Peucaea aestivalis

(Lichtenstein, 1823)

Bachman's Sparrow

G3Vulnerable Found in 37 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis). © Kaysea Bruce; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Kaysea Bruce; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis). © Alex Marine; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Alex Marine; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis). © Hannah Criswell; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Hannah Criswell; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis). © Peter Hawrylyshyn; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Peter Hawrylyshyn; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis). © Martina Nordstrand; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Martina Nordstrand; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis). © Matthew Bruce; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Matthew Bruce; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105170
Element CodeABPBX91050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyPasserellidae
GenusPeucaea
Synonyms
Aimophila aestivalis(Lichtenstein, 1823)
Other Common Names
Bachman's sparrow (EN) Bruant des pinèdes (FR)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Formerly (e.g., AOU 1983, 1998) placed in the genus Aimophila, transferred to Peucaea by AOU (2010). AOU (1957) recognized three subspecies (bachmani, aestivalis, and illinoensis), but most literature does not differentiate among them.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2019-01-09
Change Date1996-12-04
Edition Date2019-01-09
Edition AuthorsNeSmith, C. C. (2018); B. Young (2007); Martin, R., revised by G. Hammerson, M. Koenen, and D.W. Mehlman (1999); G. Hammerson (1996)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Significant recent contraction of northern edge of range; local reduction in abundance or local extinctions noted in center of range. Habitat specialist; can be severely affected by habitat modification.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: (at least formerly) from southern Missouri, Illinois, central Indiana, central Ohio, southwestern Pennsylvania, and Maryland south to eastern Texas, Gulf Coast, and south-central Florida. Now absent or local in the northeastern breeding range, where now breeds only in southern Virginia and possibly West Virginia and western Virginia; extirpated from Pennsylvania and Maryland (USFWS 1987, LeGrand and Schneider 1992). In the southeastern U.S., fairly common, but local, in the outer Coastal Plain; uncommon in the inner Coastal Plain; rare in the Piedmont (Hamel 1992). See LeGrand and Schneider (1992) for information on status in particular states in the northeastern U.S. See Bohlen (1978), Bowles (1981), and Hands et al. (1989) for information on status in the north-central U.S.

NON-BREEDING: southeastern U.S., north to eastern Texas, Gulf states, and southeastern North Carolina. Apparently fairly common in the outer Coastal Plain, uncommon in the inner Coastal Plain, but actual abundance poorly known (Hamel 1992).
Occurrences Comments
Widely distributed but local. Apparently expanded its range early in the 20th century in response to available old field habitats; recent contraction of range may be partially due to reduced availability of that habitat (Dunning et al. 2018).
Threat Impact Comments
The longleaf pine forests that once spread over the southeastern U.S. and formed the core of Bachman’s sparrow habitat have been reduced by more than 90% (Dunning et al. 2018). While rampant development and timber management practices have taken away much of the habitat, more recent and apparently ongoing population declines are attributable to fire suppression and lack of frequent fire that lead to degraded conditions that may be problematic to restore (Cox and Jones 2008). Most mature southern pinelands that remain are located on public lands (Cox and Jones 2008) and scattered clusters of private research centers and sports-hunting estates. Aggressive fire management (i.e., frequent fire rotation, ideally <3 years), where needed, on these properties could greatly improve conditions for populations of sparrows. Residential and commercial development, and construction of new transportation and service corridors contribute to fragmentation of the landscape and may have a significant negative impact on the ability to carry out necessary fire management objectives, especially on smaller sites. Large-scale landscape patterns like the percent habitat within 3 km was found to greatly influence sparrow occurrence (Tallie et al. 2015). Bachman’s sparrow occupancy in this study was directly tied to the amount of appropriate habitat in the surrounding landscape; those sites with 20% suitable habitat within 3 km had an occupancy probability >75% and sites with only 10% habitat had close to zero occupancy probability (Tallie et al. 2015). Unfortunately, this assessment did not include information on the fire history of the patches assessed.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A large sparrow with a large bill, fairly flat forehead, long dark rounded tail, gray upperparts heavily streaked with chestnut or dark brown, buffy-gray sides of head, a broad grayish-buff superciliary stripe, a thin dark russet line extending back from the eye, buff or gray sides and breast, and whitish belly (NGS 1983). More reddish in the western part of the range, grayer and darker in the south (NGS 1983). Juvenile has a distinct eye ring and streaked throat, breast, and sides; some of the streaking is retained in the first winter (NGS 1983). See Oberholser (1974) and Wolf (1977) for further details. Overall length is about 14-16 cm. Eggs are entirely white and average 19.3 mm by 15.3 mm.

Song is a highly variable combination of whistles and trills on different pitches, sung from a low perch.

When disturbed, often runs through the grass for several feet before flushing.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla) by being larger and having a larger bill that is not pink. Tail is much longer than that of the grasshopper sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum). Young in summer resemble Lincoln's sparrow (Melospiza lincolnii), but the latter does not occur in the south in summer.

Habitat

Habitat specialist. Historically, found in mature to old growth southern pine woodland subject to frequent growing-season fires; a fugitive species, breeding wherever fires created suitable conditions. Requires well-developed grass and herb layer with limited shrub and hardwood midstory components. Ideal habitat was originally the extensive longleaf pine woodlands of the south. Able to colonize recent clearcuts and early seral stages of old field succession but such habitat remains suitable only for a short time. Habitats include dry open pine (southern states) or oak woods (e.g., western portion of range) with an undercover of grasses and shrubs, hillsides with patchy brushy areas, overgrown fields with thickets and brambles, grassy orchards, and large clear-cuts (usually at least 20 ha in Virginia). In the southeastern U.S., Coastal Plain breeding habitat usually is open pine woods with thick cover of grasses or saw palmetto; in the Piedmont, mainly in overgrown fields with scattered saplings, occasionally in open woods with thick grass cover (Hamel 1992). Very occasionally breeds along the edges of wheat or corn fields (Blincoe 1921, Graber and Graber 1963, Mengel 1965).

In South Carolina, higher densities were recorded in mature (more than 80 years old) pine stands than in young stands (Dunning and Watts 1990).

In northwestern Florida, inhabited a longleaf pine stand during the first three years after annual spring fires were discontinued; canopy cover was 43% and ground cover was 85%. Five years after the burns stopped canopy cover increased to 91%, ground cover decreased to 21%, and breeding no longer occurred (Engstrom et al. 1984).

In Missouri, breeding areas include red-cedar groves of limestone glades where woody plants constitute less than 33% of the plant cover (Probasco 1978), early succession shrub and grass old fields, shrub and grass savanna, oak-hickory stands cut within the past three years, and stands of shortleaf pines with diameters of less than 7.6 cm (Evans and Kirkman 1981, Hardin et al. 1982). Within 13 territories in limestone glades, shrubs had an average cover of 4.1% and tree cover averaged 2.3% (Hardin et al. 1982). See also Hardin and Probasco (1983).

In the southern states, singing perches generally are on the dead lower branches or stubs of living pine trees (LeGrand and Schneider 1992).

Winters mainly in habitats with dense grassy cover, mostly under open pine woods, also in grassy fields, such as broomsedge (Hamel 1992), scrub oak, and along fence rows; has been recorded in riparian habitats and sometimes along the saltwater shores of coastal woodlands (Burleigh 1958, Bent 1968, Sprunt and Chamberlain 1970, LeGrand and Schneider 1992). In Florida, wintering Bachman’s sparrows were twice as numerous on areas that had been burned 4-6 months earlier (Cox and Jones 2008).

Nests on the ground in dense cover, against/under grass tuft or under low shrub (Harrison 1978), in grassy opening, field, or area with scattered trees. Open, domed nests are built by the female and consist of coarse dry grasses and weed stems lined with finer materials (Blincoe 1921, Ganier 1921, Brooks 1938). Six nests in Alabama were 18-20 cm high and 11.4 cm wide, with a smaller inner cavity (Weston, in Bent 1968). In Florida, bare ground and lower amounts of grass at nest sites are important ground level conditions that begin to decline within the first six months post fire (Jones et al. 2013). Greater than 85% of nests were located in areas burned the previous growing season. Tucker et al. (2006) found that fewer territorial males remained unpaired and breeding productivity was greater in areas burned within the first three years than in older burns.

Spends a great deal of time walking/running rather than flying, and are therefore inextricably linked to the open groundcover conditions created by frequent fire for foraging as well as nesting (Cox and Jones 2007).

Ecology

Breeding territory was 0.3-1.3 ha (average 0.62 ha) over one breeding cycle in southern Missouri (Hardin et al. 1982), 2.49 ha over the entire breeding season in Arkansas (see LeGrand and Schneider 1992). In Missouri, distances between boundaries of adjacent territories were 65-100 m.

Reproduction

In the southeastern U.S., may begin singing as early as mid-February, two months before breeding (Burleigh 1958, Sprunt and Chamberlain 1970). Eggs are laid from late April through July or August (mostly May-June), with the earliest nests in the south (Burleigh 1958, Oberholser 1974, Bent 1968). Clutch size 3-5, typically 4. Often two, sometimes 3 broods per year (Sprunt and Chamberlain 1970). Incubation, by the female, lasts 12-14 days. Young are tended by both parents (Brooks 1938), leave nest at about 9-10 days while unable to fly, continue to be fed by parents for about 25 days, during which time the female may initiate another nest and the male may assume most of the feeding responsibilities. Generally, adults do not fly directly to or from the nest (walk to or from it after landing or before flying). Nest failures seem to result mainly from predation (e.g., by crows or snakes); some reproductive failure or reduction may occur as a result of nest parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) (Bent 1968, Hardin and Probasco 1983, Haggerty 1988).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferSavannaGrassland/herbaceousOld field
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3B,N3N
ProvinceRankNative
South CarolinaS3Yes
AlabamaS3Yes
TennesseeS1BYes
ArkansasS3BYes
OhioSXYes
MissouriS1Yes
West VirginiaSHBYes
IndianaSXBYes
OklahomaS2BYes
IllinoisSXB,SHNYes
North CarolinaS3B,S2NYes
KentuckyS1BYes
VirginiaSHBYes
TexasS1BYes
MarylandSHBYes
GeorgiaS2Yes
LouisianaS3Yes
District of ColumbiaSXBYes
FloridaS3Yes
MississippiS3Yes
PennsylvaniaSXYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted - smallSerious - slightHigh - moderate
4 - Transportation & service corridorsLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh - moderate
4.1 - Roads & railroadsLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh - moderate
5 - Biological resource usePervasive - largeSerious - slightHigh - moderate
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingPervasive - largeSerious - slightHigh - moderate
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceNegligible (<1%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesNegligible (<1%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeExtreme - moderateHigh - moderate
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive - largeExtreme - moderateHigh - moderate

Roadless Areas (37)
Arkansas (2)
AreaForestAcres
Brush HeapOuachita National Forest4,205
Brush HeapOuachita National Forest4,205
Florida (17)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Farles PrairieOcala National Forest1,901
Farles PrairieOcala National Forest1,901
Impassable BayOsceola National Forest2,789
Impassable BayOsceola National Forest2,789
Natural Area WsaOsceola National Forest2,543
Natural Area WsaOsceola National Forest2,543
Natural Area WsaOsceola National Forest2,543
PinhookOsceola National Forest15,405
PinhookOsceola National Forest15,405
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
Louisiana (3)
AreaForestAcres
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
North Carolina (13)
AreaForestAcres
Catfish Lake NorthCroatan National Forest11,299
Catfish Lake NorthCroatan National Forest11,299
Catfish Lake South - ACroatan National Forest217
Catfish Lake South - ACroatan National Forest217
Catfish Lake South - BCroatan National Forest172
Catfish Lake South - BCroatan National Forest172
Pocosin AdditionCroatan National Forest286
Pocosin AdditionCroatan National Forest286
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Sheep Ridge AdditionCroatan National Forest5,808
Sheep Ridge AdditionCroatan National Forest5,808
South Carolina (2)
AreaForestAcres
Wambaw ExtFrancis Marion National Forest527
Wambaw ExtFrancis Marion National Forest527
References (90)
  1. Allaire, P.N., and C.D. Fisher. 1975. Feeding ecology of three resident sympatric sparrows in eastern Texas. Auk 92:260-269.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  4. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). Chesser, R.T., R.C. Banks, F.K. Barker, C. Cicero, J.L. Dunn, A.W. Kratter, I.J. Lovette, P.C. Rasmussen, J.V. Remsen, Jr., J.D. Rising, D.F. Stotz, and K. Winker. 2010. Fifty-first supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list of North American Birds. The Auk 127(3):726-744.
  5. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  6. Bendire, C.E. 1888. Notes on the nest and eggs of Peucaea aestivalis bachmani Audubon, Bachman's sparrow. Auk 5:351-356.
  7. Bent, A.C., et al. 1968. Life histories of North American cardinals, grosbeaks, buntings, towhees, finches, sparrows, and allies. Part Two. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 237. (reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY).
  8. BirdLife International. 2017b. <i>Peucaea aestivalis</i> (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T22721256A111375771. Downloaded from http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T22721256A111375771.en. Accessed on 26 October 2018.
  9. BirdLife International. 2018b. Archived 2018 topic: Bachman's Sparrow (<i>Peucaea aestivalis</i>): revise global status? BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums. Available at: https://globally-threatened-bird-forums.birdlife.org/2018/05/bachmans-sparrow-peucaea-aestivalis-revise -global-status/.
  10. Blincoe, B. J. 1921. Two Bachman's sparrows' nests near Bardstown, Kentucky. Wilson Bull. 33:100-101.
  11. Bohlen, H. D. 1978. An annotated check-list of the birds of Illinois. Illinois State Museum Popular Science Series. Vol. 9. 156 pp.
  12. Bowles, M. L., editor. 1981. Endangered and threatened vertebrate animals and vascular plants of Illinois. Illinois Department of Conservation. 214 pp.
  13. Breeding Bird Atlas Explorer. 2018. U.S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. Online resource available at: http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bba/index.cfm?fa=explore.ProjectHome&amp;BBA_ID=FL2011.
  14. Brooks, M. 1934. Some changes in the breeding birds of Upshur County, West Virginia. Wilson Bull. 46:243-247.
  15. Brooks, M. 1938. Bachman's sparrow in the north-central portion of its range. Wilson Bull. 50:86-109.
  16. Burleigh, T.D. 1958. Georgia Birds. First Edition. University of Oklahoma Press: Norman, Oklahoma. 746 pp.
  17. Byrd, M. A., and D. W. Johnston. 1991. Birds. Pages 477-537 in K. Terwilliger, coordinator. Virginia's endangered species: proceedings of a symposium. McDonald and Woodward Publ. Co., Blacksburg, Virginia.
  18. Carter, M., C. Hunter, D. Pashley, and D. Petit. 1998. The Watch List. Bird Conservation, Summer 1998:10.
  19. Carter, M., G. Fenwick, C. Hunter, D. Pashley, D. Petit, J. Price, and J. Trapp. 1996. Watchlist 1996: For the future. Field Notes 50(3):238-240.
  20. Conner, L. M. 2002. A technique to locate isolated populations using satellite imagery. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:1044-1049.
  21. Cox, J. A., and B. Widener. 2008. Lightning-season burning: friend or foe of breeding birds? Miscellaneous Publication 17, Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL.
  22. Cox, J. A., and C. D. Jones. 2007. Home range and survival characteristics of male Bachman's Sparrows in an old-growth forest managed with breeding-season burns. Journal of Field Ornithology 78:263-269.
  23. Cox, J. A., and C. D. Jones. 2008. Bachman's Sparrow and the Order of the Phoenix. Birding 40(3):38-45.
  24. Cox, J. A., and C. D. Jones. 2009. Influence of prescribed fire on winter abundance of Bachman's Sparrow. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121(2):359-365. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1676/07-138.1.
  25. Cox, J. A., and C. D. Jones. 2010. Estimating probabilities of survival of male Bachman's sparrows from plot-based, mark-resighting, off-plot surveys and multi-strata models. The Condor 112(4):663-669.
  26. Dunning, J. B. 1993. Bachman's Sparrow (AIMOPHILA AESTIVALIS). In the Birds of North America, No 38 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
  27. Dunning, J. B. 2006. Bachman's Sparrow. (Aimophila aestivalis). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology; Retrieved from The Birds of North American Online database: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/BNA/account/Bachmans
  28. Dunning, J. B., and B. D. Watts. 1991. Habitat occupancy by Bachman's sparrow in the Francis Marion National Forest before and after Hurricane Hugo. Auk 108:723-725.
  29. Dunning, J. B., Jr., and B. D. Watts. 1990. Regional differences in habitat occupancy by Bachman's sparrow. Auk 107:463-472.
  30. Dunning, J. B., Jr., B. J. Danielson, B. D. Watts, J. Liu, and D. G. Krementz. 2000. Studying wildlife at local and landscape scales: Bachman's Sparrows at the Savannah River Site. Studies in Avian Biology 21:75-80.
  31. Dunning, J. B., Jr., P. Pyle, and M. A. Patten 2018. Bachman's Sparrow (<i>Peucaea aestivalis</i>), version 3.1. In: The Birds of North America (P. G. Rodewald, editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.bacspa.03.1.
  32. eBird Basic Dataset. Version: EBD_relMay-2017. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. May 2017.
  33. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  34. Engstrom, R. T., R. L. Crawford, and W. W. Baker. 1984. Breeding bird populations in relation to changing forest structure following fire exclusion: a 15-year study. Wilson Bull. 96:437-450.
  35. Evans, K. E., and R. A. Kirkman. 1981. Guide to bird habitats of the Ozark Plateau. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-68. 79 pp.
  36. Ganier, A.F. 1921. Nesting of Bachman's sparrow. Wilson Bull. 33:2-4.
  37. Gobris, N. M. 1992. Habitat occupancy during the breeding season by Bachman's Sparrow at Piedmont National Wildlife Refuge in central Georgia. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. Georgia, Athens.
  38. Graber, R.R., and J.W. Graber. 1963. A comparative study of bird populations in Illinois, 1906-1909 and 1956-1958. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 28:383-528.
  39. Haggerty, T.M. 1986. Reproductive ecology of Bachman's sparrow (AIMOPHILA AESTIVALIS) in central Arkansas. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville.
  40. Haggerty, T.M. 1988. Aspects of the breeding biology and productivity of Bachman's sparrow in central Arkansas. Wilson Bull. 100:247-255.
  41. Hamel, P. B. 1992. The land manager's guide to the birds of the south. The Nature Conservancy, Chapel Hill, NC. 367 pp + several appendices.
  42. Hands, H. M., R. D. Drobney, and M. R. Ryan. 1989. Status of the Bachman's sparrow in the northcentral United States. Missouri Coop. Fish Wildl. Res. Unit Rep. 11 pp.
  43. Hardin, K.I. 1977. Status and habitat preferences of Bachman's sparrow on southern Missouri glades. Maryland Nat. Hist. Soc., Baltimore.
  44. Hardin, K.I. and G.E. Probasco. 1983. The habitat characteristics and life requirements of Bachman's Sparrow. Birding 15(4-5): 189-197.
  45. Hardin, K.I., T.S. Baskett, and K.E. Evans. 1982. Habitat of Bachman's sparrows breeding on Missouri glades. Wilson Bull. 94:208-212.
  46. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  47. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  48. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  49. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  50. Johnson, A. S., and J. L. Landers. 1982. Habitat relationships of summer resident birds in slash pine flatwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management 46:416-428.
  51. Jones, C. D., J. A. Cox, E. Toriani-Moura and R. J. Cooper. 2013. Nest-site characteristics of Bachman's Sparrows and their relationship to plant succession following prescribed burns. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125(2):293-300.
  52. King, T. G., M. A. Howell, B. R. Chapman, K. V. Miller, R. A. Schorr. 1998. Comparisons of wintering bird communities in mature pine stands managed by prescribed burning. Wilson Bulletin 110:570-474.
  53. Korosy, M. G., J. S. Reece and R. F. Noss. 2013. Winter habitat associations of four grassland sparrows in Florida dry prairie. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125(3):502-512.
  54. Krementz, D. G. and J. S. Christie. 2000. Clearcut stand size and scrub-successional bird assemblages. Auk 117:913-924.
  55. LeGrand, H. E., Jr., and K. J. Schneider. 1992. Bachman's sparrow, AIMOPHILA AESTIVALIS. Pages 299-313 in K. J. Schneider and D. M. Pence, editors. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 400 pp.
  56. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  57. McNair, D.B. 1986. Past breeding distribution of eleven species in Georgia based on nest records from egg data slips. Oriole 51:28-31.
  58. Meanley, B. 1959. Notes on Bachman's sparrow in central Louisiana. Auk 76:232-234.
  59. Mengel, R. M. 1965. The birds of Kentucky. Ornithol. Monogr. No. 3. 581 pp.
  60. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  61. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
  62. Oberholser, H.C. 1974. The bird life of Texas. 2 vols. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.
  63. Partners in Flight. 2017. Avian Conservation Assessment Database, version 2017. Available at: http://pif.birdconservancy.org/ACAD. Accessed on 09/13/2018.
  64. Partners in Flight Science Committee. 2013. Population Estimates Database, version 2013. Available at http://rmbo.org/pifpopestimates. Accessed in 2014 and 2018.
  65. Peterson, R. T. 1980a. A Field Guide to the Birds East of the Rockies. Houghton Mifflin Company. 383 pp.
  66. Platt, W.J., G.W. Evans, and S.L. Rathbun. 1988. The population dynamics of a long-lived conifer (Pinus Palustris). Amer. Nat. 131:491-525.
  67. Plentovich, S., J. W. Tucker, N. R. Haller, G. E. Hill. 1998. Enhancing Bachman's sparrow habitat via management of red-cockaded woodpecker. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:347-354.
  68. Probasco, G. E. 1978. Bird habitat-woody plant relations on Missouri limestone glades. Pages 107-109 in D. C. Glenn-Lewin and R. Q. Landers, editors. Proceedings of the fifth Midwest prairie conference, Iowa State Univ., Ames. 230 pp.
  69. Sauer, J.R., D.K. Niven, J.E. Hines, D.J. Ziolkowski, Jr., K.L. Pardieck, J.E. Fallon, and W.A. Link. 2017. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2015. Version 2.07.2017 USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Available online at http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html.
  70. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2003. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966 - 2002. Version 2003.1, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Reseach Center, Laurel, MD Available at: http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html.
  71. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, G. Gough, I. Thomas, and B.G. Peterjohn. 1997a. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis. Version 96.3. Online. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Available: http://www.mbr.nbs.gov/bbs/bbs.html.
  72. Sauer, J.R., S. Schwartz, and B. Hoover. 1996. The Christmas Bird Count Home Page. Version 95.1 U.S.G.S. Biological Resource Division, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Online. Available: http://www.mbr.nbs.gov/bbs/cbc.html.
  73. Shriver, W. G., P. D. Vickery. 2001. Response of breeding Florida Grasshopper Sparrows and Bachman's Sparrows to winter prescribed burning. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:470-475.
  74. Sibley, C.G., and B.L. Monroe, Jr. 1990. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. xxiv + 1111 pp.
  75. Sprunt, A., and E. B. Chamberlain. 1970. South Carolina bird life. Second edition. Univ. South Carolina Press, Columbia. 655 p.
  76. Stober, J. M., and D. G. Krementz. 2000. Survival and reproductive biology of the Bachman's sparrow. Proc. Annual Conf. Southeast Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies 54:383-390.
  77. Taillie, P. J., M. N. Peterson, and C. E. Moorman. 2015. The relative importance of multiscale factors in the distribution of Bachman's Sparrow and the implications for ecosystem conservation. Condor 117(2):137-146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1650/condor-14-137.1.
  78. Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy. 2018. Monitoring protocol developed by J. Cox, Stoddard Bird Lab for use by land managers/biologists on public lands. Available at: http://talltimbers.org/monitoring-nuthatches-and-bachmans-sparrows/.
  79. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  80. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  81. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  82. Thompson, W. 2007. Fire Management Needs on Florida's Public Lands. Presentation at the Florida's Land Management conference, Orlando. In: J. A. Cox and C. D. Jones. 2008. Bachman's Sparrow and the Order of the Phoenix. Birding 40(3):38-45.
  83. Tucker, J. W. 2002. Influence of season and frequency of fire on Bachman's and Henslow's Sparrows in longleaf pine forests of the Gulf Coastal Plain. Ph.D. dissertation, Auburn University, Auburn AL.
  84. Tucker, J. W., Jr., W. Robinson, and J. Grand. 2006. Breeding productivity of Bachman's Sparrows in fire managed longleaf pine forests. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 118:131-137.
  85. Tucker, J. W., W. D. Robinson, J. B. Grand. 2005. Influence of fire on Bachman's sparrow, an endemic North American songbird. Journal of Wildlife Management 68:1114-1123.
  86. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the United States: the 1987 list. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  87. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011. Migratory Bird Program. Birds of management concern and focal species. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/BMCFocalSpecies.pdf.
  88. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  89. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.
  90. Wolf, L. L. 1977. Species relationships in the avian genus AIMOPHILA. Ornithol. Monogr. No. 23. 220 pp.