Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105742
Element CodeARACJ02011
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyTeiidae
GenusAspidoscelis
SynonymsAspidoscelis burti stictogramma(Burger, 1950)Aspidoscelis burti stictogrammus(Burger, 1950)Aspidoscelis stictogramma(Burger, 1950)Cnemidophorus burti stictogrammusBurger, 1950
Concept ReferenceWright, J. W., and L. J. Vitt. 1993. Biology of whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman, Oklahoma.
Taxonomic CommentsBased on differences in body size, scutellation, and color patterns, Walker and Cordes (2011) concluded that A. stictogramma, A. xanthonota, and A. burti should be recognized as distinct species.
Reeder et al. (2002) examined phylogenetic relationships of the whiptail lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus based on a combined analysis of mitochondrial DNA, morphology, and allozymes. They determined that Cnemidophorus in the traditional sense is paraphyletic and thus in need of nomenclatural revision. Rather than subsume all cnemidophorine species (including Kentropyx) in a single large genus (Ameiva), they proposed a split that placed the North American "Cnemidophorus" clade in the monophyletic genus Aspidoscelis; under this arrangement, South American taxa remain in the genus Cnemidophorus.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-08-13
Change Date2016-08-13
Edition Date2016-08-13
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Rank ReasonsRange includes southeastern Arizona, extreme southwestern New Mexico, and northwestern Mexico; many occurrences; presumed large population size; trend probably relatively stable.
Range Extent CommentsThe patchy distribution extends from southeastern Arizona and extreme southwestern New Mexico south into eastern Sonora and northern Sinaloa in northwestern Mexico (Stebbins 2003, Walker and Cordes 2011, Rorabaugh 2016). In New Mexico, the species has been found only in Guadalupe Canyon, Hildago County, between 1,321-1,387 meters (Degenhardt et al. 1996), with unsubstantiated reports for a couple additional locations, including the Alamo Hueco Mountains in Hildago County (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1985, 1997; Degenhardt et al. 1996). Extent of occurrence is at least 75,000 sq km. At least several occurrences are extant in Arizona, where elevational range is 722-1463 meters (Rorabaugh 2016). More than 100 occupied sites likely exist in Sonora, Mexico, with 85% of the occurrences in good condition; extensive surveys were completed in 1995 (Andres Villareal Lazarraga, pers. comm., 1998). Elevational range in Sonora is about 315-1904 meters (Rorabaugh 2016).
Occurrences CommentsAt least several occurrences are extant in Arizona. In New Mexico, this species has been documented in one canyon and unsubstantiated reports exist for a couple additional locations (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1985, 1997; Degenhardt et al. 1996). More than 100 occupied sites likely exist in Sonora, Mexico, with 85% of the occurrences in good condition; extensively surveyed in 1995 (Andres Villareal Lazarraga, pers. comm., 1998).
Threat Impact CommentsOverall, this species is currently not very threatened. Locally, potential threats include habitat alteration and overcollecting. Due to limited habitat, the population in New Mexico could be impacted by uncontrolled wildfire or overgrazing of riparian vegetation (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1997). In Arizona,