Setophaga kirtlandii

(Baird, 1852)

Kirtland's Warbler

G3Vulnerable Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Medium - lowThreat Impact
Kirtland's Warbler (Setophaga kirtlandii). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102456
Element CodeABPBX03180
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyParulidae
GenusSetophaga
Synonyms
Dendroica kirtlandii(Baird, 1852)
Other Common Names
Kirtland's warbler (EN) Paruline de Kirtland (FR)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Phylogenetic analyses of sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (Lovette et al. 2010) indicate that all species formerly placed in Dendroica, one species formerly placed in Wilsonia (citrina), and two species formerly placed in Parula (americana and pitiayumi) form a clade with the single species traditionally placed in Setophaga (ruticilla). The generic name Setophaga has priority for this clade (AOU 2011).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-02-18
Change Date2024-02-18
Edition Date2024-02-18
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2024)
Threat ImpactMedium - low
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
This species has recovered from historical declines thanks to extensive conservation efforts in its breeding and non-breeding range. The population has more than doubled since 2002 with approximately 2,245 pairs estimated in 2021. The major threats historically impacting this species, habitat loss due to succession and brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater), have both been virtually eliminated. However, this species remains reliant on conservation efforts to maintain suitable habitat and ensure high rates of fledgling success.
Range Extent Comments
During the breeding season (April-September), the range includes northern Lower Michigan, the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, and northeastern and south-central Wisconsin in the United States, and at least one site in Ontario, Canada (USFWS 2019, Bocetti et al. 2020, Fink et al. 2022). Using records from the breeding range from 2004 onward (the past 20 years) from Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2024), the breeding range extent is estimated to be approximately 256,582 km² (GeoCat 2024).

During the non-breeding season (September-April), it occurs primarily on islands of The Bahamas (Bocetti et al. 2020, USFWS 2019). Reports of solitary individuals in Bermuda, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, and Mexico are not considered part of its normal non-breeding range (Faanes and Haney 1989, Brewer et al. 1991, Mayfield 1996, USFWS 2012, Cooper et al. 2017, Cooper et al. 2019b, Bocetti et al. 2020, Brunner et al. 2020). There is limited evidence that a small number of individuals spend the non-breeding season in Turks and Caicos (Cooper et al. 2017, Cooper et al. 2019b), but this part of the range was not included due to a lack of specific locality data. Using records from The Bahamas from 2004 onward (the past 20 years) from Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2024), the non-breeding range extent is estimated to be approximately 123,101 km² (GeoCat 2024). As the most limited range during its annual cycle, the non-breeding range extent was used in this assessment.
Occurrences Comments
Determining the number of occurrences in Michigan is challenging using standardized criteria due to a constantly shifting breeding habitat mosaic. The occurrences in northern Lower Michigan are likely rather large and, therefore, low in number. At the periphery of the range, there are at least three distinct occurrences in Wisconsin and one in Ontario (USFWS 2019, Bocetti et al. 2020, Kirtland’s Warbler Alliance 2022).
Threat Impact Comments
Habitat loss in the breeding range due to succession was considered one of the primary reasons for this species’ decline in the past, but the availability of appropriately-aged forest stands has been secured for the foreseeable future thanks to ongoing long-term management plans in existing habitat and the creation of new habitat in peripheral parts of the range (USFWS 2019, Bocetti et al. 2020, Olah et al. 2022, Van Dyke et al. 2022, Olah et al. 2023). The threat of habitat loss due to succession or development in the non-breeding range is considered low despite much of the habitat not being protected (USFWS 2019). Multiple invasive plant species continue to reduce the amount of native fruit-bearing plants utilized by this species in The Bahamas and Turks and Caicos, although the impacts are not known to be serious (USFWS 2019).

Brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) has been considered a threat for decades, but programs to trap and remove them from Kirtland’s warbler breeding sites have successfully reduced this threat to the point that only about 1% of nests were parasitized from 2015-2018 (Cooper et al. 2019a, USFWS 2019, Bocetti et al. 2020, Margenau et al. 2023). As of 2024, the severity of this threat is considered low.

While mortality due to collision with man-made structures is a serious threat for many migratory songbird species, it has only been documented five times for this species (USFWS 2019).

The long-term effects of climate change are projected to have the greatest impact on the non-breeding range. Habitat in the non-breeding range in the Bahamas is projected to decline in both quantity and quality in response to climate change and these factors are projected to cause declines (Brown et al. 2019, USFWS 2019). Damage from increasingly powerful hurricanes can decrease available food sources and habitat but can also produce new habitat in a natural cycle of succession (USFWS 2019). The availability and nutritional quality of native fruits, which are vital energy sources for migration to the breeding grounds in late April and early May, is projected to decline in response to increased temperatures, decreases in annual rainfall, and changes in the timing of rainfall away from the month of March (USFWS 2019). Sea-level rise is not projected to significantly decrease habitat in the coming decades (USFWS 2019). The effects of climate change are not expected to have negative impacts for habitat in the breeding range in the coming decades, although the range could shift northward (USFWS 2019).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

In adults, upperparts are blue-gray (browner in fall and winter), streaked with black; underparts are yellow with black streaks on the sides; white eye ring is broken by black lores and eye line; whitish wing bars are indistinct. Female is duller than male; immature female is duller still, with brownish upperparts.

Diagnostic Characteristics

In fall and winter, in dorsal view, resembles yellow-rumped warbler but lacks yellow rump.

Habitat

Nesting habitat consists of nearly homogeneous fire-generated stands of usually 30 hectares or more of dense scrubby jack pine (Pinus banksiana), 1.3-6 meters high (6-22 years old) (also reported as 2-4 meters tall and 8-20 years old) interspersed with many small openings, minimal ground cover, and little or no hardwoods, typically in areas of Grayling sand soils and level or gently rolling topography (Mayfield 1960, Walkinshaw 1983, Mayfield 1992, USFWS 2019, Bocetti et al. 2020). Habitat tends to be suitable only for periods of about 10-15 years. When trees reach 3.5 meters or more in height, with no live needles present below about 1.0 meters, habitat becomes increasingly unfavorable and populations decline (Brewer et al. 1991). Habitat tracts of less than 30 hectares are seldom used for nesting (Mayfield 1993). In Wisconsin, it has been documented nesting in habitat dominated by young red pine (Pinus resinosa) with nesting success rates comparable to the core of its range (Olah et al. 2020, Olah et al. 2022, Van Dyke et al. 2022, Olah et al. 2023). Nests are on the ground, well concealed under arching plants near the bases of pines (Bocetti et al. 2020). In winter, this species occurs mainly in low broadleaf scrub, including transient early successional habitats dominated by Lantana involucrata, generally in habitat patches of 2-3 hectares or larger (Miller and Conroy 1990, Mayfield 1996, Bocetti et al. 2020).

Ecology

Breeding territory encompasses about 12 ha. Possibly affected negatively by periods of drought in the winter range (Mayfield 1993).

Nest predators are thought to include blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata), American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos), garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.), eastern hognose snakes (Heterodon platyrhinos), thirteen-lined ground squirrels (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus), and red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) (Mayfield 1992).

Reproduction

Males singing ends in early July. Eggs are laid in late May-June (also July for re-nestings; few after 25 June). Clutch size is 3-5 eggs. Incubation lasts 13-15 days, by female. Young are tended by both parents, leave nest at 8-12 days (beginning in mid-June). Common host for brown-headed cowbird, which reduces nesting success. Commonly nests in loose groups of 2-30 pairs separated by substantial distances of similar unoccupied habitat.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - ConiferShrubland/chaparral
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN1B
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS1BYes
United StatesN3B
ProvinceRankNative
North CarolinaSNAYes
IndianaSNAYes
FloridaS1Yes
MichiganS3Yes
South CarolinaS1MYes
OhioS1NYes
PennsylvaniaSNAYes
GeorgiaS2MYes
VirginiaSNAYes
MarylandSNAYes
WisconsinS1BYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.3 - Temperature extremesRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineModerate - low
11.4 - Storms & floodingRestricted (11-30%)Neutral or Potential BenefitModerate - low

Roadless Areas (4)
Michigan (2)
AreaForestAcres
DeliriumHiawatha National Forest190
DeliriumHiawatha National Forest190
North Carolina (2)
AreaForestAcres
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
References (75)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). Chesser, R.T., R.C. Banks, F.K. Barker, C. Cicero, J.L. Dunn, A.W. Kratter, I.J. Lovette, P.C. Rasmussen, J.V. Remsen, Jr., J.D. Rising, D.F. Stotz, and K. Winker. 2011. Fifty-second supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list of North American Birds. The Auk 128(3):600-613.
  4. Anich, N. M., and M. P. Ward. 2017. Using audio playback to expand the geographic breeding range of an endangered species. Diversity and Distributions 23: 1499-1508.
  5. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  6. Bent, A. C. 1953. Life histories of North American wood warblers. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 203. Washington, D.C.
  7. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  8. Bocetti, C. I., D. M. Donner, and H. F. Mayfield. 2020. Kirtland's warbler (<i>Setophaga kirtlandii</i>), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (A. F. Poole, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.kirwar.01
  9. Bocetti, C. L. 1993. Hatching year Kirtland's warbler captured in unusual habitat. Wilson Bull. 105:532-533.
  10. Bond, J. 1979. Birds of the West Indies. Fourth edition. Collins, St. James Place, London. 256 pp.
  11. Botkin, D. B., D. A. Woodby, and R. A. Nisbet. 1991. Kirtland's warbler habitats: a possible early indicator of climatic warming. Biological Conservation 56:63-78.
  12. Brewer, R., G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams, Jr. 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan. xvii + 594 pp.
  13. Brown, D. J., D. M. Donner, C. A. Ribic, and C. I. Bocetti. 2019. Influence of climate change and post delisting management on long-term population viability of the conservation-reliant Kirtland's warbler. Ecology and Evolution 9(18): 10263-10276.
  14. Brunner, A. R., N. W. Cooper, and P. P. Marra. 2020. First known record of Kirtland’s warbler (<i>Setophaga kirtlandii</i>) observed and captured in Jamaica. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 132(3): 746-749.
  15. Byelich, J., et al. 1976. Kirtland's warbler recovery plan. Preliminary draft. 74 pp.
  16. Collar, N. J., L. P. Gonzaga, N. Krabbe, A. Madroño-Nieto, L. G. Naranjo, T. A. Parker III, and D. C. Wege. 1992. Threatened Birds of the Americas. The ICBP/IUCN Red Data Book. 3rd edition, Part 2. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, UK.
  17. Cooper, N. W., C. S. Rushing, and P. P. Marra. 2019a. Reducing the conservation reliance of the endangered Kirtland's warbler through adaptive management. Journal of Wildlife Management 83(6): 1297-1305.
  18. Cooper, N. W., D. N. Ewert, J. M. Wunderle Jr., E. h. Helmer, and P. P. Marra. 2019b. Revising the wintering distribution and habitat use of the Kirtland’s warbler using playback surveys, citizen scientists, and geolocators. Endangered Species Research 38: 79-89.
  19. Cooper, N. W., M. T. Hallworth, and P. P. Marra. 2017. Light-level geolocation reveals wintering distribution, migration routes, and primary stopover locations of an endangered long-distance migratory songbird. Journal of Avian Biology 48: 209–219.
  20. Dennis, B., P. L. Munholland, and J. M. Scott. 1991. Estimation of growth and extinction parameters for endangered species. Ecological Monographs 61:115-143.
  21. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  22. Ennis, R. Chair of Kirtland's Warbler Recovery Team. Huron-Manistee National Forest. Cadillac, MI
  23. Evers, D. C. 1992. A guide to Michigan's endangered wildlife. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. viii + 103 pp.
  24. Faanes, C. A., and J. C. Haney. 1989. First record of Kirtland's warbler from the Dominican Republic and additional bird observations. Caribbean J. Science 25:30-35.
  25. Fink, D., T. Auer, A. Johnston, M. Strimas-Mackey, S. Ligocki, O. Robinson, W. Hochachka, L. Jaromczyk, A. Rodewald, C. Wood, I. Davies, and A. Spencer. 2022. eBird status and trends, data version: 2021; released: 2022. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. https://doi.org/10.2173/ebirdst.2021
  26. Gadoth-Goodman, D., and D. E. Rothstein. 2019. Alternative silvicultural approaches to jack pine plantations for endangered species habitat and forest products. Forest Science 66(2): 210-220.
  27. Geospatial Conservation Assessment Tool (GeoCAT). Online. Available: <a href="http://geocat.kew.org/">https://geocat.iucnredlist.org/</a> (Accessed 2024)
  28. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2024. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2024).
  29. Griscom, L., and A. Sprunt, Jr. 1979. The warblers of America. Doubleday and Co., Garden City, New York. 302 pp.
  30. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  31. Harrison, H.H. 1984. Wood warblers' world. Simon and Schuster, New York. 335 pp.
  32. Henderson, E., and H. Hoganson. 2021. Spatially explicit Kirtland’s warbler habitat management scheduling in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. Forests 2021, 12, 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081065
  33. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  34. Huber, K. R. 1982. The Kirtland's warbler (DENDROICA KIRTLANDII), an annotated bibliography. 1852-1980. Univ. Michigan Press. 114 pp.
  35. Kepler, C. National Biological Survey. SE Research Station. Warnell School of Forest Resources. University of Georgia. Athens, GA
  36. King, W. B., compiler. 1979. Endangered birds of the world. The International Council for Bird Preservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. [Reprinted in handbook form in 1981.]
  37. Kirtland's Warbler Alliance. 2022. Kirtland's Warbler News: Results of the 2021 Kirtland's warbler census. https://www.kirtlandswarbler.org/news (Accessed 18 February 2024).
  38. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  39. Lovette, I. J., J. Pérez-emán, J. P. Sullivan, R. C. Banks, I. Florentino, S. Córdoba-Córdoba, M. Echeverry-Galvis, F. K. Barker, K. J. Burns, J. Klicka, S. M. Lanyon, and E. Bermingham. 2010. A comprehensive multilocus phylogeny for the wood-warblers and a revised classification of the Parulidae (Aves). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57:753-770.
  40. Margenau, E. A., N. W. Cooper, D. J. Brown, D. M. Donner, P. P. Marra, and P. Ryan. 2023. Spatially structured brown-headed cowbird control measures and their effects on Kirtland’s warbler longterm population sustainability. USDA Wildlife Services - Staff Publications. 2697.
  41. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  42. Mayfield, H. F. 1960. The Kirtland's Warbler. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. 242 pp.
  43. Mayfield, H. F. 1988. Do Kirtland's warblers migrate in one hop? Auk 105:204-205.
  44. Mayfield, H. F. 1992. Kirtland's warbler (DENDROCIA KIRTLANDII. In A. Poole, P. Stettenheim, and F. Gill (editors). The Birds of North America, No. 19. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and The American Ornthologists' Union, Washington, D.C. 16 pp.
  45. Mayfield, H. F. 1993. Kirtland's warblers benefit from large forest tracts. Wilson Bulletin 105:351-3.
  46. Mayfield, H. F. 1996. Kirtland's warblers in winter. Birding 28(1):34-9.
  47. Miller, K. V., and M. J. Conroy. 1990. Spot satellite imagery for mapping Kirtland's warbler wintering habitat in the Bahamas. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18:252-7.
  48. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  49. Morse, D. H. 1989. American warblers: an ecological and behavioral perspective. Harvard University Press. 384 pp.
  50. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
  51. Olah, A., C. A. Ribic, K. Grveles, S. Warner, D. Lopez, and A. M. Pidgeon. 2023. Low Kirtland's warbler fledgling survival in Wisconsin plantations relative to Michigan plantations. Ornithological Applications 125: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duad007
  52. Olah, A. M., C. A. Ribic, K. Grveles, S. Warner, D. Lopez, and A. M. Pidgeon. 2022. Kirtland’s Warbler breeding productivity and habitat use in red pine-dominated habitat in Wisconsin, USA. Avian Conservation and Ecology 17(1): 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-02009-170103
  53. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  54. Petrucha, M.E., D. M. Donner, and C. I. Bocetti. 2023. An annotated bibliography of scientific literature, records, and management plans pertaining to the recovery and conservation of the Kirtland’s warbler (<i>Setophaga kirtlandii</i>). Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-214. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 306 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-214.
  55. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  56. Probst, J. R., and J. P. Hayes. 1987. Pairing success of Kirtland's warblers in marginal and suitable habitat. Auk 104: 234-241.
  57. Probst, J.R., and J. Weinrich. 1993. Relating Kirtland's warbler population to changing landscape composition and structure. Landscape Ecology, 8:257-271.
  58. Rabe, M. Zoologist. Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Lansing, MI
  59. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  60. Rapai, W. 2012. The Kirtland's warbler: the story of a bird's fight against extinction and the people who saved it. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  61. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  62. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  63. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  64. Trauger, D. L., and C. I. Bocetti. 1993. Kirtland's warbler recovery team effectively coordinates interagency research and management. Endangered Species Tech. Bull. 18(2):14, 16-17.
  65. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1980. Selected vertebrate endangered species of the seacoast of the United States-- Kirtland's warbler. FWS/OBS-80/01.21. 5 pp.
  66. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  67. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2012. Kirtland's warbler (<i>Dendroica kirtlandii</i>) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. USFWS, East Lansing Field Office, East Lansing, Michigan.
  68. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; removing the Kirtland's warbler from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Federal Register 84(196):54436-54463.
  69. Van Dyke, F., S. Harju, M. Hindy, N. Cannata, E. Schmidt, E. Hillman, A. Sargent, and B. Keas. 2022. Comparative detection, density, and reproductive performance of Kirtland's warbler in jack and red pine. Journal of Wildlife Management 2022; 86: e22233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22233
  70. Walkinshaw, L.H. 1983. Kirtland's warbler: the natural history of an endangered species. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. 207 pp.
  71. Weinrich, J. A. 1988. Status of the Kirtland's warbler, 1987. Jack-Pine Warbler 66:154-158.
  72. Weinrich, J. A. 1989. Status of the Kirtland's warbler, 1988. Jack-Pine Warbler 67:69-72.
  73. Weinrich, J., Houghton Lake, MI
  74. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  75. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.