Setophaga pinus

(Linnaeus, 1776)

Pine Warbler

G5Secure Found in 41 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101876
Element CodeABPBX03170
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyParulidae
GenusSetophaga
Synonyms
Dendroica pinus(Linnaeus, 1776)
Other Common Names
Chipe Pinero (ES) Paruline des pins (FR) pine warbler (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Phylogenetic analyses of sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (Lovette et al. 2010) indicate that all species formerly placed in Dendroica, one species formerly placed in Wilsonia (citrina), and two species formerly placed in Parula (americana and pitiayumi) form a clade with the single species traditionally placed in Setophaga (ruticilla). The generic name Setophaga has priority for this clade (AOU 2011).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-09
Change Date1996-12-03
Edition Date1996-02-16
Edition AuthorsDirrigl, F., Jr., P. G. Rodewald, K. G. Smith, & G. Hammerson
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Large breeding range in eastern North America; common in many areas; increasing in recent decades.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: Subspecies PINUS from southeastern Manitoba east across Canada to southwestern New Brunswick, south to eastern Oklahoma and Texas, Gulf Coast, and southern Florida (AOU 1998). However, very local or absent within a broad section of land running east-west from western Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa. A disjunct breeding population occurs in the "Lost Pines" area of east-central Texas (Bastrop, Caldwell, and Fayette counties). NON-BREEDING: Subspecies PINUS in the southeastern U.S. from eastern Maryland and Delaware to eastern edge of Oklahoma (Ouachita Mountains) and Texas south through the breeding range; rare to casual in northeastern U.S., Canadian provinces, southern Texas, and the Florida Keys (AOU 1998). Very few records for vagrants (mostly in winter) in Belize, Bermuda, Costa Rica, Cuba, Greenland (October), Jamaica, and northeastern Mexico. Scattered records (mostly spring and fall) in the western U.S. RESIDENT: Subspecies ACHRUSTERA in the Bahamas on Grand Bahama, Abaco, Andros, and New Providence. Subspecies CHRYSOLEUCA in the highlands of Hispaniola in western Haiti and eastern Dominican Republic (Dunn and Garrett 1997).
Threat Impact Comments
Some forest management practices, such as clearcutting, should adversely affect the warbler because of its dependence on forest habitat. While it may be found during the breeding season in younger forests, those individuals are not necessarily breeding or breeding successfully. In Virgina, Conner et al. (1979) examined relative bird abundance in pine-oak forest clearcuts of differing ages. The species was found in increasing abundance in clearcuts greater than 10 years old and were most abundant in mature 80-year-old stands. Single-tree and group-selection cutting, while removing fewer canopy trees from forest areas, may cause increased nest predation from birds and mammals, and nest parasitism from brown-headed cowbirds (MOLOTHRUS ATER). Spread of suburban areas in pine forest regions could also cause local declines or extirpation through increased fragmentation and/or loss of forest habitat. Spraying of pesticides is of concern. Whitmore et al. (1993) found that warblers in forests treated for Spongy Moths (Lymantria dispar) with Diflubenzuron (Dimilin [registered trademark]) had significantly lower fat reserves than birds in an untreated forest. On the same study site, Sample et al. (1993) showed no significant dietary differences of warblers between treated and untreated forests, and birds consumed the same biomass of prey on both treatments. Casualties have been recorded in areas where DDT was used to control Dutch elm disease in the 1950s (Wallace et al. 1961), and where arsenical spray had been used (Barbour 1937). Nocturnal migrants are killed at television and radio towers, though this species seems less common in kills than other species. In a 25-year study at a north Florida tower, 217 individuals were found dead (Crawford 1981). Johnston and Haines (1957) reported 106 pine wrblers killed at television towers, tall buildings, and airport ceiliometers during two nights of migration in the eastern U.S. in October 1954. Predators are not well known. Egg predators probably include blue jay (CYANOCITTA CRISTATA), American crow (CORVUS BRACHYRHYNCHOS), common grackle (QUISCALUS QUISCULA), red squirrel (TAMIASCIURUS HUDSONICUS), gray squirrel (SCIURUS CAROLINENSIS), raccoon (PROCYON LOTOR), opossum (DIDELPHIS VIRGINIANUS), and snakes. Nestling predators probably are similar, but may include domestic cats, owls, and hawks. A blue jay was observed consuming a nestling in Arkansas (Rodewald, pers. obs.). Sharp-shinned (ACCIPITER STRIATUS) and Cooper's (A. COOPERII), hawks probably prey on adults. Adults are known to mob eastern screech-owl (OTUS ASIO) (Rodewald, pers. obs.) and chuck-will's-widow (CAPRIMULGUS CAROLINENSIS) (Ficken et al. 1967), indicating those are also potential predators of adults. Reported infrequently as hosts for parasitic brown-headed cowbirds (MOLOTHRUS ATER). Friedmann and Kiff (1985) mentioned only 15 known cases of nest parasitism by cowbirds on pine warblers. Given that little is known about the breeding biology of warblers, it seems likely that it is a more frequent host of cowbirds than currently known. There is also a record of an adult female cowbird removing four warbler young from a nest and dropping them to the ground (Beane and Alford 1990). Reed (1992) used a classification system to rank neotropical migrant birds based on their relative susceptibility to extinction. Based on considerations of range, habitat specificity, distribution, and population size, the pine warbler received a "5" on a scale from 1-8, with 1 being the rating of highest concern.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Slightly larger than most other wood-warblers (13-14 cm length, 9.4-15.1 g). Adult males have unstreaked, olive-green upperparts, a yellow throat and breast with indistinct black streaking on sides of the breast, a white belly and undertail coverts, dark wings with faint bluish tinge, and two broad whitish wing-bars. Adult females are duller and variable, but always with browner or grayer upperparts, a paler yellow throat and breast, duller white belly and undertail coverts. Bill is black and relatively heavy for a warbler. Immature is like adult female, but brownish gray above, breast, belly, and undertail coverts are washed with buff. Juvenile has grayish brown head and upperparts; grayish underparts are washed with buff on breast, belly, undertail coverts, and wingbars (Rodewald et al., in press).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Bay-breasted warbler (DENDROICA CASTANEA) and blackpoll warbler (D. STRIATA) in winter plumage are sometimes confused with the pine warblers. Pine warblers differ from those species in having a heavier-bodied and larger-billed appearance, unstreaked upperparts, a darker face contrasting with paler throat, a longer tail, and narrow and duller edgings on tertials. In addition, pine warblers typically show a pale yellowish or grayish area extending up the sides of the neck, which contrasts with the slightly darker face. Pine warblers have dark legs and feet (adult blackpolls usually have yellowish to pinkish legs) and are usually darker green in upperparts than are bay-breasted warblers.

Habitat

Strongly associated with presence of pine and pine-hardwood forest during the breeding and winter seasons. A common breeder in most pine forests of the southeastern United States and in areas with pines in southeast Canada and the northeastern United States, but usually at lower densities, less common as a breeder in white pine forest areas. The highest numbers seem to occur where pure stands of pine are found; less abundant as the proportion of hardwood tree species increases. Birds are rarely found in deciduous forest, scrub, and thickets, except during migration and winter.

Breeding occurs in a wide variety of pine forest types but not in other conifer forests (e.g., spruce (PICEA spp.), fir (ABIES spp.), larch (LARIX spp.), or hemlock (TSUGA spp.). In the north-central and northeastern U.S. and Canadian provinces, breeding occurs in stands of red (PINUS RESINOSA), pitch (P. RIGIDA), jack (P. BANKSIANA) and white (P. STROBUS) pines (white pine also being used in the Appalachians). In southern states, breeding and winter habitat consists of stands of shortleaf (P. ECHINATA), longleaf (P. PALUSTRIS), loblolly (P. TAEDA), Virginia (P. VIRGINIANA), and slash (P. ELLIOTTII) pines. Breeding occurs less frequently in sand (P. CLAUSA) (Stevenson and Anderson 1994) and pond pines (P. SEROTINA) (Schroeder 1985) in the southeastern U.S. All forest types used may be mixed with varying proportions of hardwood species. Nesting may occur in areas of primarily deciduous forest where small groves of pines are present. Adapts well to pine plantations, which are used for breeding throughout the range. In Florida, Repenning and Labisky (1985) did not record breeding warblers in 1-, 10-, and 24-year-old slash pine plantations, but recorded 8 birds per sq km in 40-year-old plantation forests. However, they found that the species did use 1-year-old (3 birds per sq km), 24-year-old (20 birds per sq km), and 40-year-old (86 birds per sq km) pine plantations during winter.

In winter, birds commonly forage in large mixed-species flocks in southern pine forests when numbers increase because of birds migrating from farther north. At that time, flocks may forage in forest leaf litter, or in fields and pastures, usually in the vicinity of forest edge.

Density of pine warblers is inversely related to percent of deciduous vegetation within a stand (Schroeder 1985). In a breeding habitat suitability model developed by Schroeder (1985), three main habitat variables of importance were identified: percent tree canopy closure (excluding white, sand, and pond pines), successional stage of the stand, and percent of dominant canopy pines with deciduous understory in the upper one-third layer. Optimal nesting habitat was provided by pure, dense, mature pine stands (excluding pine species mentioned above) that lack a tall deciduous understory. One shortcoming of this model, however, is that warblers do use white pine forest types for nesting; they simply tend to be less common in those pine habitats.

Conner et al. (1983) reported that mature pine forests were favored in east Texas, with increasing abundance as the proportion of pole-size pines and vegetation height increased. Tree and shrub species diversity, and foliage density at different heights had little effect. In addition, stands of sapling-sized pines were avoided.

In eastern Tennessee, Anderson and Shugart (1974) found that distribution was influenced by several habitat variables, the strongest of which was related to average size of understory vegetation, number of canopy trees, and average size of canopy vegetation. In this area, birds selected areas with sparse understory and a dense canopy. In the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas, Wilson et al. (1995) found significantly higher densities in forests with a more open midstory, lower canopy coverage, lower basal area of conifers and hardwoods, and dense ground cover of grasses, shrubs, vines, and forbs.

Nesting occurs typically in pine trees in forest, rarely in deciduous trees within pine forest. Nests usually are placed on a horizontal branch or among foliage at a branch tip, usually 8-20 m above ground. Nests are usually well hidden and difficult to observe from the ground.

Ecology

Various population density figures have been reported in the literature. In Georgia, Johnston and Odum (1956) recorded 0.4 territorial males per ha in 25-year-old pine forest, 0.85 males per ha in 35-year-old forest, 1.06 males per ha in 60-year-old forest, and 1.36 males per ha in 100-year-old forest. In Texas, Dickson and Segelquist (1979) reported 0.2 territorial males per ha in pine-hardwood sapling stands, 0.55 males per ha in pine pole stands, 0.35 males per ha in pine-hardwood pole stands, 0.50 males per ha in pine saw timber stands, and 0.20 males per ha in pine-hardwood stands. In pine plantations in southern Illinois, where the species is far less common, Graber et al. (1983) reported 2.2 males per 40.5 ha. In Maryland, Stewart and Robbins (1952) recorded breeding densities of 1.9 territorial males per ha in an immature loblolly-shortleaf pine forest, 0.5 males per ha in pine-oak forest (pitch and Virginia pines, and southern red oak (QUERCUS FALCATA), and 0.25 males per ha in a mature Virginia pine forest.

Winter bird count data from the Archbold Biological Station in central Florida (December 1993), indicate a density of approximately 2.35 birds per ha (J. Fitzpatrick, in litt.). In winter, it can be abundant in pine forests of the southeast where large mixed-species flocks may contain 50-100 or more pine warblers. In fall and winter, mixed-species flocks in southeastern pine forests usually form around Carolina chickadees (POECILE CAROLINENSIS) and tufted titmice (BAEOLOPHUS BICOLOR), and often include woodpeckers, brown-headed nuthatch (SITTA PUSILLA), eastern bluebird (SIALIUS SIALIA), kinglets (REGULUS spp.), and, farther south, blue-gray gnatcatcher (POLIOPTILA CAERULEA), blue-headed vireo (VIREO SOLITARIUS), yellow-rumped (DENDROICA CORONATA) and other warblers, and chipping sparrow (SPIZELLA PASSERINA) (Gaddis 1983, Morse 1970). Warblers in fall and winter flocks can be notoriously aggressive, with males frequently fighting, chasing, or supplanting other males and females (Morse 1974). Winter mixed-species flocks in north-central Florida contained pine warblers 65% of the time and had a mean of 2.6 individuals per flock (+ or - 1.8 SE) (Gaddis 1983).

There are few data on territory size, but size probably varies considerably depending on habitat quality. In pine-oak forest in northwestern Arkansas, two pairs held territories approximately 1.0 ha in size (Rodewald, pers. obs.). Howe (1979) observed a pair in Minnesota nest building on a 0.1-ha lake island located 450 m from shore, indicating territories can be quite small in some cases. However, warblers were more regularly recorded on 1.0-ha lake islands. In oak-pine forests with low percentages of pines, may utilize only a small proportion of a much larger territory, typically moving from pine tree to pine tree and passing over deciduous trees (Morse 1974).

Interspecifically aggressive towards many bird species, especially yellow-throated warblers (D. DOMINICA) during the breeding season on Delmarva peninsula in Maryland. Pine warblers typically prevail in aggressive encounters, and were even recorded displaying towards and countersinging with yellow-throated warblers (Ficken et al. 1968, Morse 1974). Aggressive behavior towards yellow-throated warblers has also been noted in northwestern Arkansas (Rodewald, pers. obs.). Brown-headed nuthatches flocking with pine warblers in Louisiana foraged heavily on distal parts of limbs and twigs, whereas warblers foraged in areas near tree trunks. In the absence of one another, the two species exhibited similar foraging distributions, indicating that each has an influence on the foraging behavior of the other (Morse 1967).

Individuals wintering in southern forests are susceptible to extremes in weather and temperature. After 5 inches of snow and near-zero temperatures in coastal South Carolina in February 1899, Wayne (1899) reported finding countless dead birds of 16 species, including many pine warblers, a species he described as "decimated" by the cold.

Reproduction

Perhaps due to the usual nesting high in trees, there are little data on reproduction. Breeding territories are established from late winter in the south to spring farther north. Breeding can begin in early-March in deep southern populations, later in the north, and may extend to early August. Based on 226 clutches from throughout the range, McNair (1987) reported a mean clutch initiation date of 20 April +/- 25 days (standard deviation). Median initiation date was 12 April; clutches were initiated between 7 March and 7 July. During an early spring in Georgia, one unfinished nest was found on 17 February (Burleigh 1958); however, most nest building does not begin until March in southern states. In more northerly states, nesting begins in April, May, or early June.

Males establish territories through persistent singing, continuous presence, and chasing or attacking intruding birds. Fights and chases among males become less common as season progresses, at which time males seem to maintain territories primarily through singing.

Clutch size is three to five (usually four). Although it is widely mentioned that the species is double-brooded, and even triple-brooded (Potter et al. 1980), there are no data to support those claims. It is almost certain the species can raise more than one brood per year, especially in southern states. Incubation, primarily by the female (male occasionally assists), lasts 12-13 days. Males feed the female on the nest. Young are fed by both parents during nestling and fledgling stages. The period of time parents feed young after fledging is unknown. Birds reach sexual maturity within one year.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - ConiferWoodland - Mixed
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5B,N3N
ProvinceRankNative
Nova ScotiaS2B,S4MYes
Prince Edward IslandSUMYes
New BrunswickS5BYes
ManitobaS2BYes
QuebecS4BYes
OntarioS5B,S3NYes
United StatesN5B,N5N
ProvinceRankNative
IowaS1NYes
New JerseyS4B,S4NYes
VirginiaS5Yes
OhioS3Yes
IllinoisS3Yes
South CarolinaS4Yes
Rhode IslandS4BYes
DelawareS5B,S5NYes
New HampshireS5BYes
West VirginiaS2N,S4BYes
TennesseeS5Yes
ConnecticutS5BYes
WisconsinS4BYes
MaineS5BYes
South DakotaSNAYes
ArkansasS4Yes
LouisianaS5Yes
NebraskaSNRNYes
MississippiS5B,S5NYes
OklahomaSNRYes
MinnesotaSNRBYes
PennsylvaniaS4BYes
KentuckyS4BYes
ColoradoSNAYes
MarylandS4B,S2NYes
AlabamaS5Yes
GeorgiaS5Yes
New YorkS5BYes
VermontS4BYes
MichiganS5Yes
MissouriSNRB,SNRNYes
North CarolinaS5B,S4NYes
IndianaS3BYes
MassachusettsS4BYes
FloridaS4Yes
District of ColumbiaS1B,S2NYes
TexasS5BYes
Roadless Areas (41)
Alabama (1)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
Arkansas (3)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
Florida (2)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Georgia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
Rocky MountainChattahoochee National Forest4,269
Indiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Kentucky (1)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
Michigan (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear SwampHuron-Manistee National Forest3,915
Minnesota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Baker - Homer - Brule LakesSuperior National Forest6,712
New Hampshire (3)
AreaForestAcres
Carr MountainWhite Mountain National Forest17,110
KearsargeWhite Mountain National Forest4,554
Wild RiverWhite Mountain National Forest46,878
North Carolina (4)
AreaForestAcres
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
Pennsylvania (1)
AreaForestAcres
Allegheny FrontAllegheny National Forest7,430
South Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Hellhole ExtFrancis Marion National Forest891
Tennessee (1)
AreaForestAcres
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Virginia (14)
AreaForestAcres
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Gum RunGeorge Washington National Forest12,620
Hoop HoleJefferson National Forest4,652
Mountain Lake Addition B (VA)Jefferson National Forest3,405
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Oak KnobGeorge Washington National Forest10,882
Oliver MountainGeorge Washington National Forest13,090
Price MountainJefferson National Forest9,119
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Ramseys Draft AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest12,781
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
West Virginia (5)
AreaForestAcres
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
Little MountainMonongahela National Forest8,172
Middle MountainMonongahela National Forest19,020
Mountain Lake Addition B (WV)Jefferson National Forest557
North Mountain HopevilleMonongahela National Forest6,525
References (80)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). Chesser, R.T., R.C. Banks, F.K. Barker, C. Cicero, J.L. Dunn, A.W. Kratter, I.J. Lovette, P.C. Rasmussen, J.V. Remsen, Jr., J.D. Rising, D.F. Stotz, and K. Winker. 2011. Fifty-second supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list of North American Birds. The Auk 128(3):600-613.
  4. Anderson, S. H., and H. H. Shugart, Jr. 1974. Habitat selection of breeding birds in an east Tennessee deciduous forest. Ecology 55:828-37.
  5. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  6. Barbour, T. 1937. A Pine Warbler killed by arsenical spray. Auk 54:542-43.
  7. Beane, J. C. and S. L. Alford. 1990. Destruction of a Pine Warbler brood by an adult cowbird. The Chat 54:85-7.
  8. Bent, A. C. 1953. Life histories of North American wood warblers. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 203. Washington, D.C.
  9. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  10. Brewer, R., G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams, Jr. 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan. xvii + 594 pp.
  11. Brush, T., and E. W. Stiles. Habitat use by breeding birds in the New Jersey pine barrens. Bull. New Jersey Acad Sci. 35:13-6.
  12. Bull, J. 1974. Birds of New York state. Doubleday/Natural History Press, Garden City, New York. Reprint, 1985 (with Supplement, Federation of New York Bird Clubs, 1976), Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.
  13. Burleigh, T.D. 1958. Georgia Birds. First Edition. University of Oklahoma Press: Norman, Oklahoma. 746 pp.
  14. Conner, R.N., J.G. Dickson, B.A. Locke, and C.A. Segelquist. 1983. Vegetation characteristics important to common songbirds in East Texas. Wilson Bulletin 95:349-361.
  15. Conner, R.N., J.W. Via, and I.D. Prather. 1979. Effects of pine-oak clearcutting on winter and breeding birds in southwestern Virginia. Wilson Bulletin 91(2):301-316.
  16. Crawford, R. L. 1981. Bird casualties at a Leon county, Florida tv tower: a 25-year migration study. Bull. Tall Timbers Res. Sta., No. 22.
  17. Dickson, J. G., and C. A. Segelquist. 1979. Breeding bird populations in pine and pine-hardwood forests in Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 43:549-555.
  18. Droege, S., and J.R. Sauer. 1990. North American Breeding Bird Survey, annual summary, 1989. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 90(8). 22 pp.
  19. Dunn, J. L., and K. L. Garrett. 1997. A field guide to warblers of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  20. Emlen, J. T. 1977. Estimating breeding bird densities from transect counts. Auk 94:455-68.
  21. Emlen, J. T. 1991. Divergence in the foraging responses of birds on two Bahama islands. Ecology 62:289-95.
  22. Ficken, R. W., M. S. Ficken, and D. H. Morse. 1968. Competition and character displacement in two sympatric pine-dwelling warblers (DENDROICA, Parulidae). Evolution 22:307-14.
  23. Friedmann, H., and L.F. Kiff. 1985. The parasitic cowbirds and their hosts. Proc. Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology 2(4). 78 pp.
  24. Gaddis, P. K. 1983. Composition and behavior of mixed-species flocks of forest birds in north-central Florida. Florida Field Nat. 11:25-44.
  25. Graber, J. W., R. R. Graber, and E. L. Kirk. 1983. Illinois birds: wood warblers. Biological Notes 118. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
  26. Griscom, L., and A. Sprunt, Jr. 1979. The warblers of America. Doubleday and Co., Garden City, New York. 302 pp.
  27. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  28. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  29. Harrison, H.H. 1984. Wood warblers' world. Simon and Schuster, New York. 335 pp.
  30. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  31. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  32. Howe, R. W. 1979. Distribution and behavior of birds on small islands in northern Minnesota. J. Biogeog. 6:379-90.
  33. Hutto, R. L., S. M. Pletschet, and P. Hendricks. 1986. A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season use. Auk 103:593-602.
  34. Johnston, D. W., and E. P. Odum. 1956. Breeding bird populations in relation to plant succession on the piedmont of Georgia. Ecology 37:50-62.
  35. Johnston, D. W., and T. P. Haines. 1957. Analysis of mass bird mortality in October 1954. Auk 74:447-58.
  36. Kerlinger, P., and C. Doremus. 1981. Habitat disturbance and the decline of dominant avian species in pine barrens of the northeastern United States. American Birds 35:16-20.
  37. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  38. Lynch, J.F., and D.F. Whigham. 1984. Effects of forest fragmentation on breeding bird communities in Maryland, USA. Biological Conservation 28:287-324.
  39. McNair, D. B. 1987. Egg data slips-are they useful for information on egg-laying dates and clutch size? Condor 89:369-76.
  40. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  41. Morse, D. H. 1967. Foraging relationships of brown-headed nuthatches and pine warblers. Ecology 48:94-103.
  42. Morse, D. H. 1970. Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecological Monographs 40:119-168.
  43. Morse, D. H. 1974. Foraging of pine warblers allopatric and sympatric to yellow-throated warblers. The Wilson Bulletin 86:474-7.
  44. Nesbitt, S. A., and W. M. Hetrick. 1976. Foods of the pine warbler and brown-headed nuthatch. Florida Field Nat. 4:28-33.
  45. Nolan, V., Jr. 1978. Ecology and behavior of the prairie warbler DENDROICA DISCOLOR. American Ornithologists' Union, Ornithological Monographs No. 26. 595 pp.
  46. Noss, R. F. 1991. Effects of edge and internal patchiness on avian habitat use in an old-growth Florida hammock. Natural Areas Journal 11:34-47.
  47. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  48. Peterjohn, B.G., and D.L. Rice. 1991. Ohio breeding bird atlas. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Columbus, Ohio. 416 pp.
  49. Peterjohn, B.G., and J.R. Sauer. 1993. North American breeding bird survey annual summary 1990-1991. Bird Populations 1:1-15.
  50. Peterjohn, B. G., J. R. Sauer, and W. A. Link. 1994. The 1992 and 1993 summary of the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Bird Populations 2:46-61.
  51. Peterson, R.T. 1980b. A field guide to the birds of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  52. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  53. Potter, E. F., J. F. Parnell, and R. P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill. 408 pp.
  54. Price, J., S. Droege, and A. Price. 1995. The summer atlas of North American birds. Academic Press, New York. x + 364 pp.
  55. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  56. Reed, J.M. 1992. A system for ranking conversation priorities for Neotropical migrant birds based on relative susceptibility to extinction. Pages 524-536 in J. M. Hagan III, and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smiethsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  57. Repenning, R. W., and R. F. Labisky. 1985. Effects of even-age timber management on bird communites of the longleaf pine forest in northern Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:1088-98.
  58. Robbins, C.S. 1979. Effect of forest fragmentation on bird populations. Pages 198-212 in R.M. DeGraff and K.E. Evans, editors. Management of north central and northeastern forests for nongame birds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-51.
  59. Robbins, C. S., D. K. Dawson, and B. A. Dowell. 1989a. Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the Middle Atlantic states. Wildlife Monographs No. 103.
  60. Rodewald, P. G., K. G. Smith, and J. H. Withgott. 1999. Pine warbler (DENDROICA PINUS). In A. Poole, and F. Gill (editors). The birds of North America. Academy of natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  61. Sample, B. E., R. J. Cooper, and R. C. Whitmore. 1993. Dietary shifts among songbirds in a diflubenzuron-treated forest. Condor 95:616-24.
  62. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, G. Gough, I. Thomas, and B.G. Peterjohn. 1997a. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis. Version 96.3. Online. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Available: http://www.mbr.nbs.gov/bbs/bbs.html.
  63. Schroeder, R. L. 1985. Habitat suitability index models: Pine Warbler. Biol. Rep. 82(10.28). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 8 pp.
  64. Smith, K. G. and D. R. Petit. 1988. Breeding birds and forestry practices in the Ozarks: past, present, and future relationships. Bird Conservation 3:23-49.
  65. Stevenson, H. M., and B. H. Anderson. 1994. The birdlife of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. 892 pp.
  66. Stewart, R. E., and C. S. Robbins. 1952. Birds of Maryland and the District of Columbia. North American Fauna 62, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 401 pp.
  67. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  68. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  69. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  70. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  71. Wallace, G. J., W. P. Nickell, and R. F. Bernard. 1961. Bird mortality in the Dutch elm disease program in Michigan. Bulletin 41, Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
  72. Wayne, A. T. 1899. Destruction of birds by the great cold wave of February 13 and 14, 1899. Auk 16:197-8.
  73. Whitcomb, R. F., C. S. Robbins, J. F. Lynch, B. L. Whitcomb, M. K. Klimciewicz, and D. Bystrak. 1981. Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest. Pages 125-206 in R. L. Burgess, and B. L. Sharpe (editors). Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes.
  74. Whitmore, R. C., R. J. Cooper, and B. E. Sample. 1993. Bird fat reductions in forest treated with Dimilin [registered trademark]. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12:2059-64.
  75. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  76. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.
  77. Wilson, C. W., R. E. Masters, and G. A. Bukenhofer. 1995b. Breeding bird response to pine-grassland community restoration for red-cockaded woodpeckers. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:56-67.
  78. Witham, J. W., and M. L. Hunter. 1992. Population trends of neotropical migrant landbirds in northern coastal New England. In J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migratory Landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  79. Zeranski, J. D., and T. R. Baptist. 1990. Connecticut birds. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
  80. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.