Lampropeltis extenuata

(Brown, 1890)

Short-tailed Kingsnake

G2Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Lampropeltis extenuata. Photo by Samuel Henderson, via iNaturalist.
Samuel Henderson, CC BY 4.0
Short-tailed snake (Stilosoma extenuatum). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.106507
Element CodeARADB33010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyColubridae
GenusLampropeltis
Synonyms
Stilosoma extenuatumBrown, 1890
Other Common Names
short-tailed kingsnake (EN) Short-tailed Snake (EN)
Concept Reference
Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Dowling and Maxson (1990), using immunological distance data, found Stilosoma to fall within Lampropeltis. Keogh (1996), however, found Stilosoma to be part of the probable sister group to Lampropeltis. Rodriguez-Robles and de Jesus Escobar (1999) and Bryson et al. (2007) corroborated Dowling and Maxson using mtDNA evidence, and demonstrated that recognition of Stilosoma as a genus renders Lampropeltis paraphyletic. This was confirmed and ameliorated in Pyron and Burbrink (2009) and confirmed in Ruane et al. (2014).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-06-17
Change Date2025-06-17
Edition Date2025-06-17
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025), Jackson, D. R. (2014); Jackson, D. R., and G. Hammerson (2006)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 80
Rank Reasons
This species is endemic to northern and central Florida. Range extent, area of occupancy, and abundance have suffered substantial declines. The species continues to be threatened by habitat loss from development and agriculture, and habitat degradation from conversion to pine plantations and incompatible land management practices, including expansion of roads within occupied habitat. Invasive fire ants and a lung parasite represent potential threats with unknown impacts.
Range Extent Comments
This species is endemic to Florida, principally northern and central portions of the peninsula, where it is historically known from southern Suwannee and Columbia counties south to Highlands County (Franz et. al. 1992, Enge et al. 2016, Krysko et al. 2019). However, since 2000, this species has only been documented from Gilchrist County south to Polk County (Enge et al. 2016, FNAI 2025, GBIF 2025). Only a single record exists from west of the Suwannee River (Krysko et al. 2019). The current range extent of occurrences known to be extant is 22,749 km² (RARECAT 2025). Historical range extent is estimated to be 33,243 km² (FNAI 2025, GBIF 2025, RARECAT 2025).
Occurrences Comments
Approximately 20-25 occurrences are extant (Enge et al. 2016, FNAI 2025, GBIF 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
This species has declined from habitat loss due to development, and conversion to agriculture, pasture, and pine plantations (Campbell and Moler 1992, USFWS 2023). Incompatible land management practices that disturbed the soil are likely a threat in managed areas (USFWS 2023). Populations can survive in some residential areas, however (Campbell and Moler 1992, Enge et al. 2016). Mining has caused additional habitat losses (Campbell and Moler 1992, USFWS 2023). Road mortality (Krysko et al. 2019) has unknown impacts, and highways fragment remaining habitat (Enge et al. 2016). Red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) are likely causing localized declines where present (Enge et al. 2016), and may reduce prey base (particularly crowned snakes of the genus Tantilla) as well (Krysko et al. 2019). A non-native snake parasite represents a potential serious threat and has been documented within the range (Palmisano et al. 2025).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A slender cylindrical snake with numerous dark blotches and a tail that constitutes not more than 10% of the total length; dorsum has areas of red, orange, or yellow between the blotches; belly heavily blotched; dorsal scales unkeeled, in 19 rows; anal single; adult total length usually 36-51 cm (to 65 cm) (Conant and Collins 1992).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from other Florida snakes by the following characteristics: cylindrical body form, blotched pattern with colored interspaces, and tail not more than 10% of total length (Campbell and Moler 1992).

Habitat

Habitat is dry sandy uplands, especially longleaf pine-turkey oak (sandhill) and sometimes adjacent xeric oak hammocks and rosemary-sand pine scrub. This snake also has been found in sphagnum bog adjacent to typical habitat (Ashton and Ashton 1981, Carr and Goin 1955, Campbell and Moler 1992, Ernst and Ernst 2003). Campbell and Christman (1982) reported that this species is more abundant in early successional stages in pine scrub than in advanced stages with a full pine canopy, dense evergreen shrub layer, and matted ground cover. This is a fossorial snake, sometimes found under objects or in leaf litter in fall.

Reproduction

Lays eggs.
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralSand/dune
Palustrine Habitats
Bog/fen
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
FloridaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningNegligible (<1%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingNegligible (<1%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive - largeSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.2 - Suppression in fire frequency/intensityPervasive - largeSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.3 - Other ecosystem modificationsSmall (1-10%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Florida (1)
AreaForestAcres
Farles PrairieOcala National Forest1,901
References (36)
  1. Ashton, R. E., Jr., and P. S. Ashton. 1981. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida. Part One: The Snakes. Windward Publishing Company, Miami, Florida. 176 pp.
  2. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  3. Brennan, M. N., M. Saenz, and L. D. McBrayer. 2025. Effects of land management on non-target reptiles in the sand pine scrub. Forest Ecology and Management 593: 122884. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122884
  4. Bryson Jr, R. W., J. Pastorini, F. T. Burbrink, and M. RJ Forstner. 2007. A phylogeny of the <i>Lampropeltis mexicana</i> complex (Serpentes: Colubridae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences suggests evidence for species-level polyphyly within Lampropeltis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43(2):674-684.
  5. Campbell, H. W., and P. E. Moler. 1992. Short-tailed snake S<i>tilosoma extenuatum</i> Brown. Pages 150-153 in P. E. Moler, editor. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. III. Amphibians and reptiles. Univ. Press of Florida.
  6. Campbell, H. W., and S. P. Christman. 1982a. The herpetological components of Florida sandhill and sand pine scrub associations. Pages 163-171 in N. J. Scott (editor). Herpetological communities. U.S. Fish &amp; Wildlife Service, Wildlife Res. Rep. 13.
  7. Carr, A., and C. J. Goin. 1955. Guide to the reptiles, amphibians and fresh-water fishes of Florida. Univ. Florida Press, Gainesville.
  8. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  9. Conant, R. 1975. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. Second Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xvii + 429 pp.
  10. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  11. Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
  12. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  13. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  14. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  15. Dowling, H. G., and Linda R. Maxson. 1990. Genetic and taxonomic relations of the short-tailed snakes, genus <i>Stilosoma. </i>Journal of Zoology 221(1):77-85.
  16. Enge, K. M., J. D. Mays, R. Butryn, and E. P. Hill. 2016. Status Assessments of the southern hog-nosed snake, Florida pinesnake, short-tailed kingsnake, and eastern diamond-backed rattlesnake in Florida. Final report. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Wildlife Research Section, Gainesville, Florida. 93 pp.
  17. Ernst, C. H., and E. M. Ernst. 2003. Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C.
  18. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2010. Guide to the natural communities of Florida: 2010 edition. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, FL.
  19. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2025. Biotics database. Tallahassee, FL.
  20. Franz, R., C. K. Dodd, Jr., and A. M. Bard. 1992. The non-marine herpetofauna of Egmont Key, Hillsborough County, Florida. Florida Scientist 55(3): 179-183.
  21. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  22. Highton, R. 1976. Stilosoma, S. extenuatum. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 183.1-183.2.
  23. Keogh, J. S. 1996. Evolution of the colubrid snake tribe Lampropeltini: a morphological perspective. Herpetologica 52(3):406-416.
  24. Krysko, K. L., K. M. Enge, and P. E. Moler. 2011. Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Florida. Final report to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. Submitted 15 December 2011.
  25. Krysko, K. L., K. M. Enge, and P. E. Moler. 2019. Amphibians and Reptiles of Florida. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida, USA, 706 pp.
  26. Moler, P. E., editor. 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Volume III. Amphibians and reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. xviii + 291 pp.
  27. Palmisano, J. N., M. Brenna, A. M. Durso, J. H. Kesselring, T. Morgan, Z. Lepera, B. S. Stegenga, E. E. Luckenbaugh, S. Tsoukias, S. L. McKnight, K. Titterington, L. Milligan, H. D. S. Walden, R. J. Ossibof, A. E. Savage, and T. M. Farrell. 2025. Rapid spread of the invasive pentastome <i>Raillietiella orientalis</i> (Hett, 1915) in 14 new Florida counties and in pet trade snakes. BioInvasions Records 14(1): 261 269. doi: 10.3391/bir.2025.14.1.20
  28. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  29. Pyron, R. A., and F. T. Burbrink. 2009. Neogene diversification and taxonomic stability in the snake tribe Lampropeltini (Serpentes: Colubridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52:524-529.
  30. Rodriguez-Robles, J. A. and J. M. de Jesus Escobar. 1999. Molecular systematics of New World lampropeltinine snakes (Colubridae): implications for biogeography and evolution of food habits. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68(3):355-385.
  31. Ruane, S., Bryson, R.W. Jr., Pyron, R.A., and F.T. Burbrink. 2014. Coalescent Species delimitation in Milksnakes (genus <i>Lampropeltis</i>) and impacts on phylogenetic comparative analyses. Systematic Biology 63(2):231-250.
  32. Tennant, A. 1997. A field guide to snakes of Florida. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. xiii + 257 pp.
  33. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 90-day findings on 25 petitions, notice of petition findings and initiation of status reviews. Federal Register 80(181):56423-56432.
  34. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status with Section 4(d) Rule for Short-Tailed Snake. Proposed rule. Federal Register 88(190):68070-68093.
  35. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. National Listing Workplan. Online. Available: https://www.fws.gov/project/national-listing-workplan
  36. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Candidate notice of review (CNOR). Federal Register 90(209):48912-48937.