Crotalus adamanteus

Beauvois, 1799

Eastern Diamond-backed Rattlesnake

G3Vulnerable Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Very highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101938
Element CodeARADE02010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyViperidae
GenusCrotalus
Other Common Names
Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake (EN) eastern diamondback rattlesnake (EN)
Concept Reference
Pyron, R. A., F. T. Burbrink, and J. J. Wiens. 2013. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 29:131.
Taxonomic Comments
The traditional view of rattlesnake taxonomy that recognizes the two monophyletic sister genera Crotalus and Sistrurus (e.g. Brattstrom 1964) has recently been challenged. Stille (1987) and McCranie (1988) presented data that suggested Sistrurus is not monophyletic and rendered Crotalus paraphyletic. Parkinson (1999) found Sistrurus monophyletic but its position rendered Crotalus paraphyletic. Knight et al. (1993) used mtDNA to defend the traditional generic taxonomy, but in order to do so ignored the most parsimonious tree. The genus Crotalus is monophyletic when including the Mexican C. ravus (Murphy et al. 2002), and is supported as such in most recent phylogenies, as well as being the sister taxon to a monophyletic Sistrurus (e.g., Pyron et al. 2013) (Crother 2017).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2020-07-09
Change Date2020-07-09
Edition Date2020-06-18
Edition AuthorsYoung, B., K. Enge, A. Grosse, J. Hall, A. Holbrook, J. Humphries, M. Martin, B. O’Hanlon, J. Ratcliffe, N. Shepard, D. Sollenberger, and C. Threadgill (2020)
Threat ImpactVery high
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species has a limited range in the Southeast where it has undergone an extensive long-term decline due to loss of habitat, heavy exploitation for the skin trade, and general persecution. Although the species persists in much of the range, populations are fragmented and subject to many ongoing threats.
Range Extent Comments
The range encompasses the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States from North Carolina to south Florida, and west to Mississippi and the Florida parishes of Louisiana, at elevations extending from near sea level to around 500 meters (Mount 1975, Dundee and Rossman 1989, Palmer and Braswell 1995, Ernst and Ernst 2003, Campbell and Lamar 2004). The major stronghold as of 2020 is the northern Florida peninsula, eastern and southern Florida panhandle, and southwestern Georgia (Timmerman and Martin 2003).

North Carolina: restricted to the Lower Coastal Plain south of the Neuse River; formerly occurred in the middle Coastal Plain but apparently never in the North Carolina Fall Line sandhills; not known on North Carolina barrier islands.

South Carolina: patchily distributed in the lower and middle Coastal Plain; common in the coastal marsh-sea island area, occurring on Edisto and three smaller barrier islands.

Georgia: restricted to the Coastal Plain, occurring on the Fall Line sandhills below Columbus (Fort Benning) and thriving on Georgia's sea islands.

Florida: throughout the state, including many of the Florida Keys and most of Florida's east and west coast barrier islands.

Alabama: does not range to the Fall Line but occurs in the lower Coastal Plain where longleaf pine and wiregrass dominated the uplands originally; has been recorded from Dauphin Island.

Mississippi: occurs today principally in the counties of the southeastern portion of the state, east and northeast of the eastern tip of Louisiana; historically may have ranged to the limits of the longleaf pine forest, but today the range has contracted and is confined mainly to the longleaf pine hills and pine flats regions; there are no records from Mississippi barrier islands.

Louisiana: nearly extirpated; was confined to the easternmost three of the seven Florida parishes, and never was reported from Louisiana barrier islands (Means 2017).
Occurrences Comments
As of 2020, state natural heritage programs have records of 388 occurrences with confirmed individuals during the period 2000-2020. Additional occurrences likely are present in Florida (Enge et al. 2016).

The state breakdown is as follows:

Alabama: 3 recent occurrences (2000-2020), 0 historical occurrences (pre-2000 or known to have no surviving subpopulation)
Florida: 152 recent, 244 historical
Georgia: 171 recent, 64 historical
Louisiana: 2 recent, 5 historical
Mississippi: 33 recent, 5 historical
North Carolina: 9 recent, 29 historical
South Carolina: 18 recent, 7 historical
Threat Impact Comments
The original range has been reduced and fragmented by agriculture, forestry practices, urbanization, plant succession caused by fire suppression, roadkills, persecution, and commercialization (Martin and Means 2000, Enge et al. 2016, Means 2017).

Current threats to local populations include conversion of native habitat to planted slash or loblolly pine silvicultural plantations, agricultural fields, and urban and suburban uses. Human alteration of native longleaf pine upland ecosystems (including fire suppression) is the most important threat, reducing and fragmenting suitable habitat . Stump removal eliminates underground retreat sites for the snakes.

Roads present a pervasive threat throughout the range, even in conservation areas (Enge et al. 2016). These snakes cross roads regularly and travel slowly, making them particularly susceptible to being struck by cars. Many motorists intentionally run over the snakes when they see them (Enge et al. 2016). Roads also limit the ability of of land managers to perform prescribed burns to maintain suitable habitat. Roads also provide access to rattlesnake habitat to poachers. Besides direct habitat destruction, housing and urban development also prevent the use of prescribed burns.

Another direct threat is the collecting of rattlesnakes for the skin trade and for competition for prizes in rattlesnake roundups held annually in Alabama (1) and Georgia (3). In the past, this activity utilized the practice of gassing the burrows of the gopher tortoise in winter (illegal in Florida and Georgia), sometimes killing rattlesnakes outright, and usually impacting the other fauna inhabiting burrows (Mears 2009). Rattlesnake roundups likely contribute to at least locallized declines (Means 2009). The skin trade may be more damaging. Rangewide, this sort of activity probably accounts for at least ten times (20,000) the number of rattlesnake deaths caused by roundups (Means 2017). Collecting of individuals for the venom trade is also a threat in some areas.

Although this species occurs on coastal barrier islands, it uses upland habitats that are less immediately threatened by sea level rise than species using salt marshes and beaches (Hunter et al. 2015).

In Florida, a snake was found to have the pentastomid parasite Raillietiella orientalis that was likely introduced by invasive Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus; Metcalf et al. 2019). The extent of this threat is unknown. Burmese pythons themselves represent a threat in the Everglades because of competition for prey (Enge et al. 2016). This species is also known to suffer from snake fungal disease (Lorch et al. 2016). Feral hogs are predators of rattlesnakes. Armadillos have expanded into the northern portion of the rattlesnake's range and are introduced in Florida, but they may benefit rattlesnakes by creating burrows needed as refuge sites.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This is the largest venomous snake in the United States and Canada, recognized by its large size, dorsal pattern of diamonds, yellowish unpatterned belly, black tail, infrared-sensitive pit between the eye and nostril, and rattle at the tip of the tail. The pattern on the upper surface consists of 18-20 crisply delineated diamonds aligned apex to apex down the midline of the back. The diamonds are formed by a one-scale thin yellow line enclosing dense black pigment about 1-2 scales wide. Beginning on the neck and running about 2/3-3/4 of way to the level of the vent, the diamonds grade rapidly into a series of olive-brown scales flecked with black pigment. Often the olive-brown color alternates with black, suggesting bands. Belly scales are yellowish and display either no pattern or only a light brownish mottling. The side of the face is black with two thin yellow lines that run obliquely forward from the angle of the jaw and enclose the eye in a sort of black mask. At birth, young average 14 inches (36 cm) total length (Means 1995) and grow rapidly to adult size (39-59 inches, 100-150 cm in total length) (Ernst and Barbour 1989, Berish 1992). Maximum size is about 96 inches or 244 cm). Berish (1992) found 4 neonates ranging from 37.8-64.3 cm SVL. Males average larger than females and grow larger (Timmerman 1989, Berish 1992, Means 1995).

Midbody scale rows usually number 27-29-(25-31) (Ernst and Barbour 1989). Males have 165-176 ventral scales and females have 162-187 (Ernst and Barbour 1989).

Individuals can be sexed externally by counting the subcaudal scales. Females possess 20-27 subcaudals, males 26-33 (Ernst and Barbour 1989, Means 1995).

Diagnostic Characteristics

This species differs from other rattlesnakes by the following characteristics: crisp dorsal thin yellow diamonds enclosing black pigment centered with brown; densely black face with two thin oblique yellow lines on either side of the black eye (the iris and sclera are not set off from the pupil); olive-brown tail never with bold black and white "coon tail" bands.

Habitat

Habitats include pine and wiregrass flatwoods, pine-palmetto flatwoods, longleaf pine-turkey oak hills, rosemary scrub, mesophytic and coastal maritime hammocks, xeric hammocks, barrier islands and coastal scrub habitats, vicinity of wet savannas, wet prairies (during dry periods), dry prairie, mixed pine-hardwood successional woodland, and abandoned farms and fields (especially near pine-dominated habitats), particularly areas with abundant cover (Mount 1975, Dundee and Rossman 1989, Palmer and Braswell 1995, Tennant 1997, Ernst and Ernst 2003, Campbell and Lamar 2004, Means 2017). Large tracts of habitat are most suitable. Eastern diamondbacks are basically terrestrial and rarely climb into vegetation. Shelters include stump holes, burrows of other animals, brush piles, or similar sites. Stumpholes in shortleaf/loblolly pine oldfield successional forest are utilized more frequently than burrows of the gopher tortoise (Means 2017). Eastern diamondbacks can tolerate temporary inundation of their overwintering burrows (Means 1982, 2017). According to Ernst (1992), most young are born in retreats such as gopher tortoise burrows or hollow logs.

Ecology

Reported density ranges from about 18 individuals/ha in muhlenbergia grass on a barrier spit to one individual per 6 ha in shortleaf/loblolly pine oldfield successional habitat on clayhills (Means 2017). The acreage required to maintain a minimum viable population is not known, but this species has one of the largest home ranges of any U.S. snake, up to 310 ha (Waldron et al. 2008).

The principal predators and enemies are other snakes, including the indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), which feeds upon diamondbacks, and the eastern kingsnake (Lampropeltis getulus), which takes young rattlesnakes occasionally. The red-tailed hawk is a known predator and several other birds of prey are suspected of feeding on medium- and small-sized rattlesnakes. Feral hogs have been reported to kill and feed on small rattlesnakes and white-tailed deer have been reported to stamp rattlesnakes to death (Timmerman 1989, Means 2017). Fire is a known source of mortality, albeit probably not very important (Means 2017). No doubt humans are presently the most serious source of direct mortality (roadkilling, clubbing, shooting, and collecting for sale of skins or for rattlesnake roundup competitions) (Means 2017).

Reproduction

Mating takes place in August and September. Females store sperm until the following April when ovulation and fertilization take place. Gestation requires about 120 days. Vitellogenesis begins in the ovaries of females in the fall preceding gravidity and birth (Means 2017). Females give live birth in August and September to an average of about 14 young. Females may remain in the vicinity of the newborn for several days. Males may reach sexual maturity by the time of their second birthday; females at year three (Means 2017). Males and females both probably participate in courtship and mating every August and September after reaching sexual maturity, but females usually reproduce every two or possibly three years after giving birth to their first clutch (Means 2017). In captivity, individuals have lived for more than 22 years (Bowler 1977).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralSavannaGrassland/herbaceousOld field
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
North CarolinaS1Yes
LouisianaS1Yes
GeorgiaS3Yes
FloridaS3Yes
AlabamaS3Yes
South CarolinaS2Yes
MississippiS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.1 - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animalsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8.4 - Problematic species/diseases of unknown originPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (4)
Florida (4)
AreaForestAcres
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Farles PrairieOcala National Forest1,901
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
Long BayApalachicola National Forest5,726
References (88)
  1. Allen, E. R. 1961. How to hunt the eastern diamondback rattlesnake; for rattlesnake control programs. Ross Allen's Reptile Institute, Inc., Silver Springs, FL. 20 pp.
  2. Allen, E. R. 1968. Increase of rattlesnakes, <i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>, in Florida. Presentation to the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums. 1-6.
  3. Allen, E. R. and D. C. Drysdale. 1978. Don't kill snakes. Florida Naturalist October.
  4. Allen, E. R. as told to M. P. Merryday. 1940. A snake in the hand. Natural History 1940:234-9.
  5. Andrews, E. H. and C. B. Pollard. 1953. Report of snakebites in Florida and treatment: venoms and antivenoms. Journal of the Florida Medical Association 40(6):388-97.
  6. Antonio, F. 1997. Eastern diamondback rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>). North American Regional Studbook. Central Florida Zoological Park, Lake Monroe, Florida.
  7. Ashton, R. E., Jr., and P. S. Ashton. 1981. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida. Part One: The Snakes. Windward Publishing Company, Miami, Florida. 176 pp.
  8. Auffenberg, W. 1963. The fossil snakes of Florida. Tulane Studies in Zoology 10(3):131-216.
  9. Bartram, W. 1791. Travels through North and South Carolina, Georgia, east and west Florida. Philadelphia, PA.
  10. Bauder, J. M., D. J. Stevenson, C. S. Sutherland, and C. L. Jenkins. 2017. Occupancy of potential overwintering habitat on protected lands by two imperiled snake species in the Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States. Journal of Herpetology 51(1):73-88.
  11. Beauvois, P. 1799. Memoir on Amphibia. Serpents. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 4:362-381.
  12. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  13. Berish, J. E. 1992. Annual size/sex class distribution of harvested rattlesnakes. Final report submitted to Bureau of Wildlife Research, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL. 13 pp.
  14. Berish, J.E.D. 1998. Characterization of rattlesnake harvest in Florida. Journal of Herpetology 32:551-557.
  15. Brattstrom, B. H. 1964. Evolution of the pit vipers. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History 13(11):185-268.
  16. Brock, O. G. 1980. Predatory behavior of eastern diamondback rattlesnakes (<i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>): Field enclosure and Y-maze laboratory studies, emphasizing prey trailing behaviors. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL. Ph.D. Thesis.
  17. Campbell, J. A., and E. D. Brodie, Jr., editors. 1992. Biology of the pit vipers. Selva, Tyler, Texas.
  18. Campbell, J. A., and W. W. Lamar. 2004. The venomous reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. 2 volumes. Cornell University Press.
  19. Center for Biological Diversity. 2011. Petition to list the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Petition submitted to the Secretary of the Interior. 33 pp.
  20. Christman, S. P. 1975a. Patterns of geographic variation in Florida snakes. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Ph.D. Thesis.
  21. Christman, S. P. 1975b. The status of the extinct rattlesnake, <i>Crotalus giganteus</i>. Copeia 1975(1):43-7.
  22. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  23. Conant, R. 1975. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. Second Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xvii + 429 pp.
  24. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  25. Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
  26. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  27. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  28. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  29. Davis, M. A., M. R. Douglas, M. L. Collyer, and M. E. Douglas. 2016. Deconstructing a species-complex: geometric morphometric and molecular analyses define species in the Western Rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus viridis</i>). PloS one 11(1):e0146166.
  30. Dundee, H. A., and D. A. Rossman. 1989. The amphibians and reptiles of Louisiana. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
  31. Enge, K. M. 2005. Florida's commercial trade in rattlesnakes and possible conservation strategies. Pages 212–221 in W. E. Meshaka, Jr., and K. J. Babbitt, editors. Amphibians and Reptiles: Status and Conservation in Florida. Krieger, Malabar, Florida.
  32. Enge, K. M., J. D. Mays, R. Butryn, and E. P. Hill. 2016. Status Assessments of the southern hog-nosed snake, Florida pinesnake, short-tailed kingsnake, and eastern diamond-backed rattlesnake in Florida. Final report. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Wildlife Research Section, Gainesville, Florida. 93 pp.
  33. Ernst, C. H. 1992. Venomous reptiles of North America. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. ix + 236 pp.
  34. Ernst, C. H., and E. M. Ernst. 2003. Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C.
  35. Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1989b. Snakes of eastern North America. George Mason Univ. Press, Fairfax, Virginia. 282 pp.
  36. Fradkin, A. 1978. [Snakes in aboriginal diet.] Florida Anthropologist 31:36-43.
  37. Funderburg, J. B. 1968. Eastern diamondback rattlesnake feeding on carrion. Journal of Herpetology 2(3-4):161-2.
  38. Gloyd, H. 1940. The rattlesnakes. Chicago Academy Science, Special Publication No. 4.
  39. Gopher Tortoise Council. 1992. Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake: A species in decline. Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida. Unpaginated.
  40. Holman, J. A. 1959. A Pleistocene herpetofauna near Orange Lake, Florida. Herpetologica 15(3):121-5.
  41. Holman, J. A. 1978. The late Pleistocene herpetofauna of Devil's Den Sinkhole, Levy County, Florida. Herpetologica 34:228-237.
  42. Holman, J. A. 1981a. A review of North American Tertiary snakes. Publications of the Michigan State University Paleontology Series 1(6):261-306.
  43. Holman, J. A. 1981b. A review of North American Pleistocene snakes. Publications of the Michigan State University Paleontology Series 1(7):261-306.
  44. Holman, J. A. and C. J. Claussen. 1984. Fossil vertebrates associated with paleo-Indian artifact at Little Salt Springs, FL. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 4(1):146-54.
  45. Hunter, E. A., N. P. Nibbelink, C. R. Alexander, K. Barrett, L. F. Mengak, R. K. Guy, C. T. Moore, and R. J. Cooper. 2015. Coastal vertebrate exposure to predicted habitat changes due to sea level rise. Environmental management 56(6):1528-1537.
  46. Kauffeld, C. 1955. Morbidity of snakes in the wild. Herpetologica 11(3):236.
  47. Kauffeld, C. 1957. Snakes and snake hunting. Hanover House. Garden City, New York.
  48. Kauffeld, Carl. 1969. Snakes: the keeper and the kept. Hanover House, Garden City, NY.
  49. Klauber, L. M. 1972. Rattlesnakes: their habits, life histories, and influence on mankind. Second edition. Two volumes. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
  50. Knight, A., D. Styer, S. Pelikan, J. A. Campbell, L. D. Densmore III, and D. P. Mindell. 1993. Choosing among hypotheses of rattlesnake phylogeny: a best-fit rate test for DNA sequence data. Systematic Biology 42(3):356-367.
  51. Lorch, J. M., S. Knowles, J. S. Lankton, K. Michell, J. L. Edwards, J. M. Kapfer, R. A. Staffen, E. R. Wild, K. Z. Schmidt, A. E. Ballmann, D. Blodgett, T. M. Farrell, B. M. Glorioso, L. A. Last, S. J. Price, K. L. Schuler, C. E. Smith, J. F. X. Wellehan, and D. S. Blehert. 2016. Snake fungal disease: an emerging threat to wild snakes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1709):20150457.
  52. Martin, W. H., and D. B. Means. 2000. Distribution and habitat relationships of the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>). Herpetological Natural History 7:9-34.
  53. Martof, B. S., W. M. Palmer, J. R. Bailey, and J. R. Harrison, III. 1980. Amphibians and reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 264 pp.
  54. McCollough, N. C. and J. F. Gennaro. 1963. Evaluation of venomous snake bite in the Southern United States. Journal of The Florida Medical Association 49:959-67.
  55. McCranie, J. R. 1980. <i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 252.1-252.2.
  56. McCranie, J. R. 1988. Description of the hemipenis of <i>Sistrurus ravus </i>(Serpentes: Viperidae). Herpetologica 44:123-126.
  57. Means, D. B. 1976. Special concern: eastern diamondback rattlesnake. Pp. 48-9 in H. Boschung (ed.). Endangered and threatened plants and animals of Alabama. Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History (2):1-92.
  58. Means, D. B. 1982. Responses to winter flooding of the gopher tortoise (<i>Gopherus polyphemus</i> Daudin). Herpetologica 38:521-525.
  59. Means, D. B. 1983. The enigmatic pine barrens treefrog. Florida Wildlife 37:16-19.
  60. Means, D. B. 1985. Radio-tracking the eastern diamondback rattlesnake. National Geographic Research Reports 18:529-36.
  61. Means, D. B. 1994. Diamonds in the rough. North Florida Journal 2:1-28.
  62. Means, D. B. 2009. Effects of rattlesnake roundups on the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>). Herpetological Conservation and Biology 4(2):132-141.
  63. Means, D. B. 2017. Diamonds in the rough: Natural history of the Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake. Tall Timbers Press. 416 pp.
  64. Means, D. B. and H. W. Campbell. 1981. Effects of prescribed burning on amphibians and reptiles. Pp. 89-97 in G. W. Wood (ed.). Prescribed Fire and Wildlife in Southern Forests. Belle W. Baruch Forest Science Institute, Clemson University, Clemson.
  65. Metcalf, M. F., A. Marsh, W. Brosse, and J. E. Herman. 2019. <i>Crotalus adamanteus</i> (Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake). Endoparasite. Herpetological Review 50(2):389.
  66. Mount, R. H. 1975. The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama. vii + 347 pp.
  67. Murphy, J. B. and B. L. Armstrong. 1978. Maintenance of rattlesnakes in captivity. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Special Publications 3:1-40.
  68. Murphy, J. B. and J. A. Shadduck. 1978. Reproduction in the eastern diamondback rattlesnake, <i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>, in captivity, with comments regarding a teratoid birth anomaly. British Journal of Herpetology 5(10):727-33.
  69. Murphy, R. W., J. Fu, and A. Lathrop. 2002. Phylogeny of the rattlesnakes (<i>Crotalus </i>and <i>Sistrurus</i>) inferred from sequences of five mitochondrial DNA genes. Pages 69-92 in G. W. Schuett, M. Hoggren, M. E. Douglas, and H. W. Greene, editors. Biology of the Vipers. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain, Utah.
  70. Neill, W. T. 1958. The occurrence of amphibians and reptiles in saltwater areas, and a bibliography. Bulletin of Marine Science, Gulf and Caribbean 8(1):1-97.
  71. Neill, W. T. 1961. Giant rattlesnakes--past and present. Florida Wildlife June 1961:10-13.
  72. Palmer, W. M. 1977. <i>Crotalus adamanteus</i> Beauvois. Eastern diamondback rattlesnake. Pages 308-10 in J. E. Copper, S. S. Robinson, and J. B. Funderberg (eds.). Endangered and Threatened Plants and Animals of North Carolina. State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC. 444 pp.
  73. Palmer, W. M., and A. L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  74. Parkinson, C. L. 1999. Molecular systematics and biogeographical history of pitvipers as determined by mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Copeia 1999:576-586.
  75. Platt, W. J., and M. W. Schwartz. 1990. Temperate Hardwood Forests. pp. 194-229 in Ecosystems of Florida, R. L. Myers and J. J. Ewel, eds. Univ. of Central Florida Press, Orlando.
  76. Pyron, R. A., F. T. Burbrink, and J. J. Wiens. 2013. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 29:131.
  77. Speake, D. W. and R. H. Mount. 1973. Some possible effects of "rattlesnake roundups" in the southeastern coastal plain. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the S. E. Association Game and Fish Commission 27:267-77.
  78. Stille, B. 1987. Dorsal scale microdermatoglyphics and rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus </i>and <i>Sistrurus</i>) phylogeny (Reptilia: Viperidae: Crotalinae). Herpetologica:98-104.
  79. Stohlgren, K. M., S. F. Spear, and D. J. Stevenson. 2015. A status assessment and distribution model for the Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>) in Georgia. The Orianne Society. 26 pp.
  80. Tennant, A. 1997. A field guide to snakes of Florida. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. xiii + 257 pp.
  81. Timmerman, W. W. 1989. Home range, habitat use and behavior of the eastern diamondback rattlesnake. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. M.S. Thesis.
  82. Timmerman, W. W., and W. H. Martin. 2003. Conservation guide to the eastern diamondback rattlesnake <i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetological Circular No. 32. 55 pp.
  83. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2012. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List the Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake as Threatened. Federal Register 77(91):27403-27411.
  84. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. National Listing Workplan. Online. Available: https://www.fws.gov/project/national-listing-workplan
  85. Wagner, R. T. 1962. Notes on the combat dance in <i>Crotalus adamanteus</i>. Bulletin of the Philadelphia Herpetological Society 10(1):7-8.
  86. Waldron, J. L., S. H. Bennett, S. M. Welch, M. E. Dorcas, J. D. Lanham, and W. Kalinowsky. 2006. Habitat specificity and home-range size as attributes of species vulnerability to extinction: a case study using sympatric rattlesnakes. Animal conservation 9(4):414-420.
  87. Ware, S., C. Frost and P. D. Doerr. 1993. Southern mixed hardwood forest: the former longleaf pine forest. Pages 447-93 in W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht (editors). Biodiversity of the southeastern United States, lowland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  88. Wright, A. H. and A. A. Wright. 1957. Handbook of snakes of the United States and Canada. 2 Volumes. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York. 1105 pp.