Neotoma magister

Baird, 1858

Allegheny Woodrat

G3Vulnerable Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101808
Element CodeAMAFF08100
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilyCricetidae
GenusNeotoma
Other Common Names
Allegheny woodrat (EN) Appalachian Woodrat (EN)
Concept Reference
Hayes, J. P., and M. E. Richmond. 1993. Clinal variation and morphology of woodrats (Neotoma) of the eastern United States. J. Mamm. 74:204-216.
Taxonomic Comments
Neotoma magister formerly was regarded as a subspecies of Neotoma floridana.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-08-11
Change Date2025-08-11
Edition Date2025-08-11
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and J. C. Whittaker (2006); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread in the mountains of the eastern United States. The population suffered declines due to habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, loss of food sources, and parasitic infection. It has been extirpated from the northernmost parts of the range in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York. Recent population trends are not known, but the species is presumably still declining. However, there are some efforts to breed this species in captivity and reintroduce them.
Range Extent Comments
This species is endemic to the eastern United States. The range extends from northern New Jersey, and northern Pennsylvania southwestward through western Maryland, Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia, and northern and western Virginia (from the Blue Ridge westward) to northeastern Alabama (observed in several cave systems) and northwestern North Carolina, with isolated populations north of the Ohio River in southern Ohio and southern Indiana (Hall 1981, Whitaker and Hamilton 1998, Mengak 2002, Castleberry et al. 2006, Ford et al. 2006, Ray et al. 2024). Although Hall (1981) showed N. magister in the northwestern corner of Georgia, the Tennessee River is generally accepted as the southern range limit. Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records, range extent is estimated to be 380,947 km² (RARECAT 2025).

It is considered extirpated from the northernmost extent of the range in Massachusetts, western Connecticut, and southeastern New York (Castleberry et al. 2006, Timm et al. 2019).
Occurrences Comments
Applying a 5 km separation distance to GBIF (2025) records, 92 occurrences are estimated (RARECAT 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
Declines during the late 19th century and throughout the 20th century are attributed to habitat loss, declines in food availability, and exposure to a native parasite. These threats are continuing to impact the species.

Habitat loss and fragmentation has occurred due to deforestation for logging, development, and agriculture (Linzey 1990, Castleberry et al. 2006, LoGiudice 2006). Deforestation results in a loss of habitat as well as food. Declines in food availability have come from two major sources. The first was the loss of mature American Chestnut (Castanea dentata) trees from eastern forests during the late 1800s and early 1900s (Castleberry et al. 2006, LoGiudice 2006). Populations presumably declined due to this loss of food availability (Castleberry et al. 2006, LoGiudice 2006). The second major source of decline in food availability came through drastic reductions in acorn production by oak (Quercus spp.) trees in response to persistent defoliation by the invasive Spongy Moth (Lymantria dispar) (Hall 1988, Castleberry et al. 2006, LoGiudice 2006). Habitat fragmentation can cause declines made more severe by increasing rates of predation and preventing recolonization after localized extirpation events (e.g., severe winter temperatures causing extirpations) (Fitch and Rainy 1956, Nawrot and Klimstra 1976, Monty and Feldhamer 2002, LoGiudice 2006, Kanine et al. 2018). Disturbance by human presence can also cause abandonment of otherwise suitable habitat (LoGiudice 2006).

Another source of decline comes from the raccoon roundworm (Baylisascaris procyonis). This native parasite has been shown to decrease overall health and causes significant mortality throughout the range (Kazacos 1983, McGowan 1993, Johnson et al. 1994, LoGiudice 2000, Wright 2008, Smyser et al. 2013, Powers et al. 2025). Habitat fragmentation may be leading to increased co-existence with raccoons, exacerbating the impacts of this species’ habit of carrying the feces of other animals back to their nests (LoGiudice 200).

Habitat is generally inaccessible and undesirable for development, but strip mining of coal and limestone is a potential threat in many areas.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A large grayish-brown rat with white underparts, large eyes and ears, and a long, furry, bicolored tail. Godin (1977) described the coloration as follows: "In winter the coloration above is buffy gray to pale cinnamon, heavily overlaid with black. The head and the sides of the body are buffy gray, while the axillae, or armpits, are creamy buff. The throat, belly, and feet are white, the fur being white to the roots except along the sides of the belly, where the basal color is pale leaden gray. The tail is sharply bicolored, blackish brown above, white below. The summer pelage is slightly paler and shorter. Immatures are grayer than adults, particularly on the belly."

Total length 35.5-44.7 cm; tail length 16-21 cm; mass 394-500 g (Godin 1977).

The skull is elongated, about 5.0 cm long and 2.5 cm at its greatest width, with "marked interorbital constriction and relatively small auditory bullae. The palate, lacking a posterior median spine, ends about even with the front of the first molar, which is high, flat-crowned, and prismatic. The coronoid process of the mandible is well developed" (Godin 1977).

The sexes are similar in color, and males average a little larger than females. Both sexes have a ventral skin gland which produces a strong, musky odor, especially in breeding males. External genitalia are generally apparent in the males, and females have four mammae.

There are numerous excellent published illustrations of woodrats and their skulls, including Schwartz and Schwartz (1959), Barbour and Davis (1974), Lowery (1974), Whitaker (1980), Wiley (1980), Hall (1981), Hall (1985), and Merritt (1987). Tracks are illustrated in some of these works, and tracks and scats are shown in Murie (1974).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Neotoma magister differs from the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) in having a furry, not scaly, tail; longer, softer fur; larger naked ears; and larger bright eyes. "The molars have enamel arranged in prismatic folds and are thus easily distinguished from the tuberculate molars of Rattus " (Adams 1987).

Habitat

Typical habitat is rocky cliffs and talus slopes. These woordrats make midden mounds and stick piles among rocks, but secluded nest sites generally are not within stick houses (see Hayes and Harrison 1992).

Throughout its range, this species associated with extensive rocky areas such as outcrops, cliffs, talus slopes with boulders and crevices, and caves. It occasionally uses abandoned buildings but generally avoids humans. It generally occurs at higher elevations (to about 1000 m) and is rarely found in lowlands or open areas.

In southern New York, New Jersey, and adjacent Pennsylvania, woodrat habitat "consists of extensive boulder fields at the base of ridges with rock outcrops. These talus slopes consist of large boulders (10-20 ft. [3-6 m] across) piled in several layers. Neotoma lives among the cave like spaces formed by the piled boulders" (Sciascia 1990).

Referring to the mountainous area of Pennsylvania, Merritt (1987) wrote, "limestone caves, rocky cliffs and accumulations of residual sandstone boulders marked by deep crevices with underground galleries represent favored habitat." Hall (1985) pointed out that good habitat is found "specifically at water gaps where cliff faces and boulder piles are usually abundant." Unpublished data from Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventories (eastern and western offices) make frequent references to woodrat occurrences in sandstone, limestone, or shale outcrops and cliffs, usually with crevices or abundant boulders; also solution caves and abandoned limestone quarries and mines. Associated forest is varied, including cove hardwoods, hemlock-birch, oak-pine, and various combinations of oaks, maples, hickories, beech, and yellow poplar (tulip-tree). Grape, mountain laurel, rhododendron and ferns are frequently mentioned.

In West Virginia, woodrats are common in caves, rock shelters, outcrops with deep crevices, and riverbanks with an abundance of sandstone rocks and boulders.

"In Maryland, this species is found predominately in cliffs, caves and rocky areas in the three western-most counties, and along cliffs of the Potomac River to the vicinity of Washington, D.C." (Feldhammer et al. 1984). In western Maryland "Pottsville Sandstone outcrops [provide] massive, blocky boulders and extensive cliffs with numerous crevices and miniature cave-like situations" (Thompson 1984).

In Indiana, extant populations are restricted primarily to south-facing limestone bluffs on the Ohio River, where there are den sites in the rock and dense red-cedar (Cudmore 1983, Scott Johnson, pers. comm.).

In Kentucky, "cliffs with deep crevices, caves, or large boulders piled in such a way as to form numerous retreats and shelters are favored" (Barbour and Davis 1974). In Tennessee, "rocky cliffs, caves and fissures or tumbled boulders on the sides of mountains are the preferred habitat" (Hamilton 1943), and in North Carolina it is "rocky places and abandoned buildings at elevations above 3000 feet (900 m)" (Adams 1987). Castleberry et al. (2001) suggest that forest clearcutting has minimal impact on woodrat movements, home range, and habitat use, as long as sufficient intact forest is retained adjacent to colonies. They mention, however, that harvesting methods that selectively remove important mast-producing tree species may represent the greatest threat from forest management.

A large house of sticks, leaves, and miscellaneous debris is built, usually within a cave, crevice, or other well-protected place. This may be a mound like a muskrat house (typical construction in the range of other subspecies), but is more often open, giving the impression of a large bird's nest (Poole 1940). Outside diameter is about 35-60 cm (Patterson 1933) and the inner cavity is about 12 cm across (Poole 1940). The nest is lined with shredded bark of grape, red cedar, hemlock, or basswood, grass, fur, rootlets, and sometimes feathers (Poole 1940, Merritt 1987).

Ecology

Woodrats are basically solitary and unsociable, frequently fighting one another. Each lives alone in its house, except when breeding and raising young. Poole (1949) found "a great deal of individuality" in temperament, behavior, food preferences, etc., among his captive Allegheny woodrats. When upset, woodrats may chatter their teeth or stomp their hind feet (Wiley 1980).

Near the nests are found piles of sticks and trash called middens. Part of the materials found in woodrat houses and middens appears to be cached food in the form of nuts, seeds, berries, cuttings of vegetation, and mushrooms. But there may also be miscellaneous bits of trash, including rags, bits of metal, bones, pieces of glass, paper, etc. Newcombe (1930) and Poole (1940) compiled lists of such materials. The function of this compulsive collecting is unknown.

Scats are deposited in special latrine areas, apparently used by more than one individual, or over a long period of time. Poole (1940) reported seeing such heaps measuring 45 x 25 x 5 cm. A captive kept by Patterson (1933) voided 3 to 84 fecal pellets per day. Similarly, urinating spots are used, leaving dark stains 15-20 cm in diameter on rocks (Schwartz and Schwartz 1959).

Though solitary and territorial, woodrats most often occur in clusters due to patchiness of the rock outcrop, talus, and cave habitat, and conform to the concept of a metapopulation (Hassinger et al. 1996). Home ranges are small, 0.26-0.6 ha (Wright and Hall 1996); usually less than about 90 m across (Burt and Grossenheider 1976). Poole (1940) reported movements of 183 m and 92 m by two woodrats in Pennsylvania. Foraging movements, while often focused within rock habitat, may extend beyond the protection of rocks up to 160 meters from the den site (Wright and Hall 1996). Den shifts tend be less than 100 meters with a median of 40 m (Wright 1998), and woodrats, particularly females, often live their entire lives in the same outcrop (Feller, pers. obs., 1998). There are reports of large unidirectional movements of displaced woodrats, e.g., 1 km and 4 km (McGowan 1993), as well as naturally dispersing individuals, 0.3-1 km (McGowan 1993), 1 km (Feller, pers. obs., 1995), and up to 6 km (Wright, pers. comm., 1998). While woodrats can travel long distances between patches, as distances increase, the chance of successful emigration between patches is likely to decrease, particularly in the absence of protective rock crevices. Barriers to dispersal are not clearly known, as woodrats have been documented to traverse seemingly inhospitable terrain, including roads, small streams, and small fields, though movements are largely within rock habitat (Feller, pers. obs.; Mengak, pers. comm., 1998; Wright, pers. comm., 1998). However, woodrats display unwary behavior when crossing roads (Feller, pers. obs.), and roadkills have been documented (Feller, pers. obs., 1993; McGowan 1993).

Cudmore (1983) estimated population densities of 8.3 to 71.9 woodrats per 1000 m of cliff along the Ohio River in Indiana. According to Burt and Grossenheider (1976), populations of 5-8 adults per ha are probably high.

Predators include owls, skunks, weasels, foxes, raccoons, bobcats and large snakes. Interestingly, examination of the stomach contents of 70 rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) and 15 copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix) in Pennsylvania and New Jersey revealed no woodrat remains, even though many of the snakes came from areas inhabited by woodrats (Poole 1940). Humans have been killing woodrats for thousands of years--first for food, and much later out of prejudice, because of a resemblance to European rats.

White-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) compete with woodrats for food (Rainey 1956), and in Indiana, opossums (Didelphis virginiana), raccoons (Procyon lotor) and turkey vultures (Cathartes aura) may compete for den sites (Cudmore 1983). Woodrats support many ecto- and endoparasites, including fleas, ticks, mites, chiggers, botflies (Diptera: Cuterebridae), nematodes, and tapeworms (Murphy 1952, Cudmore 1986). Bubonic plague (Schwartz and Schwartz 1959) and rabies (Dowda et al. 1981) have been reported in wild woodrats.

Reproduction

The breeding season is late winter to late summer, with the young born from March to September (Poole 1940, Merritt 1987). Gestation period is about 35 days (32 to 38 days) (Birney 1973). Females normally mate again soon after giving birth, and two or three litters of usually two to four young are produced annually (Poole 1940, Schwartz and Schwartz 1959). Sexual maturity is reached in less than a year, and some early-born females (but not males) breed in the season of their birth (Wiley 1980).

Woodrats are thought to live longer than most small rodents. One female is known to have lived more than three years in the wild (Fitch and Rainey 1956). However, mortality is normally high.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralBare rock/talus/screeCliff
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
OhioS1Yes
TennesseeS3Yes
PennsylvaniaS2Yes
West VirginiaS3Yes
ConnecticutSHYes
IndianaS1Yes
KentuckyS3Yes
North CarolinaS2Yes
New JerseyS1Yes
District of ColumbiaSHYes
New YorkS1Yes
VirginiaS3Yes
MarylandS1Yes
AlabamaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningUnknownExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingUnknownExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted - smallSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingRestricted - smallSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.3 - Temperature extremesPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (2)
Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
West Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
References (138)
  1. Adams, W. F. 1987. <i>Neotoma floridana </i>Ord, eastern wood rat. Pages 29-32 in M. K. Clark (ed.). Endangered, threatened, and rare fauna of North Carolina, Part I: a re-evaluation of the mammals. Occas. Pap. North Carolina Biol. Surv.
  2. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (Version 1.13) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10595931. Online. Available: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/
  3. Armstrong, D.M. 1972. Distribution of mammals in Colorado. University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History, Monograph No. 3, Lawrence.
  4. Balcom, B. J. and R. H. Yahner 1996. Microhabitat and landscape characteristics associated with the threatened Allegheny woodrat. Conservation Biology 10(2):515-525.
  5. Banks, E. M., R. J. Brooks, and J. Schnell. 1975. A radiotracking study of home range and activity of the brown lemming (<i>Lemmus trimucronatus</i>). Journal of Mammalogy 56:888-901.
  6. Barbour, R. W., and W. H. Davis. 1974. Mammals of Kentucky. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  7. Batzli, G. O. 1977. Population dynamics of the white-footed mouse in floodplain forest and upland forests. American Midland Naturalist 97:18-32.
  8. Beans, B. E. 1992. Without a trace: the puzzling demise of the Allegheny woodrat. Audubon Magazine January/February.
  9. Bee, J.W., R.S. Hoffmann, G. Blass, R.R. Paterson. 1981. Mammals in Kansas. Universtiy of Kansas Publications, Mus. Nat.Hist., Public Ed. Series No. 7., Lawrence.
  10. Birney, E. C. 1973. Systematics of three species of wood rats (genus <i>Neotoma</i>) in central North America. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Misc. Publ. No 58.
  11. Birney, E. C. 1976. An assessment of relationships and effects of interbreeding among wood rats of the <i>Neotoma floridana </i>species group. Journal of Mammalogy 57(1):103-32.
  12. Bowman, J. C., M. Edwards, L. S. Sheppard, and G. J. Forbes. 1999. Record distance for a non-homing movement by a deer mouse, <i>Peromyscus maniculatus</i>. Canadian Field-Naturalist 113:292-293.
  13. Bradley, R. D., C. W. Edwards, L. L. Lindsey, J. R. Bateman, M. NB Cajimat, M. L. Milazzo, C. F. Fulhorst, M. D. Matocq, and M. R. Mauldin. 2022. Reevaluation of the phylogenetic relationships among Neotomini rodents (<i>Hodomys</i>, <i>Neotoma</i>, and <i>Xenomys</i>) and comments on the woodrat classification. Journal of Mammalogy 103(5):1221-1236.
  14. Brooks, R. J., and E. M. Banks. 1971. Radio-tracking study of lemming home range. Communications in Behavioral Biology 6:1-5.
  15. Burt, W. H. 1976. A field guide to the mammals. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 289 pp.
  16. Castleberry, S. B. 2000. Conservation and management of the Allegheny woodrat in the central Appalachians. Ph.D. Dissertation, West Virginia University. 166 pp.
  17. Castleberry, S. B., M. T. Mengak, and T. E. Menken. 2014. Comparison of trapping and camera survey methods for determining presence of Allegheny woodrats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 38(2): 414–418. doi: 10.1002/wsb.383
  18. Castleberry, S. B., M. T. Mengak, and W. M. Ford. 2006. <i>Neotoma magister</i>. Mammalian Species 789: 1-5.
  19. Castleberry, S., B., T. L. King, P. B. Wood, and W. M. Ford. 2002. Microsatellite DNA analysis of population structure in Allegheny woodrats (<i>Neotoma magister</i>). Journal of Mammalogy 83:1058-1070.
  20. Castleberry, S. B., W. M. Ford, P. Bohall Wood, N. L. Castleberry, and M. T. Mengak. 2001. Movements of Allegheny Woodrats in relation to timber harvesting. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:148-156.
  21. Clausen, Mary Kay. Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, Nebraska. Pers. comm.
  22. Conservation Commission of West Virginia. 1951. A survey of West Virginia mammals. Charleston, West Virginia.
  23. Cudmore, W.W. 1983. The distribution and ecology of the eastern woodrat, <i>Neotoma floridana</i>, in Indiana. Indiana State University, Indiana. Ph.D. Dissertation.
  24. Cudmore, W. W. 1985. The present distribution and status of the eastern woodrat, <i>Neotoma floridana</i>, in Indiana. Indiana Academy of Science 94:621-627.
  25. Davis, M. M., T. J. Smyser, S. A. Johnson, J. Duchamp, J. L. Larkin, R. K. Swihart, and J. M. Doyle. 2021. Reproductive success of captive-reared Allegheny Woodrats (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) released into genetically depauperate populations. Conservation Genetics (2021) 22:903–912. Doi: 10.1007/s10592-021-01372-z
  26. DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1986. New England wildlife: habitat, natural history, and distribution. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Expt. Station, Broomall, Pennsylvania, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-108. 491 pp.
  27. DeWit, C. A. 1982. Resistance of the prairie vole (<i>Microtus ochrogaster</i>) and wood rat (<i>Neotoma floridana</i>) in Kansas to venom of the osage copperhead (<i>Agkistrodon contrortrix phaeogaster</i>). Toxicon 20(4):709-14.
  28. Douglass, R. J. 1977. Population dynamics, home ranges, and habitat associations of the yellow-cheeked vole, <i>Microtus xanthognathus</i>, in the Northwest Territories. Canadian Field-Naturalist 91:237-47.
  29. Doutt, J. K., C. A. Heppenstall, and J. E. Guilday. 1977. Mammals of Pennsylvania. The Penn. Game Commission. 283 pp.
  30. Dowda, H., A. F. Disalvo, and S. Redden. 1981. Naturally acquired rabies in an eastern wood rat (<i>Neotoma floridana</i>). J. Clin. Microbiol. 13(1):238-9.
  31. Dunn, J., J. S. Hall and T. Wilkinson. 1989. Report on woodrat survey trapping. Submitted to Pennsylvania Game Commission. Unpublished.
  32. Edwards, C. W., and R. D. Bradley. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics of the <i>Neotoma floridana</i> species group. Journal of Mammalogy 82:791-798.
  33. Feldhamer, G. A., J. E. Gates and J. A. Chapman. 1984. Rare, threatened, endangered and extirpated mammals from Maryland. Pages 395-438 in Norden, A. W., D. C. Forester, and G. H. Fenwick (eds.). Threatened and endangered plants and animals of Maryland. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis, MD.
  34. Feller, Dan. Maryland Dept. Nat. Resources, Forest, Park and Wildlife Service, Annapolis, Maryland
  35. Feller, D. J. 1993. A three year investigation into the distribution and abundance of the Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma floridana </i><i>magister</i>) in Maryland. Presentation given at The Allegheny Woodrat: Where Now and Where Next? Conference. Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
  36. Fitch, H. S. and D. S. Rainey. 1956. Ecological observations of the woodrat (<i>Neotoma floridana</i>). University of Kansas Pub. Mus. Nat. Hist. 8:499-533.
  37. Ford, W. M., S. B. Castleberry, M. T. Mengak, J. L. Rodrigue, D. J. Feller, and K. R. Russell. 2006. Persistence of Allegheny woodrats <i>Neotoma magister</i> across the mid-Atlantic Appalachian Highlands landscape, USA. Ecography 29: 745-754.
  38. Garland, T., Jr. and W. G. Bradley. 1984. Effects of a highway on Mojave Desert rodent populations. American Midland Naturalist 111:47-56.
  39. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  40. Godin, A. J. 1977. Wild mammals of New England. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 304 pp.
  41. Goertz, J. W. 1970. An ecological study of <i>Neotoma floridana </i>in Oklahoma. Journal of Mammalogy 51(1):94-104.
  42. Goertz, J. W. 1973. Habitats of five species of rat in Louisiana. Am. Midl. Nat. 90(2):460-5.
  43. Goodwin, G.G. 1935. The Mammals of Connecticut. Connecticut Geological and Natural History Survey. Bull. 53. 221 pp.
  44. Grietzer, E. 2018. The study and analysis of historic Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) sites. M.S. thesis. Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ. 56 pp. https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd/131
  45. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  46. Hall, J. S. 1985. Eastern woodrat, <i>Neotoma floridana </i>Ord. Pages 362-5 in H. H. Genoways, and F. H. Brenner (eds.). Species of special concern in Pennsylvania. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  47. Hall, J. S. 1988. Survey of the woodrat in Pennsylvania. Unpublished report of the Pennsylvania Game commission.
  48. Hamilton, W. J., Jr., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1979. Mammals of the eastern United States. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York. 346 pp.
  49. Handley, C. O., Jr. 1991. Mammals. Pages 539-616 in K. Terwilliger, coordinator. Virginia's endangered species: proceedings of a symposium. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia.
  50. Hansen, L., and G. O. Batzli. 1978. The influence of food availability on the white-footed mouse: populations in isolated woodlots. Canadian Journal of Zoology 56:2530-2541.
  51. Hassinger, J. , C. Butchkoski, D. Diefenbach. 1996. Fragmentation effects on the occupancy of forested Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) colony areas. Paper presented to Allegheny Woodrat Recovery Group Meeting. Ferrum College, Ferrum, Virginia.
  52. Hassinger, J. D., and J. Dunn, 1989. Woodrat research and management. Annual job report submitted to Pennsylvania Game Commission. Unpublished.
  53. Hayes, J. P. 1987. A brief synopsis of the systematics of <i>Neotoma floridana</i>. Unpublished.
  54. Hayes, J.P. 1990. Biogeographic, systematic, and conservation implications of geographic variation in woodrats of the eastern United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. 151pp.
  55. Hayes, J. P., and M. E. Richmond. 1993. Clinal variation and morphology of woodrats (<i>Neotoma</i>) of the eastern United States. J. Mamm. 74:204-216.
  56. Hayes, J. P., and R. G. Harrison. 1992. Variation in mitochondrial DNA and the biogeographic history of woodrats (<i>Neotoma</i>) of the eastern United States. Systematic Biology 41:331-344.
  57. Heisler, W. T. 1941. Allegheny woodrat populations. Pennsylvania State College, University Park, Pennsylvania. M.S. Thesis.
  58. Hersh, S. L. 1981. Ecology of the Key Largo woodrat. J. Mammalogy 62:201-206.
  59. Hicks, A. Wildlife Research Center. Delmar, NY
  60. Howe, R. J. 1977. Scent-marking behavior in three species of woodrats (<i>Neotoma</i>) in captivity. Journal of Mammalogy 58(4):685-8.
  61. Humphrey, S. R. 1988. Density estimates of the endangered Key Largo woodrat and cotton mouse (<i>Neotoma floridana smalli </i>and <i>Peromyscus gossypinus allapaticola</i>), using the nested-grid approach. J. Mammalogy 69:524-531.
  62. Ireland, P. H. 1969. A new method for determining the home range of woodrats. Journal of Mammalogy 50(2):378-9.
  63. Jike, L., G. O. Batzli, L. L. Geta. 1988. Home ranges of prairie voles as determined by radiotracking and by powdertracking. Journal of Mammalogy 69:183-186.
  64. Johnson, S. A. 2002. Reassessment of the allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) in Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science.
  65. Johnson, S. A., K. A. Berkley, and J. E. Fisher. 1997. 1996 Allegheny woodrat monitoring program. Unpublished report of the Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife. 11 pp.
  66. Johson, S. 1991. Status survey of the eastern woodrat in Indiana. Report submitted to Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife. Unpublished.
  67. Kanine, J. M., E. M. Kierepka, S. B. Castleberry, M. T. Mengak, N. P. Nibbelink, and T. C. Glenn. 2018. Influence of landscape heterogeneity on the functional connectivity of Allegheny woodrats (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) in Virginia. Conservation Genetics 19: 1259-1268.
  68. Kazacos, K. R. 1983. Raccoon roundworms (<i>Baylisascaris procyonis</i>) - a cause of animal and human disease. Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette, Indiana. 25 pp.
  69. Kinsey, K. P. 1976. Social behavior in confined populations of the Allegheny wood rat (<i>Neotoma floridana magister</i>). Anim. Behav. 24(1):181-7.
  70. Kinsey, K. P. 1977. Agonistic behavior and social organization in a reproductive population of Allegheny wood rats (<i>Neotoma floridana magister</i>). Journal of Mammalogy 58(3):417-41.
  71. Kirkland, G. J. Jr. 1986. Small mammal species of special concern in Pennsylvania and adjacent states: an overview. Pp. 252-267. In S. K. Majumdar, F. J. Brenner and A. F. Rhodes (ed.s). Endangered and threatened species programs in Pennsylvania and other states: causes, issues and management. Pennsylvania Acad. Sci.
  72. Kirkland, G. L. Jr., and P. M. Krim. 1990. Survey of the statuses of the mammals of Pennsylvania. J. Pennsylvania Acad. Sci. 64(1):33-45.
  73. Krohne, D. T., and G. A. Hoch. 1999. Demography of <i>Peromyscus leucopus</i> populations on habitat patches: the role of dispersal. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77:1247-1253.
  74. Layne, J. N. 1958. Notes on animals of southern Illinois. Amer. Midl. Nat. 60(1):219-54.
  75. Linzey, A. V. 1990. Status of the Allegheny woodrat. Unpublished report.
  76. Linzey, D. W., and A. V. Linzey. 1968. Mammals of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 84(3):384-414.
  77. LoGiudice, K. 2000. <i>Baylisascaris procyonis</i> and the decline of the Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>). Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 101 pp.
  78. LoGiudice, K. 2006. Toward a synthetic view of extinction: a history lesson from a North American rodent. BioScience 56(8): 687-693.
  79. Lowery, G. H., Jr. 1974. The mammals of Louisiana and its adjacent waters. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge. 565 pp.
  80. MacMillen, R. E. 1964. Population ecology, water relations and social behavior of a southern California semidesert rodent fauna. University of California Publications in Zoology 71:1-59.
  81. Maier, T. J. 2002. Long-distance movements by female white-footed mice, <i>Peromyscus leucopus</i>, in extensive mixed-wood forest. Canadian Field-Naturalist 116:108-111.
  82. Majumdar, S.K., F.J. Brenner and A.P. Rhodes. 1986. Endangered and threatened species programs in Pennsylvania and other states: causes, issues and management. Pennsylvania Academy of Science.
  83. McGowan, E. 1991. Experimental release and fate study of the Allegheny Woodrat (<i>Neotoma floridana magister</i>). Operational plan. New York St. Dept. Environ. Conserv., Delmar, New York. Unpublished.
  84. McGowan, E. M. 1993. Experimental release and fate study of the Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>). Appendix I- Unpubl. Rpt., Endang. Spec. Unit, Div. of Fish and Wildlife, New York State Dept. of Envir. Conser.
  85. Mengak, M. T. 1996. Status and distribution of Allegheny woodrats in Virginia. Presentation given to the Allegheny Woodrat Recovery Group Meeting. Ferrum College, Ferrum, Virginia.
  86. Mengak, M. T. 2000. Status and distribution of the Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) in Virginia. Abstracts of the 56th Annual Northeast Fish and Wildlife Conference. Charleston, WV, April 9-12, 2000.
  87. Mengak, M. T. 2002. Reproduction, juvenile growth and recapture rates of Allegheny woodrats (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) in Virginia. American Midland Naturalist 148:155-162.
  88. Merritt, J. F. 1987. Guide to the mammals of Pennsylvania. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  89. Monty, A.-M., and G. A. Feldhamer. 2002. Conservation assessment for the eastern woodrat, (<i>Neotoma floridana</i>) and the Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>). USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region. 36 pp.
  90. Mumford, R. E., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1982. Mammals of Indiana. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. 537 pp.
  91. Murie, O. J. 1974. A field guide to animal tracks (second edition). Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts.
  92. Murphy, M. R. 1952. Ecology and helminths of the Osage wood rat, <i>Neotoma floridana osagensis</i>, including description of <i>Longistrata neotoma</i> n.sp. (Trichostrongylidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 48:204-18.
  93. Nawrot, J. R. and W. D. Kimstra. 1976. Present and past distribution of the endangered southern Illinois woodrat (<i>Neotoma floridana illinoensis</i>). Nat. Hist. Misc. No. 196:1-12. Chicago Acad. Sci.
  94. Neal, W. A. 1967. A study of the ecology of the woodrat in the hardwood forests of the lower Mississippi River basin. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. M.S. Thesis.
  95. Newcombe, C. L. 1930. An ecological stody of the Allegheny cliff rat (<i>Neotoma pennsylvanica</i> Stone). J. Mamm. 11:204-211.
  96. Norris. S. J. 1991. Rare species survey of Gauley River National Recreation Area. Report submitted to U.S. National Park Service. Unpublished.
  97. Nye, P. E. 1991. Application for West Virginia scientific collecting permit, with supporting attachement. Unpublished.
  98. Oxley, D. J., M. B. Fenton and G. R. Carmody. 1974. The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 51-59.
  99. Patterson, R. C. 1933. Notes on <i>Neotoma pennsylvanica</i>, with special reference to the genital organization. Proc. West Virginia Acad. Sci. 33(15):38-42.
  100. Patterson, R. C. 1934. Habits of <i>Neotoma pennsylvanica</i>. Proc. West Virginia Acad. Sci. 7:32-5.
  101. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  102. Poole, E. L. 1940. A life-history sketch of the Allegheny Woodrat. Journal of Mammalogy 21: 249–270.
  103. Powers, K. E., M. H. Cavanagh, L. G. Walker, S. D. Elsen, A. T. Struthers, and L. K. Page. 2025. Presence of raccoon roundworm (<i>Baylisascaris procyonis</i>) in habitat associated with Allegheny woodrats (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) in western Virginia, USA, 2022-24. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 61(1): 229-233. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-24-00086.
  104. Rainey, D. G. 1956. Eastern woodrat, <i>Neotoma floridana</i>: life history and ecology. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. 8:535-646.
  105. Ray, J. M., N. W. Sharp, and J. W. Dittel. 2024. Genetic evidence of Allegheny woodrats (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) in Alabama: continued existed adn the southern extent of its range. Southeastern Naturalist 23(3): N31–N36.
  106. Rehmeier, R. L., G. A. Kaufman, and D. W. Kaufman. 2004. Long-distance movements of the deer mouse in tallgrass prairie. Journal of Mammalogy 85:562-568.
  107. Schlie, W. J., and T. A. Bookhut. 1985. Reintroduction of Allegheny woodrats to Hocking County, Ohio. Ohio J. Sci. 85(2):92-3.
  108. Schwartz, A., and E. P. Odum. 1957. The woodrats of the eastern United States. Journal of Mammalogy 38:197-206.
  109. Schwartz, C. W., and E. R. Schwartz. 1959. The wild mammals of Missouri. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri.
  110. Sciascia, J. C. 1990a. Eastern woodrats decline in tri-state area. Nongame News Winter 1990:1,8.
  111. Sciascia, J. C. 1990b. Woodrat population monitoring project. Nongame News Summer 1990:6.
  112. Sciascia, J. New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection and Energy. Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife. Trenton, NJ
  113. Sealander, J. A. and G. A. Heidt. 1990. Arkansas mammals: their history, classification, and distribution. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
  114. Senzota, R. B. M. 1985. Effects of prescribed burning on a small mammal community in post oak savannah, Texas. Texas A and M University. Ph.D. Dissertation.
  115. Smith, M. H. 1965. Dispersal capacity of the dusky-footed wood rat, <i>Neotoma fuscipes</i>. American Midland Naturalist 74:457-463.
  116. Smyser, T. J., and R. K. Swihart. 2014. Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) captive propagation to promote recovery of declining populations. Zoo Biology 33(1): 29-35.
  117. Smyser, T. J., S. A. Johnson, L. K. Page, C. M. Hudson, and O. E. Rhodes Jr. 2013. Use of experimental translocations of Allegheny woodrat to decipher causal agents of decline. Conservation Biology 27(4): 752-762.
  118. Stihler, C., and J. Wallace. 1996. Woodrat studies in West Virginia. Page 2 in Abstracts of the 1996 Allegheny Woodrat Recovery Group Meeting., Ferrum College, Ferrum, Virginia.
  119. Storer, T. I., F. C. Evans, and F. G. Palmer. 1944. Some rodent populations in the Sierra Nevada of California. Ecological Monographs 14:166-192.
  120. Thomas, S. C. 1998. Allegheny woodrat monitoring. Performance report. Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Grant E-2-11. 20 pp.
  121. Thomas, S. C. 2001. Allegheny woodrat monitoring. Kentucky Federal Aid Grant No. E-2. 54 pp.
  122. Thompson, E. 1984. The eastern woodrat (<i>Neotoma floridana</i>) in Garrett County, Maryland. Pages 439-41 in A. W. Norden, D. C. Forester, and G. H. Fenwick (eds.). Threatened and endangered plants and animals of Maryland. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis, Maryland.
  123. Timm, R. M., G. S. Jones, T. W. French, and J. E. Cardoza. 2019. Historical documentation of the Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) in Massachusetts. Northeastern Naturalist 26(4): N47-N51.
  124. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Regional news. Endangered Species Technical Bulletin 15(12):11.
  125. Webster, W. D., J. F. Parnell and W. C. Biggs Jr. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Maryland. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
  126. Webster, William David. University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina
  127. Whitaker, J. O. and J. R. Gammon. 1988. Endangered and threatened vertebrate animals of Indiana, their distribution and abundance. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, IN.
  128. Whitaker, J. O., and W. J. Hamilton. 1998. Mammals of the eastern United States. Comstock Publishing, Ithaca, New York.
  129. Whitaker, J. O., Jr. 1980. The Audubon Society field guide to North American mammals. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 745 pp.
  130. Wiley, R. W. 1971. Activity periods and movements of the eastern woodrat (<i>Neotoma floridana</i>). Southw. Nat. 17(1):43-54.
  131. Wiley, R. W. 1980. <i>Neotoma floridana</i>. Am. Soc. Mamm., Mammalian Species No. 139:1-7.
  132. Wilkins, K. T. 1982. Highways as barriers to rodent dispersal. Southwestern Naturalist 27: 459-460.
  133. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]
  134. Wilson, D. E., and S. Ruff. 1999. The Smithsonian book of North American mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 750 pp.
  135. Wolfe, J. L. 1971. Mississippi land mammals. Mississippi Museum of Natural Science, Jackson, MS 39202.
  136. Wright, J. 1998. Radiotelemetry study of experimental recolonization of an Allegheny woodrat (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) population. Final Report to Wild Res. Cons. Fund.
  137. Wright, J. 2008. History and current status of the Allegheny woodrat. Pages 3-21 in: J. Peles and J. Wright, editors. The Allegheny Woodrat: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of a Declining Species. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. 234 pp.
  138. Wright, J. and J. S. Hall. 1996. Radiotelemetry study of movements and resource use by Allegheny woodrats (<i>Neotoma magister</i>) in Pennsylvania. Report to Pennsylvania Game Comm. Wild Res. Fund, Project #SP247621.