Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.146077
Element CodePMORC2B0R0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNVulnerable
CITESAppendix II
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderOrchidales
FamilyOrchidaceae
GenusSpiranthes
Other Common NamesNavasota ladies'-tresses (EN)
Concept ReferenceKartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic CommentsA member of the Spiranthes cernua complex (FNA 2002a). A systematic study of this complex, treated S. parksii as a synonym of S. cernua s.s. (Pace and Cameron 2017).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2014-08-10
Change Date1989-11-14
Edition Date2014-08-10
Edition AuthorsOgle, Y., rev. C. Russell, rev. Poole/Maybury (1996), Rev. Treher)
Threat ImpactUnknown
Range Extent<100-250 square km (less than about 40-100 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank ReasonsPrimarily known from 2 river drainages in east-central Texas, with 1 location in east Texas. Although about 100 populations with a total of about 10,000 plants are currently known, many of the sites are threatened by strip mining. Rapid urban expansion has also encroached on some of the species' habitat.
Range Extent CommentsTexas endemic found in eastern Texas along the Navasota River, primarily in Grimes and Brazos counties. Also been found in Burleson, Washington, Madison, Leon, Robertson, Limestone, Freestone, Bastrop, Lee and Jasper Counties in Texas (Walters 2005).
Occurrences Comments97 EOs reported but it is unclear which are extant. Pine (2003) reported 75 to 80 distinct populations occurring historically at 138 sites in Texas, although noting that many of these sites no longer have orchids. Multiple sites and the plants within them were destroyed as a result of development and mining projects since the species gained federal and state protection in the early 1980s (Pine 2003, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2009).
Threat Impact CommentsPrimary threats are habitat disturbance or destruction related to development, mining, agriculture, and other human activities (Pine 2003, Walters 2005). Foraging by feral hogs and wildlife are also threats (Pine 2003). Threats by site are not known.