Plestiodon fasciatus

(Linnaeus, 1758)

Common Five-lined Skink

G5Secure Found in 46 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104988
Element CodeARACH01050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyScincidae
GenusPlestiodon
COSEWICE,SC
Synonyms
Eumeces fasciatus(Linnaeus, 1758)
Other Common Names
five-lined skink (EN) Northern Five-lined Skink (EN) Scinque pentaligne (FR)
Concept Reference
Brandley, M. C., H. Ota, T. Hikida, A.Nieto, M. De Oca, M. Feria-Ortiz, X. Guo, and Y. Wang. 2012. The phylogenetic systematics of blue-tailed skinks (Plestiodon) and the family Scincidae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165(1):163-189.
Taxonomic Comments
Formerly in the genus Eumeces. Smith (2005) and Brandley et al. (2005) formally proposed that all North American species (north of Mexico) be placed in the genus Plestiodon. Howes et al. (2006) and Richmond (2006) presented mt and nDNA evidence of substantial phylogeographic structure within P. fasciatus. Although neither set of authors drew any taxonomic conclusions from their results, those results suggest the possibility of one or more cryptic species; in particular, samples from the eastern Carolinas are highly divergent in both mtDNA and microsatellites from nearby populations (Crother 2017).

In a phylogenetic analysis of Eumeces based on morphology, Griffith et al. (2000) proposed splitting Eumeces into multiple genera, based on the apparent paraphyly of Eumeces. See Murphy et al. (1983) for information on the relationship of E. fasciatus to E. inexpectatus and E. laticeps.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-02-02
Change Date1996-10-28
Edition Date2005-08-26
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000 to >2,500,000 square km (about 80,000 to >1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Range Extent Comments
The geographic range extends from western New England and southern Ontario to Minnesota, and south through eastern Kansas and eastern Oklahoma to eastern Texas, the Gulf Coast, and northern peninsular Florida (Conant and Collins 1991).
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by very many occurrences or subpopulations. For example, Trauth et al. (2004) mapped hundreds of collection sites in Arkansas alone.
Threat Impact Comments
No major threats have been identified.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

The scales on the back are smooth and shiny. The middle of the underside of the tail has a row of enlarged scales. Coloration varies with age. Adult males are almost uniformly brown or olive and may have "faded" light stripes; the tail is gray and the jaws are orange-red during the breeding season. Adult females have a gray tail, and the back has five white or yellowish stripes on a dark background. Hatchlings are black with five white or yellowish stripes on the back and sides; the tail is bright blue. Maximum snout-vent length is about 3.4 inches (8.6 cm).

Habitat

Habitats include wooded areas of many kinds, especially those that are humid, well-drained, supply abundant cover (rocks, logs, stumps, leaf litter), and have a patchy canopy; also seasonally flooded lowlands in some areas (Bartlett and Bartlett 1999). Most activity occurs on the ground, but these lizards also climb trees and are distinctly arboreal in Texas. Generally secretive, five-lined skinks spend much time under cover

Eggs are laid in or under rotting logs, stumps, or humus, or under rocks (Fitch 1954, Vogt 1981). In Ontario, preferred nest sites were large, moderately decayed logs with high substrate moisture (Hecnar 1994). Oviposition sites may be outside the non-nesting home range (Seburn 1993).

Ecology

In Kansas, home range diameter approximately 27 m in males, 9 m in females; may shift home range after hibernation (Fitch 1954). Aggregations may occur during the breeding season.

As is true of other skinks, the tail of this species is readily detached if the skink is attacked. A detached tail initially wiggles vigorously and may attact the attention of a would-be predator as the lizard escapes. Later, if the tail was not eaten by the predator, the skink may return to the site, find its detached tail using chemical cues, and eat it.

Reproduction

Courtship and mating occur in spring. Clutches of 4-14 eggs are laid mostly in May-June. The female attends the eggs during incubation. Eggs hatch in 4-7 weeks (mid-July to mid-August in South Carolina). Individuals become sexually mature in their second year (Vitt and Cooper 1986, Fitch 1954). Multiple and communal nests are common in some areas (Hecnar 1994).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodWoodland - Hardwood
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN3
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS3Yes
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MinnesotaS3Yes
ArkansasS5Yes
MarylandS5Yes
MassachusettsSXYes
West VirginiaS5Yes
South CarolinaS5Yes
IowaS4Yes
MichiganS3Yes
LouisianaS5Yes
OhioSNRYes
ConnecticutS2Yes
VermontS1Yes
TennesseeS5Yes
VirginiaS5Yes
North CarolinaS5Yes
District of ColumbiaS4Yes
New JerseySUYes
NebraskaS1Yes
WisconsinS3Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
KentuckyS5Yes
DelawareS5Yes
IllinoisS5Yes
PennsylvaniaS4Yes
MissouriS5Yes
IndianaS4Yes
New YorkS3Yes
FloridaS4Yes
AlabamaS5Yes
KansasS5Yes
MississippiS5Yes
South DakotaSUYes
GeorgiaS5Yes
TexasS5Yes
Roadless Areas (46)
Alabama (1)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
Arkansas (4)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Brush HeapOuachita National Forest4,205
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
Illinois (1)
AreaForestAcres
Burke BranchShawnee National Forest6,231
Kentucky (1)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
Louisiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
North Carolina (15)
AreaForestAcres
Balsam ConePisgah National Forest10,591
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Cheoah BaldNantahala National Forest7,795
Craggy MountainPisgah National Forest2,657
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Linville Gorge AdditionPisgah National Forest2,809
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
Mackey MountainPisgah National Forest5,934
Overflow CreekNantahala National Forest3,379
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
Wesser BaldNantahala National Forest4,061
Wilson CreekPisgah National Forest4,863
South Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big MountainSumter National Forest2,337
Tennessee (3)
AreaForestAcres
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Slide HollowCherokee National Forest4,057
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Little Lake CreekNational Forests in Texas596
Virginia (17)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
Dolly AnnGeorge Washington National Forest7,855
Hoop HoleJefferson National Forest4,652
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Little Walker MountainJefferson National Forest9,818
Mountain Lake Addition AJefferson National Forest1,469
North Fork PoundJefferson National Forest4,757
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Price MountainJefferson National Forest9,119
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
West Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Middle MountainMonongahela National Forest19,020
References (32)
  1. Barbour, R. W. 1971. Amphibians and reptiles of Kentucky. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 334 pp.
  2. Bartlett, R. D., and P. P. Bartlett. 1999a. A field guide to Texas reptiles & amphibians. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. xviii + 331 pp.
  3. Bartlett, R. D., and P. P. Bartlett. 1999b. A field guide to Florida reptiles and amphibians. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. xvi + 278 pp.
  4. Brandley, M. C., A. Schmitz, and T. W. Reeder. 2005. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Systematic Biology 54:373-390.
  5. Brandley, M. C., H. Ota, T. Hikida, A.Nieto, M. De Oca, M. Feria-Ortiz, X. Guo, and Y. Wang. 2012. The phylogenetic systematics of blue-tailed skinks (<i>Plestiodon</i>) and the family Scincidae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165(1):163-189.
  6. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  7. Collins, J. T., and T. W. Taggart. 2009. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians, turtles, reptiles, and crocodilians. Sixth edition. The Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrance, Kansas. iv + 44 pp.
  8. Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
  9. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  10. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  11. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  12. DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983a. Amphibians and reptiles of New England. Habitats and natural history. Univ. Massachusetts Press. vii + 83 pp.
  13. Dixon, J. R. 2000. Amphibians and reptiles of Texas. Second edition. Texas A & M University Press, College Station. 421 pp.
  14. Dundee, H. A., and D. A. Rossman. 1989. The amphibians and reptiles of Louisiana. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
  15. Fitch, H. S. 1954. Life history and ecology of the five- lined skink, Eumeces fasciatus. Univ. Kansas Pub. Mus. Nat.Hist. 8:1-156.
  16. Griffith, H., A. Ngo, and R. W. Murphy. 2000. A cladistic evaluation of the cosmopolitan genus <i>Eumeces</i> Wiegmann (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincidae). Russian Journal of Herpetology 7(1):1-16.
  17. Harding, J. H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xvi + 378 pp.
  18. Hecnar, S. J. 1994. Nest distribution, site selection, and brooding in the five-lined skink (<i>Eumeces fasciatus</i>). Can. J. Zool. 72:1510-1516.
  19. Howes, B. J., B. Lindsay, and S. C. Lougheed. 2006. Range-wide phylogeography of a temperate lizard, the five-lined skink (<i>Eumeces fasciatus</i>). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40(1):183-194.
  20. Hulse, A. C., C. J. McCoy, and E. Censky. 2001. Amphibians and reptiles of Pennsylvania and the Northeast. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 419 pp.
  21. Johnson, T. R. 2000. The amphibians and reptiles of Missouri. Second edition. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City. 400 pp.
  22. Klemens, M. W. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Bulletin 112. xii + 318 pp.
  23. Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
  24. Murphy, R. W., W. E. Cooper, Jr., and W. S. Richardson. 1983. Phylogenetic relationships of the North American five-lined skinks, genus <i>Eumeces </i>(Sauria: Scincidae). Herpetologica 39:200-211.
  25. Oldfield, B., and J. J. Moriarty. 1994. Amphibians & reptiles native to Minnesota. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. xv + 237 pp.
  26. Palmer, W. M., and A. L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  27. Richmond, J. Q. 2006. Evolutionary basis of parallelism in North American scincid lizards. Evolution &amp; Development 8(6):477-490.
  28. Seburn, C. N. L. 1993. Spatial distribution and microhabitat use in the five-lined skink (<i>Eumeces fasciatus</i>). Can. J. Zool. 71:445-450.
  29. Smith, H. M. 2005. <i>Plestiodon</i>: a replacement name for most members of the genus <i>Eumeces</i> in North America. Journal of Kansas Herpetology 14:15-16.
  30. Trauth, S. E., H. W. Robison, and M. V. Plummer. 2004. The amphibians and reptiles of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press.
  31. Vitt, L. J., and W. E. Cooper, Jr. 1986. Skink reproduction and sexual dimorphism: <i>Eumeces fasciatus</i> in thesoutheastern United States, with notes on <i>Eumeces inexpectatus</i>. J. Herpetol. 20:65-76.
  32. Vogt, R. C. 1981c. Natural history of amphibians and reptiles of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum. 205 pp.