Alasmidonta varicosa

(Lamarck, 1819)

Brook Floater

G3Vulnerable Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.111437
Element CodeIMBIV02100
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusAlasmidonta
Other Common Names
Alasmidonte renflée (FR)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Alasmidonta varicosa was originally described under the genus Monodonta and is closely related to Alasmidonta marginata (Simpson, 1914). Current nomenclature follows Turgeon et al. (1998). It can sometimes be confused with Alasmidonta undulata and Alasmidonta heterodon (Nedeau, 2008). Systematics of the genus has not been reviewed genetically.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-06-28
Change Date2011-05-30
Edition Date2024-05-30
Edition AuthorsMaster, L.; Alderman, J. (1998); rev. Cordeiro, J. (2011); rev. T. Cornelisse (2024)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species has a large range and a moderate number of known occurrences, yet is subject to several threats and has experienced both short and long-term population declines.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, Canada and along the Atlantic slope in the United States from Maine to Georgia (USFWS 2018; IvertEBase 2024; GBIF 2024).
Occurrences Comments
As of 2018, this species was found in 239 locations (59 of which had unknown status) and 70-80 populations, with populations defined by occupancy within HUC 12 watersheds (USFWS 2018; Roy et al. 2022; IvertEBase 2024; GBIF 2024).
Threat Impact Comments
This species is threatened by habitat loss and degradation associated with dams and other waterway barriers; pollutants in wastewater discharges, including from sewage treatment plants and industrial operations; runoff of silt, fertilizers, pesticides, and other pollutants from land disturbance activities, such as development and agriculture implemented without adequate measures to control runoff and that also cause loss of riparian forests; and drought conditions that reduce habitat, elevated water temperature, and reduce dilution of pollutants and sediment runoff (Wicklow et al. 2017; USFWS 2018; Roy et al. 2022).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

The shell is kidney-shaped. The anterior margin is abruptly curved. The ventral margin is straight to slightly concave, descending somewhat. The posterior margin is biangulate below and broadly curved to straight above. The dorsal margin is slightly convex. The beaks are located well forward, approximately one fourth of length from anterior margin. There are numerous short, low, corrugations or ridges on the posterior slope. The ridges tend to be oriented radially. The shell is moderately elongate and is firm but not thick. The periostracum tends to be smooth centrally and rough elsewhere. In adults, the periostracum is brownish with dark fine rays sometimes present; in juveniles it is yellowish with green rays (Clarke, 1981). The ligament is located posterior of beaks, and is well developed. The nacre is rose or yellowish olive centrally and bluish white or blue at margins. Dentition is rudimentary. There is typically one small pseudocardinal in each valve that is poorly developed and of compressed pyramidal shape. If present, the lateral teeth are vestigial. See Clarke (1981) or Johnson (1970) for a complete description. Identification keys are provided in Bogan (2002) for North Carolina, Bogan and Alderman (2004) for South Carolina, Clarke (1981) for Canada, Fichtel and Smith (1995) for Vermont, Nedeau et al. (2000) for Maine, Nedeau and Victoria (2000) for Connecticut, Smith (2000) for New England, and Strayer and Jirka (1997) for New York.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Diagnostic characters include a flat or slightly indented ventral margin, swollen to moderately inflated valves, yellowish-green (young specimens) to brownish-black periostracum with prominent green color rays (eroded away in older specimens), series of corrugations along the dorso-posterior slope perpendicular to growth lines, pseudocardinal teeth poorly developed with only one small knob-like tooth in each valve and no lateral teeth (Strayer and Jirka, 1997; Nedeau et al., 2000; Smith, 2000; Nedeau, 2008).

This species can sometimes be confused with Alasmidonta undulata, Strophitus undulatus, and Alasmidonta heterodon (Nedeau, 2008). Alasmidonta marginata is similar but is more inflated, grows larger, and has a distinctly truncate posterior slope. No other shell within its range has distinctive radial ridging on posterior slope except Alasmidonta robusta, a localized and believed extinct species of the Santee River system in North and South Carolina. Alasmidonta robusta has distinctive wide and wavy green rays on its shell (Strayer and Jirka, 1997).

Habitat

This species is found in creeks and rivers of varying sizes with moderate flow and stable substrates along intact riparian corridors (USFWS 2018).

Reproduction

This species is a long-term brooder with gravid females found from August to May (Clarke 1981; Ortmann 1919). Fertilization occurs in summer with glochidia released the following spring (Nedeau 2008).
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
New JerseyS1Yes
District of ColumbiaSNRYes
VirginiaS1Yes
New YorkS1Yes
VermontS1Yes
DelawareSXYes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
MaineS3Yes
MassachusettsS1Yes
West VirginiaS2Yes
MarylandS1Yes
ConnecticutS1Yes
New HampshireS1Yes
GeorgiaS2Yes
North CarolinaS3Yes
Rhode IslandSHYes
South CarolinaS1Yes
CanadaN3
ProvinceRankNative
New BrunswickS3Yes
Nova ScotiaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh - low
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low

Roadless Areas (1)
North Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
References (111)
  1. Alderman, J.M. 1998a. Survey for the endangered Carolina heelsplitter (<i>Lasmigona decorata</i>) in South Carolina. A final report prepared for the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, South Carolina. 67 pp.
  2. Alderman, John (NC Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. May 1997.
  3. Allen, W.R. 1914. The food and feeding habits of freshwater mussels. Biological Bulletin 27(2):127-147.
  4. Allen, W.R. 1921. Studies of the biology of freshwater mussels. Experimental studies of the food relations of certain Unionidae. Biological Bulletin 40(4):21-241.
  5. Amyot, J.P. and J.A. Downing. 1991. Endo- and epibenthic distribution of the unionid mollusc <i>Elliptio complanata</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 10(3):280-285.
  6. Athearn, H.D. 1961. Additions to the New Brunswick checklist. Sterkiana 4:33-34.
  7. Athearn, H.D. 1963. Some new records of naiades from eastern North America. Sterkiana 9:39.
  8. Athearn, H.D. and A.H. Clarke, Jr. 1962. The freshwater mussels of Nova Scotia. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 183:11-41.
  9. Bauer, G. 1992. Variation in the life span and size of the fresh water pearl mussel. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:425-436.
  10. Bogan, A.E. 2002. Workbook and key to the freshwater bivalves of North Carolina. North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences: Raleigh, North Carolina. 101 pp.
  11. Bogan, A.E. and J.M. Alderman. 2004. Workbook and key to the freshwater bivalves of South Carolina. North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences: Raleigh, North Carolina. 64 pp.
  12. Bogan, A.E. and T. Proch. 1995. Manual of the freshwater bivalves of Maryland. Prepared for a workshop held at Versar, Inc., Columbia, Maryland, 9 March 1995. 68 pp.
  13. Burch, J.B. 1975c. Freshwater Unionacean Clams (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) of North America: Biota of Freshwater Ecosystems, Identification Manual No 11. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 176 pp.
  14. Churchill, E.P., Jr. and S.I. Lewis. 1924. Food and feeding in fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries 39(1923-1924):439-471.
  15. Clarke, A.H. 1981a. The Freshwater Molluscs of Canada. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, D.W. Friesen and Sons, Ltd.: Ottawa, Canada. 446 pp.
  16. Clarke, A. H. 1981. The tribe Alasmidontini (Unionidae: Anodontinae), Part I: <i>Pegias</i>, <i>Alasmidonta</i>, and <i>Arcidens</i>. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 326:1-101.
  17. Clarke, A.H. 1984. Status survey of the James River spiny mussel, <i>Canthyria collina</i> (Conrad), in the James River drainage system. (Contract #4107). Final report to VPI & SU, Office of Sponsored Programs, Blacksburg, Virginia.
  18. Clarke, A.H. 1986. Competetive exclusion of <i>Canthyria </i>(Unionidae) by <i>Corbicula fluminea</i> (Muller). Malacology Data Net 1:3-10.
  19. Clarke, A.H. and C.O. Berg. 1959. The freshwater mussels of central New York. Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station (N.Y. State College of Agriculture) Memoir 367:1-79.
  20. Clayton, J.L., C.W. Stihler, and J.L. Wallace. 2001. Status of and potential impacts to the freshwater bivalves (Unionidae) in Patterson Creek, West Virginia. Northeastern Naturalist 8(2):179-188.
  21. Coker, R.E., A.F. Shira, H.W. Clark, and A.D. Howard. 1921. Natural history and propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries 37:78-181.
  22. Conaboy, C. 2006. Mussels lose their river home. Concord Monitor [Concord, New Hampshire], 23 May 2006. 2 pp.
  23. COSEWIC. 2009. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the brook floater <i>Alasmidonta varicosa</i> in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa, Canada. vii + 79 pp.
  24. Davidson, Lynn. 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps by the Maryland Heritage and Biodiversity Conservation Programs, DNR, September 22, 1997. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  25. Davis, D.S. 1999. Reports of museum visits and field collections related to studies of the distribution of the freshwater mussels <i>Lampsilis cariosa</i> (Say, 1817) and <i>Leptodea ochracea</i> (Say, 1817), Mollusca, Unionidae in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia in 1999. Unpublished, 23 pp.
  26. Dutko, Rick (NJ Office of Natural Lands Management). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  27. Enser, Rick (Rhode Island Natural Heritage Program, Department of Environmental Management). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  28. Evermann, B.W. and H.W. Clark. 1918. The Unionidae of Lake Maxinkukee. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1917:251-285.
  29. Evermann, B.W. and H.W. Clark. 1920. Lake Maxinkukee, a physical and biological survey. Indiana Department of Conservation, Indianapolis, Indiana. 512 pp.
  30. Farber, Jenni. 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps by the Pennsylvania Science Office. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  31. Ferguson, Mark (Nongame and Natural Heritage Program, Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  32. Fichtel, C. and D.G. Smith. 1995. The freshwater mussels of Vermont. Nongame and Natural Heritage Program, Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department. Technical Report 18. 54 pp.
  33. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  34. Frey, Vicki (Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  35. Fuller, S. L. H. 1974. Chapter 8: Clams and mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Pp. 215-273 in: C. W. Hart, Jr., and S. L. H. Fuller (eds.). Pollution Ecology of Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, New York. 389 pp.
  36. Garner, J.T., T.M. Haggerty, and R.F. Modlin. 1999. Reproductive cycle of <i>Quadrula metanevra</i> (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Pickwick Dam tailwater of the Tennessee River. American Midland Naturalist 141:277-283.
  37. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2024. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2024).
  38. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  39. Haag, W.R. and J.L. Staton. 2003. Variation in fecundity and other reproductive traits in freshwater mussels. Freshwater Biology 48:2118-2130.
  40. Haag, W.R. and M.L. Warren, Jr. 1999. Mantle displays of freshwater mussels elicit attacks from fish. Freshwater Biology 42:35-40.
  41. Haag, W.R. and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2003. Host fishes and infection strategies of freshwater mussels in large Mobile Basin streams, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22(1):78-91.
  42. Haggerty, T.M., J.T. Garner, G.H. Patterson, and L.C. Jones, Jr. 1995. A quantitative assessment of the reproductive biology of <i>Cyclonaias tuberculata</i> (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 73:83-88.
  43. Hanson, J.M. and A. Locke. 2000. The status of the dwarf wedgemussel, <i>Alasmidonta heterodon</i>, in Canada. The Canadian Field-Naturalist 114:271-278.
  44. Hanson, J.M. and A. Locke. 2001. Survey of freshwater mussels in the Petitcodiac River drainage, New Brunswick. The Canadian Field-Naturalist 115:329-340.
  45. Havlik, M.E. and L.L. Marking. 1984. Effects of contaminants on naiad mollusks (Unionidae): a review. Abstract in Bulletin of the American Malacogical Union 3(1):106-107
  46. Heard, W.H. 1975. Sexuality and other aspects of reproduction in <i>Anodonta </i>(Pelecypoda: Unionidae). Malacologia 15(1):81-103.
  47. Heckscher, Christopher M. (Delaware Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  48. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  49. Howard, A.D. 1922. Experiments in the culture of freshwater mussels. Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries 38(1924):63-89.
  50. InvertEBase. 2024. Online. Available: https://invertebase.org/portal/index.php.
  51. James, M.R. 1987. Ecology of the freshwater mussel <i>Hyridella menziesi</i> in a small oliogotrophic lake. Archives of Hydrobiology 108:337-348.
  52. Johnson, C.W. 1915. Fauna of New England. 13. List of the Mollusca. Occasional Papers of the Boston Society of Natural History 7(13):1-231.
  53. Johnson, R.I. 1970a. The systematics and zoogeography of the Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the southern Atlantic slope region. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University 140(6):263-449.
  54. Kart, J., R. Regan, S.R. Darling, C. Alexander, K. Cox, M. Ferguson, S. Parren, K. Royar, B. Popp (eds.). 2005. Vermont's Wildlife Action Plan. Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department. Waterbury, Vermont. Available: http://www.vtfishandwildlife.com
  55. Kovalak, W.P., S.D. Dennis, and J.M. Bates. 1986. Sampling ef fort required to find rare species of freshwater mussels. Special Technical Testing Publication 894. Pp. 34-45. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  56. Kraemer, L.R. 1970. The mantle flap in three species of <i>Lampsilis </i>(Pelecypoda: Unionidae). Malacologia 10:255-282.
  57. Lefevre, G. and W.C. Curtis. 1910. Reproduction and parasitism in the Unionidae. Journal of Experimental Zoology 9(1):79-115 + 5 plates.
  58. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  59. LeGrand, H.E., Jr., S.P. Hall, S.E. McRae, and J.T. Finnegan. 2006. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina. 104 pp.
  60. Lellis, W.A. 2001. Freshwater mussel survey of the Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River: Qualitative Survey 2000. Report to the National Park Service. New York Naturla Heritage Program, Albany, New York.
  61. Machado, J., J. Coimbra, F. Castilho, and C. Sa. 1990. Effects of diflubenzuron on shell formation of the freshwater clam, <i>Anodonta cygnea</i>. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 19:35-39.
  62. Martel, A.L., D.F. McAlpine, J.B. Madill, D.L. Sabine, A. Paquet, M.D. Pulsifer, and M.F. Elderkin. 2010. Fresh-water mussels (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) of the Atlantic Maritime Ecozone. Pages 551-598 in D.F. McAlpine and I.M. Smith (eds.) Assessment of Species Diversity in the Atlantic Maritime Ecozone. NRC Research Press: Ottawa, Canada.
  63. Martin, S.M. 1997. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Maine. Northeastern Naturalist 4(1):1-34.
  64. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L. and B. Cudmore-Vokey. 2004. National general status assessment of freshwater mussels (Unionacea). National Water Research Institute / NWRI Contribution No. 04-027. Environment Canada, March 2004. Paginated separately.
  65. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  66. Morrison, J.P.E. 1973. The families of pearly fresh- water mussels. Bulletin of the American Malacological Union, Inc., March, 1973:45-46.
  67. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  68. Nedeau, E.J. 2008. Freshwater Mussels and the Connecticut River Watershed. Connecticut River Watershed Council, Greenfield, Massachusetts. 132 pp.
  69. Nedeau, E.J. and J. Victoria. 2003. A Field Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Connecticut. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, Connecticut. 31 pp.
  70. Nedeau, E.J., M.A. McCollough, and B.I. Swartz. 2000. The Freshwater Mussels of Maine. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Augusta, Maine. 118 pp.
  71. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC). Database containing location information and habitat characteristics of freshwater mussels.
  72. Ortmann, A.E. 1912. Notes upon the families and genera of the najades. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 8(2):222-365.
  73. Ortmann, A.E. 1919. Monograph of the naiades of Pennsylvania. Part III. Systematic account of the genera and species. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 8(1):1-385.
  74. Raithel, C.J. and R.H. Hartenstein. 2006. The status of freshwater mussels in Rhode Island. Northeastern Naturalist 13(1):103-116.
  75. Roy, A.H., E. Bjerre, J. Cummings, K. Kalasz, J. Carmignani, P. Hazelton, M. Kern, D. Perkins, L. Saucier, A. Skorupa, R., Katz, and C.C. Coghlan. 2022. Brook Floater restoration. identifying locations to reintroduce or augment populations with propagated mussels. Cooperator Science Series. 141. 18 pp.
  76. Sargent, Barbara (West Virginia Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  77. Schneider, Kathryn (New York Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Larry Master and Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  78. Schulz, C. and K. Marbain. 1998. Host species for rare freshwater mussels in Virginia. Triannual Unionid Report 16:32-38.
  79. Simpson, C.T. 1914. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Naiades or Pearly Fresh-water Mussels. Bryant Walker: Detroit, Michigan. 1540 pp.
  80. Skorupa, A.J., Roy, A.H., Hazelton, P.D., Perkins, D., and T. Warren. 2022. Evaluation of Host Fishes for the Brook Floater (<i>Alasmidonta varicosa</i>) from Populations in Massachusetts and Maine, USA. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 25(2): 91-102.
  81. Smith, D.G. 2000a. Keys to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Southern New England. Douglas G. Smith: Sunderland, Massachusetts. 243 pp.
  82. Spoo, A. 2008. The Pearly Mussels of Pennsylvania. Coachwhip Publications: Landisville, Pennsylvania. 210 pp.
  83. Sterrett S., A.H. Roy, P. Hazelton, B. Watson, B. Swartz, T.R. Russ, L. Holst, M. Marchand, J. Wisniewski, M. Ashton, & B. Wicklow. 2018. Brook Floater rapid assessment monitoring protocol. Cooperator Science Series. 132. 24 pp.
  84. Sterrett, S.C., A.H. Roy, P. Hazelton, B. Swartz, E. Nedeau, J . Carmignani, and A. Skorupa. 2022. Standard Operating Protocol for Mark and Recapture Monitoring of Brook Floater in Streams. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooperator Science Series FWS/CSS-142-2022, Washington, D.C. 38 pp.
  85. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  86. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  87. Strayer, D.L. and A.R. Fetterman. 1999. Changes in distribution of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) in the upper Susquehanna River basin, 1955-1965 to 1996-1997. American Midland Naturalist 142:328-339.
  88. Strayer, D.L. and J. Ralley. 1991. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of the upper Delaware River drainage. American Malacological Bulletin 9(1):21-25.
  89. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  90. Strayer, D.L. and K.J. Jirka. 1997. The Pearly Mussels of New York State. New York State Museum Memoir 26. The University of the State of New York. 113 pp. + figures.
  91. Swartz, Beth (Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  92. Taylor, R.W. 1985. Comments on the distribution of freshwater mussels (Unionacea) of the Potomac River headwaters in West Virginia. The Nautilus 99(2-3):84-87.
  93. The Catena Group. 2006. Freshwater mussel surveys of the Pee Dee River basin in South Carolina. Unpublished report prepared for the Nature Conservancy- South Carolina Chapter, January 3, 2006. 47 pp.
  94. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  95. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species Status Assessment Report for the Brook floater (Alasmidonta varicosa), Version 1.1.1. July 2018. Cortland, New York.
  96. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. 12-Month Findings on Petitions To List Eight Species as Endangered or Threatened Species. Federal Register 84(158): 41694-41699.
  97. Utterback, W.I. 1931. Sex behavior among naiades. West Virginia Academy of Science 5:43-45.
  98. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  99. VanLuven, David (NH Natural Heritage Inventory). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997
  100. Vaughn, C.C. 2018. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia, 810: 15-27.
  101. Virginia Division of Natural Heritage. 2006-2007. Personal communication with Jay Cordeiro (NatureServe) about freshwater mussel distribution in Virginia.
  102. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  103. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program (WV NHP). 2007. Personal communication with Jay Cordeiro (NatureServe) about the distribution of <i>Alasmidonta varicosa</i> and <i>Simpsonaias ambigua</i> in West Virginia.
  104. Wicklow, B.J. 2004. Conservation and life history strategies of endangered and at risk species of <i>Alasmidonta </i>(Bivalvia, Unionidae). Journal of Shellfish Research 23:316-317<i>.</i>
  105. Wicklow B.J., T.A. Cormier, J.B. Bishop, J. Devers, and S. von Oettingen. 2017. The conservation status of the brook floater mussel, Alasmidonta varicosa, in the United States: trends in distribution, occurrence, and condition of populations. Report to the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies for the Regional Conservation Needs Grant Program. Available at: https://rcngrants.org/content/conservation-status brook-floater-mussel-alasmidonta-varicosa-northeastern-united-state
  106. Williams, J.D., A.E. Bogan, and J.T. Garner. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama & the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi & Tennessee. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 908 pp.
  107. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  108. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.
  109. Wilson, C.B. and H.W. Clark. 1912. The mussel fauna of the Kankakee basin. Report and Special Papers of the U.S. Fish Commission [Issued separately as U.S. Bureau of Fisheries Document 758] 1911:1-52 + 1 map.
  110. Wisniewski, Jason (Georgia Natural Heritage Program). 2007. Personal communication with Jay Cordeiro (NatureServe) about the distribution of freshwater mussels in Georgia in March 2007.
  111. Yokley, P. 1972b. Life history of <i>Pleurobema cordatum</i> (Rafinesque, 1820) (Bivalvia:Unionacea). Malacologia 11:351-364.