Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100631
Element CodeAFCJB13050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusGila
Concept ReferenceRobins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsFormerly referred to as Tigoma bicolor, Cheonda coerlea, and Gila bicolor (Bailey and Uyeno 1964).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-02-07
Change Date2012-02-07
Edition Date2012-02-07
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and M. K. Clausen
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank ReasonsWidely distributed and at least formerly one of the most abundant fishes in the Klamath and Lost river systems, Oregon and California; doing well in reservoirs despite the presence of introduced predatory fishes; threats include drought, water diversions, pollution, and introduced species.
Range Extent CommentsThis species is widely distributed in the Klamath and Lost river systems, Oregon and California (Page and Burr 2011); The native distribution presumably was above Klamath Falls, but these fishes have colonized Iron Gate and Copco reservoirs downstream from the falls (Moyle 2002). The species has been introduced in other drainages in Oregon (Moyle 2002).
Occurrences CommentsTNHC (1996) Index of North American fishes mapped 13 collection locations.
Threat Impact CommentsThreats include a combination of factors: drought, water diversions, pollution, and introduced species. Drought creates additional stress to a system already stressed by other factors. Diversions of water from the rivers and reservoirs has dried up the preferred lowland habitats or allowed organic pollutants to become so concentrated that lakes such as the upper and lower Klamath lakes and Tule Lake become difficult for the native fishes to inhabit, even though they are tolerant of fairly extreme environmental conditions. The lakes of the upper Klamath drainage have become sumps for agricultural runoff, which carry fertilizers and animal waste, so they have become increasingly eutrophic and decreasingly favorable to fish life. In addition, the introduced fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) has proliferated in the lakes and canals in recent years, with unknown effects on native fishes (Moyle et al. 1995). A 1991-1995 Oregon study indicated numbers increased significantly in Upper Klamath Lake as fathead minnow numbers declined; in Agency Lake no significant change in abundance was noted as fathead minnows declined, however, fathead minnows composed 59 percent of the fish taken in Agency Lake compared to 27 percent of the fish taken in Upper Klamath Lake; the fathead minnow is still very abundant after a 5-year decline (Simon and Markle 1997). Blue chubs are doing well in reservoirs despite the presence of introduced predatory fishes (Moyle 1976).