Coturnicops noveboracensis

(Gmelin, 1789)

Yellow Rail

G4Apparently Secure Found in 21 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis). © Seth Owens; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Seth Owens; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis). © Lev Frid | Rockjumper Birding; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Lev Frid | Rockjumper Birding; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis). © Blair Dudeck; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Blair Dudeck; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis). © Linda Ankerstjerne Olsen; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Linda Ankerstjerne Olsen; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis). © Scott Watson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Scott Watson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis). © Ryan Sanderson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Ryan Sanderson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100233
Element CodeABNME01010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderGruiformes
FamilyRallidae
GenusCoturnicops
Other Common Names
Polluela Amarilla (ES) Râle jaune (FR) yellow rail (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
May constitute a superspecies with C. exquisitus (AOU 1998).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-07
Change Date1996-11-25
Edition Date2014-04-01
Edition AuthorsJennings, R., B. Van Dam, J. D. Soule, and G. Hammerson
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Widespread distribution centered in south-central and southeastern Canada; apparently rather rare in most areas, though this is partly because of difficulty in detection; known to be fairly common in some areas; evidently declining in some areas where habitat destruction is ongoing, but there are some significant areas of protected habitat.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: locally from northwestern Alberta to central Saskatchewan, Manitoba, northern New York (Gibbs, pers. comm.), Maine, and New Brunswick, south to southern Alberta, northeastern Montana, North Dakota, Michigan, southern Wisconsin, northern Minnesota, southern Ontario, and New England; formerly south to southern Ohio and northern Illinois (Bookhout 1995). Nested formerly in eastern California, where current nesting is a possibility. Recently rediscovered nesting in southern Oregon (Stern et al. 1993). Formerly occurred in State of Mexico, Rio Lerma Valley (subspecies GOLDMANI) where last reported in 1964 (Bookhout 1995). NON-BREEDING: mostly on Coastal Plain in southeastern U.S. from Texas to North Carolina; scattered records in California from Humboldt to Riverside Counties (Bookhout 1995).
Occurrences Comments
Difficult to estimate due to rail's secretive nature, but a total of more than 150 EOs were reported from the five states and provinces that provided this information in a 1993 survey. It is likely that there are many more EOs in territories that did not respond (e.g., Manitoba and Saskatchewan). Species is likely highly under-detected. Many new records in Minnesota as a result of intensive county inventories suggest that the scant records prior to these inventories were due to lack of detection.
Threat Impact Comments
The major threats are nesting habitat destruction due to coastal development, natural succession, and wetland destruction. The breeding grounds are used for hay and pastures. Light agricultural use is beneficial, whereas intensive grazing removes needed cover. Hunting is a threat of unknown dimensions, especially in the mid-Atlantic coastal zone (Gibbs, pers. comm.). In Minnesota, habitat is threatened by agriculture and gamebird management activities (Coffin and Pfannmuller 1988). The timing of flooding for waterfowl management differs from the natural flooding cycle of the migratory habitat of the rails (Rundle and Fredrickson 1981). Johnson and Dinsmore (1986) reported that waterfowl management can be compatible with breeding rails. In Mississippi, urbanization, development of the coastal zone, and stream alteration projects have lowered the water table and destroyed marshes.
In Illinois, a public viewing area used once a week by humans 229 m from a rookery did not cause any overt responses from nesting birds (DeMauro 1993). See Vos (1984) for information on response to human disturbance in Colorado. Predators may include the red fox (VULPES VULPES), mink (MUSTELA spp), raccoon (PROCYON LOTOR), snakes, turtles, crows (CORVUS spp), gulls (LARUS spp), hawks, owls, eagles, rats, opossum (DIDELPHIS VIRGINIANA), striped skunk (MEPHITIS MEPHITIS), river otter (LUTRA CANADENSIS), coyote (CANIS LATRANS) and bobcat (LYNX RUFUS).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A small buffy rail with very secretive habits (Peterson 1980). White wing patch noticeable in flight. Has a very short greenish bill and a striped, checkered back with buff and black (Peterson 1980). The male's bill turns black after the breeding season. Weight 50-55 g; 15 to 19 cm (6 to 7.5 inches) long; wingspan 25 to 33 cm (10 to 13 inches) (Evers 1990). Males are generally larger than females.

Both the male and female are capable of calling. The calls consist of a long, continued series of pairs and triplets of "ticks" (Savaloja 1981). The female has a variety of calls used when protecting young. A "rowr" is used when the nest is disturbed, a whining may be used to attract young, and moans may be given when brooding (Savaloja 1981). Males call during northward migration and females do not. During the pre-incubation period the males will give their calls nightly for hours, stopping for only a few minutes each hour. Calling continues (at lower levels) during and after incubation but generally ends in mid-August.

The chicks have a pink bill and are black in color. The bill fades and eventually becomes black in its juvenile stage. Juveniles are darker than adults and have white barred breast areas and distinctive spots on the head. Young chicks and juveniles give various sounds described as "wees" and "peeps" (Savaloja 1981).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Small size; striped yellow and black above with small white crossbars; in flight shows a large white patch on trailing edges of wings; bill short and thick. Call is a four- or five-note tik-tik, tik-tik-tik, in alternate twos and threes (National Geographic Society 1999).

Habitat

BREEDING: Emergent wetlands, grass or sedge marshes and wet meadows in freshwater situations. Some breeding territories in these wet meadows contain firm footing and only a few remnant pools of water (Berkey 1991). These areas can range from damp to 38 cm (15 inches) of water but the average depth used for nesting is 8 to 15 cm (3 to 6 inches) (Savaloja 1981). Choose shallow water habitats over deep marsh zones. The vegetation ranges in height from about 5 to over 60 cm (2 to over 24 inches). This variation depends on the area and the time of year. In Minnesota, nest in large marshes composed of mixed sedge and bulrush, with cattails in deeper areas (Hanowski and Niemi 1990). The largest populations in North Dakota are in fens (bogs) with thick, soft mats of dead vegetation (Berkey 1991). In Manitoba, the birds are found in small boggy areas (Savaloja 1981). In the Great Lakes Region, nearly exclusively associated with CAREX spp. (Evers 1990). In Michigan, nest sites predominantly among the sedge CAREX LASIOCARPA (Bart et al. 1984, Bookhout and Stenzel 1987, Brewer et al. 1991). In Maine, found in damp, low-lying areas with water depths of 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 inches) in otherwise dried-out portions of floodplains with a senescent mat composed of previous year's sedge growth (Gibbs et al. 1991). Habitats in Maine contained low densities of sedge, rush, and grass stems compared to other areas. Birds will use freshly burned area for territories only if burned after they have arrived to the breeding area (Savaloja 1981). NON-BREEDING: grain fields in winter and when migrating. Winters in both freshwater and brackish marshes, as well as in dense, deep grass. During fall migration, will use many open habitats, from rice paddies to dry hayfields. Winters are spent in a variety of areas, including salt-marshes, grain fields, damp grassy meadows, and freshwater marshes. In the south, the bird winters in agricultural fields and occasionally in rice fields (Berkey 1991).

Ecology

Male territories are an average of 7.8 ha (19 acres), and are established within one week of their arrival (Bookhout and Stenzel 1987). Territories may encompass multiple female activity areas. The activity areas used by females average 1.2 ha (3 acres) during pre-incubation, decreasing to 0.3 ha (0.7 acres) during incubation (Bookhout and Stenzel 1987). Adult birds are flightless for several weeks during molting (mid- to late August) (Savaloja 1981).

Reproduction

Sexual activity usually takes place in the late morning hours. Lay six to ten eggs per clutch (Savaloja 1981, Brewer et al. 1991) with eight being the average. In Minnesota and North Dakota eggs are laid in late May and early June (Savaloja 1981). Incubation begins after the last egg is laid and lasts 13 to 20 days (Harrison 1979, Savaloja 1981). Female incubates and does not leave the nest at night during this time. Within one day of hatching the young leave the nest and are cared for by female. The young can feed on their own at 11 days (Stenzel 1983). Fledge at five weeks (Stahlhelm 1974). Renesting may occur if initial nests are destroyed or unsuccessful.
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceousCropland/hedgerow
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDBog/fenRiparian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN3B,N4N
ProvinceRankNative
MassachusettsS1NYes
North CarolinaS2NYes
TexasS3NYes
ArkansasSNAYes
IllinoisSXB,S2NYes
VirginiaSNRNYes
OhioSXYes
CaliforniaS2Yes
New JerseySUNYes
KansasSNAYes
MontanaS3BYes
WisconsinS1BYes
MissouriSUYes
AlabamaS2NYes
New YorkSNRNYes
OklahomaS2NYes
MississippiS2NYes
MichiganS2Yes
OregonS2BYes
South CarolinaS3NYes
FloridaS2NYes
GeorgiaSUYes
MinnesotaS3BYes
North DakotaS2Yes
IndianaSNAYes
IowaSNAYes
South DakotaSUBYes
LouisianaS3NYes
MaineSNRBYes
District of ColumbiaSHNYes
NebraskaSNRNYes
KentuckySNAYes
CanadaN3B,NUM
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS3BYes
NunavutSUBYes
QuebecS3BYes
Northwest TerritoriesS3Yes
SaskatchewanS3BYes
British ColumbiaS1BYes
AlbertaSUBYes
ManitobaS3BYes
Roadless Areas (21)
California (6)
AreaForestAcres
Crane Mtn.Modoc National Forest1,269
Crane Mtn.Modoc National Forest1,269
Mt. VidaModoc National Forest7,771
Mt. VidaModoc National Forest7,771
SoldierModoc National Forest10,102
SoldierModoc National Forest10,102
Michigan (2)
AreaForestAcres
FibreHiawatha National Forest7,432
FibreHiawatha National Forest7,432
North Dakota (6)
AreaForestAcres
DurlerDakota Prairie Grasslands12,464
DurlerDakota Prairie Grasslands12,464
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
VenloDakota Prairie Grasslands5,317
VenloDakota Prairie Grasslands5,317
Oregon (7)
AreaForestAcres
Crane MountainFremont National Forest23,096
Crane MountainFremont National Forest23,096
Crane MountainFremont National Forest23,096
MarshWinema National Forest1,226
MarshWinema National Forest1,226
Sky Lakes AWinema National Forest3,940
Sky Lakes AWinema National Forest3,940
References (46)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Bart, J., R. A. Stehn, J. A. Herrick, N. A. Heaslip, T. A. Bookhout, and J. R. Stenzel. 1984. Survey methods for breeding yellow rails. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:1382-1386.
  4. Berkey, G. 1991. Yellow Rails: birds that go click in the night. North Dakota Outdoors, March 1991:8-9.
  5. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  6. BirdLife International. (2013-2014). IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on various dates in 2013 and 2014. http://www.birdlife.org/
  7. Bookhout, T.A. 1995. Yellow Rail (COTURNICOPS NOVEBORACENSIS). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 139. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 16 pp.
  8. Bookhout, T.A., and J.R. Stenzel. 1987. Habitat and movements of breeding Yellow Rails. Wilson Bulletin 99(3):441-447.
  9. Brewer, R., G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams, Jr. 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan. xvii + 594 pp.
  10. Carter, M., C. Hunter, D. Pashley, and D. Petit. 1998. The Watch List. Bird Conservation, Summer 1998:10.
  11. Coffin, B., and L. Pfannmuller, editors. 1988. Minnesota's endangered flora and fauna. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 473 pp.
  12. Conway, C. J. 1990. Seasonal changes in movements and habitat use by three sympatric species of rails. M.Sc.thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie.
  13. Eddleman, W. R. 1989. Biology of the Yuma Clapper Rail in the southwestern U.S. and northwestern Mexico. Final Report, Intra-Agency Agreement No. 4-AA-30-02060, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Yuma Project Office, Yuma, AZ.
  14. Eddleman, W. R., F. L. Knopf, B. Meanley, F. A. Reid, and R. Zembal. 1988. Conservation of North American rallids. Wilson Bulletin 100:458-475.
  15. Elliot, R.D., and R.I.G. Morrison. 1979. The incubation period of the yellow rail. Auk 96(2):422-423.
  16. Evers, D.C. 1990. Yellow Rail, COTURNICOPS NOVEBORACENSIS (Gmelin). Draft species abstract for Michigan Heritage Program, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI.
  17. Evers, D. C. 1992. A guide to Michigan's endangered wildlife. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. viii + 103 pp.
  18. Gibbs, J. P. 1993. Personal communication.
  19. Gibbs, J.P., W.G. Shriver, and S.M. Melvin. 1991. Spring and summer records of the Yellow Rail in Maine. Journal of Field Ornithology 62(4):509-516.
  20. Global Biological Information Facility (GBIF). 2023. EBird Data Download for Yellow Rail (<i>Coturnicops noveboracensis</i>). Global Biological Information Facility. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hwf4uc (Accessed 6 June 2023).
  21. Grimm, M. 1991. Northeast Wisconsin Yellow Rail survey. Passenger Pigeon 53(2):115-121.
  22. Hanowski, J. M., and G. J. Niemi. 1990. An approach for quantifying habitat characteristics for rare wetland birds. Pages 51-56 in Mitchell et al., editors. Ecosystem management: rare species and significant habitats. New York State Museum Bulletin 471.
  23. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  24. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  25. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  26. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  27. Johnson, R.R., and J.J. Dinsmore. 1986. Habitat used by brooding Virginia Rails and Soras. Journal of Wildlife Management 50:387-392.
  28. Leston, L., and T. A. Bookhout. 2020.¿Yellow Rail¿(<i>Coturnicops noveboracensis</i>), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (A. F. Poole, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA.¿https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.yelrai.01
  29. McKee, R. 1987. Rock knockers and egg trails. Audubon, Sept., pp. 79, 84-87.
  30. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1999. Field guide to the birds of North America. Third edition. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC. 480 pp.
  31. North American Bird Conservation Initiative. 2022. The State of the Birds, United States of America, 2022. https://www.stateofthebirds.org/2022/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/state-of-the-birds-2022-pages.pdf (Accessed 6 June 2023).
  32. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  33. Peabody, P. 1922. Haunts and breeding habits of the yellow rail, <i>Coturnicops noveboracensis</i>. The Journal of the Museum of Comparative Oology (1-2):33-44. PEA22A0001. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/33270858 (Accessed 21 June 2023).
  34. Peterson, R. T. 1980a. A Field Guide to the Birds East of the Rockies. Houghton Mifflin Company. 383 pp.
  35. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  36. Ripley, S. D. 1977. Rails of the world. M.F. Feheley Publishers, Ltd., Toronto. 406 pp. [publication by same name published by Smithsonian 1984; same?]
  37. Robbins, S. D., Jr. 1991. Wisconsin birdlife: population and distribution past and present. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  38. Rundle, W.D., and L.F. Fredrickson. 1981. Managing seasonally flooded impoundments for migrant rails and shorebirds. Wild. Soc. Bull. 9:80-87.
  39. Savaloja, T. 1981. Yellow Rail. Birding 13(3):80-85.
  40. Stahlhelm, P.S. 1974. Behavior and ecology of the Yellow Rail (COTURNICOPS NOVEBORACENSIS). M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 79 pp.
  41. Stenzel, J. R. 1983. Ecology of breeding yellow rails at Seney National Wildlife Refuge. M.S. thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  42. Stenzell, J. R. 1982. Ecology of breeding yellow rails at Seney National Wildlife Refuge. M.S. thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
  43. Sterling, J. 2008. Yellow Rail (<i>Coturnicops noveboracensis</i>) Account in Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=10396&inline (Accessed 2 June 2023).
  44. Stern, M. A., J. F. Morawski, and G. A. Rosenberg. 1993. Rediscovery and status of a disjunct population of breeding yellow rails in southern Oregon. Condor 95:1024-1027.
  45. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  46. Zembal, R., B. M. Massey, and J. M. Fancher. 1989. Movements and activity patterns of the light-footed clapper rail. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:39-42.