Neotamias palmeri

(Merriam, 1897)

Palmer's Chipmunk

G3Vulnerable Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104774
Element CodeAMAFB02200
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilySciuridae
GenusNeotamias
Synonyms
Eutamias palmeriTamias palmeri(Merriam, 1897)
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
Taxonomic Comments
See Patterson and Norris (2016) for a revised classification of Marmotini (Sciuridae: Xerinae), based on Thorington et al. (2012), Ge et al. (2014), and Patterson and Norris (2016); the three chipmunk lineages should be recognized as three distinct genera, namely, Tamias Illiger, 1811, Eutamias Trouessart, 1880, and Neotamias A. H. Howell, 1929. Thorington and Hoffmann (in Wilson and Reeder 2005) noted that chipmunks could be legitimately allocated to one (Tamias), two (Neotamias, Tamias), or three (Tamias, Neotamias, Eutamias) genera; they chose to adopt the single-genus (Tamias) arrangement.

This species formerly was regarded as a subspecies of Tamias umbrinus by some authors.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2015-08-13
Change Date2015-08-13
Edition Date2015-08-13
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Small distribution in one mountain range in southern Nevada; population size likely exceeds 100,000; probably relatively stable or slowly declining; probably has been negatively affected by habitat changes resulting from woodcutting, campground development, and water diversions that reduce riparian habitat, and by predation by feral dogs and cats, but the degree of threat posed by these factors is not well documented; may be vulnerable to detrimental effects of increasing recreational use of the mountains (national recration area), but no documentation of this is currently available; may be highly vulnerable to climate change over the next several decades.
Range Extent Comments
The range is restricted to the Spring (Charleston) Mountains, near Las Vegas, Clark County, southern Nevada, at elevations of about 2,050-3,300 meters (most abundant at 2,600-2,900 meters) (Hall 1946, Best 1993, Nevada Natural Heritage Program, Lowrey and Longshore 2010).
Occurrences Comments
The number of distinct occurrences has not been determined using standardized criteria; the enire range could be regarded as a single occurrence or at most several closely adjacent ones. This species is represented by many localities localities in one mountain range; Lowrey and Longshore (2010) established trapping grids in 48 sites throughout the chipmunk's range and captured multiple individuals in every grid.
Threat Impact Comments
Water diversion is reducing available riparian habitat; campgrounds and woodcutting are reducing available habitat; feral dogs and cats are increasing mortality through predation (G. Clemmer, pers. comm., 1995). The degree to which these factors may significantly affect chipmunk populations in the near future is unknown, but threat impact may be low.

Residential and commerical development expanding from Las Vegas (east of the mountains) and in the Pahrump Valley (west of the mountains), and associated human population growth, combined with designation of the mountains as a national recreation area (NRA), could lead to negative impacts on chipmunk habitat and populations, though the NRA status might instead/also lead to favorable management (Hafner et al. 1998).

These chipmunks do not tolerate habiats with high temepratures and over the next several decades may be highly vulnerable to negative effects of ongoing climate change (Nevada Natural Heritage Program). The severity of the impact over the next 10 years or three generations is uncertain but may be slight.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This chipmunk is similar to the Uinta chipmunk (Neotamias umbrinus) but has browner or more reddish dark back stripes, and it is more tawny or orangish on the underside of the tail, and it has more gray on the shoulders; total length 210-223 mm (Whitaker 1996).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Panamint chipmunk (the only other chipmunk in the range) is somewhat smaller (total length 192-220 mm), with the shoulders less gray and the back stripes less distinctly dark and light (Whitaker 1996). Uinta chipmunk has darker stripes that are less brown or reddish, and the belly is white (Whitaker 1996).

Habitat

Habitat includes coniferous forests, from the upper elevations of pinyon/juniper to above the bristlecone pine timber line (primarily white-fir/limber pine/mixed conifer associations. Lowrey and Longshore (2010) found that maturing white-fir and to a lesser extent, ponderosa forest (decreasing density of immature or understory fir trees) contributed to both increased population density and increased survival; increasing density of currant berry shrubs (Ribes spp.) also contributed to increased population density. These chipmunks rarely venture far from shelter among large rocks, logs, or cliff crevices. Sometimes they nest in trees (e.g., in cavities made by woodpeckers).

Ecology

Generally secretive and highly mobile; may habituate to humans (Best 1993).

Reproduction

Copulation occurs probably in April and early May; births occur in late May in June; gestation lasts at least 33 days; liter size usually 3-6; young first emerge in June, continue to appear through August (see Best 1993).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - ConiferCliff
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
NevadaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasModerate - low
1.3 - Tourism & recreation areasHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (4)
Nevada (4)
AreaForestAcres
Angel Peak NorthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest12,577
Charleston - CarpenterHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest17,828
Charleston - ClarkHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest4,674
Charleston - Macks CynHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest11,378
References (31)
  1. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2024. The Mammal Diversity Database (MDD). Online. Available: www.mammaldiversity.org
  2. Baker, R. J., L. C. Bradley, R. D. Bradley, J. W. Dragoo, M. D. Engstrom, R. S. Hoffman, C. A. Jones, F. Reid, D. W. Rice, and C. Jones. 2003a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2003. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 229:1-23.
  3. Banfield, A. W. F. 1974. The mammals of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada. 438 pp.
  4. Best, T. L. 1993. <i>Tamias palmeri</i>. Mammalian Species No. 443:1-6.
  5. Broadbooks, H. E. 1970a. Home ranges and territorial behavior of the yellow-pine chipmunk, <i>Eutamius amoenus.</i> Journal of Mammalogy 51:310-26.
  6. Broadbooks, H. E. 1970b. Populations of the yellow pine chipmunk, <i>Eutamias amoenus</i>. American Midland Naturalist 83:472-488.
  7. Brown, J. H. 1971. Mechanisms of competitive exclusion between two species of chipmunks. Ecology 52:305-311.
  8. Elliot, L. 1978. Social behavior and foraging ecology of the eastern chipmunk (<i>Tamias striatus</i>) in the Adirondack Mountains. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology No. 265. 107 pp.
  9. Gashwiler, J. S. 1965. Longevity and home range of a Townsend chipmunk. Journal of Mammalogy 46:693.
  10. Hafner, D. J., E. Yensen, and G. L. Kirkland, Jr. (compilers and editors). 1998. North American rodents. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Rodent Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. x + 171 pp.
  11. Hall, E. R. 1946. Mammals of Nevada. The University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
  12. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  13. Jackson, H. H. 1961. Mammals of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 504 pp.
  14. Jameson, E. W., Jr. 1999. Host-ectoparasite relationships among North American chipmunks. Acta Theriologica 44:225-231.
  15. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  16. Levenson, H., et al. 1985. Systematics of the Holarctic chipmunks (<i>Tamias</i>). J. Mammalogy 66:219-242.
  17. Lowrey, C., and K. Longshore. 2010a. Palmers chipmunk ecology project. USGS report.
  18. Lowrey, C., and K. Longshore. 2010b. Long-term conservation strategy for the Palmers chipmunk (<i>Tamias palmeri</i>) within the Spring Mountains, Nevada. USGS report prepared for Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan.
  19. Lowrey, C., and K. Longshore. 2013. Habitat interaction between two species of chipmunk in the Basin and Range Province of Nevada. Western North American Naturalist 73:129-136.
  20. Nevada Division of Wildlife. 1996. Distribution, abundance, and habitat components of the Palmer's chipmunk (<i>Tamias palmeri</i>) in the Spring Mountains of southern Nevada. Job Performance Report prepared for Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, Project EW-2-5. January 1996.
  21. Oxley, D. J., M. B. Fenton and G. R. Carmody. 1974. The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 51-59.
  22. Patterson, B. D., and R. W. Norris. 2016. Towards a uniform nomenclature for ground squirrels: the status of the Holarctic chipmunks. Mammalia 80(3):241-251.
  23. Piaggio, A. J., and G. S. Spicer. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the chipmunks inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase II gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20:335-350.
  24. Roberts, D. R. 1962. Rodent movements in a cutover forest of the Sierra Nevada, California. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
  25. Sheppard, D. 1972. Home ranges of chipmunks (<i>Eutamias</i>) in Alberta. Journal of Mammalogy 53:379- 380.
  26. Storer, T. I., F. C. Evans, and F. G. Palmer. 1944. Some rodent populations in the Sierra Nevada of California. Ecological Monographs 14:166-192.
  27. Sutton, D. A. 1992. Tamias amoenus. Am. Soc. Mamm., Mammalian Species No. 390:1-8.
  28. Wadsworth, C. E. 1972. Observations of the Colorado chipmunk in southeastern Utah. Southwestern Naturalist 16:451-454.
  29. Whitaker, J. O., Jr. 1996. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Mammals. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, USA. 937 pp.
  30. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  31. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]