Botaurus lentiginosus

(Rackett, 1813)

American Bittern

G5Secure Found in 8 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103409
Element CodeABNGA01020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPelecaniformes
FamilyArdeidae
GenusBotaurus
Other Common Names
American bittern (EN) Avetoro Norteño (ES) Butor d'Amérique (FR)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
May constitute a superspecies with B. pinnatus (AOU 1998).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-06
Change Date2016-04-06
Edition Date2014-02-26
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and D.W. Mehlman
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Widespread distribution but populations are declining; threat of habitat destruction.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: southeastern Alaska and southern Mackenzie to Newfoundland, south to southern California, central Arizona (formerly), southern New Mexico, central Kansas, central Missouri, central and western Tennessee, western Kentucky, central Ohio, southern Pennsylvania, northeastern West Virginia, eastern Maryland, and eastern Virginia (rarely North Carolina); locally in Texas, Louisiana, Florida, and Mexico south to Puebla and the state of Mexico (AOU 1983). In the northeastern U.S., abundance declines sharply south of northern New England and New York (Gibbs and Melvin 1992). Range is large but highly discontinuous due to restricted habitat. NON-BREEDING: southwestern British Columbia, northern Nevada, northern Texas, Ohio Valley (rarely), and New York south to southern Mexico (rarely or formerly to Panama) and the West Indies (AOU 1983). Occurs in winter primarily near the coast; areas of relatively high density include southern Florida, San Joaquin Valley (California), eastern North Carolina (no longer common, H. LeGrand, pers. comm.), Okefenokee Swamp, southern Louisiana, and various national wildlife refuges elsewhere (Root 1988).
Occurrences Comments
Estimate provided by NatureServe (2014).
Threat Impact Comments
Threatened by loss and degradation of wetlands due to drainage, filling, conversion to agriculture or recreational use, siltation, and pollution. The most serious factor limiting populations is availability of wetland habitat. The entire life cycle is dependent on wetlands, yet over half the original wetlands in the conterminous U.S. have been destroyed (Tiner 1984). The most serious losses have occurred among palustrine emergent wetlands, of which about 4.75 million acres (1.92 million ha) were lost between the mid-1950s and mid-1970s (Tiner 1984). Inland, freshwater wetlands, the most important nesting and wintering areas, are among the most threatened habitats (Tiner 1984). Larger wetlands (greater than 10 ha) may support large portions of regional nesting populations, and loss of these wetlands can be critical to populations in many areas. Small wetlands (less than five ha) may serve as important alternate feeding sites and as "stepping stones" during movements between larger wetlands, but receive no legal protection in most states. Habitat quality also may be limiting. Eutrophication, siltation, chemical contamination, and human disturbance may seriously reduce habitat quality, even at large protected wetlands. Eutrophication, caused by inflow of nitrates and phosphates from urban and agricultural areas, in combination with silting and turbidity, has damaged the aquatic fauna that serve as prey for endangered Eurasian bitterns in Great Britain (Day and Wilson 1978). Marshland invasion by purple loosestrife (LYTHRUM SALICARIA) and phragmites (PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS) may substantially alter waterbird habitats in the northeastern U.S., but effects on bitterns have not been assessed. Acid deposition is a potential threat given the dependence on wetland habitats vulnerable to acidification, the high proportion of amphibians in their diet (Cottam and Uhler 1945), and the large numbers of bitterns and large proportion of the breeding range in regions receiving rainfall of reduced pH (the northeastern U.S. and central and eastern Canada). Amphibians are typically vulnerable to strong reductions in water pH (Freda 1985), and the Eurasian bittern avoids waters with pH less than 4.5 (Cramp 1977), probably because such waters lack amphibian and fish prey. However, American bitterns usually occupy habitats with substantial growths of emergent vegetation, even in more northerly parts of their range (DesGranges and Houde 1989; Gibbs et al., in press.). Such areas typically are of circumneutral pH and are chemically buffered against strong shifts in acidity. Little is known about the effects of contaminants. However, heavy metals, PCBs, and organochlorines have been found in tissues of a number of heron species (Fleming et al. 1983), despite bans on use of some of these chemicals (i.e., organochlorines) since the 1970s. Agricultural chemicals may have significant, indirect effects by entering wetlands via runoff from upland areas and reducing prey populations. Many of this bird's prey, including aquatic insects, crayfish, and amphibians, are vulnerable to agricultural pesticides. Wading birds are known to be moderately susceptible to oil toxicosis. A nematode parasite, EUSTRONGILIDES, contracted from small fish, can devastate wading bird populations, and thrives in waters polluted with nutrients and silt; bittern populations at wetlands and impoundments receiving stormwater and runoff from residential and agricultural areas may be particularly vulnerable to epizootics of Eustrongylidosis (P. Frederick, pers. comm.). Illegal shooting incidental to upland gamebird or waterfowl hunting has an unknown impact populations. Records maintained by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife indicate that at least three bitterns were shot and killed on or adjacent to wildlife management areas in that state during pheasant hunting seasons between 1986-90 (B. Blodget and W. Easte, pers. comms.). Historically, hunting may have been a greater source of mortality than it is today. Audubon (1840) reported that American bitterns were "common" in markets of New Orleans in the early 1800s. Several of this bird's common names, such as Indian Hen and Meadow Hen, may reflect its popularity as food for native Americans and colonists. In Europe, illegal hunting has a significant impact on Eurasian bittern populations and has led to declines and prevented population recovery in many areas (Day 1981). Human disturbance in or along the margins of wetlands has unknown impacts on reproduction, feeding ecology, and site fidelity. In Great Britain, recreational boaters are thought to limit the availability of undisturbed feeding sites for Eurasian bitterns at protected wetlands (Bibby 1981). Draining, filling and disturbance of wetlands and environmental contamination (especially by chlorinated hydrocarbons) are suspected as causes of decline in Connecticut (Zeranski and Baptist 1990).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A stocky wading bird with a straight pointed bill, relatively short neck and legs, and somewhat pointed wings; darker flight feathers; bill dull yellow with a dusky tip on the upper mandible; legs and feet are greenish yellow; breeding feathering includes generally inconspicuous white ruffs on the shoulders and two small green patches on the back; wing span 107 cm (NGS 1983). Terrestrial locomotion is slow and stealthy; flight is rapid and usually low.

MORPHOLOGY AND PLUMAGES: A brown, medium-sized heron, 60-85 cm long, with a stout body and neck and relatively short legs (Palmer 1962, Cramp 1977, Hancock and Kushlan 1984). Adult plumage is all brown above (finely flecked with black) and heavily streaked with brown and white below. The crown is rusty- brown. An elongated, black patch extends from below the eye down the side of the neck, a characteristic unique among herons (Hancock and Kushlan 1984). The throat is white. Sexes are similar, except that the male is slightly larger (Palmer 1962). Juveniles differ only in lacking black neck patches, which are obtained in the first winter. Plumage does not change seasonally. In flight, seem hurried, ungraceful, and stiff. When disturbed, they often freeze in an upright, concealing posture, with head and bill upturned.

VOCALIZATIONS: During the breeding season, males repeat from two to 10 times a distinctive, far-carrying call, rendered as "pump-er-lunk" by Palmer (1962), and which is often preceded by a series of clicking and gulping sounds. A detailed, anatomical description of how they vocalize, through inflation of the esophagus, was provided by Chapin (1922). They rely on their resounding calls to communicate among the dense, visually restricting emergent vegetation that dominates nesting habitats. Low frequency sounds, such as their "booming," attenuate less rapidly and are audible at greater distances in dense marsh vegetation than high frequency sounds (Cosens and Falls 1984). When flushed from a marsh, they often emit a hoarse "kok-kok-kok" or nasal "haink" (Palmer 1962).

EGGS: Eggs measure 49 by 37 mm and are elliptical, buff-brown to deep olive-brown, smooth, and slightly glossy (Harrison 1978).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from night-herons in the following ways: wings are pointed rather than rounded, flight feathers are much darker than back (vs. no contrast), upperparts lack white spotting, and bill is more slender. Much larger than the least bittern (average length 71 cm vs. 33 cm). Differs from similar juvenile green heron in being larger (length 71 cm vs. 46 cm) and in having flight feathers of wings obviously darker than the middle of the back.

Habitat

BREEDING: Primarily large freshwater and (less often) brackish marshes, including lake and pond edges where cattails, sedges, or bulrushes are plentiful and marshes where there are patches of open water and aquatic-bed vegetation. Occurs also in other areas with dense herbaceous cover, such as shrubby marshes, bogs, wet meadows, and, rarely, hayfields (Brewer et al. 1991). Readily uses wetlands created by impoundments. Wetlands of 2.5 ha or more may support nesting; smaller wetlands may serve as alternate foraging sites (Gibbs and Melvin 1992). See Hanowski and Niemi (1990) for a quantitative study of habitat in Minnesota.

Nests primarily in inland freshwater wetlands, sometimes in tidal marshes or in sparsely vegetated wetlands or dry grassy uplands. Breeding occurs primarily in wetlands with tall emergent vegetation. Sparsely vegetated wetlands and dry grassy uplands are sometimes used, as are tidal marshes in some areas (Stewart and Robbins 1958, Swift 1987). In comparison to the sympatric least bittern (IXOBRYCHUS EXILIS), uses a wider variety of wetland cover types, less densely vegetated sites, shallower water depths, and primarily freshwater habitats.

Wetlands used in Maine were dominated by emergent and aquatic-bed (floating-leaved and submergent) vegetation, had a high diversity of vegetative life forms, and a high degree of cover/water interspersion (Gibbs et al. in press; Gibbs and Melvin 1990). Portions of wetlands used were dominated by sedges (CAREX spp.), broad-leaved cattail (TYPHA LATIFOLIA), and ericaceous shrubs. In a study of Quebec lakes, lakes with patches of floating-leaved plants, emergent growth along shorelines, and abundant amphibian populations were preferred (DesGranges and Houde 1989).

At Horicon Marsh in Wisconsin, responded to tape-recorded calls only from shallow water cattail and dry cattail habitats and seemed to avoid deepwater cattails (Manci and Rusch 1988). At moist soil impoundments in Missouri, associated with water depths of less than 10 cm and vegetative cover characterized as "rank, dense, or sparse." Habitat use was not associated with "open" or "short" vegetative cover or water of depths of greater than 10 cm (Fredrickson and Reid 1986). In Minnesota, seven breeding territories had a mean water depth of 10 cm, vegetation height of 1.3 m, and density of sedge and grass stems of 117 stems/m squared (Hanowski and Niemi 1986).

NON-BREEDING: Migrant bitterns were flushed at 25 sites during spring in Missouri with mean water depth of 26 cm, vegetation height of 63 cm, and stem density of 157 stems/m squared. Characteristics of 35 flush sites in fall were similar, except that vegetation was taller (118 cm) (Reid 1989). In areas where temperatures stay above freezing and waters remain open, especially in coastal regions where the ocean moderates climate (Root 1988). Wintering habitat is much like breeding habitat, and overwintering populations are heavily dependent on managed wetland areas, such as those occurring at wildlife refuges (Root 1988). Occasionally occurs in habitats that are more open than the usual ones. Overwintering occasionally takes place in brackish coastal marshes (Hancock and Kushlan 1984).

Ecology

Basically solitary. Low population density. Too little is known of rates of predation on nests and adults to infer the importance of predation as a factor limiting populations. Similarly, only minimal information is available on the effects of parasites and disease. Wading birds are known to be susceptible Type C botulism (occasionally), avian cholera (infrequently), chlamydial infections (frequently), sarcocystis (rarely), and aspergillosis (infrequently) (Friend 1987). Known to harbor lice and flies (Peters 1936) and a number of species of nematodes (Boyd 1966).

Reproduction

Nesting occurs solitarily (non-colonially) on all-purpose territories that provide both feeding and nesting sites, but occasionally up to a few pairs nest in a small area (Harrison 1979). Polygyny is suspected to occur (Palmer 1962). Mating rituals are elaborate, and involve display of a tuft of white nuptial feathers located on the sides of the neck (see Baker 1980, Johnsgard 1980). BOTAURUS bitterns may undergo a change in iris color from yellow to orange during courtship (Wood 1986).

The nest consists of a platform of reeds, sedges, cattail, or other available emergent vegetation, and is lined with fine grasses. Nests are usually placed on the ground, in a tussock, a few inches above water, or are floating; are surrounded by water, and have dense, overhead cover (Bent 1926, Vesall 1940, Cogswell 1977, Harrison 1978, Terres 1980). Nests may also be built in grassy uplands (Vesall 1940, Duebbert and Lokemoen 1977). Nests are usually accessed by two, well-beaten pathways (Gabrielson 1914).

Egg-laying begins in late April or early May, about a month after the arrival at nesting areas, and continues until mid-June (Bent 1926). In the north-central U.S., nests may contain eggs from about early May to early July (Brewer et al. 1991). Clutch size ranges from two to seven eggs, usually three to five (Duebbert and Lokemoen 1977, Graber et al. 1978). Incubation, by the female only, begins with the first egg (Palmer 1962). Hatching occurs after 24-28 days (Burns 1915, Bent 1926, Vesall 1940), and chicks remain at or near the nest for two weeks (Gabrielson 1914, Vesall 1940, Harrison 1979, Terres 1980). Chicks are fed only by the female, and are given fish, frogs, snakes, crayfish, and mice (Gabrielson 1914, Byers 1951). Nests often become fouled with food debris (Vesall 1940). Post-fledging behavior of young is unreported.

Apparently single-brooded (Palmer 1962). In upland habitats in North and South Dakota, 57% of 72 nests hatched at least one egg (Duebbert and Lokemoen 1977). Little is known about sources of egg, chick or post-juvenile mortality, age at fledging or first breeding, or territory size. Age at fledging for the closely-related Eurasian bittern is 50-55 days (Cramp 1977). One banded American bittern lived at least eight years (Clapp et al. 1982). Probably undergoes extensive post-breeding dispersal, which has resulted in numerous sightings, mostly between September and December, at locations as distant as Iceland, Norway, and Great Britain (Cramp 1977). Information on molt is incomplete. Adults undergo a complete post-breeding molt from August to November, and possibly a pre-breeding renewal of body plumage (Palmer 1962, but see Bent 1926).
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5B,N3N
ProvinceRankNative
NunavutS3BYes
New BrunswickS4B,S4MYes
QuebecS4BYes
Nova ScotiaS3B,S4MYes
Northwest TerritoriesS3Yes
Island of NewfoundlandS4B,SUMYes
British ColumbiaS3B,SNRNYes
AlbertaS3BYes
Prince Edward IslandS4BYes
SaskatchewanS5BYes
ManitobaS5BYes
LabradorS3B,SUMYes
OntarioS5BYes
United StatesN4B,N4N
ProvinceRankNative
IndianaS2BYes
OhioS2Yes
LouisianaS4NYes
MarylandS1BYes
DelawareS1BYes
Rhode IslandS1B,S1NYes
WisconsinS2BYes
FloridaS3NYes
KansasS1BYes
IllinoisS2Yes
WyomingS2BYes
IowaS2BYes
AlaskaS3BYes
GeorgiaS3Yes
IdahoS1BYes
MinnesotaS4BYes
New HampshireS3BYes
MontanaS3BYes
ArkansasS2NYes
CaliforniaS3Yes
New JerseyS1B,S3NYes
District of ColumbiaS1B,S2NYes
New MexicoS2Yes
PennsylvaniaS2B,S3MYes
TennesseeS1Yes
MississippiS1NYes
South DakotaS4BYes
OklahomaS2Yes
VirginiaS1B,S2NYes
OregonS4Yes
New YorkS4Yes
KentuckySHBYes
NebraskaS4Yes
South CarolinaS3NYes
MichiganS3Yes
TexasS3Yes
North DakotaSNRBYes
WashingtonS4B,S3NYes
MaineS4BYes
AlabamaS3NYes
MissouriS1Yes
ColoradoS3BYes
VermontS3BYes
West VirginiaS1B,S1NYes
North CarolinaS1B,S3NYes
UtahS2Yes
ArizonaS1Yes
NevadaS3BYes
MassachusettsS2BYes
ConnecticutS1BYes
Roadless Areas (8)
Montana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big Snowy Mountains WsaLewis and Clark National Forest88,003
Nevada (1)
AreaForestAcres
Pearl PeakHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest71,405
Oklahoma (1)
AreaForestAcres
Beech CreekOuachita National Forest8,303
Oregon (2)
AreaForestAcres
Crane MountainFremont National Forest23,096
Sky Lakes AWinema National Forest3,940
Utah (1)
AreaForestAcres
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
Vermont (1)
AreaForestAcres
Devil's Den 09083Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests9,169
Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
References (79)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Andrle, R. F., and J. R. Carrol, editors. 1988. The atlas of breeding birds in New York State. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York. 551 pp.
  4. Audubon, J.J. 1840. The birds of America. [Reprint edition. 1967. Dover Publications, Inc., New York. 650 pp.]
  5. Azure, D. A. 1998. Aspects of American Bittern ecology in northwest Minnesota. M.S. thesis. University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota. 139 pp.
  6. Baker, J. L. 1980. Mating ritual of an American bittern. South Dakota Bird Notes 32:56.
  7. Bent, A. C. 1926. Life histories of North American marsh birds. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 135.
  8. Bibby, C. J. 1981. Wintering bitterns in Britain. British Birds 74:1-10.
  9. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  10. BirdLife International. (2013-2014). IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on various dates in 2013 and 2014. http://www.birdlife.org/
  11. Boyd, E. M. 1966. Observations on nematodes of herons in North America including three new species and new host and state records. Journal of Parasitology 52:503-11.
  12. Brewer, R., G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams, Jr. 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan. xvii + 594 pp.
  13. Brininger, W. L., Jr. 1996. The ecology of the American Bittern in northwest Minnesota. M.S. thesis. St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota. 70 pp.
  14. Brown, M., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1986. Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. J. Wildl. Manage. 50:392-397.
  15. Burns, F. L. 1915. Comparative periods of depostion and incubation of some North American birds. Wilson Bulletin 27:275-86.
  16. Byers, E. 1951. Feeding behavior of young American bitterns. Wilson Bulletin. 63:334-6.
  17. Carter, M., G. Fenwick, C. Hunter, D. Pashley, D. Petit, J. Price, and J. Trapp. 1996. Watchlist 1996: For the future. Field Notes 50(3):238-240.
  18. Chapin, J. P. 1922. The function of the oesophagus in the bittern's booming. Auk 39:196-202.
  19. Clapp, R. B., M. K. Klimkiewicz, and J. H. Kennard. 1982. Longevity records of North American birds: Gaviidae through Alcidae. J. Field Ornithol. 53:81-124.
  20. Cogswell, H. L. 1977. Water birds of California. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. 399 pp.
  21. Cosens, S. E., and J. B. Falls. 1984. A comparison of sound propagation and song frequency in temperate marsh and grassland habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15:161-70.
  22. Cottam, C., and F. M. Uhler. 1945. Birds in relation to fishes. Fish and Wildlife Service. Leaflet No 272.
  23. Cramp, S. (editor). 1977. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Paleartic. Vol. 1: Ostrich to Ducks. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 722 pp.
  24. Day, J. C. U. 1981. Status of bitterns in Europe since 1976. British Birds. 74:10-6.
  25. Day, J. C. U., and J. Wilson. 1978. Breeding bitterns in Britain. British Birds 71:285-300.
  26. Desgranges, J. L., and B. Houde. 1989. Effects of acidity and other environmental parameters on the distribution of lacustrine birds in Quebec. In J. L. DesGranges (editor) Studies of the Effects of Acidification on Aquatic Wildlife in Canada: Lacustrine Birds and Their Habitats in Quebec. Can. Wildl. Serv. Occas. Pap. No. 67.
  27. Duebbert, H. G., and J. T. Lokemoen. 1977. Upland nesting of American bitterns, marsh hawks, and short-eared owls. Prairie Nat. 9:33-40.
  28. Eaton, E. H. 1914. Birds of New York. Part 2. Univ. of the State of New York, Albany.
  29. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  30. Fleming, W. J., D. R. Clar, Jr., and C. J. Henny. 1983. Organochlorine pesticides and PCB's: a continuing problem for the 1980's. Trans. N. Amer. Wildl. and Nat. Resour. Conf. 48:186-99.
  31. Freda, A. 1985. The influence of acidic pond water on amphibians: a review. In H. C. Martin (editor). Acidic precipitation. Proc. Intl. Symp. Acidic Precipitation. D. Reidel Publ. Co. Dordrecht, Holland.
  32. Fredrickson, L. H., and T. S. Taylor. 1982. Managment of seasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 148. 29 pp.
  33. Fredrickson, L.H., F.A. Reid. 1986. Wetlands and riparian habitats: a nongame management overview. Pages 59-96 in J.B. Hale, L.B. Best, and R. L. Clawson, (eds.) Management of nongame wildlife in the Midwest: a developing art. Proc. Symp. 47th Midwest Fish and Wildl. Conf.
  34. Friend, M. 1987. Field Guide to Wildlife Diseases. Vol. 1: General Field Procedures and Diseases of Migratory Birds. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 167. 225 pp.
  35. Gabrielson, I. N. 1914. Ten day's bird study in a Nebraska swamp. Wilson Bulletin. 87:51-68.
  36. Gibbs, J.P., and S.M. Melvin. 1989. An assessment of wading birds and other wetlands avifauna and their habitats in Maine. Unpubl. report, Maine Dept. Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Bangor, Maine. 114 pp.
  37. Gibbs, J.P., and S.M. Melvin. 1990. An assessment of wading birds and other wetlands avifauna and their habitats in Maine. Maine Department of Inland Fish. and Wildlife, Bangor, Maine. 61 pp. Unpublished report.
  38. Gibbs, J. P., and S. M. Melvin. 1992. American bittern, BOTAURUS LENTIGINOSUS. Pages 51-69 in K. J. Schneider and D. M. Pence, editors. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 400 pp.
  39. Gibbs, J. P., J. R. Longcore, D. G. McAuley, and J. K. Ringelman. 1991. Use of wetland habitats by selected nongame waterbirds in Maine. Fish and Wildlife Reservation 9, Fish and Wildlife Service.
  40. Graber, J. W., R. R. Graber, and E. L. Kirk. 1978. Illinois Birds: Ciconiiformes. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv. Biol. Notes 109.
  41. Hancock, J., and H. Elliot. 1978. The herons of the world. Harper and Row, New York.
  42. Hancock, J., and J. Kushlan. 1984. The Herons Handbook. Croom Helm, Ltd., Kent, England. 288 pp.
  43. Hands, H. M., R. D. Drobney, and M. R. Ryan. 1989. Status of the American bittern in the northcentral United States. Missouri Coop. Fish Wildl. Res. Unit Rep. 13 pp.
  44. Hanowski, J. M., and G. J. Niemi. 1986. Habitat characteristics for bird species of special concern. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, Minnesota. Unpublished report.
  45. Hanowski, J. M., and G. J. Niemi. 1990. An approach for quantifying habitat characteristics for rare wetland birds. Pages 51-56 in Mitchell et al., editors. Ecosystem management: rare species and significant habitats. New York State Museum Bulletin 471.
  46. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  47. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  48. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  49. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  50. Johnsgard, P. A. 1980. Copulatory behavior of the American bittern BOTAURUS LENTIGINOSUS. Auk 97:868-9.
  51. Jorde, D. G., J. R. Longcore, and P. W. Brown. 1989. Tidal and nontidal wetlands of northern Atlantic states. Pages 1-26 in L. M. Smith, R. L. Pederson, and R. M. Kaminiski (editors). Habitat management for migrating and Wintering waterfowl in North America. Texas Tech. Univ. Press, Lubbock, Texas.
  52. Kibbe, D. 1989. Survey of Vermont's rare marshland bird species. Unpubl. report, Hoboken, New Jersey. 8 pp.
  53. Lowther, P., A.F. Poole, J.P. Gibbs, S. Melvin, and F.A. Reid. 2009. American Bittern (<i>Botaurus lentiginosus</i>). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, ed.). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/018/doi:10.2173/bna.18.
  54. Manci, K. M., and D. H. Rusch. 1988. Indices to distribution and abundance of some inconspicuous waterbirds at Horicon Marsh. Journal of Field Ornithology 59:67-75.
  55. National Audubon Society. 2014. View all Species. Website accessible at http://birds.audubon.org/species. Accessed on various dates in 2014.
  56. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
  57. NatureServe. 2014. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed: various dates, 2014 ).
  58. Palmer, R. S. (editor). 1962. Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 1. Loons through flamingos. Yale University Press, New Haven. 567 pp.
  59. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  60. Payne, R. B., and C. J. Risley. 1976. Systematics and evolutionary relationships among the herons (Ardeidae). Univ. Michigan Mus. Zool., Misc. Publ. No. 150. 115 pp.
  61. Peters, H.S. 1936. A list of external parasites from birds of the eastern part of the United States. Bird-Banding 7:9-27.
  62. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  63. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  64. Reid, F. A. 1989. Differential habitat use by waterbirds in a managed wetland complex. University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. Ph.D. dissertation. 243 pp.
  65. Ridgely, R. S. and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  66. Root, T. 1988. Atlas of wintering North American birds: An analysis of Christmas Bird Count data. University of Chicago Press. 336 pp.
  67. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, J. E. Fallon, K. L. Pardieck, D. J. Ziolkowski, Jr., and W. A. Link. 2014. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2012. Version 02.19.2014. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/.
  68. Schneider, K.J., and D.M. Pence, editors. 1992. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA. 400 pp.
  69. Sibley, D. A. 2000a. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  70. Stewart, R. E., and C. S. Robbins. 1958. Birds of Maryland and the District of Columbia. North American Fauna No. 62. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
  71. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  72. Swift, B. L. 1987. An analysis of avian breeding habitats in Hudson river tidal marshes. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delmar, New York. Unpublished report. 62 pp.
  73. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  74. Tiner, R. W., Jr. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, D.C. 59 pp.
  75. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the United States: the 1987 list. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  76. Vesall, D. B. 1940. Notes on nesting habits of the American bittern. Wilson Bulletin. 52:207-8.
  77. Wood, D. S. 1986. On iris color in BOTATUS bitterns. Colonial Waterbirds 9:108-9.
  78. Zeranski, J. D., and T. R. Baptist. 1990. Connecticut birds. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
  79. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.