Drymarchon couperi

(Holbrook, 1842)

Eastern Indigo Snake

G2Imperiled (G2G3) Found in 9 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102208
Element CodeARADB11020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyColubridae
GenusDrymarchon
Synonyms
Drymarchon corais couperi(Holbrook, 1842)Drymarchon kolpobasileusKrysko, Granatosky, Nuñez, and Smith, 2016
Other Common Names
eastern indigo snake (EN)
Concept Reference
Folt, B., J. Bauder, S. Spear, D. Stevenson, M. Hoffman, J. R. Oaks, P. L. Wood, Jr., C. Jenkins, D. A. Steen, and C. Guyer. 2019. Taxonomic and conservation implications of population genetic admixture, mito-nuclear discordance, and malebiased dispersal of a large endangered snake, Drymarchon couperi. PLoS ONE 14(3): e0214439
Taxonomic Comments
Wüster et al. (2001) using morphological evidence, demonstrated that D. couperi is a distinct species (Crother 2017). Krysko et al. (2016a) supported recognition of D. couperi as distinct from D. melanurus and suggested that D. couperi is split into 2 distinct genetic lineages (termed "Atlantic" and "Gulf," but see Fig. 2 for map) that correspond to historical biogeography and sea level changes in peninsular Florida. Subsequently, Krysko et al. (2016b) erected a new species, D. kolpobasileus, to represent the Atlantic lineage. However, re-evaluation by Folt et al. (2019) from a broader genetic perspective cast doubt on the 2-species hypothesis, and D. kolpobasileus was synonymized into D. couperi. D. kolpobasileus is currently recognized by SSAR.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-06-09
Change Date2025-06-09
Edition Date2025-06-09
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
This species is restricted to the Coastal Plain of the southeastern U.S. An estimated 95% of longleaf pine forest, the primary habitat used by this species, was destroyed due to logging, agriculture, and development. Development continues to be a threat. Habitat degradation continues in the forms of long-term fire exclusion, the loss of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) from the landscape, which provide crucial refuge sites in xeric habitats, and fragmentation by roads. The population declined by over 50% from historical levels and was extirpated from the entire western extent of the historical range. The population is presumably continuing to decline due to threats.
Range Extent Comments
The current range includes southeastern Georgia, throughout Florida, and one reintroduced population in southern Alabama (Diemer and Speake 1983, Krysko et al. 2019, Chandler et al. 2023). In Florida, it is primarily found in the peninsula and is likely extirpated from the Panhandle except at Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve where it has been reintroduced (Krysko et al. 2019, Chandler et al. 2023). In Alabama, it is being reintroduced in Conecuh National Forest in the south-central part of the state (Chandler et al. 2023). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records from 2005-2025, range extent is estimated to be 283,532 km² (RARECAT 2025).

The historical range extended throughout the lower Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States, from southern South Carolina through Georgia and Florida to the Florida Keys, and west to southern Alabama and perhaps southeastern Mississippi (Diemer and Speake 1983). The species is apparently very rare or extirpated in Alabama, western Florida, Mississippi, and South Carolina.
Occurrences Comments
USFWS (2019) determined there were 51 extant natural populations and two extant reintroduced populations.
Threat Impact Comments
Historical declines are primarily due to habitat loss of mature longleaf pine habitat due to conversion to slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and sand pine (P. clausa) plantations for lumber and paper industries, citrus groves and other agriculture, and mining (Moler 1992, Krysko et al. 2019). An estimated 95% of historical longleaf pine habitat was lost in the 1800s and 1900s (Ware et al. 1993). Habitat loss continues and relatively few sites have been adequately restored. By virtue of the loss of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) from the landscape, which provide important refuges, habitat suitability continues to decline (Moler 1992, Bolt et al. 2023, USFWS 2024). Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) allowed tens of thousands of tortoise burrows to be entombed prior to 2008, and continues to allow the destruction of habitat and tortoise burrows for development (FWC 2024). FWC provides permits for the relocation of over 10,000 tortoises annually, a quantity greater than the capacity of authorized recipient sites (Miller 2021, Turner 2021, FWC 2024). The removal of stumps and fallen trees also eliminates another source of refuge sites for this snake (Moler 1992, Bolt et al. 2023). Habitat fragmentation from roads is a continuing threat with ongoing impacts. Long-term fire exclusion from fire-adapted habitats is also an ongoing threat reducing habitat quality (FNAI 2010). Multiple diseases impact this species and may be impacting overall health of individuals with unknown consequences at the population level (Bogan, Jr. et al. 2024).

Gassing of gopher tortoise burrows, which also incidentally killed this species, is considered a past threat after it was made illegal in Florida in 1978 (USFWS 1998, FWC 2024). Similarly, commercial collection for the pet trade is now illegal and has drastically declined (USFWS 1998).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

The longest of North American snakes; heavy-bodied and shiny blue-black overall; chin, throat, and sides of head variably suffused with cream, orange, or red; scales unkeeled (males may have partial keel on scales of the middorsal 3-5 scale rows); anal undivided; 17 scale rows at mid-body; 1 preocular; third from last upper labial distinctly narrowed at the top; adult total length usually 152-213 cm (to 263 cm), about 43-61 cm at hatching (Conant and Collins, Smith and Brodie 1982).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from Drymarchon corais erebennus as follows: lacks prominent black lines extending downward from the eye; body does not tend to be brownish anteriorly; two labials meet above the third from last one; and there are usually 15 dorsal scale rows at the rear end of the body (rather than 14) (Conant and Collins 1991).

Habitat

Habitat includes sandhill regions dominated by mature longleaf pines, turkey oaks, and wiregrass; flatwoods; most types of hammocks; coastal scrub; dry glades; palmetto flats; prairie; brushy riparian and canal corridors; and wet fields (Matthews and Moseley 1990, Tennant 1997, Ernst and Ernst 2003). Occupied sites are often near wetlands and frequently are in association with gopher tortoise burrows. Pineland habitat is maintained by periodic fires. Viable populations of this species require relatively large tracts of suitable habitat. Refuges include tortoise burrows, stump holes, land crab burrows, armadillo burrows, or similar sites. Eggs may be laid in gopher (Geomys) burrows (Ashton and Ashton 1981). See USFWS (1998) for further information.

Ecology

Ranges widely in warmer months, with home range 50-100 ha or more (up to 224 ha in males, USFWS 1998); in winter, usually stays fairly close to a deep shelter, with home range usually less than 10 ha (Moler 1992).

Reproduction

Copulation occurs primarily in fall and winter. Eggs are laid in May-June (also reportedly as early as April). Clutch size usually is 5-10. Hatchlings appear from late July through October. Females can lay fertile eggs after several years of isolation (Behler and King 1979, Moler 1992).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparral
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
GeorgiaS2Yes
AlabamaS1Yes
FloridaS2Yes
MississippiSXYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsRestricted - smallExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.1 - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animalsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.1.1 - Intentional use (species being assessed is the target)Pervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineInsignificant/negligible or past
5.1.2 - Unintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target)Large (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingSmall (1-10%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
5.3.4 - Unintentional effects: large scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest]Small (1-10%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.2 - Suppression in fire frequency/intensityPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive - largeUnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (9)
Florida (9)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Farles PrairieOcala National Forest1,901
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
Impassable BayOsceola National Forest2,789
Long BayApalachicola National Forest5,726
Natural Area WsaOsceola National Forest2,543
PinhookOsceola National Forest15,405
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
References (48)
  1. Ashton, R. E., Jr., and P. S. Ashton. 1981. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida. Part One: The Snakes. Windward Publishing Company, Miami, Florida. 176 pp.
  2. Ballard, S. R. 1992. Geographic distribution: <i>Drymarchon corais couperi</i>. Herpetological Review 23:26-27.
  3. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  4. Bogan, J. E., Jr., R. J. Ossiboff, A. L. Childress, J. F. X. Wellehan, and A. K. Mason. 2024. Evaluating the effects of viruses on eastern indigo snakes (<i>Drymarchon couperi</i>) with gastric cryptosporidiosis. Viruses 16(9): 1496. doi: 10.3390/v16091496
  5. Bolt, M. R., J. M. Bauder, M. L. Legare, C. L. Jenkins, B. B. Rothemel, and D. R. Breininger. 2023. Easter indigo snake (<i>Drymarchon couperi</i>) shelter site use in peninsular Florida, USA, and implications for habitat conservation. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 18(2): 362–373.
  6. Carr, A., and C. J. Goin. 1955. Guide to the reptiles, amphibians and fresh-water fishes of Florida. Univ. Florida Press, Gainesville.
  7. Chandler, H. C., D. Steen, J. Blue, J. E. Bogan, M. R. Bolt, T. Brady, D. R. Beininger, J. Buening, M. Elliott, J. Godiwn, C. Guyer, R. L. Hill, et al. 2023. Evaluating growth rates of captive, wild, and reintroduced populations of the imperiled eastern indigo snake (<i>Drymarchon couperi</i>). Herpetologica 79(4): 220–230.
  8. Chandler, H. C., M. C. Allender, B. S. Stegenga, E. Haynes, E. Ospina, and D. J. Stevenson. 2019. Ophidiomycosis prevalence in Georgia’s eastern indigo snake (<i>Drymarchon couperi</i>) populations. PLoS ONE 14(6): e0218351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218351
  9. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  10. Collins, J. T. 1991. Viewpoint: a new taxonomic arrangement for some North American amphibians and reptiles. SSAR Herpetol. Review 22:42-43.
  11. Collins, J. T., and T. W. Taggart. 2002. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians, turtles, reptiles, & crocodilians. Fifth edition. Publication of The Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrence, Kansas. iv + 44 pp.
  12. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  13. Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
  14. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  15. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  16. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  17. Crother, B. I., J. Boundy, J. A. Campbell, K. de Queiroz, D. R. Frost, R. Highton, J. B. Iverson, P. A. Meylan, T. W. Reeder, M. E. Seidel, J. W. Sites, Jr., T. W. Taggart, S. G. Tilley, and D. B. Wake. 2000 [2001]. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetological Circular No. 29. 82 pp.
  18. Diemer, J. E., and D. W. Speake. 1983. The distribution of the eastern indigo snake, <i>Drymarchon corais couperi</i>, in Georgia. J. Herpetology 17:256-264.
  19. Ernst, C. H., and E. M. Ernst. 2003. Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C.
  20. Fitch, H. S. 1970. Reproductive cycles of lizards and snakes. Univ. Kansas Museum Natural History Miscellaneous Publication 52:1-247.
  21. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2024. Gopher tortoise management plan. Tallahassee, Florida. 60 p.
  22. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2010. Guide to the natural communities of Florida: 2010 edition. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, FL.
  23. Folt, B., J. Bauder, S. Spear, D. Stevenson, M. Hoffman, J. R. Oaks, P. L. Wood, Jr., C. Jenkins, D. A. Steen, and C. Guyer. 2019. Taxonomic and conservation implications of population genetic admixture, mito-nuclear discordance, and malebiased dispersal of a large endangered snake, <i>Drymarchon couperi</i>. PLoS ONE 14(3): e0214439
  24. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  25. Krysko, K. L., K. M. Enge, and P. E. Moler. 2019. Amphibians and Reptiles of Florida. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida, USA, 706 pp.
  26. Krysko, K. L., L. P. Nuñez, C. A. Lippi, D. J. Smith, and M. C. Granatosky. 2016a. Pliocene–Pleistocene lineage diversifications in the Eastern Indigo Snake (<i>Drymarchon couperi</i>) in the southeastern United States. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 98:111-122.
  27. Krysko, K.L., M.C. Granatosky, L.P. Nunez, and D.J. Smith. 2016b. A cryptic new species of Indigo Snake (genus <i>Drymarchon</i>) from the Florida Platform of the United States. Zootaza 4138(3):549-569.
  28. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  29. McCranie, James R. 1980. <i>Drymarchon, D. corias</i>. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. (267):1-4.
  30. Metcalf, M. F., C. W. Gunnels IV, E. M. Everham III, S. B. Girimurugan, P. Andreadis, and J. E. Herman. 2021. Movement of the eastern indigo snake (<i>Drymarchon couperi</i>) in southern Florida, USA. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 16(2): 425–435.
  31. Miller, K. 2021. 'Recipient sites' in Florida charging up to $6,000 for relocating gopher tortoises... is that sustainable? The Palm Beach Post. 29 September 2021. https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/weather/2021/09/29/florida-asks-help-finding-homes-threatened-gopher-tortoise/5840929001/ [Accessed 9 June 2025].
  32. Moler, P. E. 1985. Distribution of the eastern indigo snake, <i>Drymarchon corais couperi</i>, in Florida. SSAR Herpetol. Rev. 16(2):37-38.
  33. Moler, P. E. 1992. Eastern indigo snake <i>Drymarchon corais couperi</i> (Holbrook). Pages 181-186 in P. E. Moler, editor. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. III. Amphibians and reptiles. Univ. Press of Florida.
  34. Piccolomini, S. E. 2020. Evaluation of movement patterns and space use in reintroduced eastern indigo snakes (<i>Drymarchon couperi</i>) in the Florida Panhandle. M. S. thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, AL. 49 pp.
  35. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  36. Santamaria, C. A., E. Galbraith, A. M. Gainsbury. 2024. Development of an assay for the detection of the federally threatened Florida eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) using soil eDNA. Conservation Science and Practice 6 :e13237. doi: 10.1111/csp2.13237
  37. Smith, H. M. 1941. A review of the subspecies of the indigo snake (<i>Drymarchon corais</i>). Journal of the Washington Academy of Science 31:466-481.
  38. Stevenson, D. J., K. J. Dyer, and B. A. Willis-Stevenson. 2003. Survey and monitoring of the eastern indigo snake in Georgia. Southeastern Naturalist 2:393-408.
  39. Tennant, A. 1997. A field guide to snakes of Florida. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. xiii + 257 pp.
  40. Turner, J. 2021. Florida wildlife officials support expanding how far gopher tortoises can be relocated. Herald-Tribune, Sarasota, Florida. https://www.heraldtribune.com/story/news/environment/2021/12/16/florida-officials-support-gopher-tortoise-change-favors-developers/8923938002/ [Accessed 9 June 2025].
  41. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  42. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Multi-species recovery plan for the threatened and endangered species of South Florida. Technical/Agency draft, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia.
  43. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. Recovery Plan for the Eastern Indigo Snake, First Revision. Atlanta, Georgia. 11 pp.
  44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Technical Amendments for Southeastern Mussels, Snails, and a Reptile. Federal Register 87(33):8960-8967.
  45. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Initiation of 5-Year Status Reviews for 67 Southeastern Species. Notice of initiation of reviews; <br/>request for information. Federal Register 88(91): 30324-30328.
  46. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2024. Eastern indigo snake (<i>Drymarchon couperi</i>) 5-year status review: summary and evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Georgia Ecological Services Field Office, Atlanta GA. 22 pp.
  47. Ware, S., C. Frost and P. D. Doerr. 1993. Southern mixed hardwood forest: the former longleaf pine forest. Pages 447-93 in W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht (editors). Biodiversity of the southeastern United States, lowland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  48. Wuster, W., J. L. Yrausquin, and A. Mijares-Urrutia. 2001 [2002]. A new species of indigo snake from north-western Venezuela (Serpentes: Colubridae: <i>Drymarchon</i>). Herpetological Journal 11:157-165.