Helonias bullata

L.

Swamp-pink

G3Vulnerable Found in 27 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
Swamp pink (Helonias bullata). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.151923
Element CodePMLIL10010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderLiliales
FamilyLiliaceae
GenusHelonias
Other Common Names
swamppink (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Distinct species in a monotypic genus.
Conservation Status
Review Date2009-12-31
Change Date1992-03-06
Edition Date1992-01-24
Edition AuthorsDavid Snyder, rev. D. Snyder (1997), rev. K. Gravuer (2009)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent5000-200,000 square km (about 2000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Helonias bullata is known from the Coastal Plain of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia (formerly also Staten Island, NY, where now extirpated), as well as from higher elevations in northern New Jersey, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Restricted to forested wetlands that are perennially water-saturated with a low frequency of inundation, habitat specificity appears to be a critical factor in this species' rarity. Approximately 225 occurrences are believed extant, over half of which are in New Jersey; 80 additional occurrences are considered historical and 15 are extirpated. The species is locally abundant at several sites in New Jersey, Delaware, Virginia, and North Carolina; some have 10,000+ clumps of plants. In addition to sites known to have been extirpated, significant habitat has been lost throughout the range due to factors such as drainage for agriculture. A number of local population declines have also been documented in the past 20 years. Degradation of this species' sensitive habitat via changes to the hydrologic regime is the primary threat. Such changes can be direct (ditching, damming, draining) or indirect (from development in the watershed); indirect impacts are particularly difficult to address. Other threats include poor water quality, invasive species, trash, all terrain vehicles, deer herbivory, trampling, and collection. Given this species' very specific hydrological requirements, climate change could also be an issue. H. bullata has limited ability to colonize new sites (low incidence of flowering, limited seed dispersal, poor seedling establishment) and low genetic variation, limiting its ability to adapt to changing conditions and recover when sites are destroyed.
Range Extent Comments
Helonias bullata occurs on the Coastal Plain in southern New York state (Staten Island), New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Occurs at higher elevations (primarily disjunct bog areas in the Southern Appalachians) in northern New Jersey, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Extant populations in all states except New York. The greatest number of sites are in southern New Jersey, but the species is also locally abundant at some other sites, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region.
Occurrences Comments
Intensive survey efforts since this species was Federally listed have approximately doubled the number of known occurrences. Approximately 225 occurrences are believed extant, over half of which are in New Jersey; Virginia also has a considerable number (40+). Approximately 80 additional occurrences are considered historical, with the vast majority in New Jersey and a considerable number (14) in Delaware as well. 15 occurrences are extirpated, again mostly in New Jersey.
Threat Impact Comments
Habitat degradation is the primary rangewide threat. This degradation is difficult to address through either land protection or regulatory mechanisms because it is often brought about by off-site land uses, particularly development. Evidence of detrimental effects of development on H. bullata habitat and population quality continues to accumulate; such impacts are anticipated to worsen as development continues (USFWS 2007). A major component of habitat degradation is changes to the hydrologic regime. Such changes can be direct (e.g., ditching, damming, draining) or indirect (i.e, from development in the watershed). Indirect impacts often result from increased impervious surface in the watershed, which reduces infiltration and increases overland flow of stormwater, leading to increased stream erosion, wetland sedimentation, flood volumes and velocities, water level fluctuations, and hydrologic drought (USFWS 2007). Other components of degradation associated with adjacent development include poor water quality, invasive exotic species, trash, all terrain vehicles, herbivory by overabundant deer populations, trampling, and collection (USFWS 2007). Direct habitat losses have slowed, but historical losses were substantial (USFWS 2007). Because this species requires a very specific hydrology in order to thrive, climate change, which has the potential to either increase or decrease water levels at established sites, is an anticipated threat. For example, increased drought in southern Appalachians mountain bogs may already be having detrimental impacts. Also, about 10% of known occurrences are in areas with increased vulnerability to coastal flooding due to sea level rise (USFWS 2007).
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Helonias bullata is very distinctive when in flower or fruit; the seed shape is unique. It may be characterized by "basal leaves evergreen, elongate-spatulate, becoming 3 dm; scape elongating to 1 m, covered with short bract-like leaves at base, these becoming remote and scale-like above; raceme ovoid, 3-10 cm, ca 3 cm thick; flowers fragrant, 1 cm wide; seeds linear, 5 mm" (Gleason and Cronquist, 1991). Its basal rosette is similar to Amianthium muscitoxicum, with which it sometimes co-occurs, but the leaves of H. bullata are wider (to 4 cm vs. under 2.5 cm), widest near the pointed apex (vs. strap-shaped and rounded at the apex), form dense clumps, and are glossy and flat (vs. dull and possessing prominent central veins).

Habitat

Restricted to forested wetlands that are groundwater influenced and are perennially water-saturated with a low frequency of inundation. Sutter (1982) described these as sites where the water table is at or very near the surface and is stable, fluctuating only slightly during spring and summer. These habitats include emergent portions of hummocks in and along stream channels in Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) swamps, headwater seepage wetlands, red maple (Acer rubrum) swamps, mixed hardwood/evergreen swamps, and (rarely) black spruce-tamarack (Picea mariana-Larix laricina) bogs. In Georgia, the species is found in coldwater Blue Ridge seepage swamps (mountain bogs) with purple pitcherplant (Sarracenia purpurea), red maple, mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), Carolina sheep laurel (K. caroliniana), rosebay rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum), and thickets of tag alder (Alnus serrulata) and peat moss (Sphagnum). The species appears to be somewhat shade tolerant and to need enough canopy to minimize competition with other more aggressive species and herbivory by deer. It is often found at stream sources.

Reproduction

Reproduces sexually and asexually; reproduces vegetatively via rhizomes forming clusters of closely spaced rosettes, and also produces prolific seed following flowering (although very few of the plants in a population typically produce flowers in a given year) (Sutter 1984 cited in CPC 2008, USFWS Swamp Pink Recovery Plan Technical Draft 1990). Highly self-compatible (Sutter 1984 cited in CPC 2008), although the rate of selfing vs. outcrossing in nature appears to vary widely; of fifteen natural populations sampled in a genetic study, estimates suggested that seven of the populations were highly outcrossing, while several other populations had much lower outcrossing estimates (Godt et al. 1995).

Primary seed dispersal takes place by gravity and wind, which probably carries seeds less than 40cm (Godt et al. 1995). Secondary seed dispersal by ants and water has been experimentially verified (Peterson 1992 cited in USFWS 2007). Seeds possess eliasomes (lipid-rich ridges of soft tissue) that foster dispersal by ants. Seeds can also float for days, which could facilitate long-distance downstream dispersal by water. Seeds are viable for only a few weeks, so the species does not have a seed bank (Godt et al. 1995).
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDBog/fen
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
North CarolinaS2Yes
DelawareS2Yes
GeorgiaS1Yes
New YorkSXYes
VirginiaS2Yes
New JerseyS3Yes
MarylandS2Yes
South CarolinaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
1.1 - Housing & urban areasPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
2 - Agriculture & aquaculturePervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
5 - Biological resource useLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
6.1 - Recreational activitiesLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionPervasive - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
9.4 - Garbage & solid wastePervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - low
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - low

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, SPRING-FLOWERING
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (27)
Georgia (9)
AreaForestAcres
Big MountainChattahoochee National Forest1,974
Duck BranchChattahoochee National Forest194
Ellicott Rock AdditionChattahoochee National Forest690
Helton CreekChattahoochee National Forest2,348
Joe GapChattahoochee National Forest5,321
Kelly RidgeChattahoochee National Forest8,325
Patterson GapChattahoochee National Forest1,186
Sarah's CreekChattahoochee National Forest6,888
Tate BranchChattahoochee National Forest1,069
North Carolina (7)
AreaForestAcres
Barkers Creek (addition)Nantahala National Forest975
Graveyard Ridge (addition)Pisgah National Forest1,958
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Overflow CreekNantahala National Forest3,379
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
South Carolina (2)
AreaForestAcres
Big MountainSumter National Forest2,337
Ellicott Rock 1Sumter National Forest301
Virginia (9)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Saint Marys AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest1,454
Saint Marys AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest1,454
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
References (15)
  1. Center for Plant Conservation (CPC). 2008, 29 January last update. National Collection Plant Profile: <i>Helonias bullata</i>. Center for Plant Conservation. Online. Available: www.centerforplantconservation.org/collection/cpc_viewprofile.asp?CPCNum=2210 (Accessed 2009).
  2. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2002a. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxvi + 723 pp.
  3. Gleason, H.A. 1952. The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 3 volumes. Hafner Press, New York. 1732 pp.
  4. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. 910 pp.
  5. Godt, M.J.W., J.L. Hamrick and S. Bratton. 1995. Genetic diversity in a threatened wetland species, <i>Helonias bullata</i> (Liliaceae). Conservation Biology 9(3): 596-604.
  6. Hough, M.Y. 1983. New Jersey wild plants. Harmony Press, Harmony, NJ. 414 pp.
  7. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  8. Laidig, K. J., R.A. Zampella, and C. Popolizio. 2009. Hydrologic regimes associated with <i>Helonias bullata</i> L. (swamp pink) and the potential impact of simulated water-level reductions. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 136(2): 221-232.
  9. Southern Appalachian Species Viability Project. 2002. A partnership between the U.S. Forest Service-Region 8, Natural Heritage Programs in the Southeast, NatureServe, and independent scientists to develop and review data on 1300+ regionally and locally rare species in the Southern Appalachian and Alabama region. Database (Access 97) provided to the U.S. Forest Service by NatureServe, Durham, North Carolina.
  10. Sutter, R. 1982. The distribution and reproductive biology of Helonias bullata L. in North Carolina. North Carolina Dept. Agriculture, Plant Industry Division, Raleigh.
  11. Sutter, R.D. 1984. The status of Helonias bullata L. (Liliaceae) in the southern Appalachians. Castanea 49(1): 9-16.
  12. Sutter, R.D., V. Frantz, and K.A. McCarthy. 1988. Atlas of rare and endangered plant species in North Carolina. North Carolina Dept. Agriculture, Plant Protection Section, Conservation Program, Raleigh, North Carolina. 174 pp.
  13. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1988. Determination of <i>Helonias bullata</i> (swamp pink) to be a threatened species. Federal Register 53(175): 35075-35080.
  14. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Swamp Pink (<i>Helonias bullata</i>) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. Review conducted by Wendy Walsh, New Jersey Field Office, Pleasantville, NJ. [http://www.fws.gov/northeast/Endangered/PDF/Swamp%20Pink%205yr.pdf]
  15. Wilson, L.K. 1990c. Swamp pink (<i>Helonias bullata</i>) recovery plan. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA. 41 pp.