Rhinichthys osculus

(Girard, 1856)

Speckled Dace

G4Apparently Secure (G4G5) Found in 45 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Medium - lowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1315251
Element CodeAFCJB37190
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusRhinichthys
Concept Reference
Moyle, P.B., N. Buckmaster, N. and Y. Su. 2023. Taxonomy of the speckled dace species complex (Cypriniformes: Leuciscidae, Rhinichthys) in California, USA. Zootaxa 5249(5): 501-539.
Taxonomic Comments
This is a narrower concept of Rhinichthys osculus, but it is still likely a species complex. Specifically, based on multiple genetic, geographic, and geologic analyses, populations in California, Nevada, and southern Oregon have been reassigned to R. nevadensis and R. klamathensis (Moyle et al. 2023).

Moyle et al. (2023) note that the literature suggest that other species-level lineages exist in the Colorado River basin and in the Columbia River (and related) basins. Based on this, they are in agreement with Minckley and Marsh (2009) that the name R. osculus should be applied only to dace in the Gila River basin (the Gila River flows into the lower Colorado River). They also note that the name R. nubila could be applied to populations in the Columba River because that name has been widely used for dace in this basin in the past. Further taxonomic and systematic work is needed to sort out this species complex.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-02-05
Change Date2025-02-05
Edition Date2025-02-05
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactMedium - low
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread and relatively common in the western United States and British Columbia, Canada. It is threatened by human water consumption rates and invasive predatory fishes.
Range Extent Comments
This narrower concept of Rhinichthys osculus occurs in southeastern British Columbia, Canada, and in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona, United States (COSEWIC 2016, Smith et al. 2017, Moyle et al. 2023). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records, range extent is estimated to be 1,631,784 km².

Populations in the Klamath River, Lahontan, and Sacramento Rivers basin have been reassigned to R. klamathensis (California and southern Oregon); populations in the Death Valley system have been reassigned to R. nevadensis (California and Nevada); and populations in the south California coastal region to R. gabrielino (Moyle et al. 2023).
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by a large number of subpopulations (Smith et al. 2017, GBIF 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
This species is primarily threatened by human water consumption rates and invasive predatory fishes (COSEWIC 2016, Smith et al. 2017).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

The following description is from Minckley (1973) and Sublette et al. (1990). The speckled dace is a chunky, rounded minnow. Adults reach lengths of 45-80 mm standard length (SL = length from tip of snout to end of hypural plate) (Wallace 1980). Usually there are 8 dorsal rays (6-9), 13-14 pectoral rays, 8 pelvic rays, and 7 anal rays. There are 60-90 scales along the lateral line. The mouth is subterminal, usually with no frenum. Pharyngeal arches contain teeth in two rows, usually 1,4-4,1 or 2,4-4,2. A single, small barbel is located at the edge of each jaw. Coloration is variable depending on geographic location, but often dark and blotchy dorsally, lighter ventrally. A lateral band extends from the dorsal fin onto the caudal peduncle. Breeding males have an intense red color at the base of paired fins, near the anal fin base, on the lower caudal lobe, near the upper part of the gill cleft, and on the mouth. Breeding tubercles are present on pectoral rays of males. Larval speckled dace from the upper and lower Colorado River basin were described by Snyder (1981) and Winn and Miller (1954), respectively.

Diagnostic Characteristics

In Arizona and New Mexico, the speckled dace is morphologically most similar to Tiaroga cobitis, the loach minnow, with which it often occurs syntopically. The speckled dace differs in having a single barbel at each side of the upper lip and the mouth is relatively larger and less oblique than in loach minnow. The loach minnow possesses more dorsally oriented eyes than does the speckled dace. Other meristic counts are the same or overlap in the two species. Both species have a blotchy appearance, but the speckled dace lacks off-white spots before and after the dorsal fin and on the caudal peduncle.

Smaller specimens of speckled dace might be confused with Agosia chrysogaster, the longfin dace, which is syntopic with the speckled dace in parts of its range. Longfin dace has a long coiled intestine and a black peritoneum; speckled dace has an S-shaped intestine and light peritoneum.

Habitat

Occurs in many kinds of habitats: riffles, runs, and pools of cool flowing headwaters, creeks, and small to medium rivers with mostly rocky substrates; large and small lakes (rarely); warm, permanent and intermittent streams; and outflows of desert springs (Moyle 1976); usually found in shallow water (averaging about 0.5 m deep or less); in streams, often congregates below riffles and eddies (Minckley 1973). Young tend to occupy edges of streams in slower, shallow water (Cross 1975). Larger adults generally are in relatively quiet water where cover (e.g., overhanging trees, deadfalls, boulders) is available (Minckley 1985).

Stream populations spawn in swift water over rocky substrates. Lake populations spawn in shallow waters with gravel substrate or on gravel edge of riffles in inlet streams (Moyle 1976). In Aravaipa Creek, Arizona, spawning occurred over rapids and riffles, at depths less than 25 cm, over substrates of gravel, cobble, or rubble (Minckley 1981).

Mueller (1984) described spawning behavior of speckled dace in the San Francisco River, New Mexico. Spawning occurred in a 1-m square section of stream recently scoured by human activity. Spawning clusters formed, each with more than 25 fish. Dace thrashed violently (presumable at spawning) and eggs were found at depths to 5 cm. Most eggs were unexposed, attached to undersides of rocks or in interstices between rocks. Territoriality or spawning pairs were not observed.

In the Virgin River (Utah, Arizona, Nevada), speckled dace were collected from 500 m to 1800 m elevation (Cross 1975). Sixty percent were collected in runs, 30 percent in pools, and 10 percent in riffles. Two-thirds of the collections were associated with gravel, rubble, or cobble substrates and one-third with sand and mud. Seventy percent were collected near some type of cover, usually overhanging trees, deadfalls, and boulders. Speckled dace were collected at current speeds averaging 0.43 m/sec (SD = 0.25 m/sec, range 0 to 1 m/sec) and at depths averaging 48 cm (SD = 43 cm).

Speckled dace from the Virgin River (Utah, Arizona, and Nevada) preferred an average temperature of 15.8 C (range 9.5 to 16 C, depending on acclimation temperature) (Deacon et al. 1987). Critical thermal maxima were 30.5, 32.6, and 36.8 C for dace acclimated at 10, 15, and 25 C (Deacon et al. 1987). Rangewide, however, the speckled dace is found at much higher average temperatures, such as 29 C at Ash Meadows, Nevada, 28 C at Pahranagat Valley, Nevada (Deacon and Bradley 1972), and 29.4 C at Kendall Springs in Wyoming (Hubbs and Kuehne 1937).

Lowe et al. (1967) showed that speckled dace, collected from Sonoita Creek, Arizona, were intolerant to elevated temperatures and reduced oxygen levels. Speckled dace were least tolerant to reduced oxygen levels when compared to Agosia chrysogaster, Catostomus clarki, and Cyprinodon macularius (Lowe et al. 1967).

Ecology

Associated with several different faunas depending on location. In the Gila River drainage, native associates include the spikedace (Meda fulgida), roundtail chub (Gila robusta), loach minnow (Tiaroga cobitis), longfin dace (Agosia chrysogaster), Sonora sucker (Catostomus insignis), desert sucker (Catostomus clarki), and Gila trout (Oncorynchus gilae). Historical associates included the woundfin (Plagopterus argentissimus), bonytail (Gila elegans), squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), all now extirpated from the Gila River basin.

Populations show large fluctuations in size (Minckley 1969, Deacon and Bradley 1972). LaBounty and Minckley (1972) noted that increasing populations of longfin dace may result in decreasing populations of speckled dace in areas of overlap at intermediate elevations. There is not enough data to understand the nature of this relationship (i.e., whether or not it is cause-effect).

Predators include introduced trouts (Oncorynchus and Salmo spp.) in the Colorado River mainstream, flathead catfish (Pylodictus olivaris) in the Salt River basin, and also introduced basses (Micropterus spp.) and green sunfish (Chaenobryttus cyanellus) (Minckley 1985). Thamnophis cyrtopsis (black-necked garter snake) is known to feed on speckled dace (John 1964).

Mpoame and Rinne (1983) recorded the protozoan Ichthyopthirius multifiliis, trematode Ornithodiplostomum ptychocheilus, and the cestode Ligula intestinalis as parasites of speckled dace in Aravaipa and Hurricane creeks, Arizona.

Generally occurs in small, loose groups.

Reproduction

Cross (1975) collected ripe females in late June and mid-July 1973 from the Virgin River drainage in Utah. In Aravaipa Creek, Arizona, speckled dace were collected in breeding coloration or with tubercles from December to August, with mature gonads from November to March, or seen engaged in spawning activities from January to April. Larvae were collected from January to April.

John (1963) studied reproduction in Cave Creek, Chiricahua Mountains, Arizona. Females matured at two years of age. Peaks in reproductive activity were in early spring and late summer. John believed spawning efforts were triggered by flash floods. Males defended territories, and activities of the male often resulted in circular, clean gravel areas that John (1963) called nests. A female entered a defended area and partially buried or wedged herself under the edge of a stone. Males took positions next to the buried female and the pair or group vibrated for a few seconds, after which the female departed. A female entered a nest several times, depositing a portion of her ripe eggs during each spawning event. John (1963) gave data for the total number of eggs laid in an aquarium by each of eight females. From these data, Vives calculated that the number of eggs laid was related to standard length by the equation: number of eggs laid = -264.41 + 10.45 SL (mm) (R- squared = 0.89, p < 0.001). Females ranged from 45 to 75 mm SL and numbers of eggs laid ranged from 174 to 514. Eggs hatched in 6 days at 18 to 19 C under laboratory conditions.

Maximum age of speckled dace in streams of the Chiricahua Mountains is 3 years (John 1964). Moyle et al. (1989) stated that some may live up to 5-6 years.

Females from the Kettle River, British Columbia, Canada, did not mature until the end of their second year (Peden and Hughes 1981).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN3
ProvinceRankNative
British ColumbiaS3Yes
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS5Yes
WashingtonS5Yes
NevadaSNRYes
ColoradoS5Yes
IdahoS5Yes
ArizonaS3Yes
Navajo NationS5Yes
WyomingS4Yes
New MexicoS3Yes
UtahS4Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2.1 - Abstraction of surface water (domestic use)Large (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2.3 - Abstraction of surface water (agricultural use)Large (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (45)
Arizona (8)
AreaForestAcres
Barbershop CanyonCoconino National Forest1,311
ChiricahuaCoronado National Forest76,876
East Clear CreekCoconino National Forest1,613
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
Lower San FranciscoApache-Sitgreaves National Forests59,310
NolanApache-Sitgreaves National Forests6,780
PipestemApache-Sitgreaves National Forests34,598
Santa TeresaCoronado National Forest8,929
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
West Meadow CreekNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest115,949
Nevada (5)
AreaForestAcres
Arc Dome - Blank Mtn.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest3,662
GrantsvilleHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest6,156
Hicks MountainHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest16,334
Humboldt - Angel LkHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,008
Jenneman PeakHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest6,431
New Mexico (8)
AreaForestAcres
Contiguous To Black & Aldo Leopold WildernessGila National Forest111,883
Contiguous To Gila Wilderness & Primitive AreaGila National Forest79,049
Devils CreekGila National Forest89,916
Eagle PeakGila National Forest34,016
Frisco BoxGila National Forest38,979
Lower San FranciscoGila National Forest26,460
Mother HubbardGila National Forest5,895
NolanGila National Forest13,051
Oregon (3)
AreaForestAcres
FairviewUmpqua National Forest7,417
Middle SantiamWillamette National Forest7,316
Moose LakeWillamette National Forest5,013
Utah (14)
AreaForestAcres
Bear Valley PeakDixie National Forest7,438
Box - Death HollowDixie National Forest3,175
Burch CreekWasatch-Cache National Forest6,938
Casto BluffDixie National Forest87,466
Cove CreekFishlake National Forest25,555
Dog ValleyFishlake National Forest11,810
FishhookDixie National Forest12,959
High Uintas (UT)Wasatch-Cache National Forest102,398
Joe LottFishlake National Forest19,826
LakesWasatch-Cache National Forest121,967
MogotsuDixie National Forest16,762
Moody WashDixie National Forest31,835
Pine Valley MountainsDixie National Forest57,673
Stump CreekCaribou National Forest355
Washington (2)
AreaForestAcres
ManastashWenatchee National Forest11,155
Thorp Mtn.Wenatchee National Forest22,717
Wyoming (4)
AreaForestAcres
Lake Alice - Commissary RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest166,707
Phillips RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest10,108
Salt River RangeBridger-Teton National Forest235,661
West Slope TetonsTarghee National Forest47,448
References (24)
  1. Andersen, M. E., and J. E. Deacon. 1996. Status of endemic non-salmonid fishes in eastern Nevada. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 29:124-133.
  2. COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 51 pp.
  3. Courtenay, W. R., Jr., J. R. Deacon, D. W. Sada. R. C. Allan and G. L. Vinyard. 1985. Comparative status of fishes along the course of the pluvial White River, Nevada. Southwestern Naturalist 30(4):503-524.
  4. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  5. Miller, R. R., J. D. Williams, and J. E. Williams. 1989. Extinctions of North American fishes during the past century. Fisheries 14(6):22-38.
  6. Minckley, W. L. 1973. Fishes of Arizona. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona. 293 pp.
  7. Minckley, W. L., and P. C. Marsh. 2009. Inland fishes of the greater Southwest: chronicle of a vanishing biota. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, 426 pp.
  8. Moyle, P. B. 1976a. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp.
  9. Moyle, P. B., J. E. Williams, and E. D. Wikramanayake. 1989. Fish species of special concern of California. Final report submitted to California Dept. of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova. 222 pp.
  10. Moyle, P.B., N. Buckmaster, N. and Y. Su. 2023. Taxonomy of the speckled dace species complex (Cypriniformes: Leuciscidae, <i>Rhinichthys</i>) in California, USA. Zootaxa 5249(5): 501-539.
  11. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  12. Peden, A.E., and G.W. Hughes. 1988. Sympatry in four species of <i>Rhinichthys</i> (Pisces), including the first documented occurrences of <i>Rhinichthys umatilla </i>in the Canadian drainages of the Columbia River. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66(8):1846-1856.
  13. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  14. Scott, W. B., and E. J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 184. 966 pp.
  15. Sigler, W. F., and R. R. Miller. 1963. Fishes of Utah. Utah State Department of Fish and Game, Salt Lake City, Utah, 203 pp.
  16. Smith, G.R., J. Chow, P.J. Unmack, D.F. Markle, and T.E. Dowling. 2017. Evolution of the <i>Rhinichthys osculus</i> complex (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in Western North America. pp. 45-84 In: Fishes of the Mio-Pliocene Western Snake River Plain and Vicinity. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, No. 204 no.2.
  17. Sublette, J. E., M. D Hatch, and M. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. University New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 393 pp.
  18. Taylor, F. R., L. A. Gillman, and J. W. Pedretti. 1989. Impact of cattle on two isolated fish populations in Pahranagat Valley, Nevada. Great Basin Naturalist 49:491-495.
  19. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 18 September 1987. Proposed endangered status for Independence Valley speckled dace and Clover Valley speckled dace. Federal Register 52:35282-35286.
  20. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1982. Emergency determination of endangered status for two fish species in Ash Meadows, Nevada. Federal Register 47(90):19995-19999.
  21. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  22. Williams, J. E. and D. W. Sada. 1985b. Status of two endangered fishes, <i>Cyprinodon nevadensis mionectes</i> and <i>Rhinichthyes osculus nevadensis</i>, from two springs in Ash Meadows, Nevada. Southwestern Naturalist 30:475-84.
  23. Williams, J. E., M. A. Stern, A. V. Munhall, and G. A. Anderson. 1990. Conservation status of threatened fishes in Warner Basin, Oregon. Great Basin Naturalist 50(3):243-8.
  24. Wydoski, R. S., and R. R. Whitney. 1979. Inland fishes of Washington. The University of Washington Press, Seattle. 220 pp.