Branchinecta lynchi

Eng, Belk and Eriksen, 1990

Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp

G3Vulnerable Found in 127 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.107216
Element CodeICBRA03030
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassBranchiopoda
OrderAnostraca
FamilyBranchinectidae
GenusBranchinecta
Other Common Names
vernal pool fairy shrimp (EN)
Concept Reference
Eng, L.L., D. Belk, and C.H. Erikson. 1990. California Anostraca: Distribution, habitat, and status. Journal of Crustacean Biology 10(2): 247-277. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1548485?refreqid=excelsior%3A2bde55ee67369e6bd73730d3e4616d34&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Taxonomic Comments
Depicted in error as Branchinecta coloradensis by Linder (1941)
Conservation Status
Review Date2010-12-09
Change Date2003-10-01
Edition Date2010-12-09
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2010); Rogers, D.C. (2008); Cordeiro, J. (2008)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Despite the extremely wide range of this species, it is federally listed as a threatened species. While it is not as restricted in range as some of the other fairy shrimp, it is not considered abundant at any site (Eriksen and Belk, 1999, call it "an uncommon, common fairy shrimp"), and its habitat continues to be threatened by urban and agricultural development and climate change; although range, overall, has not contracted.
Range Extent Comments
Endemic to the Central Valley, Central Coast Mountains, and South Coast Mountains of California. It ranges from the Vina Plains in Tehama County, through the Central Valley, and south along the Central Coast to northern Santa Barbara County. There are also several disjunct populations on the Santa Rosa Plateau and in Riverside County (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992). Note this is the most widely distributed of the California endemic large branchiopods occurring throughout most of the length of California's Central Valley, from the Millville Plains and Stillwater Plains in Shasta County to Pixley in Tulare County with disjunct populations in the Santa Rosa Plateau near Rancho Santa California in Riverside County (Helm, 1998).
Occurrences Comments
At the time of listing in 1994, it was known from 32 loosely described populations (localities lumped to populations) in a range that extended from the Redding and Stillwater Plains area in Shasta County, California, south through the Central Valley to Pixley in Tulare County, and along the central coast range from northern Solano County to Pinnacles in San Benito County, California (occurrences in Shasta- 1, Tehama- 4, Glenn- 1, Butte- 1, Yuba- 1, Placer- 1, El Dorado- 1, Sacramento- 2, Solano- 1, Contra Costs- 1, Alameda- 1, Merced- 4, Madera- 2, Fresno- 2, San Benito- 1, Tulare- 4, San Luis Obispo- 1, Santa Barbara- 1, and Riverside Cos.- 2) (USFWS, 2007). In 1998 the shrimp was discovered in two distinct vernal pool habitats in Jackson County, Oregon, and these occurrences now comprise a disjunct population center in the Klamath Mountains Vernal Pool Region, approximately 130 miles north of the species' previously known range (USFWS, 2006). The known range of was also extended due to its detection in one pool at the Napa Airport at the southeastern edge of the Lake-Napa Vernal Pool Region. It has been located in 605 pools or swales (Helm, 1998) across 27 counties in the Agate Desert, White City, and Table Rocks areas in the Rogue River Valley in Oregon as well as various localities in the Cantral Valley and Coast Ranges of California (USFWS, 2006). Number of actual occurrences probably fewer after the delineation of element occurrences. Since the species' listing, surveys have documented it in several locations along the edge of the range in the Santa Barbara Vernal Pool Region: at several Department of Defense bases (Fort Hunter-Liggett, Camp Roberts, and Vandenburg Air Force Base), near San Luis Obispo, at the Santa Maria Airport, and in an isolated pool on the Los Padres National Forest; while in Western Riverside Co., it has also been discovered at a limited number of additional pools, as well as from several pools at Cruzan Mesa in Los Angeles Co. (new county occurrence records:Calaveras- 4, Colusa- 1, Kings- 2, Monterey- 34, Napa- 1, and Yolo- 4 Cos.) (USFWS, 2007).
Threat Impact Comments
The primary threats are elimination and degradation of vernal pool habitat (habitat almost completely gone in Rogue River Valley and 60% lost in Agate Desert) by industrial, urban, and residential development and conversion of grasslands to agricultural fields. (USFWS, 1992; 2006). Some 92 occurrences (27 percent) are threatened by development, and an additional 27 occurrences (7 percent) are threatened by agricultural conversion (USFWS, 2005). In Oregon, the species is threatened by commercial and industrial development, agricultural conversion, and utility projects causing habitat degradation, pesticide contamination from mosquito control and fertilizer runoff, physical barriers to dispersal, human activities such as urban and agricultural development (USFWS, 2006).
From USFWS (2007):
The largest continuing threat to this species is the loss and modification of habitat due to urban development, agricultural conversion, and infrastructure construction, especially along the periphery of urban areas. Cities are rapidly expanding into vernal pool habitat where the shrimp are found. Conversion of vernal pool habitat to intensive agriculture continues to contribute to the decline in vernal pools. Occurrences within road right-of ways are threatened by road maintenance and road-widening activities. Invasive nonnative plants are a threat to natural vernal pool hydrology in a number of lands under public or private conservation management, including the Stone Lake Preserve, Camp Roberts, the Santa Rosa Plateau, and Skunk Hollow vernal pools, and numerous small remnant parcels of vernal pool habitat. The use of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) to control mosquito larvae (to prevent the spread of human pathogens) may be an emerging threat for the shrimp as introduced mosquitofish have been shown to significantly reduce fairy shrimp abundance when introduced to pools with active shrimp. Also during the rainy season, juvenile bullfrogs disperse readily into vernal pool complexes from permanent waters and can spend several weeks or more at pools consuming aquatic invertebrates including macro-crustaceans. Use of off-road vehicles (ORVs) poses an unquantified threat to the vernal pool fairy shrimp at specific locations. The introduction of pesticides and other contaminants into vernal pool waters may threaten occurrences of the vernal pool fairy shrimp. Water quality in vernal pools may also be degraded over large portions of the Central Valley due
to pesticide overspray and residues. The runoff and precipitation that fill the pools can include pesticides (i.e., herbicides, insecticides, fungicides). Drought is likely to decrease or terminate reproductive output as pools fail to flood, or dry up before reproduction is complete. Climate change has the potential to adversely affect the vernal pool fairy shrimp through changes in vernal pool inundation patterns and temperature regimes. Loss and fragmentation of vernal pool habitat is thought to decrease dispersal ability. Therefore, species range shifts that may be required by climate change may be more difficult due to factors such as the loss of potential habitat from development, occupation of potential habitat by nonnative species, and lack of appropriate soil substrates. Existing preserves in California may not provide the full range of conditions needed to sustain fairy shrimp during variable climatic conditions (Pyke, 2004; 2005b)
Ecology & Habitat

Description

See Eng et al. (1990) for a complete scientific description.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Is most similar in appearance to B. coloradensis. See Eng et a. (1990) for distinguishing characteristics.

Habitat

This species inhabits vernal pools and similar ephemeral wetlands. It is most commonly found in grassed or mud bottomed pools or basalt flow depression pools in unplowed grasslands (Eng et al. 1990). The pools vary in size from over 10 ha to only 20 square meters. It occurs at temperatures between 6 and 20 degrees C in soft and poorly buffered waters (Eng et al. 1990). Occurs mostly in vernal pools (79%) although it also inhabits a variety of natural and artificial seasonal wetland habitats, such as alkali pools, ephemeral drainages, stock ponds, roadside ditches, vernal swales, and rock outcrop pools. Whatever the habitat, the wetlands in which this species is found are small (<200 square meters) and shallow (mean 5 cm), however this species occasionally inhabits large (44,534 square meters) and very deep (122 cm) habitats (Eriksen & Belk, 1999).

Reproduction

The eggs are dropped from the brooding female to the benthos. The eggs hatch when the vernal pools and swales fill with rainwater and the immature stages rapidly develop into adults. Other life history characteristics include mean days to mature (18.0), mean days to reproduce (39.7), mean population longevity in days (90.6) (Helm, 1998).
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDBog/fen
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS2Yes
CaliforniaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentPervasive - largeExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasPervasive - largeExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasPervasive - largeExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (127)
California (126)
AreaForestAcres
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
BackboneShasta-Trinity National Forest11,466
Bakeoven RidgeShasta-Trinity National Forest46
Bear MountainLos Padres National Forest913
Bell QuinbyShasta-Trinity National Forest11,556
Big RocksLos Padres National Forest11,866
BlackKlamath National Forest6,530
Black ButteLos Padres National Forest5,116
Black MountainLos Padres National Forest16,818
Bonanza KingShasta-Trinity National Forest16,402
BoulderKlamath National Forest435
Box CampKlamath National Forest858
BriscoeMendocino National Forest7,212
Burnt Lava FlowModoc National Forest8,387
Callahan FlowModoc National Forest6,618
Callahan FlowKlamath National Forest3,231
CamuesaLos Padres National Forest8,209
Castle Crags AShasta-Trinity National Forest113
Castle Crags BShasta-Trinity National Forest1,619
Chalk PeakLos Padres National Forest7,472
ChanchelullaShasta-Trinity National Forest3,915
China Springs AShasta-Trinity National Forest25
China Springs BShasta-Trinity National Forest568
ChinquapinShasta-Trinity National Forest22,040
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Condrey Mtn.Klamath National Forest2,923
Cow CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest22,627
Cow CreekSix Rivers National Forest1,271
CrapoKlamath National Forest1,487
Cub (fs)Klamath National Forest135
CuyamaLos Padres National Forest19,631
De La GuerraLos Padres National Forest5,418
Deer MountainMendocino National Forest11,716
Devils RockShasta-Trinity National Forest16,209
DiableLos Padres National Forest19,597
Dog CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest5,001
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
EagleShasta-Trinity National Forest6,553
East BeegumShasta-Trinity National Forest8,425
East ForkShasta-Trinity National Forest6,201
East GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest27,894
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Fisher Gulch BShasta-Trinity National Forest4,791
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
Garcia MountainLos Padres National Forest7,850
Granite PeakShasta-Trinity National Forest122
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
GriderKlamath National Forest10,647
Hobo GulchShasta-Trinity National Forest88
Horseshoe SpringsLos Padres National Forest14,089
Indian CreekKlamath National Forest5,011
IshiLassen National Forest21,805
Jacobs (fs)Klamath National Forest577
JohnsonKlamath National Forest10,652
JuncalLos Padres National Forest12,289
KangarooKlamath National Forest40,617
KelseyKlamath National Forest3,237
Kettle Mtn.Shasta-Trinity National Forest4,589
La BreaLos Padres National Forest14,031
La PanzaLos Padres National Forest4,954
Lake EleanorShasta-Trinity National Forest397
Little French CShasta-Trinity National Forest11,529
Little PineLos Padres National Forest1,315
Los Machos HillsLos Padres National Forest11,112
Lpoor CanyonLos Padres National Forest13,762
Machesna MountainLos Padres National Forest12,271
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
ManzanaLos Padres National Forest2,101
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
MayfieldLassen National Forest14,444
Mill CreekSequoia National Forest27,643
Mirada PimeLos Padres National Forest13,302
MonoLos Padres National Forest28,141
Mt. EddyShasta-Trinity National Forest7,232
Mt. HoffmanKlamath National Forest802
Mt. Shasta AShasta-Trinity National Forest676
Mt. Shasta BShasta-Trinity National Forest2,809
Mt. Shasta CShasta-Trinity National Forest292
Murphy GladeShasta-Trinity National Forest1,015
MuseKlamath National Forest238
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Orleans Mtn.Klamath National Forest49,090
Orleans Mtn.Shasta-Trinity National Forest57
Orleans Mtn. BSix Rivers National Forest17,183
Orleans Mtn. CSix Rivers National Forest15,589
PantherShasta-Trinity National Forest12,016
PattisonShasta-Trinity National Forest29,299
Penney RidgeShasta-Trinity National Forest5,226
Pilot CreekSix Rivers National Forest9,192
PortugueseKlamath National Forest18,915
QuatalLos Padres National Forest7,253
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
RussianKlamath National Forest21,771
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
Salt GulchShasta-Trinity National Forest6,511
San Mateo CanyonCleveland National Forest65
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
Sespe - FrazierAngeles National Forest4,254
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
ShacklefordKlamath National Forest1,679
SiskiyouKlamath National Forest54,039
Siskiyou ASix Rivers National Forest1,017
Siskiyou BSix Rivers National Forest18,871
Slate CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest6,636
SnoozerKlamath National Forest23,414
Snow MountainMendocino National Forest14,457
Snow MountainLassen National Forest2,165
South ForkShasta-Trinity National Forest16,786
Stanley MountainLos Padres National Forest14,674
Stoveleg GapShasta-Trinity National Forest61
Tepusquet PeakLos Padres National Forest5,821
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
Tom MartinKlamath National Forest9,031
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
Ukonom CreekKlamath National Forest4,621
UnderwoodSix Rivers National Forest6,591
UnderwoodShasta-Trinity National Forest3,046
Weaver BallyShasta-Trinity National Forest829
Wells MountainShasta-Trinity National Forest5,919
West BeegumShasta-Trinity National Forest5,198
West GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest37,516
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
References (15)
  1. Eng, L.L., D. Belk, and C.H. Erikson. 1990. California Anostraca: Distribution, habitat, and status. Journal of Crustacean Biology 10(2): 247-277. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1548485?refreqid=excelsior%3A2bde55ee67369e6bd73730d3e4616d34&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  2. Eriksen, C. H. and D. Belk. 1999. Fairy Shrimps of California's Puddles, Pools, and Playas. Mad River Press: Eureka, California.196 pp.
  3. Helm, B.P. 1998. Biogeography of eight large branchiopods endemic to California. Pages 124-139 in C.W. Witham, E.T. Bauder, D. Belk, W.R. Ferren, Jr. and R. Ornduff (eds.) Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems- Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant society, Sacramento, California.
  4. Linder, F. 1941. Contributions to the morphology and the taxonomy of the Branchiopoda Anostraca. <i>Z</i>oologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala, 10: 101-302.
  5. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  6. Pyke, C.R. 2004. Habitat loss confounds climate change impacts. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:178-182.
  7. Pyke, C.R. 2005a. Assessing climate change impacts on vernal pool ecosystems and endemic branchiopods. Ecosystems 8:95-105.
  8. Pyke, C.R. 2005b. Interactions between habitat loss and climate change: Implications for fairy shrimp in the Central Valley Ecoregion of California, USA. Climate Change 68:199-218.
  9. Pyke, C.R. and J.T. Marty. 2005. Cattle grazing mediates climate change impacts on ephemeral wetlands. Conservation Biology 19(5):1619-1625.
  10. Rogers, D. C. 2013. Anostraca catalogus (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 61(2):525–546.
  11. Rogers, D.C. and B.J. Hann. 2016. Class Branchiopoda (in Chapter 16, Phylum Arthropoda). Pages 437-477 in J.H. Thorp and and D.C. Rogers (Editors), Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates, 4th edition, Volume II: Keys to Nearctic Fauna. Academic Press.
  12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1992. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposal to determine Endangered Status for Four Fairy Shrimp and the Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp in California. Proposed Rule. Federal Register. 57(90):19856-19862.
  13. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2005. Recovery plan for vernal pools ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. xxvi + 606 pages.
  14. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006. Draft recovery plan for listed species of the Rogue Valley Vernal Pool and Illinois Valley Wet Meadow Ecosystems. Region 1, Portland, Oregon. 136 pp.
  15. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Vernal pool fairy shrimp (<i>Branchinecta lynchi</i>) 5-year review: Summary and evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California. 74 pp. FWS07R0007. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/tess/species_nonpublish/1117.pdf