Yucca brevifolia

Engelm.

Western Joshua Tree

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 24 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
High - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.160735
Element CodePMAGA0B071
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderAsparagales
FamilyAsparagaceae
GenusYucca
Synonyms
Yucca brevifolia var. brevifolia
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
This record is for Yucca brevifolia in the narrow sense, excluding Yucca jaegeriana. Based on morphological, biological (pollination), and genetic studies, Yucca brevifolia var. jaegeriana is considered a distinct entity that should be recognized at the specific rank (Royer et al. 2016 and Lenz 2007a). FNA (2002a) does not recognize 'jaegeriana' as distinct, thus treating it as a synonym of Yucca brevifolia in the broad sense.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-02-02
Change Date2021-02-02
Edition Date2021-02-02
Edition AuthorsTreher (2021)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Yucca brevifolia is endemic to the United States and occurs primarily within the Mojave Desert but also the Great Basin Desert of southeastern California and southern Nevada. It is threatened by fire, drought, climate change, and numerous threats related to habitat loss including off road vehicle use.
Range Extent Comments
Yucca brevifolia is endemic to the United States and occurs primarily within the Mojave Desert but also the Great Basin Desert of southeastern California and southern Nevada. This species overlaps in range with Yucca jaegeriana in a small area of Nevada, called the Tikaboo Valley, where the two species hybridize (USFWS 2018, Royer et al. 2016, Lenz 2007). Range extent was calculated using data from iNaturalist (2021), SEINet (2021), and CCH2 (2021).
Threat Impact Comments
Yucca brevifolia is threatened by fire, drought, climate change, and numerous threats related to habitat loss. One of the more severe threats to the species is an increase in fire frequency, which causes direct mortality and reduced survivorship over time. A greater presence of non-native annual grasses, which produce a fuel load in the environment, have increased the frequency of fire in the deserts where this species occurs. The plant communities and Joshua Tree itself are not especially tolerant of fire. Native plants, when responding with vigorous growth to an unusually wet winter, also contribute to an increased fuel load and are responsible for some fires in the past. Younger, smaller plants are more vulnerable to mortality than older, larger plants. One cause of mortality post-fire is predation by small mammals seeking a food source (USFWS 2018, Cole et al. 2011). With its primary seed disperser, the Shasta Ground Sloth, extinct, the species ability to shift into suitable habitat is limited (Cole et al. 2011).

Climatic conditions threaten the species in the short and long term, in multiple ways, through increased temperatures, drought, and precipitation timing. While this species is tolerant of drought, young plants including seedlings experience greater mortality and lower germination success during drought, which is increasing in severity currently and into the future due to climate change. Studies are needed to understand the impact of this threat and to document declines. The species range is expected to become more arid, specifically drier and hotter, with climate change. The species habitat is predicted to shrink and move into refugia, northward, and to higher elevations (USFWS 2018).

Habitat loss, including degradation of soil structure loss and loss of plant cover, is caused by development, military activities, grazing animals, renewable energy development, and off road vehicle use. About 2.2% of the species range is in areas with residential and urban development. While plants are largely protected by local ordinances, habitat loss does happen to some degree (USFWS 2018). About 24.6% of the species range in on military lands, but the species is not believed to be impacted, but potentially benefited by management plans and conservation efforts (USFWS 2018). Grazing animals browse plants, including flowers below 2 meters in height, trample young plants, and contribute to a loss of soil structure that can degrade habitat (USFWS 2018, Lybbert and St. Clair 2017). Off road vehicle use can be severe where it occurs, causing mortality to this species and its nurse plants and damage to the seed bank and degradation to the soil structure (USFWS 2018).

An additional threat to the species is damage and mortality from native herbivores (USFWS 2018).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species is somewhat of a generalist of flats, gentle slopes, mesas, and bajadas on a variety of substrates, but typically igneous, that are silty, loamy, or sandy, within many different plant communities including Yellow Pine Forest and Sonoran Desert (USFWS 2019, Lenz 2007). The species has tolerance for saline and alkaline conditions, but does have a tendency to occur in areas with consistent precipitation year round, although of varying overall totals (USFWS 2019, Lenz 2007). It tolerates winter lows of 4 °C (39 °F) and summer highs of 46 °C (110 °F) (USFWS 2019).

Reproduction

In a study of Joshua Tree, Joshua Tree, seed caching rodents were found to cache seeds within 30 m of host plant (Wall et al. 2006). The presence of rhizomes allow for vegetative (asexual) spread of the species (USFWS 2018). Nurse plants are important for successful seedling survival by creating favorable microclimates and protection from herbivory (USFWS 2018).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandWoodland - MixedDesert
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
NevadaS3Yes
CaliforniaSNRYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3.4 - Scale unknown/unrecordedRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.2 - War, civil unrest & military exercisesRestricted (11-30%)Neutral or Potential BenefitHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.1 - Increase in fire frequency/intensityRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2.1 - Unspecified speciesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh - low
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationPervasive (71-100%)UnknownLow (long-term)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh - moderate

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived, EVERGREEN
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (24)
California (21)
AreaForestAcres
Boundary Peak (CA)Inyo National Forest210,884
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
Circle MountainSan Bernardino National Forest6,375
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Deep CreekSan Bernardino National Forest23,869
Domeland Add.Sequoia National Forest3,046
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Granite PeakSan Bernardino National Forest450
Heartbreak RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest4,455
Mill CreekSequoia National Forest27,643
PaiuteInyo National Forest58,712
Pleasant ViewAngeles National Forest26,395
San DimasAngeles National Forest7,160
ScodiesSequoia National Forest725
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
Soldier CanyonInyo National Forest40,589
South SierraInyo National Forest41,853
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
Wonoga Pk.Inyo National Forest11,272
WoolstaffSequoia National Forest41,445
Nevada (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bald Mtn.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest41,598
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
References (13)
  1. Cole, K.L., K. Ironside, J. Eischeid, G. Garfin, P.B. Duffy, and C. Toney. 2011. Past and ongoing shifts in Joshua tree distribution support future modeled range contraction. Ecological Applications 21(1):137–149.
  2. Cole, W.S., Jr., A.S. James, C.I. Smith. 2017. First Recorded Observations of Pollination and Oviposition Behavior in <i>Tegeticula antithetica</i> (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae) Suggest a Functional Basis for Coevolution with Joshua Tree (<i>Yucca</i>) Hosts. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 110(4):390–397.
  3. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2002a. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxvi + 723 pp.
  4. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  5. Lenz, L.W. 2007a. Reassessment of <i>Yucca brevifolia</i> and recognition of <i>Y. jaegeriana </i>as a distinct species. ALISO 24(1): 97-104.
  6. Lybbert, A.H., and S.B St. Clair. 2017. Wildfire and floral herbivory alter reproduction and pollinator mutualisms of Yuccas and Yucca moths. Journal of Plant Ecology 10(5):851–858.
  7. Royer, A. M., M.A. Streisfeld, and C.I. Smith. 2016. Population genomics of divergence within an obligate pollination mutualism: Selection maintains differences between Joshua tree species. American Journal of Botany 103(10):1730–1741.
  8. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, PLANTS Database [USDA PLANTS]. http://plants.usda.gov/. Accessed 2015.
  9. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016. 90-Day Findings on 10 Petitions. Federal Register 81(178): 63160-63165.
  10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018. Joshua Tree Status Assessment. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 113 pp. + Appendices A–C.
  11. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. 12-Month Findings on Petitions To List Eight Species as Endangered or Threatened Species. Federal Register 84(158): 41694-41699.
  12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Petition Finding for Joshua Trees (Yucca brevifolia and Y. jaegeriana). Notification of finding. Federal Register 88(46): 14536-14560.
  13. Wall, S. B. V., T. Esque, D. Haines, M. Garnett, and B. A. Waitman. 2006. Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia) seeds are dispersed by seed-caching rodents. Ecoscience 13(4):539-543.