Noturus munitus

Suttkus and Taylor, 1965

Frecklebelly Madtom

G3Vulnerable Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
PS:TESA Status
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100581
Element CodeAFCKA02170
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderSiluriformes
FamilyIctaluridae
GenusNoturus
USESAPS:T
Concept Reference
Suttkus, R. D., and W. R. Taylor. 1965. Noturus munitus, a new species of madtom, family Ictaluridae, from southern United States. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 78:169-178.
Taxonomic Comments
Populations in the Pearl and Mobile basins should be investigated for possible polytypy (Starnes 1995, who referred to this fish as the "freckled madtom"). See Grady and LeGrande (1992) for a study of phylogenetic relationships, modes of speciation, and historical biogeography of Noturus madtom catfishes. See Lundberg (1992) for a synthesis of recent work on the systematic relationships of ictalurid catfishes.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-07-31
Change Date1996-09-19
Edition Date2012-07-31
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and L. Glass-Godwin
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
Spotty distribution in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Tennessee; significant decline in distribution and abundance; threatened by various alterations to stream habitat (dredging, siltation, impoundment, etc.).
Range Extent Comments
Range includes the Pearl River, eastern Louisiana and southern Mississippi; Tombigbee River, eastern Mississippi and western Alabama; upper Alabama (likely extirpated) and Cahaba rivers, central Alabama; Etowah River, northern Georgia; Conasauga River, northern Georgia and southeastern Tennessee (Bennett et al. 2008, 2010; Page and Burr 2011). Probably this species was formerly more widespread in the Mobile Bay drainage.

Current range: Pearl River drainage (Bogue Chitto River, lower Pearl River and tributaries); upper Tombigbee River drainage (East Fork, Buttahatchie River, lower Luxapallila Creek, Sipsey River; Alabama and Cahaba river drainages (lower Cahaba River); Etowah River system (upper Etowah River); Conasauga River system (middle Conasauaga River) (Bennett et al. 2010).
Occurrences Comments
On a coarse level, this species currently is represented by 9 patches of occupied habitat (see map in Bennett et al. 2010).

This madtom is very difficult to survey due to its small size, secretive nature, and nocturnal, benthic, and cryptic life style (P. Shute, pers. comm., 1997), so available data may not reflect the full distribution and abundance of the species.
Threat Impact Comments
This small fish's movements are impeded by dams and impoundments. The species disappeared abruptly from the Alabama River after construction of the Millers Ferry and Claiborne dams and associated navigational modifications of the river channel (Ramsey 1976). It is expected to disappear from the main channel of the upper Tombigbee because of the impoundment and canalization of the river by the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, though hopefully it will survive in large tributaries (Boschung and Mayden 2004).

High levels of siltation within streambeds constitute poor habitats for the species (Shepard 1996).

Jelks et al. (2008) categorized the Cahaba population as vulnerable, Coosa population as endangered, Pearl population as vulnerable, and Tombigbee population as endangered, based on the present or threatened destruction, modification, or reduction of habitat or range, combined with a narrowly restricted range.

This species is regarded as very threatened; the greatest threat is probably siltation followed by habitat modifications due to impoundment, channelization (Shephard et al. 1996; P. Shute, pers. comm., 1997), gravel removal operations, and altered flow regimes (Shephard et al. 1996). Populations in the Tombigbee and Alabama rivers have dwindled in recent years, primarily because of the construction and maintenance of inland waterways that have destroyed most of the permanent gravel bars (Mettee et al. 1996). Other threats include nonpoint source pollution related to activities such as silviculture, agriculture, and construction in the watersheds. Gravel removal and washing in the Buttahatchie River has degraded some habitat in that system, and channelization for flood control has drastically reduced the population in Luxapallila Creek due to loss of habitat and increased sediment loads (Shepard, pers. comm., 1997).

Frecklebelly darters are regarded by some as fairly resistant to nondestructive intrusion (S. Shively, pers. comm., 1997), but others consider them fragile and susceptible to nondestructive intrusion (P. Shute, pers. comm., 1997).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Primary habitat is rocky riffles, rapids, and runs, often near vegetation, in small to large rivers (Lee et al. 1980, Page and Burr 2011).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
AlabamaS2Yes
TennesseeS1Yes
GeorgiaS1Yes
LouisianaS3Yes
MississippiS3Yes
Roadless Areas (4)
Georgia (4)
AreaForestAcres
Foster BranchChattahoochee National Forest171
Ken MountainChattahoochee National Forest527
Lance CreekChattahoochee National Forest9,025
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
References (37)
  1. Bart, Henry L. (Tulane Museum of Natural History, Tulane University) 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  2. Bennett, M. G., B. R. Kuhajda, and J. H. Howell. 2008. Status of the imperiled frecklebelly madtom, <i>Noturus munitus</i> (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae): a review of data from field surveys, museums records, and the literature. Southeastern Naturalist 7:459-474.
  3. Bennett, M. G., B. R. Kuhajda, and J. Khudamrongsawat. 2010. Life-history attributes of the imperiled frecklebeyy madtom, <i>Noturus munitus</i> (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae), in the Cahaba River system, Alabama. Southeastern Naturalist 9:507-520.
  4. Boschung, H. T., and R. L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 960 pp.
  5. Freeman, B. J. (Institute of Ecology and Museum of Natural History, University of Georgia). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  6. Godwin, J. Aquatic Zoologist. Alabama Natural Heritage Program, Huntington College, Montgomery, AL
  7. Grady, J. M., and W. H. LeGrande. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships, modes of speciation, and historical biogeography of the madtom catfishes, genus <i>Noturus </i>Rafinesque (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae). Pages 747-777 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  8. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  9. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  10. Lundberg, J. G. 1992. The phylogeny of ictalurid catfishes: a synthesis of recent work. Pages 392-420 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  11. MacBeth, R. Heritage Zoologist, Georgia Natural Heritage Program, Wildlife Resource Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Social Circle, GA Personal communication.
  12. MacBeth, Robyn M. (Georgia Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  13. Major, Smoot (Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC on 19 August 1997.
  14. Mann, Tom. (Mississippi Natural Heritage Program. Mississippi Museum of Natural Science). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  15. Mettee, M. F., P. E. O'Neil, and J. M. Pierson. 1996. Fishes of Alabama and the Mobile Basin. Oxmoor House, Birmingham, Alabama. 820 pp.
  16. Miller, G. L. 1984. Trophic ecology of the frecklebelly madtom <i>Noturus munitus</i> in the Tombigbee River, Mississippi. American Midland Naturalist 111:8-15.
  17. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  18. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  19. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  20. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  21. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  22. Ramsey, J.S. 1976. Freshwater Fish. Pp. 53-65 in: H. Boschung, ed. Endangered and Threatened Plants and Animals of Alabama. Bull. Ala. Mus. Nat. Hist. No. 2
  23. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  24. Shepherd, T. E., S. W. McGregor, P. E. O'Neil, and M. F. Mettee. 1996. Status survey of the frecklebelly madtom (<i>Noturus munitus</i>) in the Mobile River Basin: summary of results for 1995-96 the Upper Tombigbee, Alabama, and Cahaba River Systems. Prepared in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. 34 pp.
  25. Shute, P. Aquatic Zoologist. Tennessee Valley Authority Regional Heritage. River Basin Operations. Wildlife and Natural Heritage Resources. Norris, TN
  26. Shute, Peggy (Aquatic Zoologist, Tennessee Valley Authority Regional Heritage). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. October 1997.
  27. Shute, Peggy (Aquatic Zoologist, Tennessee Valley Authority Regional Heritage). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. February 2000.
  28. Shute, P. W., D. A. Etnier, C. F. Saylor, and R. D. Bivens. [In press]. Fishes. In Hatcher, et al. (editors). Tennessee's Rare Vertebrate Wildlife. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Nashville, Tennessee.
  29. Starnes, W. C. 1995. Taxonomic validation for fish species on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Category 2 species list. 28 pp.
  30. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  31. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996b. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia: Export of freshwater fish and mussel records west of the Mississippi River in 1997. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  32. Stewart, J.H. 1989. Status review report on the frecklebelly madtom, NOTURUS MUNITUS. USFWS publication, Jackson, MS. 4 pp.
  33. Suttkus, R. D., and W. R. Taylor. 1965. <i>Noturus munitus</i>, a new species of madtom, family Ictaluridae, from southern United States. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 78:169-178.
  34. Taylor, W.R. 1969. A revision of the catfish genus <i>Noturus</i> (Rafinesque) with an analysis of higher groups in the Ictaluridae. Smithsonian Institution, U.S. National Museum Bulletin 282. 315 pp.
  35. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2020. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule for the Upper Coosa River Distinct Population Segment of Frecklebelly Madtom and Designation of Critical Habitat. Federal Register 85(224):74050-74088.
  36. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Notification of Review Federal Register 87(85): 26152-26178.
  37. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule for the Upper Coosa River Distinct Population Segment of Frecklebelly Madtom and Designation of Critical Habitat. Final rule. Federal Register 88(41):13038-13070.