Rallus obsoletus yumanensis

Dickey, 1923

Yuma Ridgway's Rail

T3T3 (G3T3) Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
T3T3Global Rank
MediumThreat Impact
Yuma Ridgway's rail (Rallus obsoletus yumanensis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104295
Element CodeABNME0501A
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSubspecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderGruiformes
FamilyRallidae
GenusRallus
Synonyms
Rallus longirostris yumanensisDickey, 1923
Other Common Names
Yuma Clapper Rail (EN) Yuma Ridgways (clapper) rail (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1957. The AOU check-list of North American birds, 5th ed. Port City Press, Inc., Baltimore, MD. 691 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Ripley (1977) included subspecies rhizophorae and nayaritensis of western coastal Mexico (Banks and Tomlinson 1974) in subspecies yumanensis.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-04-12
Change Date1996-11-25
Edition Date2024-04-12
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G. (2006, 2011), Sears, N. (2024)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
This bird has a small breeding range in the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. Reliable long-term trend data are lacking, but populations have declined substantially since the 1900s due to habitat degradation and loss. There is evidence that management and restoration efforts, along with an increase in survey efforts, may be reversing this trend in parts of the range, however, its remaining wetland habitat continues to be threatened by human-led activities.
Range Extent Comments
Yuma Ridgway’s rails occur along the lower Colorado River and tributaries in Arizona, California, and Nevada, USA, the Salton Sea in Imperial County, California, and in northern Mexico at the Ciénega de Santa Clara, Sonora, and Colorado River Delta, Baja California. Although most do not migrate, individuals in parts of the breeding range have been recorded from mangrove wetlands along the coast of Sonora, Sinaloa, and Nayarit, Mexico (Harrity and Conway 2020, iNaturalist 2024, GBIF 2024).

In Arizona, rails occur as far north as Lake Mead, the Virgin River, the Bill Williams River, the lower Gila River from near Phoenix to the Colorado River, and the lower Salt and Verde Rivers. Occasional records outside this range include Picacho Reservoir, Tavasci Marsh, Roosevelt Lake, and Quitobaquito Pond (Arizona Heritage Data Management System 2021). In California, they are found in appropriate habitat along the entire length of the California portion of the Colorado River and some tributaries in the immediate vicinity of this river and in the Imperial Valley, Imperial County (California Natural Diversity Database 2023). In Nevada, they have been detected as far north as Key Pittman Wildlife Management Area (WMA) and Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in Lincoln County, along the Virgin River south of Mesquite to upper end of Lake Mead, Overton WMA in Clark County, and west to Ash Meadows NWR in Nye County (A. Chaney, Nevada Division of Natural Heritage, pers. comm. 2024).

Using breeding records since 2004 (i.e., the past 20 years) from Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2024), the calculated range extent is approximately 101,000 km².
Occurrences Comments
Using a separation distance of 5 km, data provided by NatureServe Network Programs indicate there are approximately 50 extant occurrences in the US. Additional occurrences are located in the Ciénega de Santa Clara and Colorado River Delta, Mexico.

According to USFWS (2022), there are five population centers across the rail’s range of 14 watersheds within the Colorado River Basin. Of the five, three are considered core population areas. The first is along the lower Colorado River, with the highest densities at the Imperial, Cibola, and Havasu National Wildlife Refuges. The second largest population center is at the Salton Sea in California, which includes the Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge and the Wellton Mohawk Irrigation District. The third major population center, the Ciénega de Santa Clara in Sonora, Mexico, supports the largest marsh in the rail's U.S.-Mexico range and >70% of the global population (Hinojosa-Huerta et al. 2013). The two peripheral populations, which are smaller and represent the expansion of the subspecies, occur along the lower Gila and Salt Rivers in central Arizona, and in southern Nevada along the Las Vegas Wash. In Mexico, rails were widely distributed in the Colorado River Delta, occupying almost all marshlands dominated by cattail.
Threat Impact Comments
The most immediate threat to Rallus obsoletus is the continued loss, degradation, and fragmentation of its wetland habitat. The conversion and deterioration of wetlands due to development for industry, agriculture, salt production, and urbanization have drastically reduced the extent of this species’ habitat (BirdLife International 2020, Eddleman and Conway 2020). Potential poisoning from selenium is likely a significant threat factor in the Imperial Valley, California, but the effects on this subspecies are unknown (Ricca et al 2022). Incidental mortalities at solar facilities have also been documented (Harrity and Conway 2020).

In southern California, loss of coastal saltmarsh habitat is estimated at 75-90% since settlement of the region (Eddleman and Conway 2020). In Arizona, this subspecies is threatened by habitat fragmentation due to human activities such as river channelization, dredging, drying, and flooding of marshes, floodplain development, and diversion of water sources (Arizona Natural Heritage Program 2021). In addition, chigger mites in populations in southwestern Arizona and Nevada could result in population declines; in southwestern Arizona upwards of 92% of some sub-populations are infested (Harrity and Conway 2019, BirdLife International 2020, Nevada Natural Heritage Program 2020). In Mexico, the biggest threat to the habitat at Ciénega de Santa Clara is the lack of a secured water supply and the possible diversion of this water to be used by the Yuma Desalting Plant in Arizona (Hinojosa-Huerta et al. 2013). In Baja California, this subspecies is threatened by resort and industrial development planned by international companies and salt evaporation pond development (Eddleman and Conway 2020), and in northern Mexico, disjunct populations of yumanensis may be vulnerable to habitat loss and degradation in their wintering areas resulting from increased development along the coast, reduced freshwater inflows, and pressures from shrimp farming (Harrity and Conway 2020).

Existing changes in climate conditions do not appear to have had a negative impact on Yuma Ridgway’s rails yet, however, rail populations may become affected by projected future water shortages in the Colorado River (USFWS 2009).
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Subspecies yumanensis is relatively pale brown whereas subspecies rhizophorae is pale grayish and subspecies nayaritensis is darker grayish; the wings of yumanensis are more pointed than those of the other two subspecies (Banks and Tomlinson 1974).

Habitat

This subspecies occupies almost all available marshlands dominated by cattail and few zones dominated by saltcedar and common reed (Hinojosa-Herta et al. 2001). It prefers mature stands along margins of shallow ponds with stable water levels (Matthews and Moseley 1990). Generally in freshwater and alkali marshes dominated by stands of emergent vegetation interspersed with areas of open water and drier, upland benches (Biosystems Analysis 1989). In Mexico, prefers brackish marshes dominated by dense stands of tall Tamarix with an understory of iodine bush (Matthews and Moseley 1990).

Nests probably on dry hummocks or in small shrubs among dense cattails or bulrushes along the edges of shallow ponds in freshwater marshes with stable water levels (Ehrlich et al. 1992).
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLAND
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
ArizonaS3Yes
NevadaS1BYes
CaliforniaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningNegligible (<1%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.3 - Renewable energyNegligible (<1%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherUnknownUnknownLow (long-term)
11.2 - DroughtsUnknownUnknownLow (long-term)

Roadless Areas (4)
Arizona (4)
AreaForestAcres
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Horse MesaTonto National Forest9,146
References (28)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1957. The AOU check-list of North American birds, 5th ed. Port City Press, Inc., Baltimore, MD. 691 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). Chesser, R.T., R.C. Banks, C. Cicero, J.L. Dunn, A.W. Kratter, I.J. Lovette, A.G. Navarro-Sigüenza, P.C. Rasmussen, J.V. Remsen, Jr., J.D. Rising, D.F. Stotz, and K.Winker. 2014. Fifty-Fifth Supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list of North American Birds. The Auk 131(4):1-15.
  3. Anderson, B. W., and R. D. Ohmart. 1985. Habitat use by clapper rails in the lower Colorado River valley. Condor 87:116-126.
  4. Banks, R. C., and R. E. Tomlinson. 1974. Taxonomic status of certain clapper rails of southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. Wilson Bull. 86:325-335.
  5. Biosystems Analysis, Inc. 1989. Endangered Species Alert Program Manual: Species Accounts and Procedures. Southern California Edison Environmental Affairs Division.
  6. BirdLife International. 2020. <i>Rallus obsoletus</i>. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T22731577A178663850. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T22731577A178663850.en. Accessed on 11 February 2022.
  7. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  8. Conway, C. 2002. Standardized Protocols for Monitoring Marsh Birds in North America. Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, United States Geological Survey and School of Renewable Natural Resources. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
  9. Dooremolen, D. V., N. Rice, and T. Ricks. 2024. Marsh Bird Monitoring, including Yuma Ridgway’s Rail, along Las Vegas Wash, Clark County, Nevada, 2023. Report prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southern Nevada Field Office, and Las Vegas Wash Coordination Committee. Southern Nevada Water Authority, Las Vegas Wash Project Coordination Team, Las Vegas, Nevada. 25 pp.
  10. Eddleman, W. R. and C. J. Conway. 2020. Ridgway's Rail (Rallus obsoletus), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (P. G. Rodewald, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.ridrai1.01. Published March 4, 2020, text last updated March 21, 2018.
  11. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  12. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2024. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2024).
  13. Harrity, E. J., and C. J. Conway. 2019. Novel ectoparasite infestation on Yuma ridgway's rails (<i>Rallus obsoletus yumanensis</i>). The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 131(1):139-146.
  14. Harrity, E. J., and C. J. Conway. 2020. Satellite transmitters reveal previously unknown migratory behavior and wintering locations of Yuma Ridgway’s Rails. Journal of Field Ornithology 91(3):300-312.
  15. Hinojosa-Huerta, O., E. Soto-Montoya, M. Gómez-Sapiens, A. Calvo-Fonsecaa, R. Guzmán-Olachea, J. Butrón-Méndez, J. Juan Butrón-Rodríguez, and M. Román-Rodríguez. 2013. The Birds of the Cienega de Santa Clara, a wetland of international importance within the Colorado River Delta. Ecological Engineering, 59: 61-73.
  16. Hinojosa-Huerta, O., J. J. Rivera-Díaz, H. Iturribarría-Rojas, and A. Calvo-Fonseca. 2008. Population trends of Yuma clapper rails in the Colorado River delta, Mexico. Studies in Avian Biology 37(37):69-73.
  17. Hinojosa-Huerta, O., S. DeStefano, and W. W. Shaw. 2001. Distribution and abundance of the Yuma clapper rail (<i>Rallus longirostris yumanensis</i>) in the Colorado River delta, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 49(1):171-182.
  18. iNaturalist. 2024. Online. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org (accessed 2024).
  19. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  20. Palma, S. S. V. 2024. Influencia del manejo del hábitat y factores ambientales el palmoteador de Yuma (<i>Rallus obsoletus yumanensis</i>) en la Ciénega de Santa Clara, Sonora, México. Thesis.
  21. Parker, S. S., M. J. Clifford, and B. S. Cohen. 2024. Potential impacts of proposed lithium extraction on biodiversity and conservation in the contiguous United States. Science of The Total Environment 911 (2024):168639.
  22. Ripley, S. D. 1977. Rails of the world. M.F. Feheley Publishers, Ltd., Toronto. 406 pp. [publication by same name published by Smithsonian 1984; same?]
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2000. Yuma Clapper Rail Revised Survey Protocol. Memorandum to Yuma Clapper Rail Interested Parties. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office, Phoenix, AZ.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2009. Yuma Clapper Rail (<i>Rallus longirostris yumanensis</i>) Recovery Plan. Draft First Revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Technical Corrections for 18 Southwestern United States Species Found in Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. Federal Register 86(225):67352-67360.
  27. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Biological Opinion, Conference Opinion for the Tonto National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, Coconino, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona. Southwestern Region U.S.D.A. Forest Service. Arizona Ecological Services Field Office, Interior Region 8 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 288 pp.
  28. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Technical Corrections for Eight Species of Endangered and Threatened Fish and Wildlife. Federal Register 88(181):64824-64831.