinus</i>, Pallus) and the kestrel (<i>Falco tinnunculus</i>, L.) in the vole plague districts. Ann. Scot. Nat. Hist. 1982:219-231.
  2. Adamus, P. R. 1988. Atlas of breeding birds in Maine, 1978-1983. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Augusta. 366 pp.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  4. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1989. Thirty-seventh supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Checklist of North American birds. Auk 106:532-538.
  5. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  6. Andrle, R. F., and J. R. Carrol, editors. 1988. The atlas of breeding birds in New York State. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York. 551 pp.
  7. Bailey, H. H. 1913. The Birds of Virginia. J. P. Bell Co., Inc., Lynchburg, Virginia. 362 pp.
  8. Banfield, A. W. F. 1947. A study of the winter feeding habits of the Short-eared Owl in the Toronto region. Canadian Journal of Research 25:45-65.
  9. Bent, A. C. 1938. Life histories of North American birds of prey. Part 2. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 170. 482 pp., 92 pls.
  10. Berger, A. J. 1981. Hawaiian Birdlife. Second Edition. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii. xv + 260 pp.
  11. Beske, A., and J. Champion. 1971. Prolific nesting of short-eared owls on Buena Vista Marsh. Passenger Pigeon 33:99-103.
  12. Bevier, L. R., editor. 1994. The atlas of breeding birds of Connecticut. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut Bull. 113. xvii + 461 pp.
  13. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  14. BirdLife International. (2013-2014). IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on various dates in 2013 and 2014. http://www.birdlife.org/
  15. Birney, E. C., W. E. Grant, and D. D. Baird. 1976. Importance of vegetative cover to cycles of <i>Microtus</i> populations. Ecology 57:1043-51.
  16. Bosakowski, T. 1986. Short-eared owl winter roosting strategies. American Birds 40:237-240.
  17. Brauning, D. W., editor. 1992. Atlas of breeding birds in Pennsylvania. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 484 pp.
  18. Braun, M. J., D. W. Finch, M. B. Robbins, and B. K. Schmidt. 2000. A field checklist of the birds of Guyana. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  19. Brower, J. E., and J. H. Zar. 1977. Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. W. C. Brown, Co. Publ., Dubuqe, Iowa.
  20. Cadman, M.D. and A.M. Page. 1994. Status report on the Short-eared Owl, <i>Asio flammeus</i>, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 60 pp.
  21. Cadman, M.D., P.F.J. Eagles, and F.M Helleiner, compilers. 1987. Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario. Federation of Ontario Naturalists and the Long Point Bird Observatory. Universtiy of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Ontario.
  22. Carter, M., C. Hunter, D. Pashley, and D. Petit. 1998. The Watch List. Bird Conservation, Summer 1998:10.
  23. Castro, I. and A. Phillips. 1996. A guide to the birds of the Galapagos Islands. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  24. Clark, R.J. 1975. A field study of the short-eared owl (<i>Asio flammeus</i>) Pontoppidan in North America. Wildlife Monographs 47:1-67.
  25. Clark, R. J., and J. G. Ward. 1974. Interspecific competition in two species of open country raptors <i>Circus cyaneus</i> and <i>Asio flammeus</i>. Proc. Pennsylvania Acad. Sci. 48:79-87.
  26. Combs, K. P., and C. R. Griffin. 1990. Population dynamics, habitat use and management of short-eared owls on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts, Department of Forest and Wildlife Management, Amherst, Massachusetts. Unpublished progress report. 24 pp.
  27. Combs, K.P., and S.M. Melvin. 1989. Population dynamics, habitat use and management of short-eared owls on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Boston, Massachusetts. Unpublished progress report. 24 pp.
  28. Craighead, J. J., and F. C. Craighead, Jr. 1956. Hawks, Owls and Wildlife. The Stackpole Company, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and the Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C.
  29. Cramp, S., editor. 1985. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. The birds of the western Palearctic. Vol. 4, terns to woodpeckers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
  30. de la Peña, M. R. and M. Rumboll. 1998. Birds of southern South America and Antarctica. Harper Collins Publishers, London.
  31. Dement'ev, G. P., N. A. Gladkov, and E. P. Spangenber. 1951. Birds of the Soviet Union. Israel Prog. for Sci. Translations, Russian translation, Jerusalem, Israel.
  32. Dubois, A.D. 1924. A nuptial song flight of the short-eared owl. Auk 41:260-263.
  33. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  34. Fitzgerald, S. D., J.S. Patterson, M. Kiupel, H.A. Simmons, S.D. Grimes, C.F. Sarver, R.M. Fulton, B.A. Steficek, T.M. Cooley, J.P. Massey, and J.G. Sikarskie. 2003. Clinical and pathologic features of West Nile virus infection in native North American owls (Family Strigidae). Avian Disease 47(3):602–610.
  35. Forbush, E. H. 1927. Birds of Massachusetts and other New England States. Part 2: Land birds from bob-whites to Grackles. Massachusetts Department of Agriculture, Boston, Massachusetts. 461 pp.
  36. Gahbauer, M. A., R. A. Miller, N. Paprocki, A. Morici, A. C. Smith, and D. A. Wiggins. 2021. Status and monitoring of short-eared owls (<i>Asio flammeus</i>) in North and South America. Airo 29: 115-142.
  37. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2023. GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.h5apnk (Accessed 26 May 2023).
  38. Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N., and K. M. Bauer. 1980. Handbuch der Vogel Mitteleuropas. Volume 9. Columbiformes-Piciformes. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden.
  39. Goddard, T. R. 1935. A census of short-eared owls (<i>Asio flammeus</i>) at Newcastle, Roxburgshire. Journal of Animal Ecology 4:113-118.
  40. Gogol-Prokurat, M. 2016. Short-eared Owl Range Map. California Wildlife Habitat Relationship Program, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA. https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/Default.aspx (Accessed 26 May 2023).
  41. Grinnell, J., and A. Miller. 1944. The distribution of the birds of California. Pacific Coast Avifauna Number 27, Cooper Ornithological Club, Berkeley, California.
  42. Gronlund, S., and H. Mikkola. 1969. On the ecology the short-eared owl in Lapua Alajoki in 1969. Suomenselan Linnut 4:68-76.
  43. Hagen, Y. 1969. Norwegian studies on the reproduction on birds of prey and owls in relation to micro-rodent population fluctiations. Fauna 22:73-126.
  44. Hall, G.A. 1983. West Virginia birds: distribution and ecology. Spec. Publ. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. No. 7, Pittsburgh. 180 pp.
  45. Harrison, J. G. 1943. On a case of tuberculosis in a wild bird. Ibis 85:516-517.
  46. Hess, G.K., R.L. West, M. Barnhill, and L. Fleming. 1999. Birds of Delaware. Univ. Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
  47. Holt, D. 1985. The short-eared owl in Massachusets. Cape Nat. 14:31-35.
  48. Holt, D. W. 1992. Notes on short-eared owl, <i>Asio flammeus</i>, nest sites, reproduction, and territory sizes in coastal Massachusetts. Can. Field-Nat. 106:352-356.
  49. Holt, D.W. 1993a. Breeding season diet of Short-eared Owls in Massachusetts. Wilson Bulletin 105(3):490-496.
  50. Holt, D.W. 1993b. Trophic niche of nearctic Short-eared Owls. Wilson Bulletin 105(3):497-503.
  51. Holt, D.W., and S.M. Leasure. 1993. Short-eared Owl (<i>Asio flammeus</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 62. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 24 pp.
  52. Holt, D. W., and S. M. Melvin. 1986. Population dynamics, habitat use, and management needs of the short-eared owl in Massachusetts: summary of 1985 research. Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildife, Natural Heritage Program, Boston, Massachusetts.
  53. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  54. Johnsgard, P. 1988. North American owls: biology and natural history. Smithsonian Inst. Press. 336 pp.
  55. Johnson, S. R. and D. R. Herter. 1989. The Birds of the Beaufort Sea. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., Anchorage, Alaska. 372 pp.
  56. Kirk, D.A., and C. Hyslop. 1998. Population status and recent trends in Canadian raptors: a review. Biological Conservation 83 (1): 91-118.
  57. Kirk, D. A., D. Hussell, and E. Dunn. 1995. Raptor population status and trends in Canada. Bird Trends (Canadian Wildlife Service) 4:2-9.
  58. Klimkiewicz, M. K., and J. K. Solem. 1974. First year of breeding bird atlas: Howard County Maryland. Maryland Birdlife 30(1):27-35.
  59. Korpimaki, E. 1984. Population dynamics of birds of prey in relation to fluctuations in small mammal populations in western Finland. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 21:287-293.
  60. Korpimaki, E. 1985. Rapid tracking of microtine population by their avian predators: possible evidence for stabilizing predation. Oikos 45:281-284.
  61. Larsen, J.C. 1987. Short-eared owl breeding survey. California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame Wildlife Investigation. Unpublished report. Project No. W-065-R-4, Job No. II-13.
  62. Laughlin, S. B., and D. P. Kibbe, editors. 1985. The atlas of breeding birds of Vermont. University Press of New England, Hanover Vermont. 456 pp.
  63. Lockie, J.D. 1955. The breeding habits and food of short-eared owls after a vole plague. Bird Study 2:53-69.
  64. Mebs, T. 1966. Eulen und Kauze, Strigidae. Kosmos-Naturfuhrer. Franckh'sche Verlagshandlung, Stuttgart, Germany.
  65. Melvin, S.M., D.G. Smith, D.W. Holt, and G.R. Tate. 1989. Small owls. Pages 88-96 in B.G. Pendleton, editor. Proceedings of the Northeast raptor management symposium and workshop. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C. 353 pp.
  66. Mikkola, H. 1983. Owls of Europe. Buteo Books, Vermillion, South Dakota. 400 pp.
  67. Mikkola, H., and S. Sulkava. 1969. On occurrence and feeding habits of short-eared owl in Finland 1964-68. Ornis Fennica 46:188-193.
  68. Murray, G. A. 1976. Geographic variation in the clutch sizes of seven owl species. Auk 93:602-613.
  69. Murray, J. J. 1952. A check-list of the birds of Virginia. Virginia Soc. Ornithol.
  70. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
  71. Palmer, R. S. 1949. Maine Birds. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, Vol. 102. 656 pp.
  72. Pardiñas, U. F. J. and S. Cirignoli. 2003. Bibliografía comentada sobre los análisis de egagrópilas de aves rapaces en Argentina. Ornitologia Neotropical 13:31-59.
  73. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  74. Partners in Flight. 2020. Population Estimates Database, version 3.1. Available at http://pif.birdconservancy.org/PopEstimates.
  75. Partners in Flight Science Committee. 2013. Population Estimates Database, version 2013. Available at http://rmbo.org/pifpopestimates. Accessed in 2014 and 2018.
  76. Peterson, R.T. 1934. A field guide to the birds. First edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  77. Pitelka, F. A., P. Q. Tomich, and G. W. Treichel. 1955. Breeding behavior of jaegers and owls near Barrow, Alaska. Condor 57:3-18.
  78. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  79. Pratt, H. D., P. L. Bruner, and D. G. Berrett. 1987. A Field Guide to the Birds of Hawaii and the Tropical Pacific. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 409 pp. + 45 plates.
  80. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  81. Randall, T. E. 1925. Abnormally large clutches of eggs of short-eared owl (<i>Asio flammeus</i>). Canadian Field Naturalist Monographs 39:194.
  82. Remsen, Jr., J.V. 1978. Bird species of special concern in California. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department for Fish and Game. 54 pp.
  83. Ridgely, R. S. 2002. Distribution maps of South American birds. Unpublished.
  84. Robbins, C. S. 1969. The season. Maryland Birdlife 25:92-100.
  85. Robbins, C. S. 1972. The season. Maryland Birdlife 28:105-117.
  86. Roberson, D. 2008. Short-Eared Owl Species Account in Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1:242–248,. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=10408 (Accessed 26 May 2023).
  87. Root, T. 1988. Atlas of wintering North American birds: An analysis of Christmas Bird Count data. University of Chicago Press. 336 pp.
  88. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, and J. Fallon, 2004. The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966-2003. Version 2004.1. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.
  89. Schneider, K.J., and D.M. Pence, editors. 1992. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA. 400 pp.
  90. Smith, G. A. 1989. Point Peninsula, Jefferson County; mouse raptor mecca during the winter of 1987-1988. Kingbird 39(1):7-20.
  91. Snyder, L.L., and C.E. Hope. 1938. A predator-prey relationship between the short-eared owl and the meadow mouse. Wilson Bulletin 50:110-112.
  92. Stewart, R. E., and C. S. Robbins. 1958. Birds of Maryland and the District of Columbia. North American Fauna No. 62. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
  93. Tate, G.R. 1991. Population dynamics, reproductive ecology, and conservation of two insular populations of the short-eared owl in Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts. M.S. thesis. 107 pp.
  94. Tate, G. R. 1992. Short-eared owl, <i>Asio flammeus</i>. Pages 171-189 in K. J. Schneider and D. M. Pence, editors. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 400 pp.
  95. Tate, G. R., and S. M. Melvin. 1987. Population dynamics, habitat use, and management needs of the short-eared owl in Massachusetts: summary of 1986 research. Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Unpublished report.
  96. Tate, G.R., and S.M. Melvin. 1988. Population dynamics, habitat use, and management needs of the short-eared owl in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Boston, Massachusetts. Unpublished progress report. 15 pp.
  97. Tate, J., Jr. 1986. The Blue List for 1986. American Birds 40:227-236.
  98. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  99. Urner, C.A. 1921. Short-eared owl nesting at Elizabeth, New Jersey. Auk 38:602-603.
  100. Urner, C.A. 1923. Notes on the short-eared owl. Auk 40:30-36.
  101. Urner, C. A. 1925. Notes on two ground-nesting birds of prey. Auk 42:31-41.
  102. Village, A. 1987. Numbers, territory-size and turnover of short-eared owls <i>Asio flammeus</i> in relation to vole abundance. Ornis Scandinavica 18:198-204.
  103. Wiggins, D. A., D. W. Holt and S. M. Leasure. 2006. Short-eared Owl (<i>Asio flammeus</i>). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/062
  104. Wiggins, D. A., D. W. Holt, and S. M. Leasure. 2020. Short-eared Owl (<i>Asio flammeus</i>), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (S. M. Billerman, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.sheowl.01
  105. Witherby, H. F., F. C. R. Jourdain, N. F Tcehurst, and B. W. Tucker. 1938. The Handbook of British Birds. Volume 2: Warblers to Owls. H. F. and G. Witherby Ltd., London, United Kingdom. 352 pp.
  106. Young, L. S., J. G. Grenshaw, and L. L. Grenshaw. 1988. Food caching by a short-eared owl. Murrelet 69:39.